Thromboembolic prophylaxis in total hip replacement: a comparison between the low molecular weight heparinoid Lomoparan and heparin-dihydroergotamine

The long path to NOAC

The discovery of anticoagulant drugs occurred at a time when the process of blood coagulation only had been roughly described and their mode of action was unknown. Nevertheless, heparin – which was discovered 100 years ago – and warfarin – which was developed in the 1920s – had taken off on a triumphal course which is unique in medical history. The synthesis of anticoagulants with targeted mode of action was only achieved at the end of the last century, e. g. the inhibitor of factor Xa fondaparinux or the recombinant production of the direct thrombin inhibitor hirudin, closely followed by the synthesis of the direct oral inhibitors of factor Xa and thrombin. These compounds had been clinically developed in the early 21st century and meanwhile, they have become available for several indications. Dabigatran is the only thrombin inhibitor and rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban are the three factor Xa inhibitors which entered the market and have started replacing the conventional anticoagulants for treatment of venous thromboembolic complications and for prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. They have several characteristics in common such as a reproducible bioavailability, much shorter halflives than vitamin K antagonists, low interaction with other drugs, fixed dosing regimens without the necessity for routine coagulation controls and a better risk-/benefit profile than conventional anticoagulants. However, there are differences between the various compounds with regard to metabolism, renal elimination and the various dosing regimens which definitely need to be considered when prescribed to various patient populations.

Treatment and prevention of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition)

This chapter about the recognition, treatment, and prevention of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is part of the Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Grade 1 recommendations are strong and indicate that the benefits do, or do not, outweigh risks, burden, and costs. Grade 2 suggests that individual patient values may lead to different choices. Among the key recommendations in this chapter are the following: For patients receiving heparin in whom the clinician considers the risk of HIT to be > 1.0%, we recommend platelet count monitoring over no platelet count monitoring (Grade 1C). For patients who are receiving heparin or have received heparin within the previous 2 weeks, we recommend investigating for a diagnosis of HIT if the platelet count falls by >/= 50%, and/or a thrombotic event occurs, between days 5 and 14 (inclusive) following initiation of heparin, even if the patient is no longer receiving heparin therapy when thrombosis or thrombocytopenia has occurred (Grade 1C). For patients with strongly suspected (or confirmed) HIT, whether or not complicated by thrombosis, we recommend use of an alternative, nonheparin anticoagulant (danaparoid [Grade 1B], lepirudin [Grade 1C], argatroban [Grade 1C], fondaparinux [Grade 2C], or bivalirudin [Grade 2C]) over the further use of unfractionated heparin (UFH) or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) therapy or initiation/continuation of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) [Grade 1B]. The guidelines include specific recommendations for nonheparin anticoagulant dosing that differ from the package inserts. For patients with strongly suspected or confirmed HIT, we recommend against the use of vitamin K antagonist (VKA) [coumarin] therapy until after the platelet count has substantially recovered (usually, to at least 150 x 10(9)/L) over starting VKA therapy at a lower platelet count (Grade 1B); that VKA therapy be started only with low maintenance doses (maximum, 5 mg of warfarin or 6 mg of phenprocoumon) over higher initial doses (Grade 1B); and that the nonheparin anticoagulant (eg, lepirudin, argatroban, danaparoid) be continued until the platelet count has reached a stable plateau, the international normalized ratio (INR) has reached the intended target range, and after a minimum overlap of at least 5 days between nonheparin anticoagulation and VKA therapy rather than a shorter overlap (Grade 1B). For patients receiving VKAs at the time of diagnosis of HIT, we recommend use of vitamin K (10 mg po or 5 to 10 mg IV) [Grade 1C].

