Phase II randomized clinical trial of endosonography and PET/CT versus clinical assessment only for follow-up after surgery for upper gastrointestinal cancer (EUFURO study)

How to Balance Prognostic Factors in Controlled Phase II Trials: Stratified Permuted Block Randomization or Minimization? An Analysis of Clinical Trials in Digestive Oncology

In controlled phase II trials, major prognostic factors need to be well balanced between arms. The main procedures used are SPBR (Stratified Permuted Block Randomization) and minimization. First, we provide a systematic review of the treatment allocation procedure used in gastrointestinal oncology controlled phase II trials published in 2019. Second, we performed simulations using data from six phase II studies to measure the impacts of imbalances and bias on the efficacy estimations. From the 40 articles analyzed, all mentioned randomization in both the title and abstract, the median number of patients included was 109, and 77.5% were multicenter. Of the 27 studies that reported at least one stratification variable, 10 included the center as a stratification variable, 10 used minimization, 9 used SBR, and 8 were unspecified. In real data studies, the imbalance increased with the number of centers. The total and marginal imbalances were higher with SBR than with minimization, and the difference increased with the number of centers. The efficiency estimates per arm were close to the original trial estimate in both procedures. Minimization is often used in cases of numerous centers and guarantees better similarity between arms for stratification variables for total and marginal imbalances in phase II trials.

Endoscopic Resection of Malignancies in the Upper GI Tract: A Clinical Algorithm

Background

Malignancies in the upper gastrointestinal tract are amenable to endoscopic resection at an early stage. Achieving a curative resection is the most stringent quality criterion, but post-resection risk assessment and aftercare are also part of a comprehensive quality program.

Summary

Various factors influence the achievement of curative resection. These include endoscopic assessment prior to resection using chromoendoscopy and HD technology. If resectability is possible, it is particularly important to delineate the lateral resection margins as precisely as possible before resection. Furthermore, the correct choice of resection technique depending on the lesion must be taken into account. Endoscopic submucosal dissection is the standard for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and gastric carcinoma. In Western countries, it is becoming increasingly popular to treat Barrett's neoplasia over 2 cm in size and/or with suspected submucosal infiltration with en bloc resection instead of piece meal resection. After resection, risk assessment based on the histopathological resection determines the patient's individual risk of lymph node metastases, particularly in the case of high-risk lesions. This is categorized according to the current literature.

Key Messages

This review presents clinical algorithms for endoscopic resection of esophageal SCC, Barrett's neoplasia, and gastric neoplasia. The algorithms include the pre-resection assessment of the lesion and the resection margins, the adequate resection technique for the respective lesion, as well as the post-resection risk assessment with an evidence-based recommendation for follow-up therapy and surveillance.

Endoscopic ultrasound for structured surveillance after curative treatment of esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Structured surveillance after treatment of esophageal cancer is not established. Due to a paucity of data, no agreement exists on how surveillance should be performed. The main argument against intensive follow-up in esophageal cancer is that it may not lead to true survival advantage.

METHODS

Structured surveillance was performed in 42 patients after multimodal therapy with peri-operative chemotherapy (29) or definitive chemoradiotherapy (13) of esophageal cancer. The surveillance protocol included gastroscopy, endoscopic ultrasound, chest X-ray, abdominal ultrasound, and CEA measurement at regular intervals of up to five years. We analyzed relapse rate, time to relapse, localization of recurrence, diagnosis within or without structured surveillance, diagnostic method providing the first evidence of a relapse, treatment of recurrence, and outcome.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 48 months; 18/42 patients suffered from tumor relapse, with 16 asymptomatic patients diagnosed within structured surveillance. Median time to recurrence was 9 months. Isolated local or locoregional recurrence occurred in 6, and isolated distant relapse in 9 patients. All patients with isolated locoregional recurrence were exclusively diagnosed with endoscopic ultrasound. Six patients received curatively intended therapy with surgery or chemoradiation, leading to long-lasting survival.

