1
|
Park HS, Lee J, Lai HW, Park JM, Ryu JM, Lee JE, Kim JY, Marrazzo E, De Scalzi AM, Corso G, Montemurro F, Gazzetta G, Pozzi G, Toesca A. Surgical and Oncologic Outcomes of Robotic and Conventional Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Reconstruction: International Multicenter Pooled Data Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:6646-6657. [PMID: 35583693 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-11865-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2021] [Accepted: 04/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy (RNSM) has been developed to reduce conspicuous scar and increase the quality of life in women. This study aimed to evaluate the surgical and oncologic outcomes of RNSM with immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) compared with conventional nipple-sparing mastectomy (CNSM). PATIENTS AND METHODS This international multicenter, pooled analysis of individual patient-level data enrolled a total of 755 procedures in 659 women (609 had breast cancer and 50 underwent risk-reducing mastectomy) who underwent nipple-sparing mastectomy with IBR. Surgical and oncologic outcomes, including 30-days postoperative (POD 30d) complication rate, nipple necrosis rate, grade of Clavien-Dindo classification, disease-free survival, and overall survival, were evaluated. Propensity score-matched analyses were performed to adjust for confounding factors. RESULTS The median age of both the RNSM and CNSM groups was 45 years. The RNSM group had lower body mass index (BMI) and a higher proportion of benign disease compared with the CNSM group. POD 30d complications and postoperative complication grade III rates were lower in the RNSM group than in the CNSM group (p < 0.05). The nipple necrosis rate was 2.2% and 7.8% for RNSM and CNSM, respectively (p = 0.002). After propensity score matching, significantly lower rates of POD 30d complications, nipple necrosis, and postoperative complication grade III occurred in the RNSM group than in the CNSM group (all p < 0.05). Oncologic outcomes were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSION RNSM can provide better cosmetic results with favorable surgical and oncologic outcomes for women with early breast cancer or BRCA mutation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyung Seok Park
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jeea Lee
- Department of Surgery, Uijeongbu Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University, Uijeongbu, Gyeonggi-do, Korea
| | - Hung-Wen Lai
- Endoscopic and Oncoplastic Breast Surgery Center, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.,Minimal Invasive Surgery Research Center, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.,Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Jung Mi Park
- Department of Biostatistics and Computing, Graduate School, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jai Min Ryu
- Breast Division, Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jeong Eon Lee
- Breast Division, Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jee Ye Kim
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Emilia Marrazzo
- Breast Unit, Department of Surgery, Ospedale Maggiore di Lodi, ASST di Lodi, Lodi, Italy
| | | | - Giovanni Corso
- Division of Breast Surgery, School of Medicine, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Filippo Montemurro
- Breast Surgery Strategic Program, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO - IRCCS, Str. Provinciale 142, Candiolo, Torino, Italy
| | - Guglielmo Gazzetta
- Breast Surgery Strategic Program, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO - IRCCS, Str. Provinciale 142, Candiolo, Torino, Italy
| | - Giada Pozzi
- Breast Surgery Strategic Program, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO - IRCCS, Str. Provinciale 142, Candiolo, Torino, Italy
| | - Antonio Toesca
- Breast Surgery Strategic Program, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO - IRCCS, Str. Provinciale 142, Candiolo, Torino, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Blair SL, Kolb F. Minimally Invasive Mastectomy: It Is Coming Around the Mountain. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:10.1245/s10434-022-11634-w. [PMID: 35334010 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-11634-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2022] [Accepted: 03/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah L Blair
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, USA.
| | - Frederic Kolb
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Video-assisted Transaxillary Nipple-sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Implant-based Breast Reconstruction: A Novel and Promising Method. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2022; 46:91-98. [PMID: 34424367 PMCID: PMC8381859 DOI: 10.1007/s00266-021-02527-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2021] [Accepted: 08/07/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Background Although video-assisted breast surgery is gaining popularity, endoscopic reconstruction after mastectomy is still facing lots of problems, bring about that endoscopic method has not yet become a standard procedure for breast cancer reconstruction. Here, we introduce a novel surgical technique of video-assisted transaxillary nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate implant-based breast reconstruction and describe the detailed surgical procedure using this technique. Methods Detailed steps of surgical procedure, the patient characteristics and the mean operative time of this new technique were described in this article. All patients were asked to score their satisfaction with their reconstructed breasts preoperatively, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months postoperatively using the BREAST-Q. Results At first, we used our “conventional method” and performed on 10 patients from April 2017 to June 2020; the operative time was 324.80 ± 66.39 minutes. After improving several procedures of the technique, the “optimized method” was performed on 14 cases from July 2020 to November 2020; the operative time decreased to 193.71 ± 28.75 minutes with shortest was 133 minutes; the optimized method was novel and easy to learn and be generalized. Most of the patients were satisfied with the reconstruction results. There was no significant difference between preoperative scores and scores at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months (p = 0.364). Since there is no wound on the breast dome, no obvious postoperative complications were observed except for one patient presented with infection. Conclusions This new technique has allowed surgeons to achieve excellent and reproducible outcomes in a single-stage procedure and represents an excellent technique for patients who wish to have a scarless and aesthetically pleasing appearance after mastectomy for breast cancer. This article also highlights the mean operative time (193.71 ± 28.75 minutes) that has been made possible with this new technique. Level of Evidence V This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors http://www.springer.com/00266. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00266-021-02527-6.