Prévention de la maladie thromboembolique en orthopédie et traumatologie

Orthopaedic and trauma surgery are classified according 3 groups of venous thromboembolic risk. Elective total hip replacement (THR) or total knee replacement (TKR), hip fracture surgery or trauma patients are at high risk. Isolated lower extremity injury with fracture is at moderate risk whereas this risk is low without fracture as well as with knee arthroscopy. In THR and TKR, low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), fondaparinux or melagatran-ximelagatran are strongly recommended. The routine use of other anticoagulants, in particular vitamin K antagonist are not recommended. In patients at high risk of venous thromboembolism as for example trauma patients, optimal use of intermittent pneumatic compression is an alternative option in case of contra-indication to anticoagulant prophylaxis. Graduated compression stockings enhance the efficacy of pharmacological methods. In schedule surgery, initiation of prophylaxis with LMWH may be started postoperatively. To reduce the haemorrhagic risk of anticoagulants, timing of first postoperative dose is essential and is proper to each drug. Duration of prophylaxis depends on the surgical and the individual patients' risk. Extended prophylaxis in THR for up to 42 days with LMWH and up to 35 days with fondaparinux in hip fracture surgery is recommended. However extended prophylaxis after 14 days in TKR has not demonstrated a higher efficacy and should only be considered for patients with additional risk factors. In patients with isolated lower extremity injury or undergoing knee arthroscopy, LMWH should not be routinely used according to a low or a moderate risk and/or the duration of prophylaxis required. But LMWH has to be considered for patients with additional risk factors. Prophylaxis in other orthopedic procedures has not been assessed and will be extrapolated from the above recommendations.

Major bleeding rates after prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism: Systematic review, meta-analysis, and cost implications

Objectives: The frequency and consequences of major bleeding associated with anticoagulant prophylaxis for prevention of venous thromboembolism is examined.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials that reported rates of major bleeding after pharmaceutical thromboprophylaxis in patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery. Thromboprophylactic agents were divided into four groups:warfarin/other coumarin derivatives (WARF), unfractionated heparin (UFH), low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), and pentasaccharide (PS). Meta-analysis was conducted comparing LMWH with each of WARF, UFH, and PS. The frequency of re-operation due to major bleeding was reviewed and combined with published costs to estimate the mean cost of managing major bleeding events in these patients.

Results: Twenty-one studies including 20,523 patients met inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. No evidence of significant between-trial heterogeneity in risk ratios was found. Combined (fixed effects) relative risks (RR) of major bleeding compared with LMWH were WARF – RR 0.59 (95 percent confidence interval [CI], 0.44–0.80); UFH – RR 1.52 (95 percent CI, 1.04–2.23); PS – RR 1.52 (95 percent CI, 1.11–2.09). Seventy-one studies including 32,433 patients were included in the review of consequences of major bleeding. We estimated that the average cost of major bleeding is $113 per patient receiving thromboprophylaxis.

Conclusions: LMWH results in fewer major bleeding episodes than UFH and PS but more than WARF. These events are costly and clinically important.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: recognition, treatment, and prevention: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy

This chapter about the recognition, treatment, and prevention of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is part of the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy: Evidence Based Guidelines. Grade 1 recommendations are strong and indicate that the benefits do, or do not, outweigh risks, burden, and costs. Grade 2 suggests that individual patients' values may lead to different choices (for a full understanding of the grading, see Guyatt et al, CHEST 2004; 126:179S-187S). Among the key recommendations in this chapter are the following: For patients in whom the risk of HIT is considered to be > 0.1%, we recommend platelet count monitoring (Grade 1C). For patients who are receiving therapeutic-dose unfractionated heparin (UFH), we suggest at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring until day 14, or until UFH is stopped, whichever occurs first (Grade 2C). For patients who are receiving postoperative antithrombotic prophylaxis with UFH (HIT risk > 1%), we suggest at least every-other-day platelet count monitoring between postoperative days 4 to 14 (or until UFH is stopped, whichever occurs first) [Grade 2C]. For medical/obstetric patients who are receiving prophylactic-dose UFH, postoperative patients receiving prophylactic-dose low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), postoperative patients receiving intravascular catheter UFH "flushes," or medical/obstetrical patients receiving LMWH after first receiving UFH (risk, 0.1 to 1%), we suggest platelet count monitoring every 2 days or 3 days from day 4 to day 14, or until heparin is stopped, whichever occurs first (Grade 2C). For medical/obstetrical patients who are only receiving LMWH, or medical patients who are receiving only intravascular catheter UFH flushes (risk < 0.1%), we suggest clinicians do not use routine platelet count monitoring (Grade 2C). For patients with strongly suspected (or confirmed) HIT, whether or not complicated by thrombosis, we recommend use of an alternative anticoagulant, such as lepirudin (Grade 1C+), argatroban (Grade 1C), bivalirudin (Grade 2C), or danaparoid (Grade 1B). For patients with strongly suspected (or confirmed) HIT, we recommend routine ultrasonography of the lower-limb veins for investigation of deep venous thrombosis (Grade 1C); against the use of vitamin K antagonist (VKA) [coumarin] therapy until after the platelet count has substantially recovered; that the VKA antagonist be administered only during overlapping alternative anticoagulation (minimum 5-day overlap); and begun with low, maintenance doses (all Grade 2C). For patients receiving VKAs at the time of diagnosis of HIT, we recommend use of vitamin K (Grade 2C) [corrected] For patients with a history of HIT who are HIT antibody negative and require cardiac surgery, we recommend use of UFH (Grade 1C).

