Oesophagectomy with or without supraclavicular lymphadenectomy after neoadjuvant treatment for squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus

Risk factors and prognosis for supraclavicular lymph node metastasis in patients with thoracic esophageal cancer. Distant or regional metastasis?

We aimed to determine the frequency and prognosis of supraclavicular (#104) lymph node (LN) metastasis compared with other LN stations in patients with advanced thoracic esophageal cancer and to identify risk factors for metastasis to delineate the indications for three-field lymphadenectomy (3FL). The study cohort of 567 eligible patients with esophageal cancer had undergone subtotal esophagectomy from 2003 to 2020. LN metastasis was defined as pathologically proven metastasis or positron emission tomography-positive LNs. The efficacy index (EI), calculated from the frequency of LN metastases and survival rates, was used as prognostic value of each LN station dissection for patient survival. Risk factors for #104 LN metastasis were determined by multivariable logistic regression. The frequency of #104 LN metastasis was 11.6% overall, 31.7% in upper and 8.3% in middle/lower third lesion. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 71% of patients and chemo-radiation to 11%. The 5-year overall survival was 45.8%. The EI for #104 LNs (5.3) was similar to that for #101 LNs. Risk factors were age < 65 years, upper third lesion, clinical N2-3, #101/106rec LN metastasis and poorly differentiated carcinoma. The 5-year overall survival of patients with middle/lower lesions was 38% (EI 3.1), similar to that for #101 and #8/9/11 LNs. The prognosis of patients with #104 LN metastases is similar to that of patients with metastases in other regional LN stations. Therefore, we recommend 3FL exclusively for patients at a high risk of #104 LN metastasis due to the overall metastatic rate not being high.

A Surrogate Endpoint for Overall Survival in Locally Advanced and Resectable Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Reanalysis of Data From the NEOCRTEC5010 Trial

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate disease-free survival (DFS) as a surrogate endpoint for overall survival (OS) in patients with locally advanced and resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We re-analyzed patient data from the NEOCRTEC5010 randomized controlled trial (N = 451 patients) to compare their OS with that of an age- and sex-matched cohort from the general population of China. We used expected survival and the standardized mortality ratio, respectively, in our analysis of data collected from a neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (NCRT) plus surgery group and a surgery-only group. Published data from 6 randomized controlled trials and 20 retrospective studies were used to examine the correlation between DFS and OS at the trial level.

RESULTS

The annual hazard rate of disease progression decreased to 4.9% and 8.1% within 3 years in the NCRT and surgery groups, respectively. Patients who were disease-free at 36 months had a 5-year OS of 93.9% (95% CI, 89.7%-98.4%) in the NCRT group with a standardized mortality ratio of 1.1 (95% CI, 0.7-1.8; P = .5639). In contrast, the 5-year OS was only 12.9% (95% CI, 7.3%-22.6%) for patients in the NCRT group who exhibited disease progression within 36 months. At the trial level, DFS and OS were correlated with treatment effect (R2 = 0.605).

CONCLUSIONS

Disease-free status at 36 months is a valid surrogate endpoint for 5-year OS in patients with locally advanced and resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Patients who were disease-free at 36 months showed a favorable OS, which was indistinguishable from that of the age- and sex-matched comparison group from the general population; otherwise, their 5-year OS was extremely poor.

Significance of dissection in each regional lymph-node station of esophageal cancer based on efficacy index and recurrence patterns after curative esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

The optimal extent of lymph-node (LN) dissection in esophageal cancer has not been established. Although the frequency and patterns of recurrence in each regional LN station after radical dissection are important in determining the regional LNs of thoracic esophageal cancer to be routinely dissected, this information has not been investigated sufficiently. We studied the significance of dissection at each LN station based on their recurrence patterns.

METHODS

Six hundred and twelve patients with esophageal cancer who underwent curative esophagectomy were studied. The incidence and pattern of recurrence (systemic or non-systemic) at each regional LN station were analyzed. To compare the significance of dissection among regional LNs, the efficacy index (EI) was also calculated.

