Use of vascular staplers in major hepatic resections

PARTIAL HEPATECTOMY USING LINEAR CUTTER STAPLER: ARE THERE ADVANTAGES?

BACKGROUND

Morbidity of liver resections is related to intraoperative bleeding and postoperative biliary fistulas. The Endo-GIA stapler (EG) in liver resections is well established, but its cost is high, limiting its use. The linear cutting stapler (LCS) is a lower cost device.

AIMS

To report open liver resections, using LCS for transection of the liver parenchyma and en bloc stapling of vessels and bile ducts.

METHODS

Ten patients were included in the study. Four patients with severe abdominal pain had benign liver tumors (three adenomas and one focal nodular hyperplasia). Among the remaining six patients, four underwent liver resection for the treatment of colorectal liver metastases, three of which had undergone preoperative chemotherapy. The other two cases were one patient with metastasis from a testicular teratoma and the other with metastasis from a gastrointestinal neuroectodermal tumor.

RESULTS

The average length of stay was five days (range 4-7 days). Of the seven patients who underwent resections of segments II/III, two presented postoperative complications: one developed a seroma and the other a collection of abdominal fluid who underwent percutaneous drainage, antibiotic therapy, and blood transfusion. Furthermore, the three patients who underwent major resections had postoperative complications: two developed anemia and received blood transfusions and one had biloma and underwent percutaneous drainage and antibiotic therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of the linear stapler in hepatectomies was efficient and at lower costs, making it suitable for use whenever EG is not available. The size of the LCS stapler shaft is more suitable for en bloc transection of the left lateral segment of the liver, which is thinner than the right one. Further studies are needed to evaluate the safety of LCS for large liver resections and resections of tumors located in the right hepatic lobe.

Morbidity and mortality in 1,174 patients undergoing hepatic parenchymal transection using a stapler device

BACKGROUND

Transection of liver parenchyma using staplers is now commonly performed. Large studies are needed to assess the usefulness of the technique as well as perioperative outcomes.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of a prospectively maintained database. A total of 1,174 patients undergoing liver resections in routine surgical practice, using a stapler device at MD Anderson Cancer Center between January 1, 1994 and November 10, 2011 were evaluated.

RESULTS

There were 900 major resections (3 segments or more) (77 %) and 274 minor resections (<3 segments or wedge resections) (23 %). A vast majority, 1,133 (96.5 %), were indicated for an underlying malignancy (24 % primary liver or gall bladder and 72.5 % metastatic) compared with benign disease, 41 (3.5 %), with the most common indication being metastatic colorectal cancer 584 (49.7 %). Of the total 1,174 patients 128 (10.9 %) had a prior liver resection. Median OR time and blood loss was 206 min and 300 mL, respectively, with 11 % of patients requiring transfusion in the perioperative or postoperative period. Overall morbidity and mortality rate was 14 and 3.2 %, respectively, with a median hospital stay of 7 days (interquartile range [IQR], 4 days). Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated blood loss and extent of liver resection to be independent predictors of adverse outcome. A total of 13 instances (1.1 %) of misfired staplers were noted and were associated with higher blood loss (p < 0.001) and mortality (15 vs. 3.1 %, p = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of stapler device for hepatic resection is safe and effective, but rare instances of a misfired stapler device are associated with an adverse outcome.

Evaluation of stapler hepatectomy during a laparoscopic liver resection

METHODS

An international database of 1499 laparoscopic liver resections was analysed using multivariate and Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 764 stapler hepatectomies (SH) were compared with 735 electrosurgical resections (ER). SH was employed in larger tumours (4.5 versus 3.8 cm; P < 0.003) with decreased operative times (2.6 versus 3.1 h; P < 0.001), blood loss (100 versus 200 cc; P < 0.001) and length of stay (3.0 versus 7.0 days; P < 0.001). SH incurred a trend towards higher complications (16% versus 13%; P = 0.057) including bile leaks (26/764, 3.4% versus 16/735, 2.2%: P = 0.091). To address group homogeneity, a subset analysis of lobar resections confirmed the benefits of SH. Kaplan-Meier analysis in non-cirrhotic and cirrhotic patients confirmed equivalent patient (P = 0.290 and 0.118) and disease-free survival (P = 0.120 and 0.268). Multivariate analysis confirmed the parenchymal transection technique did not increase the risk of cancer recurrence, whereas tumour size, the presence of cirrhosis and concomitant operations did.

CONCLUSIONS

A SH provides several advantages including: diminished blood loss, transfusion requirements and shorter operative times. In spite of the smaller surgical margins in the SH group, equivalent recurrence and survival rates were observed when matched for parenchyma and extent of resection.

