Acute appendicitis complicating pregnancy in the Oxford region

Obstetrical complications of endometriosis, particularly deep endometriosis

Over the past few years, a new topic in the field of endometriosis has emerged: the potential impact of the disease on pregnancy outcomes. This review aims to summarize in detail the available evidence on the relationship between endometriosis, particularly deep endometriosis (DE), and obstetrical outcomes. Acute complications of DE, such as spontaneous hemoperitoneum, bowel perforation, and uterine rupture, may occur during pregnancy. Although these events represent life-threatening conditions, they are rare and unpredictable. Therefore, the current literature does not support any kind of prophylactic surgery before pregnancy to prevent such complications. Results on the impact of DE on obstetrical outcomes are debatable and characterized by several limitations, including small sample size, lack of adjustment for confounders, lack of adequate control subjects, and other methodologic flaws. For these reasons, it is not possible to draw conclusions on this topic. The strongest evidence shows that DE is associated with higher rates of placenta previa; for other obstetrical outcomes, such as miscarriage, intrauterine growth restriction, preterm birth and hypertensive disorders, results are controversial. Although it is unlikely that surgery of DE may modify the impact of the disease on the course of pregnancy, no study has yet investigated this issue.

Abdominal emergencies during pregnancy

Abdominal emergencies during pregnancy (excluding obstetrical emergencies) occur in one out of 500-700 pregnancies and may involve gastrointestinal, gynecologic, urologic, vascular and traumatic etiologies; surgery is necessary in 0.2-2% of cases. Since these emergencies are relatively rare, patients should be referred to specialized centers where surgical, obstetrical and neonatal cares are available, particularly because surgical intervention increases the risk of premature labor. Clinical presentations may be atypical and misleading because of pregnancy-associated anatomical and physiologic alterations, which often result in diagnostic uncertainty and therapeutic delay with increased risks of maternal and infant morbidity. The most common abdominal emergencies are acute appendicitis (best treated by laparoscopic appendectomy), acute calculous cholecystitis (best treated by laparoscopic cholecystectomy from the first trimester through the early part of the third trimester) and intestinal obstruction (where medical treatment is the first-line approach, just as in the non-pregnant patient). Acute pancreatitis is rare, usually resulting from trans-ampullary passage of gallstones; it usually resolves with medical treatment but an elevated risk of recurrent episodes justifies laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the 2nd trimester and endoscopic sphincterotomy in the 3rd trimester. The aim of the present work is to review pregnancy-induced anatomical and physiological modifications, to describe the main abdominal emergencies during pregnancy, their specific features and their diagnostic and therapeutic management.

A systematic review on endometriosis during pregnancy: diagnosis, misdiagnosis, complications and outcomes

BACKGROUND

Traditionally, pregnancy was considered to have a positive effect on endometriosis and its painful symptoms due not only to blockage of ovulation preventing bleeding of endometriotic tissue but also to different metabolic, hormonal, immune and angiogenesis changes related to pregnancy. However, a growing literature is emerging on the role of endometriosis in affecting the development of pregnancy and its outcomes and also on the impact of pregnancy on endometriosis. The present article aims to underline the difficulty in diagnosing endometriotic lesions during pregnancy and discuss the options for the treatment of decidualized endometriosis in relation to imaging and symptomatology; to describe all the possible acute complications of pregnancy caused by pre-existing endometriosis and evaluate potential treatments of these complications; to assess whether endometriosis affects pregnancy outcome and hypothesize mechanisms to explain the underlying relationships.

METHODS

This systematic review is based on material searched and obtained via Pubmed and Medline between January 1950 and March 2015. Peer-reviewed, English-language journal articles examining the impact of endometriosis on pregnancy and vice versa were included in this article.