RESULTS

Regional LN recurrence was diagnosed in 101 (16.5%) patients. Among the regional LNs, recurrent laryngeal nerve, paraesophageal, and perigastric LNs showed higher EIs (3.1-6.7). Pretracheal and posterior thoracic para-aortic LNs showed low EIs (0-0.2). Supraclavicular LNs had moderate EIs (1.7-2.0). The recurrence rate was highest in the pretracheal LN, followed by the supraclavicular LNs. The majority (81.8%) of the pretracheal LN had a systemic recurrence, while about half (right: 60.0%, left: 43.8%) of the supraclavicular LNs had a systemic recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Due to the high incidence of systemic recurrence or low EI for pretracheal and posterior thoracic para-aortic LNs, we suggest that these LN stations be regarded as non-regional LNs and be excluded from routine dissection. Supraclavicular LNs may also be excluded from routinely dissected stations.

Implementation of the Esophagectomy Complication Consensus Group definitions: the benefits of speaking the same language

In 2015 the Esophagectomy Complication Consensus Group (ECCG) reported consensus definitions for complications after esophagectomy. This aimed to reduce variation in complication reporting, attributed to heterogeneous definitions. This systematic review aimed to describe the implementation of this definition set, including the effect on complication frequency and variation. A systematic literature review was performed, identifying all observational and randomized studies reporting complication frequencies after esophagectomy since the ECCG publication. Recruitment periods before and subsequent to the index ECCG publication date were included. Coefficients of variance were calculated to assess outcome heterogeneity. Of 144 studies which met inclusion criteria, 70 (48.6%) used ECCG definitions. The median number of separately reported complication types was five per study; only one study reported all ECCG complications. The coefficients of variance of the reported frequencies of eight of the 10 most common complications were reduced in studies which used the ECCG definitions compared with those that did not (P = 0.036). Among ECCG studies, the frequencies of postoperative pneumothorax, reintubation, and pulmonary emboli were significantly reduced in 2020-2021, compared with 2015-2019 (P = 0.006, 0.034, and 0.037 respectively). The ECCG definition set has reduced variation in esophagectomy morbidity reporting. This adds greater confidence to the observed gradual improvement in outcomes with time, and its ongoing use and wider dissemination should be encouraged. However, only a handful of outcomes are widely reported, and only rarely is it used in its entirety.

Prophylactic supraclavicular lymph node dissection for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The supraclavicular lymph nodes (SCLNs) have been regarded as regional nodes for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in Japan and eastern Asian countries, whereas their involvement has been regarded as distant metastasis in Western countries. The importance of thorough dissection of the lymphatic chain along the recurrent laryngeal nerve, including the cervical paraesophageal nodes, has become well understood; therefore, the contemporary clinical question is whether prophylactic SCLN dissection (SLND) in addition to cervical paraesophageal node dissection is beneficial for patients with ESCC. We analyzed studies comparing esophagectomy with SLND vs. esophagectomy without SLND, in both of which cervical paraesophageal node dissection had been completed, based on a comprehensive literature search of the PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases. Our meta-analysis focused on two long-term outcomes: 3-year and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates; and three short-term outcomes: pneumonia, recurrent nerve palsy, and anastomotic leakage. Four studies, with a collective total of 1584 patients were included in the review. No significant differences were found between esophagectomy with SLND vs. esophagectomy without SLND in the meta-analysis of both long-term (3-year and 5-year OS; risk ratio 1.09, 95% CI 0.94-1.26, P = 0.28, and risk ratio 1.14, 95% CI 0.96-1.35, P = 0.15, respectively) and short-term outcomes. Based on our analysis, no clear data support prophylactic SLND on the cervical paraesophageal node dissection.

Long-term survival of patients with T1bN0M0 esophageal cancer after thoracoscopic esophagectomy using data from JCOG0502: a prospective multicenter trial

BACKGROUND

Thoracoscopic esophagectomy (TE) is considered the standard surgery for esophageal cancer because of its superiority over open esophagectomy (OE) in terms of short-term outcomes. However, few prospective multicenter studies have evaluated its long-term survival after TE. This study aimed to investigate whether the prognosis for patients with T1bN0M0 esophageal cancer after TE is not inferior to OE using data from the Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study (JCOG0502), a prospective multicenter trial comparing esophagectomy with chemoradiotherapy.

METHODS

Data of patients in JCOG0502 after esophagectomy were used to compare the overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) after OE versus TE. OE or TE was selected at the surgeon's discretion. A hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated via Cox proportional-hazards model.

