Transabdominal gastro-oesophageal devascularization and oesophageal transection for bleeding oesophageal varices

Transabdominal gastro-esophageal devascularization and esophageal transection for bleeding esophageal varices after failed injection sclerotherapy: long-term follow-up report

BACKGROUND

Management of continued bleeding from esophageal varices despite adequate injection sclerotherapy remains one of the medical and surgical dilemmas. Transabdominal gastroesophageal devascularization and esophageal transection (TGDET) is considered an effective and safe procedure for such patients.

AIM

This study aimed at presenting continued evaluation of TGDET. Various problems influencing the early outcome are discussed, and long-term outcome is analyzed.

DESIGN

This was a prospective clinical descriptive study.

METHODS

Prospective data was collected on 142 consecutive patients managed by one group of surgeons over a 5 year-period and 15 years follow-up after failed injection sclerotherapy for variceal bleeding. Evaluation was made in terms of effectiveness in controlling the acute bleeding, postoperative morbidity and mortality, recurrent bleeding, encephalopathy, and long-term survival.

RESULTS

There were 133 men and 9 women. Mean age was 41.8 years. Etiology of portal hypertension was bilharziasis in 54.9% and posthepatitic in 14.8%. Child-Pugh grading on admission was A: 47.2%, B: 28.8%, and C: 14%. Hemorrhage was controlled in all cases. Clinical leak was observed in 5.6%, portal vein thrombosis in 6.3%, and staple line erosion in 2.1% of cases. No patient developed encephalopathy. In-hospital mortality was 12.7%. Complete eradication of varices was observed in 70.6% patients. Recurrent variceal bleeding was noticed in 6.9% of cases. Actuarial 15-year survival for Child-Pugh A patients was 44%, B was 22.5%, and none for C.

CONCLUSION

TGDET remains a safe and effective procedure after failure of sclerotherapy when other alternatives are either not indicated or not available.

Effect of previous sclerotherapy on the outcome of gastro-oesophageal devascularization and oesophageal transection in bleeding oesophageal varices

This retrospective analysis studied the effect of sclerotherapy on subsequent oesophageal transection in the management of patients with bleeding oesophageal varices and compared the result with that in those who did not receive sclerotherapy as the primary treatment. Fifty patients were treated by gastro-oesophageal devascularization and oesophageal transection for bleeding oesophageal varices over a 4-year period. Twenty-six patients did not receive sclerotherapy (group 1) and 24 received between one and four sessions of sclerotherapy (group 2) before surgery. Oedema and thickness of the lower end of the oesophagus and some adhesions were noted during surgery in patients who had had previous sclerotherapy; however, stapled oesophageal transection and anastomosis could be performed in all these patients. There was no oesophageal leak in any patient, although there was a higher rate of chest complications (nine versus six patients) in group 2. Six patients (12 per cent) died (three in each group) during the postoperative period; three had Child grade C disease. It is concluded that the decision to operate to control bleeding varices should be made early. One or two sessions of sclerotherapy before surgery does not increase intraoperative difficulty or the postoperative leak rate following oesophageal transection. The outcome of surgery is directly related to the state of liver reserve (Child grade).

Surgical emergencies in liver disease

In this chapter the surgical management of bleeding oesophageal varices, ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma and fulminant liver failure have been discussed. Bleeding oesophageal varices can usually be successfully treated with vasopressin, balloon tamponade and injection sclerotherapy. Emergency surgery should be considered if two courses of injection sclerotherapy have failed to achieve haemostasis. Stapled oesophageal transection and portosystemic shunting are currently the two most popular procedures. The former is associated with a lower morbidity and mortality as well as a lower incidence of subsequent encephalopathy. Ruptured hepatocellular carcinomas are usually associated with liver cirrhosis and impaired liver function. Selective coeliac axis cannulation followed by embolization of the hepatic artery branches supplying the tumour is an effective method of achieving haemostasis and is associated with a lower morbidity and mortality than emergency hepatic artery ligation or liver resection. If haemostasis is achieved by embolization the patient may subsequently be assessed for an elective resection of the tumour. Fulminant liver failure may be managed by supportive medical therapy or orthotopic liver transplantation. Patients whose liver failure is graded as mild (grade I) should be treated by medical therapy, whereas those with severe liver damage (grades III and IV) should be assessed for transplantation. Accurate monitoring of the patient's clinical progress and prognostic indicators are vital in deciding whether conservative treatment should be continued or liver transplantation performed.