Colonic parastomal hernia repair by translocation without formal laparotomy

Abdominal Oblique Internal and External Muscles Gap Colostomy for Lower Incidence of Parastomal Hernia and Higher Quality of Life: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Parastomal hernia and fecal incontinence cause severe distress to the rectal cancer patients with stoma after abdominoperineal resection. We attempted a new colostomy technique through the gap between the abdominal oblique internal and external muscles to prevent parastomal hernia and improve quality of life.

METHODS

This cohort study retrospectively examined clinical data from a total of 114 consecutive rectal cancer patients who underwent laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection in our center from March 2016 to March 2018 after propensity score matching. Group A included 57 patients who underwent colostomy through the gap between the abdominal oblique internal and oblique external muscles, while group B included 57 patients who underwent extraperitoneal colostomy. Patients' quality of life was evaluated using Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life (FIQL) Scale.

RESULTS

Group A had a lower incidence of parastomal hernia (0% vs. 15.7%, p = 0.004) and higher quality of life, especially in lifestyle, coping/behavior and embarrassment domains (all p values < 0.05) than group B both during the follow-up period. The incidence of other outcomes did not differ between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Colostomy through the gap between the abdominal oblique internal and oblique external muscle is a new technique showing both safety and effectiveness for preventing parastomal hernia and improving quality of life after laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection.

Relationship between stoma creation route for end colostomy and parastomal hernia development after laparoscopic surgery

BACKGROUND

The therapeutic benefits of extraperitoneal colostomy with laparoscopic surgery remain unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the route for stoma creation with laparoscopic surgery and stoma-related complications, especially parastomal hernia (PSH).

METHODS

From January 2007 to March 2015, a total of 59 patients who underwent laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection or Hartmann procedure were investigated. Patient demographic and treatment characteristics, including stoma-related complications, were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Transperitoneal and extraperitoneal colostomy were performed in 29 and 30 patients, respectively. Median follow-up duration was 21 months (range: 2-95). Patient demographic and treatment characteristics were comparable between the transperitoneal group (TPG) and the extraperitoneal group (EPG). PSH developed in 12 (41 %) patients in TPG, and 4 (13 %) patients in EPG (p = 0.020). The incidence of other stoma-related complications and non-stoma-related complications did not differ significantly between TPG and EPG. No patient characteristics except for transperitoneal route for stoma creation were associated with PSH development.

CONCLUSIONS

The extraperitoneal route for stoma creation is associated with a significantly lower incidence of PSH development after laparoscopic surgery. Whenever possible, extraperitoneal colostomy should be recommended, even with laparoscopic surgery.

Parastomal hernia: a growing problem with new solutions

Parastomal hernia is one of the most common complications following stoma creation and its prevalence is only expected to increase. It often leads to a decrease in the quality of life for patients due to discomfort, pain, frequent ostomy appliance leakage, or peristomal skin irritation and can result in significantly increased healthcare costs. Surgical technique for parastomal hernia repair has evolved significantly over the past two decades with the introduction of new types of mesh and laparoscopic procedures. The use of prophylactic mesh in high-risk patients at the time of stoma creation has gained attention in lieu of several promising studies that have emerged in the recent days. This review will attempt to demonstrate the burden that parastomal hernias present to patients, surgeons, and the healthcare system and also provide an overview of the current management and surgical techniques at both preventing and treating parastomal hernias.

[Hernia surgery in urology. Part 2: parastomal, trocar and incisional hernias - fundamentals of clinical diagnostics and treatment]

Hernias are a common occurrence with a correspondingly huge clinical and economic impact on the healthcare system. Parastomal and trocar hernias are rare in routine urological work. The therapy of parastomal hernias remains problematic but basically the surgeon is able to use conventional techniques with suture repair or procedures with mesh implantation. The conventional parastomal hernia repair with mesh can be classified into sublay, onlay and intraperitoneal techniques. Furthermore, a relocation of the stoma is possible. Trocar hernias represent a rare but hazardous complication. Due to the increase in keyhole surgery there is also the danger of a rise in their occurrence. Incisional hernias occur frequently in patients who have undergone laparotomy and for repair different surgical techniques and types of meshes are available. This article presents an overview of the epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical symptoms, diagnostic and therapy of parastomal, trocar and incisional hernias.

[Conventional reparation of parastomal hernia]

The reparation of parastomal hernias and their recurrence remain problematic although the implementation of mesh techniques has lowered recurrences rates. Conventional surgical techniques include suture repair, relocation of the stoma as well as diverse hernia repair procedures with mesh implantation. Suture repair has been abandoned due to its high recurrence rate. Simple relocation is not recommended because of high rates of recurrent parastomal hernias. Conventional hernia repair using mesh implants is classified according to the mesh position into epifascial (onlay), retromuscular (sublay) and intraperitoneal (IPOM) techniques. Furthermore, a combination of relocation with additional mesh enforcement is also possible. The value of the different mesh techniques and of new biological mesh prostheses must be evaluated in randomized controlled studies.

Surgery of recurrent parastomal hernia: direct repair or relocation?