RESULTS

Of the 210 patients who underwent esophagectomy, 109 underwent OE, whereas 101 underwent TE. The 5-year OS was 88.9% after OE and 85.0% after TE. The hazard ratio of TE for OS was 1.53 (95% CI, 0.84-2.78; p = 0.16) and 1.10 (95% CI, 0.52-2.35; p = 0.80) in the univariable and multivariable analyses, respectively. The 5-year RFS was 85.3% after OE and 79.1% after TE. The hazard ratio of TE for RFS was 1.39 (95% CI, 0.81-2.38; p = 0.23) and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.44-1.74; p = 0.70) in the univariable and multivariable analyses, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The prognosis for patients with T1bN0M0 esophageal cancer after TE was not inferior to OE.

Should the Supraclavicular Lymph Nodes be Considered Regional Lymph Nodes in Cervical Esophageal Cancer?

BACKGROUND

The importance of supraclavicular lymph node (SCLN) metastases in esophageal cancer (EC) remains unknown. Few studies have reported on the prognostic impact of SCLN metastases on patients with cervical EC (CEC). This study aimed to investigate whether SCLNs should be considered regional lymph nodes and be dissected in patients with CEC.

METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled 835 consecutive patients who underwent radical esophagectomy. Of these patients, 67 underwent radical surgery for CEC. These 67 patients were divided into three groups based on the presence of lymph node metastases with or without metastatic SCLNs or the absence of lymph node metastases.

RESULTS

Of the 67 patients, 23 (34.3%) did not have metastatic lymph nodes (pN-negative group), 27 (40.3%) had metastatic lymph nodes except for metastatic SCLNs (pN-positive group without metastatic SCLN), and 17 (25.4%) had metastatic lymph nodes including metastatic SCLNs (pN-positive group with metastatic SCLNs). The 5-year overall survival rate was 58.4% for the pN-negative group, 46.2% for the pN-positive group without metastatic SCLNs, and 7.8% for the pN-positive group with metastatic SCLNs. The pN-positive group with metastatic SCLNs tended to show residual tumor cells and complications after surgery. The presence of metastatic SCLNs was a significantly poor prognostic factor (p = 0.004). The efficacy index was lowest for the lymph nodes in the supraclavicular region.

CONCLUSIONS

The prognosis of the CEC patients with metastatic SCLNs was dismal. Although the cervical esophagus is located adjacent to the SCLNs, the SCLNs may be considered extra-regional lymph nodes in patients with CEC.

Supraclavicular lymph node metastasis in elderly patients undergoing esophageal squamous cell carcinoma radical surgery: construction of risk and prognostic predictive nomograms

Background

Supraclavicular lymph node metastasis (SCLN) is an adverse prognostic determinant of esophageal cancer. However, lymphadenectomy for SCLN is a traumatic procedure, especially in elderly patients, which is associated with more postoperative complications. Currently, identification of risk factors of SCLN metastasis and avoidance of unnecessary lymphadenectomy for SCLN in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients has become an unmet clinical need.

Methods

A total of 90 elderly patients with ESCC between January 2008 and December 2013 was eligible for this analysis. Logistic regression was performed to determine risk factors for SCLN metastasis after ESCC radical surgery in elderly patients. A nomogram was constructed to individually predict the risk for SCLN metastasis. The Kaplan-Meier survival curve and cumulative risk curve were further analyzed to evaluate the effect of SCLN metastasis after ESCC radical surgery on survival prognosis and cumulative risk assessment in elderly patients. Finally, the SCLN metastasis group and the independent risk factor group were fitted by drawing a decision curve to evaluate the net benefit of the model.

Results

SCLN developed in 38 patients (42.2%). Postoperative lymph node metastasis (P<0.05), tumor thrombus (P<0.05) and tumor infiltration (P<0.05) were independent risk factors for SCLN metastasis. The influence of SCLN metastasis on postoperative survival in elderly ESCC patients was statistically significant (P=0.028, P <0.05); with the passage of time, the cumulative risk of SCLN metastasis increased, the survival probability decreased, and the survival time was shortened.

Conclusions

Postoperative lymph node metastasis, tumor thrombus and tumor infiltration are independent risk factors for recurrence and metastasis of SCLNs in elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. The nomogram model based on these factors provides a preliminary reference for individualized risk assessment, prognosis guidance and decision-making of SCLN metastasis in elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).