RESULTS

Changes of the endometriotic lesions may occur during pregnancy caused by the modifications of the hormonal milieu, posing a clinical dilemma due to their atypical appearance. The management of these events is actually challenging as only few cases have been described and the review of available literature evidenced a lack of formal estimates of their incidence. Acute complications of endometriosis during pregnancy, such as spontaneous hemoperitoneum, bowel and ovarian complications, represent rare but life-threatening conditions that require, in most of the cases, surgical operations to be managed. Due to the unpredictability of these complications, no specific recommendation for additional interventions to the routinely monitoring of pregnancy of women with known history of endometriosis is advisable. Even if the results of the published studies are controversial, some evidence is suggestive of an association of endometriosis with spontaneous miscarriage, preterm birth and small for gestational age babies. A correlation of endometriosis with placenta previa (odds ratio from 1.67 to 15.1 according to various studies) has been demonstrated, possibly linked to the abnormal frequency and amplitude of uterine contractions observed in women affected. Finally, there is no evidence that prophylactic surgery would prevent the negative impact of endometriosis itself on pregnancy outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Complications of endometriosis during pregnancy are rare and there is no evidence that the disease has a major detrimental effect on pregnancy outcome. Therefore, pregnant women with endometriosis can be reassured on the course of their pregnancies although the physicians should be aware of the potential increased risk of placenta previa. Current evidence does not support any modification of conventional monitoring of pregnancy in patients with endometriosis.

Effect of early and late antibiotic treatment in experimental acute pancreatitis in rats

BACKGROUND

The clinical course in acute necrotizing pancreatitis is mainly determined by bacterial infection of pancreatic and peripancreatic necrosis. The effect of two antibiotic regimens for early and late treatment was investigated in the taurocholate model of necrotizing pancreatitis in the rat.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy male Wistar rats were divided into five pancreatitis groups (12 animals each) and a sham-operated group (10 animals). Pancreatitis was induced by intraductal infusion of 3% taurocholate under sterile conditions. Animals received two different antibiotic regimes (20 mg/kg imipenem or 20 mg/kg ciprofloxacin plus 20 mg/kg metronidazole) early at 2, 12, 20, and 28 h after induction of pancreatitis or late at 16 and 24 h after induction of pancreatitis or no antibiotics (control). Animals were examined after 30 h for pancreatic and extrapancreatic infection.

RESULTS

Early and late antibiotic treatment with both regimes could significantly reduce pancreatic infection from 58 to 8-25%. However, extrapancreatic infection was only reduced by early antibiotic therapy. While quinolones also reduced bacterial counts in small and large bowel, imipenem did not.

CONCLUSIONS

In our animal model of necrotizing pancreatitis, early and late treatment with ciprofloxacin/metronidazole and imipenem reduce bacterial infection of the pancreas. Extrapancreatic infection, however, is reduced significantly only by early antibiotic treatment. The effectivity of early antibiotic treatment in the clinical setting should be subject to further investigation with improved study design and sufficient patient numbers.

Pregnancy outcome following non-obstetric surgical intervention

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of non-obstetric surgical procedures on maternal and fetal outcome.

METHODS

A systematic review of all English language literature.

RESULTS

Fifty-four papers met the inclusion criteria. The overall number of patients reported was 12,452. Reported maternal death was rare at .006%. The miscarriage rate was 5.8%; however, this number is difficult to interpret since matched controls were not available. The rate of elective termination of pregnancy following non-obstetric surgery was 1.3%. The rate of premature labor induced by non-obstetric surgical intervention was 3.5% and this was noted specifically following appendectomy versus other types of interventions (P<.001). A total of 2.5% of pregnancies resulted in fetal loss. The prematurity rate was 8.2%. The rate of major birth defects among women who underwent non-obstetric surgical intervention in the first trimester was 3.9%. Sub-analysis of papers reporting on appendectomy during pregnancy revealed a high rate (4.6%) of surgery-induced labor. Fetal loss associated with appendectomy was 2.6%; however, this rate was increased when peritonitis was present (10.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Modern surgical and anesthesia techniques appear to diminish the rate of maternal death. Surgery in the first trimester does not appear to increase major birth defects and should not be delayed when indicated. Acute appendicitis with peritonitis is associated with higher risk to the mother and fetus.