Bilateral vs. ipsilateral venography as the primary efficacy outcome measure in thromboprophylaxis clinical trials: a systematic review

Contrast venography, in combination with symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE), is the standard efficacy outcome measure in clinical trials of thromboprophylaxis in major orthopedic surgery. It is uncertain whether performing bilateral venography offers any real advantage over venography of the operated leg alone. This study was undertaken to determine the risk of isolated contralateral deep vein thrombosis (DVT) following major orthopedic surgery and to evaluate whether bilateral venography, rather than venography on the operated leg alone, offers any gain in DVT detection and, thereby, improves efficiency in clinical study design. A systematic review of prospective studies that reported DVT incidence as the primary efficacy outcome based on mandatory bilateral venography in patients undergoing elective hip or knee arthroplasty or hip fracture repair was conducted. Based on the use of bilateral venography as a primary efficacy outcome measure, the incidence of any DVT is 16.7% following total hip replacement, 18.8% after hip fracture repair, and 33.8% after total knee replacement. While DVT risk in the operated leg varies depending on the type of surgery, the risk of isolated DVT in the non-operated leg is approximately 4% to 5% in all three procedures. By increasing the detection of any DVT, the use of bilateral venography reduces required sample size by 16% to 25% compared to ipsilateral venography. In clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of thromboprophylaxis in major orthopedic surgery, bilateral venography reduces the risk of undiagnosed DVT in the non-operated leg and improves the efficiency of study design by substantially reducing the sample size requirement.

On the prophylactic and therapeutic use of danaparoid sodium (Orgaran) in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a rare but dangerous complication of heparin prophylaxis or treatment. The present laboratory tests to measure heparin-associated antibodies are not specific. The diagnosis of HIT mainly depends on the decrease in platelet count and on clinical symptoms. To evaluate clinical outcome, bleeding complications and platelet counts were evaluated in 45 patients with HIT type II (HIT II) treated prophylactically (subcutaneous injections) or therapeutically (intravenous infusion) with danaparoid. Group I included 24 patients with HIT II without thromboembolic complications who received danaparoid twice daily subcutaneously (10 IU/kg) for a mean of 16 days. Group II included 21 patients with thromboembolic complications. They were treated with intravenous danaparoid (2.6 IU/kg/h +/- 1.1) for a mean of 17 days. During subcutaneous prophylaxis, mean anti-Xa levels of 0.2 U/mL and during intravenous treatment, mean anti-Xa levels of 0.4 U/mL were reached. No deaths, amputations, or serious bleeding complications occurred, and no new thromboses were observed in both patient groups. Treatment with danaparoid led to a fast normalization of the platelet counts. This normalization occurred earlier and the concentration of platelets was higher in patients treated with intravenous doses. Danaparoid with subsequent vitamin K-antagonist treatment effectively prevents thromboembolic complications in patients with HIT.