Vascular inflow control during hemi-hepatectomy: a comparison between intrahepatic pedicle ligation and extrahepatic vascular ligation

BACKGROUND

Intrahepatic pedicle ligation (IPL) is an alternative to extrahepatic portal dissection (EPD). Although IPL has been well described, concern has arisen over a possible association with increased complication rates.

METHODS

Patients who underwent hemi-hepatectomy during January 1995 to December 2010 were reviewed and the inflow control technique (IPL versus EPD) documented. Patient, tumour, treatment and outcome variables were compared.

RESULTS

  A total of 798 patients underwent hemi-hepatectomy, 568 (71.2%) of the right and 230 (28.8%) of the left liver. In univariate analysis, factors associated with the choice of IPL included surgeon, right hepatectomy, preoperative portal vein embolization, diagnosis of colorectal cancer liver metastasis, and smaller tumour size (P < 0.011). In multivariate analysis, right hepatectomy [versus left: hazard ratio (HR) 3.878, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.15-13.14; P = 0.029] and smaller tumour size (median of 4.5 cm versus 5.5 cm: HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.59-0.88; P = 0.002) were associated with IPL. Pringle manoeuvre time was longer in IPL procedures (40 min versus 29 min; P < 0.001). Complication rates (49.8% in IPL versus 48.4% in EPD; P = 0.706) were similar in both groups, as was the severity of complications; 17.6% of EPD and 22.3% of IPL patients experienced complications of grade ≥3 (P = 0.225).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with small tumours undergoing right hepatectomy were more likely to undergo IPL. In selected patients, IPL was not associated with an increased complication rate and thus it should be considered a safe approach.

Clamp-crushing versus stapler hepatectomy for transection of the parenchyma in elective hepatic resection (CRUNSH)--a randomized controlled trial (NCT01049607)

Background

Hepatic resection is still associated with significant morbidity. Although the period of parenchymal transection presents a crucial step during the operation, uncertainty persists regarding the optimal technique of transection. It was the aim of the present randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of hepatic resection using the technique of stapler hepatectomy compared to the simple clamp-crushing technique.

Methods/Design

The CRUNSH Trial is a prospective randomized controlled single-center trial with a two-group parallel design. Patients scheduled for elective hepatic resection without extrahepatic resection at the Department of General-, Visceral- and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg are enrolled into the trial and randomized intraoperatively to hepatic resection by the clamp-crushing technique and stapler hepatectomy, respectively. The primary endpoint is total intraoperative blood loss. A set of general and surgical variables are documented as secondary endpoints. Patients and outcome-assessors are blinded for the treatment intervention.

Discussion

The CRUNSH Trial is the first randomized controlled trial to evaluate efficacy and safety of stapler hepatectomy compared to the clamp-crushing technique for parenchymal transection during elective hepatic resection.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01049607

Hepatic resection nomenclature and techniques

Nomenclature describing liver anatomy and liver resection has been standardized with the Brisbane 2000 terminology. When performing liver resection, blood loss should be minimized by using low central venous pressure (CVP) anesthesia and vascular occlusion as appropriate. There are many options for transection of the liver parenchyma, and although no technique has been shown to be superior to clamp-crushing, hepatic surgeons should be familiar with the techniques available.

Hepatic parenchyma resection using stapling devices: peri-operative and long-term outcome

BACKGROUND

Stapler-assisted hepatectomy has not been well established, as a routine procedure, although few reports exist in the literature. This analysis assesses the safety and outcome of the method based on peri-operative data.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From February 2005 to December 2006, endo GIA vascular staplers were used for parenchymal liver transection in 62 consecutive cases in our department. There were 18 (29%) patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), 31 (50%) with metastatic lesions and 13 (21%) with benign lesions [adenoma, focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH), simple cysts]. Twenty-one patients underwent major resections (33.9%) (i.e. removal of three segments or more) and 41 (66.1%) minor hepatic resections.

RESULTS

Median blood loss was 260 ml. The median total operative time was 150 min and median transection time was 35 min. No patient required more than 2 days of intensive care unit (ICU) treatment. The median hospital stay was 8 days. Surgical complications included two (3%) cases of bile leak, two (3%) cases of pneumonia, two (3%) cases with wound infection and two (3%) cases with pleural effusion. The peri-operative mortality was zero. In a 30-month median follow-up, all patients with benign lesions were alive and free of disease. The 3-year disease-free survival for patients with HCC was 61% (57% for patients with colorectal metastases) and the 3-year survival 72% (68% for patients with colorectal metastases).

