Non-operative treatment of small bowel obstruction following appendicectomy or operation on the ovary or tube

Predicting the Need for Surgery in Uncomplicated Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction: A Scoring Tool

INTRODUCTION

Nonoperative treatment can be attempted for uncomplicated adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO), but carries a risk of delayed surgery. Highlighting initial parameters predicting risk of failure of nonoperative management would be of great interest.

METHODS

Patients initially managed conservatively for uncomplicated ASBO were retrospectively analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to identify predictive failure's factors. Based on the risk factors, a score was created and then prospectively validated in a different patients' population.

RESULTS

Among 171 patients included, 98 (57.3%) were successfully managed conservatively. In a multivariate analysis, three independent nonoperative management failure's factors were identified: Charlson Index ≥4 (P = 0.016), distal obstruction (P = 0.009), and maximum small bowel diameter over vertical abdominal diameter ratio >0.34 (P = 0.023). A score of two or three was associated with a risk of surgery of 51.4% or 70.3% in the retrospective analysis and 62.2% or 75% in the validation cohort, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This clinical-radiological score may help guide surgical decision-making in uncomplicated ASBO. A high score (≥2) was predictive of failure of nonoperative management. This tool could assist surgeons to determine who would benefit from early surgery.

Evaluation and management of small-bowel obstruction: an Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma practice management guideline

BACKGROUND

Small-bowel obstruction (SBO) represents as many as 16% of surgical admissions and more than 300,000 operations annually in the United States. The optimal strategies for the diagnosis and management of SBO continue to evolve secondary to advances in imaging techniques, critical care, and surgical techniques. This updated systematic literature review was developed by the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma to provide up-to-date evidence-based recommendations for SBO.

METHODS

A search of the National Library of Medicine MEDLINE database was performed using PubMed interface for articles published from 2007 to 2011.

RESULTS

The search identified 53 new articles that were then combined with the 131 studies previously reviewed by the 2007 guidelines. The updated guidelines were then presented at the 2012 annual EAST meeting.

CONCLUSION

Level I evidence now exists to recommend the use of computed tomographic scan, especially multidetector computed tomography with multiplanar reconstructions, in the evaluation of patients with SBO because it can provide incremental clinically relevant information over plains films that may lead to changes in management. Patients with evidence of generalized peritonitis, other evidence of clinical deterioration, such as fever, leukocytosis, tachycardia, metabolic acidosis, and continuous pain, or patients with evidence of ischemia on imaging should undergo timely exploration. The remainder of patients can safely undergo initial nonoperative management for both partial and complete SBO. Water-soluble contrast studies should be considered in patients who do not clinically resolve after 48 to 72 hours for both diagnostic and potential therapeutic purposes. Laparoscopic treatment of SBO has been demonstrated to be a viable alternative to laparotomy in selected cases.

The inpatient burden of abdominal and gynecological adhesiolysis in the US

BACKGROUND

Adhesions are fibrous bands of scar tissue, often a result of surgery, that form between internal organs and tissues, joining them together abnormally. Postoperative adhesions frequently occur following abdominal surgery, and are associated with a large economic burden. This study examines the inpatient burden of adhesiolysis in the United States (i.e., number and rate of events, cost, length of stay [LOS]).

METHODS

Hospital discharge data for patients with primary and secondary adhesiolysis were analyzed using the 2005 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Procedures were aggregated by body system.

RESULTS

We identified 351,777 adhesiolysis-related hospitalizations: 23.2% for primary and 76.8% for secondary adhesiolysis. The average LOS was 7.8 days for primary adhesiolysis. We found that 967,332 days of care were attributed to adhesiolysis-related procedures, with inpatient expenditures totaling $2.3 billion ($1.4 billion for primary adhesiolysis; $926 million for secondary adhesiolysis). Hospitalizations for adhesiolysis increased steadily by age and were higher for women. Of secondary adhesiolysis procedures, 46.3% involved the female reproductive tract, resulting in 57,005 additional days of care and $220 million in attributable costs.

CONCLUSIONS

Adhesiolysis remain an important surgical problem in the United States. Hospitalization for this condition leads to high direct surgical costs, which should be of interest to providers and payers.