A meta-analysis of thromboembolic prophylaxis following elective total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Although several agents have been shown to reduce the risk of thromboembolic disease, there is no clear preference for thromboembolic prophylaxis in elective total hip arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to define the efficacy and safety of the agents that are currently used for prophylaxis against deep venous thrombosis -- namely, low-molecular-weight heparin, warfarin, aspirin, low-dose heparin, and pneumatic compression.

METHODS

A Medline search identified all randomized, controlled trials, published from January 1966 to May 1998, that compared the use of one of the prophylactic agents with the use of any other agent or a placebo in patients undergoing elective total hip arthroplasty. For a study to be included in our analysis, bilateral venography had to have been performed to confirm the presence or absence of deep venous thrombosis. Fifty-two studies, in which 10,929 patients had been enrolled, met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. The rates of distal, proximal, and total (distal and proximal) deep venous thrombosis; symptomatic and fatal pulmonary embolism; minor and major wound-bleeding complications; major non-wound bleeding complications; and total mortality were determined for each agent in each study. The absolute risk of each outcome was determined by dividing the number of events by the number of patients at risk. A general linear model with random effects was used to calculate the 95 percent confidence interval of risk. A crosstabs of study by outcome was performed to test homogeneity (ability to combine studies). The risk of each outcome was compared among agents and between each agent and the placebo.

RESULTS

With prophylaxis, the risk of total (proximal and distal) deep venous thrombosis ranged from 17.7 percent (low-molecular-weight heparin) to 31.1 percent (low-dose heparin); the risk with prophylaxis with any agent was significantly lower than the risk with the placebo (48.5 percent) (p < 0.0001). The risk of proximal deep venous thrombosis was lowest with warfarin (6.3 percent) and low-molecular-weight heparin (7.7 percent), and again the risk with any prophylactic agent was significantly lower than the risk with the placebo (25.8 percent) (p < 0.0001). Compared with the risk with the placebo (1.51 percent), only warfarin (0.16 percent), pneumatic compression (0.26 percent), and low-molecular-weight heparin (0.36 percent) were associated with a significantly lower risk of symptomatic pulmonary embolism. There were no significant differences among agents with regard to the risk of fatal pulmonary embolism or of mortality with any cause. The risk of minor wound-bleeding was significantly higher with low-molecular-weight heparin (8.9 percent) and low-dose heparin (7.6 percent) than it was with the placebo (2.2 percent) (p < 0.05). Compared with the risk with the placebo (0.28 percent), only low-dose heparin was associated with a significantly higher risk of major wound-bleeding (2.56 percent) and total major bleeding (3.46 percent) (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The best prophylactic agent in terms of both efficacy and safety was warfarin, followed by pneumatic compression, and the least effective and safe was low-dose heparin. Warfarin provided the lowest risk of both proximal deep venous thrombosis and symptomatic pulmonary embolism. However, there were no identifiable significant differences in the rates of fatal pulmonary embolism or death among the agents. Significant risks of minor and major bleeding complications were observed with greater frequency with certain prophylactic agents, particularly low-molecular-weight heparin (minor bleeding) and low-dose heparin (both major and minor bleeding).

Newer strategies for the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Treatment with heparin is associated with two types of thrombocytopenia. One is a mild, transient, nonimmune disorder, generally without adverse clinical consequence. The other, known as heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), is a potentially serious, immunoglobulin-mediated reaction with a paradoxic high risk of thromboembolic events. Various treatment options for HIT are discussed, with emphasis on pharmacologic approaches that control the increased thrombin generation characteristic of this disorder.

Danaparoid in the prevention of thromboembolic complications

OBJECTIVE

To review the therapies used to prevent postoperative thromboembolic complications with a focus on the role of danaparoid, a new low-molecular-weight glycosaminoglycan.