Appendectomy in pregnancy: the experience of a university hospital

The files of pregnant patients who underwent appendectomy at our hospital over the period 1977-96 were studied retrospectively. Forty-six patients were operated upon amongst 52 108 deliveries over this period. Of those 27 had uncomplicated acute appendicitis and six had one of the complications of acute appendicitis (a prevalence of 0.063%). Thirteen had normal appendices (71.7% accuracy). Obstetric complications occurred in four patients, with three fetal losses (6.5%). Those with complicated appendicitis had significantly delayed presentation, in-hospital delay and prolonged postoperative stay. Recently we used diagnostic laparoscopy in two patients for diagnosis and to perform appendectomy in one. In conclusion, the incidence of acute appendicitis in pregnancy seems to be the same over the period of gestation and the diagnostic accuracy seems to be related both to the late presentation by the patient and to physician delay. Maternal morbidity and fetal loss are mostly limited to those with complicated appendicitis.

Antibiotic prophylaxis in severe acute pancreatitis

Severe acute pancreatitis is considered to be a subgroup of acute pancreatitis with the development of local and/or systemic complications. A significant correlation exists between the development of pancreatic necrosis, the frequency of bacterial contamination of necrosis and the evolution of systemic complications. Bacterial infection and the extent of necrosis are determinants for the outcome of severe acute pancreatitis. The late course of necrotizing pancreatitis is determined by bacterial infection of pancreatic and peripancreatic necroses. Mortality increases from 5-25% in patients with sterile necrosis to 15-28% when infection has occurred. The use of prophylactic antibiotics has been recommended in patients with necrotizing pancreatitis. Several controlled clinical trials demonstrated a significant reduction in pancreatic infections or a significant reduction of hospital mortality. However, the results of these clinical trials are controversial and not convincing. Recently, the largest randomized placebo-controlled, double-blind trial has been able to demonstrate that antibiotic prophylaxis with ciprofloxacin and metronidazole has no beneficial effects with regard to the reduction of pancreatic infection and the decrease of hospital mortality. The clinical data from this placebo-controlled trial do not support antibiotic prophylaxis in all patients with necrotizing pancreatitis, but in specific subgroups of patients with pancreatic necrosis and a complicated course.

Incidence of appendicitis during pregnancy

BACKGROUND

The aetiology and pathogenesis of appendicitis remains unknown. A relation with female sex hormones has been proposed because of a lower incidence among women and incidence variations during the menstrual cycle, but studies have given inconsistent results. Pregnancy constitutes a period of dramatic increases in levels of female sex hormones, but the incidence of appendicitis during childbearing is not known.

METHODS

Case-control study of pregnancy status at the time of appendectomy of 53 058 women and of 53 058 population-based age-matched controls. Cases and controls were identified by linkage of the Swedish Inpatient Register and the nation-wide census. Pregnancy status at the time of operation was obtained by linkage with the Swedish Fertility Register. Differences in pregnancy status were analysed using conditional logistic regression and expressed as odds ratios (OR) with 95% CI.

RESULTS

Fewer patients than expected with appendicitis were pregnant compared with the controls, especially in the third trimester (OR = 0.49, 95% CI : 0.30-0.79 for perforated and OR = 0.33, 95% CI : 0.28-0.39 for non-perforated appendicitis).

CONCLUSIONS

The reduced incidence of appendicitis suggests a protective effect of pregnancy, especially in the third trimester.

Acute appendicitis complicating pregnancy

Appendicitis occurring during pregnancy presents a difficult problem for both the treating gynecological and the surgeon. We studied retrospectively the cases of 52 consecutive patients seen during a four-year period at Riyadh Central Hospital, a large and busy general hospital. The incidence of appendicitis in various stages of pregnancy, along with its symptomatology, physical signs, laboratory results, and operative findings, were analyzed. The rates of complications, especially maternal and fetal mortality, were also analyzed and findings compared with those reported elsewhere. There was no maternal morbidity and a 4% fetal mortality. We concluded that an aggressive approach in the diagnosis and surgical management of these patients reduces the maternal and fetal mortality.