Bologna Guidelines for Diagnosis and Management of Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction (ASBO): 2010 Evidence-Based Guidelines of the World Society of Emergency Surgery

Background

There is no consensus on diagnosis and management of ASBO. Initial conservative management is usually safe, however proper timing for discontinuing non operative treatment is still controversial. Open surgery or laparoscopy are used without standardized indications.

Methods

A panel of 13 international experts with interest and background in ASBO and peritoneal diseases, participated in a consensus conference during the 1^st International Congress of the World Society of Emergency Surgery and 9^th Peritoneum and Surgery Society meeting, in Bologna, July 1-3, 2010, for developing evidence-based recommendations for diagnosis and management of ASBO. Whenever was a lack of high-level evidence, the working group formulated guidelines by obtaining consensus.

Recommendations

In absence of signs of strangulation and history of persistent vomiting or combined CT scan signs (free fluid, mesenteric oedema, small bowel faeces sign, devascularized bowel) patients with partial ASBO can be managed safely with NOM and tube decompression (either with long or NG) should be attempted. These patients are good candidates for Water Soluble Contrast Medium (WSCM) with both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. The appearance of water-soluble contrast in the colon on X-ray within 24 hours from administration predicts resolution. WSCM may be administered either orally or via NGT (50-150 ml) both immediately at admission or after an initial attempt of conservative treatment of 48 hours. The use of WSCM for ASBO is safe and reduces need for surgery, time to resolution and hospital stay.

NOM, in absence of signs of strangulation or peritonitis, can be prolonged up to 72 hours. After 72 hours of NOM without resolution surgery is recommended.

Patients treated non-operatively have shorter hospital stay, but higher recurrence rate and shorter time to re-admission, although the risk of new surgically treated episodes of ASBO is unchanged. Risk factors for recurrences are age <40 years and matted adhesions. WSCM does not affect recurrence rates or recurrences needing surgery when compared to traditional conservative treatment.

Open surgery is the preferred method for surgical treatment of strangulating ASBO as well as after failed conservative management. In selected patients and with appropriate skills, laparoscopic approach can be attempted using open access technique. Access in the left upper quadrant should be safe. Laparoscopic adhesiolysis should be attempted preferably in case of first episode of SBO and/or anticipated single band. A low threshold for open conversion should be maintained.

Peritoneal adhesions should be prevented. Hyaluronic acid-carboxycellulose membrane and icodextrin can reduce incidence of adhesions. Icodextrin may reduce the risk of re-obstruction. HA cannot reduce need of surgery.

Prevention of intra-abdominal adhesions in gynaecological surgery

Important progress has been made in the field of post-surgical adhesion prevention with the development of consensus statements in gynaecology from the United Kingdom, Germany, the European Society of Gynaecological Endoscopy, Call for Action in Colorectal Surgery and a recent Technical Bulletin from The Practice Committee of the American Society of Reproductive Medicine. These reports suggest that the application of adhesion reduction devices together with the use of microsurgical principles reduces the formation of post-operative adhesions. This commentary provides additional information to assist gynaecologists in making surgical decisions. However, variation in adhesion classifications, mode of device application, lack of uniformity in surgical approaches and variations in interpretation of results make comparative assessment of the efficacy of adhesion reduction devices and surgical techniques difficult. Considering the choice of an adhesion-reduction device, one has to evaluate the cost and its clinical impact carefully. This is particularly important if one were to support routine, prophylactic use of adhesion-reduction devices. Healthcare providers should take into account the needs of individual patients, available resources, and institutional or clinical practice limitations. Good surgical technique and perhaps the use of approved devices for adhesion reduction would give patients the best chance to benefit from reproductive and gynaecological surgery.

Impact of adhesions in colorectal surgery

The extent of the problem of adhesions is considerable and poses a significant burden on healthcare systems, the workload of surgeons and the lives of patients. This paper reviews the work undertaken and the associated evidence for the impact of adhesions. It considers the various options and strategies to reduce adhesions alongside the fundamental necessity for good surgical technique.

Risk factors for adverse outcomes following surgery for small bowel obstruction

OBJECTIVE

To construct risk indices predicting adverse outcomes following surgery for small bowel obstruction (SBO).

METHODS

The VA National Surgical Quality Improvement Program contains prospectively collected data on more than 1 million patients. Patients undergoing adhesiolysis only or small bowel resection for SBO from 1991 to 2002 were selected. Independent variables included 68 presurgical and 12 intraoperative risk factors; dependent variables were 21 adverse outcomes including death. Stepwise logistic regression was used to construct models predicting 30-day morbidity and mortality and to derive risk index values. Patients were then divided into risk classes.