CONCLUSION

Structured surveillance offers the chance to identify limited and asymptomatic tumor relapse. Especially in cases of locoregional recurrence, long-lasting survival or even a cure can be achieved. Endoscopic ultrasound is the best method for the detection of locoregional tumor recurrence and should be an integral part of structured surveillance after curative treatment of esophageal cancer.

Pattern and time point of relapse in locally advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma after multimodal treatment: implications for a useful structured follow-up

PURPOSE

Despite improvements in multimodal treatment of locally advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma, the majority of patients still relapses. The impact of structured follow-up for early detection of recurrence is unclear and controversially discussed.

METHODS

Patients with locally advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma having received neoadjuvant/perioperative chemotherapy followed by tumor resection between 2009 and 2021, underwent a structured follow-up including three-monthly imaging during the first 2 years, followed by semiannual and annual examinations in year 3-4 and 5, respectively. Clinical outcome including pattern and time point of relapse was analyzed.

RESULTS

Two hundred fifty-seven patients were included in this analysis. In 50.2% (n = 129) of patients, recurrent disease was diagnosed, with the majority (94.6%) relapsing within the first 2 years. The most common site of relapse were lymph node metastases followed by peritoneal carcinomatosis and hepatic and pulmonary metastases. 52.7% of patients presented with symptoms at the time of relapse. Cumulative risk and time point of relapse differed significantly between patient with a node-positive tumor (ypN+) after neoadjuvant treatment (high-risk group) and patients with node-negative primary tumor (ypN0) (low-risk group). High-risk patients had a significantly inferior disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) with 11.1 and 29.0 months, respectively, whereas median DFS and OS were not reached for the low-risk group.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of relapse differs significantly between high- and low-risk patients. Only a part of relapses is associated with clinical symptoms. An individualized follow-up strategy is recommended for high- and low-risk patients considering the individual risk of relapse.

Outcome and prognostic factors in patients undergoing salvage therapy for recurrent esophagogastric cancer after multimodal treatment

PURPOSE

Perioperative systemic treatment has significantly improved the outcome in locally advanced esophagogastric cancer. However, still the majority of patients relapse and die. Data on the optimal treatment after relapse are limited, and clinical and biological prognostic factors are lacking.

METHODS

Patients with a relapse after neoadjuvant/perioperative treatment and surgery for esophagogastric cancer were analyzed using a prospective database. Applied treatment regimens, clinical prognostic factors and biomarkers were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of 246 patients 119 relapsed. Among patients with a relapse event, those with an early relapse (< 6 months) had an inferior overall survival (OS 6.3 vs. 13.8 months, p < 0.001) after relapse than those with a late relapse (> 6 months). OS after relapse was longer in patients with a microsatellite-unstable (MSI) tumor. Systemic treatment was initiated in 87 patients (73% of relapsed pat.); among those OS from the start of first-line treatment was inferior in patients with an early relapse with 6.9 vs. 10.0 months (p = 0.037). In 27 patients (23% of relapsed pat.), local therapy (irradiation or surgical intervention) was performed due to oligometastatic relapse, resulting in a prolonged OS in comparison to patients without local therapy (median OS 35.2 months vs. 7.8 months, p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis confirmed the prognostic benefit of the MSI status and a local intervention.

CONCLUSION

Patients relapsing after multimodal treatment have a heterogeneous prognosis depending on the relapse-free interval (if systemic treatment applied), extent of metastatic disease as well as MSI status. The benefit of additional local intervention after relapse should be addressed in a randomized trial.