Collapse
|
4
|
Endoscopic-assisted Nipple-sparing Mastectomy with Direct-to-Implant Subpectoral Breast Reconstruction in the Management of Breast Cancer. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2021; 9:e3978. [PMID: 34909357 PMCID: PMC8663902 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000003978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2021] [Accepted: 10/19/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Endoscopic-assisted or robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy (E-NSM or R-NSM) with direct-to-implant breast reconstruction is becoming an increasingly popular surgical treatment for breast cancer patients. However, existing surgical methods such as traditional two-dimensional endoscopic-assisted or robot-assisted surgery are time-consuming and expensive. A new innovative three-dimensional videoscope system is efficient but needs special instruments; additionally, the incision over the extramammary region near the anterior axillary line is still too invisible. This study took place from May 2020 to April 2021. This technique is suitable for patients with small- to moderate-sized breasts (C cup size and below; grade 0 to grade I ptotic breasts). We have now performed 30 procedures, including eight bilateral reconstructions. The average operative time (including axillary operation) of a unilateral reconstruction is 179 ± 40.96 minutes, and for bilateral reconstruction, it was 271 ± 45.29 minutes. The median follow-up time was 9.93 months. For the complications, only one patient presented with a mild depigmentation of the nipple and one patient presented with local cellulitis but recovered after oral administration of antibiotics. All patients were satisfied with their postoperative aesthetic outcome. We present a new surgical technique of E-NSM with direct-to-implant subpectoral breast reconstruction to achieve better results.
Collapse
|
5
|
Filipe MD, de Bock E, Postma EL, Bastian OW, Schellekens PPA, Vriens MR, Witkamp AJ, Richir MC. Robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy complication rate compared to traditional nipple-sparing mastectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Robot Surg 2021; 16:265-272. [PMID: 34128142 PMCID: PMC8960562 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-021-01265-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2021] [Accepted: 06/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Breast cancer is worldwide the most common cause of cancer in women and causes the second most common cancer-related death. Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) is commonly used in therapeutic and prophylactic settings. Furthermore, (preventive) mastectomies are, besides complications, also associated with psychological and cosmetic consequences. Robotic NSM (RNSM) allows for better visualization of the planes and reducing the invasiveness. The aim of this study was to compare the postoperative complication rate of RNSM to NSM. A systematic search was performed on all (R)NSM articles. The primary outcome was determining the overall postoperative complication rate of traditional NSM and RNSM. Secondary outcomes were comparing the specific postoperative complication rates: implant loss, hematoma, (flap)necrosis, infection, and seroma. Forty-nine studies containing 13,886 cases of (R)NSM were included. No statistically significant differences were found regarding postoperative complications (RNSM 3.9%, NSM 7.0%, p = 0.070), postoperative implant loss (RNSM 4.1%, NSM 3.2%, p = 0.523), hematomas (RNSM 4.3%, NSM 2.0%, p = 0.059), necrosis (RNSM 4.3%, NSM 7.4%, p = 0.230), infection (RNSM 8.3%, NSM 4.0%, p = 0.054) or seromas (RNSM 3.0%, NSM 2.0%, p = 0.421). Overall, there are no statistically significant differences in complication rates between NSM and RNSM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M. D. Filipe
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre, University Medical Centre Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - E. de Bock
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre, University Medical Centre Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - E. L. Postma
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - O. W. Bastian
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre, University Medical Centre Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - P. P. A. Schellekens
- Department of Plastic Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M. R. Vriens
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre, University Medical Centre Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - A. J. Witkamp
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre, University Medical Centre Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M. C. Richir
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre, University Medical Centre Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|