RESULTS

Of the 2002 patients, 1650 underwent adhesiolysis only and 352 underwent small bowel resection. Thirty-seven percent undergoing adhesiolysis only and 47% undergoing small bowel resection had more than 1 complication (P < 0.001). The overall 30-day mortality was 7.7% and did not differ significantly between the groups. Odds of death were highest for dirty or infected wounds, ASA class 4 or 5, age >80 years, and dyspnea at rest. Morbidity ranged from 22%, among patients with 0 to 7 risk points, to 62% for those with >19 risk points. Mortality ranged from 2% among patients with 0 to 12 risk points to 28% for those with >31 risk points.

CONCLUSIONS

Morbidity and mortality after surgery for SBO in VA hospitals are comparable with those in other large series. The morbidity rate, but not the mortality rate, is significantly higher in patients requiring small bowel resection compared with those requiring adhesiolysis only (P < 0.001). The risk indices presented provide an easy-to-use tool for clinicians to predict outcomes for patients undergoing surgery for SBO.

The epidemiology and treatment patterns of postoperative adhesion induced intestinal obstruction in Varsinais-Suomi Hospital District

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The epidemiology and treatment patterns of postoperative adhesion induced intestinal obstruction have been poorly investigated in Finland. This study evaluated the epidemiology and treatment patterns of postoperative adhesion induced intestinal obstruction in a well defined geographical area (Hospital District).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All inpatient episodes between 1.1.1999 and 31.12.1999 due to postoperative adhesion induced intestinal obstruction in Varsinais-Suomi Hospital District were evaluated retrospectively using individual patient records.

RESULTS

123 hospitalizations due to postoperative adhesion-related intestinal obstruction were observed during the study period. The total number of preceding operations was 176 considering altogether 101 patients. The most prevalent single initial operations causing adhesion induced intestinal obstruction were colorectal, upper abdominal, and female reproductive system procedures. Of all treatment episodes 32% were operative and mortality was 2%. The median days of hospital stay (range) of all inpatient episodes, operative episodes, and conservative episodes were 6 (1-58), 11 (2-34) and 4 (1-58), respectively. Patient dependent factors associated with increased likelihood to operative treatment of obstruction were: female gender (40% in females vs 23% in males, P = 0.042) and previous gynaecological surgery (70% of the patients, P = 0.032). Intraoperative findings were obstruction in 70%, strangulation in 20%, necrosis in 8%, and perforation in 2% of operations. Bowel resection was needed in 38% of operations. Preceding gynaecological surgery increased the likelihood of bowel strangulation as an intraoperative finding.

CONCLUSION

The epidemiology, treatment patterns and results of postoperative adhesion induced intestinal obstruction are of the average international level in the Varsinais-Suomi Hospital District. The treatment patterns among the different hospitals in the Hospital District are similar. Female gender is associated with increased risk for operative treatment of adhesive obstruction. Previous gynaecological surgery increases the likelihood of operative treatment and complicated obstruction.

Contribution of computed tomography to decision making in the management of adhesive small bowel obstruction

BACKGROUND

In adhesive small bowel obstruction, the early recognition of complications such as strangulation or volvulus is essential to choose between surgical or conservative initial treatment. The objective of this study was to determine prospectively the contribution of computed tomography (CT) to decision making in the management of these patients.

METHODS

Patients with suspected adhesive small bowel obstruction had CT at admission. Patients with CT signs of volvulus or strangulation and/or clinical signs of peritoneal irritation underwent urgent surgery; other patients had conservative initial treatment.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients were evaluated. CT demonstrated signs of strangulation or volvulus in 19 patients, including three with signs of peritoneal irritation. Within this group, urgent laparotomy was performed in 17 patients and confirmed the CT diagnosis in 16. Thirty-seven patients without clinical or CT signs of complications had initial conservative treatment; among them, seven of 12 with a distal obstruction determined by CT required a delayed operation for persisting obstruction, compared with two of 25 patients with a proximal obstruction (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

CT is useful for the evaluation of adhesive small bowel obstruction, to detect accurately patients with complications who require urgent operation and to determine the location of the adhesion, which represents a significant prognostic factor for success of conservative treatment.