Single-center experience in implementation of endoscopic surveillance protocol after esophagectomy

Esophageal cancer has a notably high recurrence rate with a paucity of robust evidence in defining the optimal surveillance strategy. The surveillance protocol at our institution comprises of annual esophagogastroduodenoscopy (OGD) from years 1 to 5 postoperatively. This study aims to evaluate the implementation of the endoscopic surveillance at our center and ascertain the value of endoscopy in detecting local recurrence after esophagectomy. A retrospective cohort review of all patients (320 patients) who underwent esophagectomy between 2013 and 2018 was conducted. The local esophageal cancer database and corresponding OGD reports were accessed to obtain data on demographics, operation details, local recurrence, and endoscopy performed. 1086 OGDs were performed between 2014 and 2020, broadly categorized to surveillance and symptomatic OGDs; 555 and 531, respectively. Surveillance OGDs detected four asymptomatic local recurrences, of which only one was treated with curative intent. Symptomatic OGDs resulted in a higher yield for the detection of local recurrence compared with surveillance endoscopy; 5% versus 0.7%, with overall median time-to-recurrence of 11.5 months (95% confidence interval 9-17). Of local recurrences, 85.7% occurred within the first 2 years postoperatively. The proportion of endoscopic findings differed between intensive and ad hoc surveillance cohorts for strictures, esophagitis, Barrett's esophagus, and sloughing. Thirteen patients were diagnosed with histologically confirmed Barrett's with no subsequent local recurrences. Surveillance endoscopy had a low positive yield rate with subsequent minimal survival benefits. Therefore, it is prudent to consider an alternative protocol that focuses on the period with the highest risk of recurrence and symptom presentation.

[68Ga]Ga-FAPI PET for the evaluation of digestive system tumors: systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Digestive system tumors are a group of tumors with high incidence in the world nowadays. The assessment of digestive system tumor metastasis by conventional imaging seems to be unsatisfactory. [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-FAPI, which has emerged in recent years, seems to be able to evaluate digestive system tumor metastasis. We aimed to summarize the current evidence of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-FAPI PET/CT or PET/MR for the assessment of primary tumors, lymph node metastases, and distant metastases in digestive system tumors. Besides, we also aimed to perform a meta-analysis of the sensitivity of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-FAPI PET diagnosis to discriminate between digestive system tumors, primary lesions, and non-primary lesions (lymph node metastases and distant metastases).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed, MEDLINE and Cochrane Library databases were searched from the beginning of the database build to August 12, 2022. All studies undergoing [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-FAPI PET for the evaluation of digestive tumors were included in the screening and review. Screening and full text review was performed by 3 investigators and data extraction was performed by 2 investigators. Risk of bias was examined with the QUADAS-2 criteria. Diagnostic test meta-analysis was performed with a random-effects model.

RESULTS

A total of 541 studies were retrieved. Finally, 22 studies were selected for the systematic review and 18 studies were included in the meta-analysis. In the 18 publications, a total of 524 patients with digestive system tumors, 459 primary tumor lesions of digestive system tumors, and 1921 metastatic lesions of digestive system tumors were included in the meta-analysis. Based on patients, the sensitivity of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-FAPI PET for the diagnosis of digestive system tumors was 0.98 (95% CI: 0.94-0.99). Based on lesions, the sensitivity of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-FAPI PET for the diagnostic evaluation of primary tumor lesions of the digestive system was 0.97 (95% CI: 0.93-0.99); the sensitivity of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-FAPI PET for the diagnostic evaluation of non-primary lesions (lymph node metastases and distant metastases) of the digestive system tumors was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.79-0.99).

CONCLUSION

[⁶⁸Ga]Ga-FAPI PET has high accuracy and its sensitivity is at a high level for the diagnostic evaluation of digestive system tumors. Clinicians, nuclear medicine physicians, and radiologists may consider using [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-FAPI PET/CT or PET/MR in the evaluation of primary tumors, lymph node metastases, and distant metastases in digestive system tumors.

Follow-up strategy and survival for five common cancers: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of intensive follow-up after curative intent treatment for five common solid tumours, in terms of survival and treatment of recurrences.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted, identifying comparative studies on follow-up for colorectal, lung, breast, upper gastro-intestinal and prostate cancer. Outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS), cancer specific survival (CSS), and treatment of recurrences. Random effects meta-analyses were conducted, with particular focus on studies at low risk of bias.

