The surgeon and inflammatory bowel disease

Methotrexate showed efficacy both in Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, predictors of surgery were identified in patients initially treated with methotrexate monotherapy

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate methotrexate efficacy in patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), and identify predictors of surgery for patients who were initially treated with methotrexate monotherapy.

Design: We performed a retrospective analysis of 34,860 patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in the IBD Bioresource (United Kingdom) prior to 9 November 2021. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with methotrexate efficacy. The data were randomly stratified into training and testing sets (7:3). Nomograms were developed based on Cox regression analysis outcomes. The predictive accuracy and discriminative ability were determined using the concordance index (C-index) and calibration curves.

Results: Overall, 1,042 patients (CD: 791, UC: 251) were included. Independent factors associated with effective methotrexate monotherapy were younger age at diagnosis, latest therapy period, exclusive upper gastrointestinal tract disease (for CD), and longer duration between diagnosis and methotrexate initiation (for UC). For CD, predictors in the nomogram were gender, treatment era, tolerance, lesion site, perianal involvement, disease behaviour, and biologics requirements (C-index: 0.711 and 0.732 for training and validation cohorts, respectively). For UC, the factors were age at diagnosis and sex (C-index: 0.784 and 0.690 for training and validation cohorts, respectively). Calibration curves demonstrated good agreement between predictions and actual observations.

A systemic review and metaanalysis of postoperative outcomes in urgent and elective bowel resection in patients with Crohn's disease

PURPOSE

The study examined whether urgency of surgical intervention affects postoperative outcomes in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) undergoing bowel resection.

METHOD

The review was conducted according to a predefined, published study protocol in Prospero which is an international database of prospectively registered systematic reviews in health. The study reported according to PRIMSMA guidelines. We searched Embase and Pubmed for articles reporting postoperative outcome after urgent and elective surgery in patients with CD undergoing bowel resection. Primary outcome variable was 30-day overall postoperative complications while secondary outcome variables were intraabdominal septic complications (IASCs), mortality, reoperation, and readmission. Assessment of bias was performed using Newcastle-Ottawa score. Two authors independently extracted data on each study, patients, and outcome measures.

RESULTS

The search identified 22 studies in which 955 patients underwent urgent surgeries while 6518 patients underwent elective surgeries. Based on the quality assessment, 19 studies were classified as having high risk of bias, one study as having a medium risk of bias and 2 studies as having low risk of bias (≥ 8 stars). Random-effect metaanalysis showed urgent surgery was associated with ~ 40% increase in overall complications compared to elective surgery (RR = 1.43, 95% CI [1.09; 1.87], p = 0.010). IASCs also increased in patients who had urgent surgery (RR = 1.44, 95% CI [1.08; 1.92], p = 0.013). No significant difference was shown in mortality and readmission rates.

CONCLUSION

Urgent bowel resection in patients with CD is associated with higher risk of overall postoperative complications and IASCs.