DATA SOURCES

A MEDLINE search was performed to identify pertinent English-language literature including studies, abstracts, and review articles. Key search terms included danaparoid, heparinoid, lomoparin, heparin, prophylaxis, thrombosis, embolism, thromboembolism, and thromboembolic and postoperative complications. The manufacturer of danaparoid was contracted for additional information related to this compound.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

All identified articles were reviewed for possible inclusion in this review. Comparisons primarily focused on data obtained from prospective, randomized, controlled, blind clinical trials. Another important consideration was the use of venography to determine the presence of deep venous thrombosis.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Various therapies are available for the prevention of postoperative thromboembolic complications. Effective pharmacologic treatments currently available include adjusted-dose heparin, warfarin, aspirin, dextran, and low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs). Until recently, warfarin was considered the drug of choice for thromboprophylaxis in high-risk patients, including patients undergoing orthopedic surgical procedures. Because of their comparable efficacy and greater ease of use, LMWHs are gaining favor over warfarin in this patient population. In well-designed clinical trials involving patients undergoing elective total hip replacement or fractured hip surgery, danaparoid has demonstrated greater efficacy than other active treatments, including warfarin, dextran, aspirin, and heparin plus dihydroergotamine. While studies comparing danaparoid with LMWHs have not yet been published, danaparoid may be more useful in patients with heparin-associated thrombocytopenia.

CONCLUSIONS

Danaparoid is an antithrombotic agent with characteristics that distinguish it from heparin and LMWHs. Based on the efficacy and safety data reviewed, danaparoid should be considered one of the drugs of choice for the prevention of thromboembolic complications in patients undergoing orthopedic hip procedures and the drug of choice for the management of any patient with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia who requires anticoagulant therapy.

State-of-the-Art Review : Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Major Orthopedic Surgery

Venous thromboembolism continues to be a major source of morbidity and mortality in both elective and traumatic orthopedic surgery. Prevention of this complication has received much attention in the orthope dic literature in recent years. We reviewed the relative efficacy and safety of various agents in the prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism arising after major orthopedic surgery. In patients undergoing total hip replacement, low-molecular-weight heparin in fixed doses, adjusted doses of warfarin, and unfractionated heparin in adjusted doses are the most effective prophylactic agents and are highly recommended for routine use. Low-molecular- weight heparin or warfarin should be used in patients with hip fractures. Low-molecular-weight heparin, warfarin, or intermittent pneumatic compression should be used in patients undergoing major knee surgery. A number of questions still remain unanswered. In particular, further studies are needed to establish the optimal duration of prophylaxis.

Novel antithrombotic drugs in development

Platelet activation plays a critical role in thromboembolic disorders, and aspirin remains a keystone in preventive strategies. This remarkable efficacy is rather unexpected, as aspirin selectively inhibits platelet aggregation mediated through activation of the arachidonic-thromboxane pathway, but not platelet aggregation induced by adenosine diphosphate (ADP), collagen and low levels of thrombin. This apparent paradox has stimulated investigations on the effect of aspirin on eicosanoid-independent effects of aspirin on cellular signalling. It has also fostered the search for antiplatelet drugs inhibiting platelet aggregation at other levels than the acetylation of platelet cyclo-oxygenase, such as thromboxane synthase inhibitors and thromboxane receptor antagonists. The final step of all platelet agonists is the functional expression of glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa on the platelet surface, which ligates fibrinogen to link platelets together as part of the aggregation process. Agents that interact between GPIIb/IIIa and fibrinogen have been developed, which block GPIIb/IIIa, such as monoclonal antibodies to GPIIb/IIIa, and natural and synthetic peptides (disintegrins) containing the Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) recognition sequence in fibrinogen and other adhesion macromolecules. Also, some non-peptide RGD mimetics have been developed which are orally active prodrugs. Stable analogues of prostacyclin, some of which are orally active, are also available. Thrombin has a pivotal role in both platelet activation and fibrin generation. In addition to natural and recombinant human antithrombin III, direct antithrombin III-independent thrombin inhibitors have been developed as recombinant hirudin, hirulog, argatroban, boroarginine derivatives and single stranded DNA oligonucleotides (aptanes). Direct thrombin inhibitors do not affect thrombin generation and may leave some 'escaping' thrombin molecules unaffected. Inhibition of factor Xa can prevent thrombin generation and disrupt the thrombin feedback loop that amplifies thrombin production.