CONCLUSION

Stapler-assisted liver resection is feasible with a low incidence of surgical complications. It can be used as an alternative for parenchyma transection especially in demanding hepatectomies for elimination of the operating time and control of bleeding.

Right hepatic lobectomy using the staple technique in 101 patients

BACKGROUND

Application of linear stapling devices for extrahepatic vascular control in liver surgery has been well-established. However, the technique for use of stapling devices in hepatic parenchymal transection is not well defined.

PURPOSE

To describe the safety and efficacy of our technique for use of vascular stapling devices in hepatic parenchymal transection during open right hepatic lobectomy is the purpose of this study.

METHODOLOGY

We reviewed our experience with 101 consecutive open right hepatic lobectomies performed by a single surgeon between January 2003 and July 2006, in which vascular staplers were utilized for the parenchymal transection phase.

RESULTS

Of the 101 patients who underwent resection, 53 (52%) were female. The mean age was 58 years. Malignant disease was the indication for resection in the majority of patients (88%). Of those with cancer, 78% (69 of 89) had metastatic colorectal cancer, 6% (5 of 89) had metastatic neuroendocrine tumor, 4% (4 of 89) had hepatocellular carcinoma, 4% (4 of 89) had cholangiocarcinoma, and the remaining 8% were other metastatic cancers. Twelve patients (12%) underwent resection for hepatic adenoma or symptomatic benign disease (FNH or hemangioma). Forty-eight patients (48%) underwent a major ancillary procedure at the time of hepatic resection. Thirty-nine patients (39%) had a nonanatomic wedge resection of a left lobe lesion, 27 patients (27%) had one or more lesions treated with radiofrequency ablation (RFA), and 6 patients (6%) were treated with a synchronous bowel resection. The median total operative time was 336 min (range 155-620 min). A Pringle maneuver for temporary vascular inflow occlusion was utilized in all cases, with a median time of 9 min (range 4-17 min). Ten patients (10%) required blood transfusion during surgery or in the postoperative period. The maximum transfusion was 2 U of packed red blood cells (PRBC) in seven patients and 1 U of PRBC in three patients. The mean nadir postoperative hematocrit was 28.2. All patients with malignant disease had tumor-free margins at the completion of the procedure. The average hospital length of stay was 6.0 days. One patient (1%) developed a clinically significant bile leak requiring a postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERCP). No patient required reoperation. The 30 and 60-day postoperative survival was 100%.

CONCLUSION

These findings indicate that application of vascular stapling devices for parenchymal transection in major hepatic resection is a safe technique, with low transfusion requirements and minimal postoperative bile leak. The technique allows for rapid transection of the entire right hepatic lobe in under 10 min. Short video clips of the technique will be demonstrated.

Application of endovascular stapler in living-donor liver transplantation

We used an endovascular stapler in recipients of living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Hepatic veins were transected in 10 recent LDLTs (6 right-lobe and 4 left-lobe grafts), and the portocaval shunt was transected in 5 of these 10 LDLTs. Median operative time with the vascular stapler was 861 minutes (range 675 to 932), whereas the median time to liver explantation was 292 minutes (range 200 to 461) (both with P < or = .05 vs vascular stapler use). To our knowledge, this is the first report on the use of an endovascular stapler device in LDLT.

Stapler Hepatectomy is a Safe Dissection Technique: Analysis of 300 Patients

BACKGROUND

In many surgical procedures, stapling devices have been introduced for safety and to reduce the overall operative time. Their use for transection of hepatic parenchyma is not well established. Thus, the feasibility of stapler hepatectomy and a risk analysis of surgical morbidity based on intraoperative data have been prospectively assessed on a routine clinical basis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From October 1, 2001, to January 31, 2005, a total of 416 patients underwent liver resection in our department. During this period endo GIA vascular staplers were used for parenchymal transection in 300 cases of primary (22%) and metastatic (57%) liver cancer, benign diseases (adenoma, focal nodular hyperplasia [FNH], cysts) (14%), gallbladder carcinoma (2%), and other tumors (5%). There were 193 (64%) major resections (i.e., removal of three segments or more) and 107 minor hepatic resections. Additional extrahepatic resections were performed in 44 (15%) patients.

RESULTS

Median values for operative time and intraoperative hemorrhage were 210 minutes and 700 ml, respectively. Further, transfusion of RBC and FFP was needed in 17% and 11% of patients, respectively. A postoperative ICU stay for >2 days was required in 18% of patients. The median postoperative hospital stay was 10 days (IQR 8-14 days). The most frequent surgical complications were bile leak (8%), wound infection (3%), and pneumothorax (2%). In 7% of cases after stapler hepatectomy a relaparotomy was necessary. Treated medical complications were pleural effusion (7%), renal insufficiency (5%), and cardiac insufficiency (3%). Risk assessment revealed that both operative time and indication for resection had significant impact on surgical morbidity. Mortality (4%) and morbidity (33%) were comparable to other high-volume centers performing conventional liver resection techniques.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, stapler hepatectomy can be used in a routine clinical setting with a low incidence of surgical complications.

