Yazdani K, Seshadri S, Tillo D, Yang M, Sibley CD, Vinson C, Schneekloth JS. Decoding complexity in biomolecular recognition of DNA i-motifs with microarrays.
Nucleic Acids Res 2023;
51:12020-12030. [PMID:
37962331 PMCID:
PMC10711443 DOI:
10.1093/nar/gkad981]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Revised: 09/28/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023] Open
Abstract
DNA i-motifs (iMs) are non-canonical C-rich secondary structures implicated in numerous cellular processes. Though iMs exist throughout the genome, our understanding of iM recognition by proteins or small molecules is limited to a few examples. We designed a DNA microarray containing 10976 genomic iM sequences to examine the binding profiles of four iM-binding proteins, mitoxantrone and the iMab antibody. iMab microarray screens demonstrated that pH 6.5, 5% BSA buffer was optimal, and fluorescence was correlated with iM C-tract length. hnRNP K broadly recognizes diverse iM sequences, favoring 3-5 cytosine repeats flanked by thymine-rich loops of 1-3 nucleotides. Array binding mirrored public ChIP-Seq datasets, in which 35% of well-bound array iMs are enriched in hnRNP K peaks. In contrast, other reported iM-binding proteins had weaker binding or preferred G-quadruplex (G4) sequences instead. Mitoxantrone broadly binds both shorter iMs and G4s, consistent with an intercalation mechanism. These results suggest that hnRNP K may play a role in iM-mediated regulation of gene expression in vivo, whereas hnRNP A1 and ASF/SF2 are possibly more selective in their binding preferences. This powerful approach represents the most comprehensive investigation of how biomolecules selectively recognize genomic iMs to date.
Collapse