RESULTS

Fourteen out of 63 studies were considered to be at low risk of bias (8 colorectal, 4 breast, 0 lung, 1 upper gastro-intestinal, 1 prostate). These studies showed no significant impact of intensive follow-up on OS (hazard ratio, 95% confidence interval) for colorectal (0.99; 0.92-1.06), breast 1.06 (0.92-1.23), upper gastro-intestinal (0.78; 0.51-1.19) and prostate cancer (1.00; 0.86-1.16). No impact on CSS (hazard ratio, 95% confidence interval) was found for colorectal cancer (0.94; 0.77-1.16). CSS was not reported for other cancer types. Intensive follow-up increased the rate of curative treatment (relative risk; 95% confidence interval) for colorectal cancer recurrences (1.30; 1.05-1.61), but not for upper gastro-intestinal cancer recurrences (0.92; 0.47-1.81). For the other cancer types, no data on treatment of recurrences was available in low risk studies.

CONCLUSION

For colorectal and breast cancer, high quality studies do not suggest an impact of intensive follow-up strategies on survival. Colorectal cancer recurrences are more often treated locally after intensive follow-up. For other cancer types evaluated, limited high quality research on follow-up is available.

Detection of secondary upper gastrointestinal tract cancer during follow-up esophagogastroduodenoscopy after gastrectomy for gastric cancer

Aim

Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) may contribute to early detection of secondary cancer in the upper gastrointestinal tract although the clinical relevance of follow-up after gastrectomy remains unclear. This study aimed to elucidate the effectiveness of follow-up EGD by investigating the incidence of secondary cancer in any part of the upper gastrointestinal tract.

Methods

Data from 1438 patients who underwent curative partial gastrectomy for primary gastric cancer between 2008 and 2014 and follow-up EGD at least once during a 5-year follow-up period were retrospectively reviewed. Incidence rates of remnant gastric cancer, laryngeal cancer, and esophageal cancer detected after follow-up EGD were determined, and risk factors for secondary cancers were examined. The characteristics of clinicopathological diagnoses of secondary cancers were reviewed and compared according to the frequency of follow-up EGD.

Results

The average annual frequency of EGD was 0.7, while the 5-year cumulative incidence rates of remnant gastric cancer and secondary laryngeal and esophageal cancers were 2.9% and 1.3%, respectively. Risk factors for remnant gastric cancer included heavy smoking, proximal gastrectomy, and tumor size ≥ 30 mm. All secondary cancers were resectable upon diagnosis, with endoscopically resectable cancer accounting for 81.0% of cases. Our results found a significantly higher proportion of endoscopically resectable cancers during regular follow-up than during infrequent follow-up.

Conclusions

Follow-up EGD can be a useful modality for detecting secondary upper gastrointestinal tract cancer, likely leading to curative treatment for secondary cancer. Focusing on patients presenting with risk factors may increase the value of follow-up EGD after gastrectomy.

Imaging Modalities for Early Detection of Pancreatic Cancer: Current State and Future Research Opportunities

Simple Summary

While survival rates for many cancers have improved dramatically over the last 20 years, patients with pancreatic cancer have persistently poor outcomes. The majority of patients with pancreatic cancer are not suitable for potentially curative surgery due to locally advanced or metastatic disease stage at diagnosis. Therefore, early detection would potentially improve survival of pancreatic cancer patients through earlier intervention. Here, we present clinical challenges in the early detection of pancreatic cancer, characterise high risk groups for pancreatic cancer and current screening programs in high-risk individuals. The aim of this scoping review is to investigate the role of both established and novel imaging modalities for early detection of pancreatic cancer. Furthermore, we investigate innovative imaging techniques for early detection of pancreatic cancer, but its widespread application requires further investigation and potentially a combination with other non-invasive biomarkers.