[Use of vascular stapling device in liver resections]

BACKGROUND

Among several liver resection techniques, the use of stapler in the portal pedicles is an interesting option.

AIM

To describe the technique of liver resection using a vascular stapling device.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of eight patients underwent hepatic resections with stapling techniques. The authors have used intrahepatic approach glissonian pedicles with the application of a vascular stapler device in all cases. Liver parenchyma and hepatic veins were transected as usual.

RESULTS

There were no deaths. No complications directly attributable to stapler ligations of portal pedicles were observed.

CONCLUSION

Stapling techniques can be helpful in hepatic resection procedures. The vascular stapler may significantly reduce glissonian pedicle section time.

Vascular occlusion to decrease blood loss during hepatic resection

BACKGROUND

Historically, the primary hazard with liver surgery has been intraoperative blood loss. This led to the refinement of inflow and outflow occlusive techniques. The utility of the different methods of inflow and outflow techniques for hepatic surgery were reviewed.

METHODS

A search of the English literature (Medline, Embase, Cochrane library, Cochrane clinical trials registry, hand searches, and bibliographic reviews) using the terms "liver," "hepatic," "Pringle," "total vascular exclusion," "ischemia," "reperfusion," "inflow," and "outflow occlusion" was performed.

RESULTS

A multitude of techniques to minimize blood loss during hepatic resection have been studied. The evidence suggests that inflow occlusion techniques are generally well tolerated. These should be used with caution in patients with cirrhosis, fibrosis, steatosis, cholestasis, and recent chemotherapy, and for prolonged time intervals.

CONCLUSIONS

Harmful effects of intraoperative blood loss and transfusion occur during hepatic resection. Portal triad clamping (PTC) is associated with less blood loss compared with no clamping. In procedures with ischemic times <1 hour in length, PTC-C (continuous) is likely equal to PTC-I (intermittent). In patients with chronic liver disease or undergoing lengthy operations, PTC-I is likely superior to PTC-C. PTC is superior to total vascular exclusion except in patients with tumors that are large and deep seated, hypervascular, and/or abutting the hepatic veins or vena cava and in patients with increased right-sided heart pressures.

Hepatic resection using stapling devices

BACKGROUND

The progress and development of stapling devices has been remarkable. They have become indispensable for gastrointestinal diseases and are increasingly utilized in laparoscopic operations. Liver surgery applications for this technique are continuing to emerge, and in this study, we introduced the use of stapling devices to hepatic surgery.

METHODS

We examined the operative procedure and efficacy of hepatic resections using stapling devices as follows: transection of Glisson's pedicle and the hepatic vein using endolineal stapling devices in right and left lobectomies; bisegmentectomy II and III en masse using a stapling device; and application of endolineal stapling devices to vessel transections and dissections of the hepatic parenchyma in laparoscopic hepatectomies.

RESULTS

It was considered useful to tactfully apply stapling devices to vessel transections and dissections of the hepatic parenchyma in order to simplify the operative procedures of right or left lobectomies and lateral segmentectomies. Furthermore, the use of endoscopic stapling devices was an acceptable alternative to vessel transactions and dissections of the hepatic parenchyma in laparoscopic hepatectomies.

CONCLUSIONS

We believe that stapling devices will become utilized in liver surgery hereafter.

Recent advances in hepatic resection

Hepatic surgery has emerged over the last three decades and has proven to be a safe and effective treatment for primary and secondary malignancies, as well as for benign diseases of the liver. During the past 10 years, several major advances have been made in 1) surgical technique with the advent of portal pedicle ligation maneuvers and the implementation of mechanical staplers, 2) intraoperative management with the development of low central venous pressure anesthesia, and 3) surgical technology with the innovation of laparoscopy for staging of patients with cancer and performing minimally invasive liver resection. We present a summary of our experience with these advances.

Surgical stapling of the spleen, pancreas, liver, and urogenital tract

Stapling instrumentation designed primarily for specific gastrointestinal procedures and transection of vascular pedicles have been adapted for use in parenchymal organs of the abdomen and urogenital tract. This article reviews current veterinary clinical and experimental use of stapling instrumentation for splenic, pancreatic, hepatic, and urogenital surgery.