Acute appendicitis in the pregnant patient

Acute appendicitis is the most common surgical problem in pregnancy requiring emergent intervention. To establish a contemporary patient profile and formulate an effective management strategy, a retrospective review was conducted of 84 pregnant patients who underwent laparotomy with a preoperative diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Gestational stage at presentation included the first trimester in 27 patients (32%), the second trimester in 37 patients (44%), the third trimester in 13 patients (16%), and the puerperium in 7 patients (8%). Fifty-four patients (64%) had pathologically proven acute appendicitis; the incidence did not vary by trimester. Other intra-abdominal conditions were detected in 15 patients (18%). There were no significant differences between patients with positive and negative laparotomies (or among trimesters) regarding frequency of presenting symptoms and signs or laboratory results. Operation occurred within 24 hours of symptom onset in 19 of 54 (35%) instances of proven acute appendicitis. Perforation occurred in 23 of 54 patients (43%), all of whom had symptoms exceeding 24 hours (p less than 0.0005). Five instances of perinatal death and one case of extreme perinatal morbidity were associated with negative laparotomies; only one of these was attributed to operation itself. No adverse long-term maternal morbidity or mortality occurred. Wound infection developed in seven cases of acute appendicitis (six perforated) and two negative explorations. We conclude that (1) gestational physiologic changes obscure the accurate diagnosis of acute appendicitis; (2) the natural history of acute appendicitis is not affected by trimester of presentation; and (3) adverse sequelae of acute appendicitis are obviated by prompt operative exploration and prevention of appendiceal perforation.

Acute appendicitis in pregnancy

Acute appendicitis is the commonest nongynaecological surgical problem occurring during pregnancy. Almost 10 year's experience at a large teaching hospital is supplemented with an extensive review of the literature to offer guidelines for diagnosis and management. Symptoms, signs and investigations are unhelpful in diagnosis. The overwhelming message is that because perinatal mortality rises from less than 3% in both uncomplicated appendicitis and negative laparotomy, to 20% in perforated disease, the maxim regarding acute appendicitis--if in doubt, take it out--is never more true than in pregnancy.

A case of acute appendicitis in pregnancy

An unusual case of appendicitis in the second trimester of pregnancy is presented. The underlying pathology was shrouded by incomplete abortion. The patient's condition worsened after her uterus was evacuated and it was only at laparotomy that a ruptured appendix was discovered. The need for vigilance in suspecting appendicitis is heightened so as to reduce morbidity and mortality from appendicitis in pregnancy.

Endometriosis of the vermiform appendix

The pathological findings and clinical aspects of 22 patients with endometriosis of the vermiform appendix are presented. The cases were found among 10,000 appendices examined from 1950 to 1981. During this period of 32 years, 800 cases of pelvic endometriosis were seen. In 10 patients no other locations of pelvic endometriosis were found.

Acute appendicitis complicating pregnancy and the puerperium. A study of 5 cases

This series of 5 cases of appendicitis complicating all stages of pregnancy and the puerperium illustrates particularly the potentially rapid course of the disease and the need to perform laparotomy on suspicion. Diagnosis may be aided, in later pregnancy, by the finding of pain increments when the fetus moves, as well as by the use of Alders test. Though a muscle-splitting incision over the point of maximal tenderness is usually suggested, we recommend a right paramedian incision when the fetus is viable as it gives greater flexibility.

Perforation of the appendix during pregnancy: a rare complication of endometriosis. Case report

Perforation of the appendix in a 23-year-old Nigerian Igbo woman during the 35th week of pregnancy is reported. In the perforated area, the wall of the appendix was replaced largely by decidualized endometriotic tissue.

Acute appendicitis in pregnancy

A retrospective study of appendicitis in pregnancy in Aberdeen has been performed. The incidence, symptoms, findings at laparotomy and outcome are described. Delay in diagnosis is stressed as the casual factor in increased maternal morbidity and high neonatal mortality.