Abstract

Pancreatic cancer, one of the most lethal malignancies, is increasing in incidence. While survival rates for many cancers have improved dramatically over the last 20 years, people with pancreatic cancer have persistently poor outcomes. Potential cure for pancreatic cancer involves surgical resection and adjuvant therapy. However, approximately 85% of patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer are not suitable for potentially curative therapy due to locally advanced or metastatic disease stage. Because of this stark survival contrast, any improvement in early detection would likely significantly improve survival of patients with pancreatic cancer through earlier intervention. This comprehensive scoping review describes the current evidence on groups at high risk for developing pancreatic cancer, including individuals with inherited predisposition, pancreatic cystic lesions, diabetes, and pancreatitis. We review the current roles of imaging modalities focusing on early detection of pancreatic cancer. Additionally, we propose the use of advanced imaging modalities to identify early, potentially curable pancreatic cancer in high-risk cohorts. We discuss innovative imaging techniques for early detection of pancreatic cancer, but its widespread application requires further investigation and potentially a combination with other non-invasive biomarkers.

MAGEA10 expression is a predictive marker of early hepatic recurrence after curative gastrectomy for gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer

BACKGROUND

Resection for hepatic recurrence after gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer may be curative; however, the prediction of hepatic recurrence remains intractable. Therefore, we aimed to explore predictive markers for hepatic recurrence in gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer based on genetic information.

METHODS

This study recruited 154 patients who underwent curative gastrectomy for pathological stage II or III primary gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. Genes associated with hepatic recurrence were comprehensively analyzed using whole-exome sequencing and gene expression profiling (GEP), followed by immunohistochemistry analysis for MAGEA10. The cumulative incidences of hepatic recurrence, relapse-free survival, and overall survival were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 12 patients with early hepatic recurrences were found within 2 years of surgery. Although there were no distinct gene mutations in recurrent patients, upregulation of MAGEA10 was identified in patients with early hepatic recurrence using GEP analysis. Immunostaining for MAGEA10 stained the cell nuclei in 29 (18.8%) of 154 samples. Furthermore, protein expression of MAGEA10 on immunohistochemistry was significantly related to a high MAGEA10 mRNA expression, high cumulative incidences of hepatic recurrence, and poor relapse-free survival. Overall survival did not differ significantly between positive and negative immunohistochemical staining for MAGEA10. The sensitivity and specificity of MAGEA10 staining for early hepatic recurrence were 58.3% and 84.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

MAGEA10 represents a promising predictive marker for early hepatic recurrence after curative gastrectomy for gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer.

Value of regular endosonography and [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose PET-CT after surgery for gastro-oesophageal junction, stomach or pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Most patients undergo follow-up after surgery for cancers of the gastro-oesophageal junction, stomach or pancreas, but data to support which modalities to use and the frequency of investigation are limited.

METHODS

Patients in the EUFURO study were randomized to either visits to the outpatient clinic at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months after surgery (standard), or to the addition of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET-CT and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) with guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy to clinical assessments (intervention). Data from the intervention arm were used to analyse the diagnostic performance of endosonography or [18F]FDG PET-CT in detecting recurrences.

RESULTS

During the scheduled follow-up, 42 of 89 patients developed recurrence; PET-CT and EUS in combination detected 38 of these recurrences. EUS detected 23 of the 42 patients with recurrent disease during follow-up and correctly diagnosed 17 of 19 locoregional recurrences. EUS was able to detect isolated locoregional recurrence in 11 of 13 patients. In five patients, EUS was false-positive for isolated locoregional recurrence owing to missed distant metastases. PET-CT detected locoregional recurrence in only 12 of 19 patients, and isolated locoregional recurrence in only 7 of 13. False-positive PET-CT results in 23 patients led to a total of 44 futile procedures.

CONCLUSION

Accuracy in detecting recurrences by concomitant use of PET-CT and EUS was high (90 per cent). PET-CT had moderate to high sensitivity for overall recurrence detection, but low specificity. EUS was superior to PET-CT in the detection of locoregional and isolated locoregional recurrences.

When What You See Is Not Always What You Get: Raising the Bar of Evidence for New Diagnostic Imaging Modalities

Even though prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-positron emission tomography (PET)-computed tomography (CT) is more accurate than conventional imaging in prostate cancer patients, its impact on patient-relevant outcomes is unknown. We argue that more evidence is required before using PSMA-PET-CT as the standard of care for staging.