PURPOSE

Parastomal hernia is a common late complication after stoma creation. The management options are many; unfortunately, most literature suggests unsatisfactory results. There are few studies comparing the outcomes after repair of parastomal hernias especially in recurrent cases, and the results are controversial. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes after repair of recurrent parastomal hernias between direct repair (DR) and relocation (RL).

METHOD

We performed a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent direct repair or RL for recurrent parastomal hernia during the period between 1990 and 2005. Perioperative data and re-recurrence rates were obtained and analysed with appropriate statistical methods.

RESULTS

With mean follow-up time of 2 years, 50 operations were available for evaluation; 27 (54%) DR and 23 (46%) RL [five same-side RL (SSRL) and 18 opposite-side RL (OSRL)]. There were no deaths and there were similar complication rates between groups. Four of five (80%) SSRL had a re-recurrent parastomal hernia. Considering only DR with OSRL, although OSRL had longer operative time and hospital stay than DR, the re-recurrence rate was lower (38%vs 74%; P = 0.02). However, with Kaplan-Meier calculated and longer predicted follow-up time, re-recurrence rates were similar (Log rank P = 0.09).

CONCLUSION

Recurrent parastomal hernia repair is associated with high re-recurrence rates.OSRL seems to have promising short-term outcomes; however, whether these results hold up long-term remains unclear. Therefore, larger cohorts of patients with longer follow-up or prospective randomized trials are needed.

Late stomal complications

Ostomy creation is a common surgical procedure performed by a variety of surgical specialties. Complications associated with stomas are frequent and run the gamut from technical, mechanical, physiologic, and psychologic. The impact of these complications ranges from simple inconvenience to life threatening. The majority of these complications may not occur for years following creation of the stoma. In this article, the author reviews many of the late complications associated with stomas and options regarding their management.

Parastomal hernia repair: laparoscopic ventral hernia meshplasty with stoma relocation. The current state and a clinical case presentation

BACKGROUND

Parastomal hernia is a frequent complication after performing an ostomy, and although different technical options have been described, it lacks an ideal intervention to resolve it. The use of meshes and the laparoscopic approach, has led to a significant advance in resolving this condition. However, the ideal technique should guarantee must ensure integral repair of the abdominal wall, taking into account the functionality of the stoma. In large parastomal eventrations the repairing of the ventral hernia with a mesh and relocating the stoma in another quadrant may be an intervention that fulfills both principles, and open approach being described.

METHODS

We review the current state of surgical management of this condition and analyze the different technical options. Present the first description for using a laparoscopic technique with meshplasty and stoma relocation in an obese patient with a complex parastomal hernia, with results in the 18 month follow up.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical technique repair of the parastomal hernia is sometimes a complex issue, which possibly requires different solutions according to the characteristics of the hernia and patient. The technique described of meshplasty with stoma relocation by laparoscopic approach has been revealed as an affordable technique, with minor inconvenience to the patient, absence of complications and good functional results in the long term, benefiting from the advantages of minimally invasive surgery itself.

[Parastomal hernias: background, current status and future prospects]

Parastomal hernia (PH) is the most common delayed complication in stoma surgery. Only a third of these are operated on, something which is partly explained by the high recurrence rate observed after repair. The use of prosthetic materials has improved the results, although they continue to be below the ideal. For this reason, it has been proposed that the best solution may be in preventing the PH. Several studies show promising results, with very marked reductions in the percentage of IH, on placing a prophylactic peristomal prosthesis. In this article we present a review of the risk factors associated with PH, a classification of the existing diversity of repair techniques, and an algorithm is proposed for the management of PH, including its prevention.

Parastomal hernias

The incidence of parastomal hernias is probably 30% to 50%. Suture repair of a parastomal hernia or relocation of the stoma results in a high recurrence rate, whereas with mesh repair recurrence rates are lower. Several mesh repair techniques are used in open and laparoscopic surgery, but randomized trials comparing various techniques and with long-term follow-up are needed for better evidence.

Parastomal hernia

BACKGROUND

Parastomal hernia following formation of an ileostomy or colostomy is common. This article reviews the incidence of hernia, the technical factors related to the construction of the stoma that may influence the incidence, and the success of the different methods of repair.

METHODS

A literature search using the Medline database was performed to locate English language articles on parastomal hernia. Further articles were obtained from the references cited in the literature initially reviewed.

RESULTS

Parastomal hernia affects 1.8-28.3 per cent of end ileostomies, and 0-6.2 per cent of loop ileostomies. Following colostomy formation, the rates are 4.0-48.1 and 0-30.8 per cent respectively. Site of stoma formation (through or lateral to rectus abdominis), trephine size, fascial fixation and closure of lateral space are not proven to affect the incidence of hernia. The role of extraperitoneal stoma construction is uncertain. Mesh repair gives a lower rate of recurrence (0-33.3 per cent) than direct tissue repair (46-100 per cent) or stoma relocation (0-76.2 per cent).

CONCLUSION

The incidence of parastomal hernia is between 0 and 48.1 per cent, depending on the type of stoma and length of follow-up. No technical factors related to the construction of the stoma have been shown to prevent herniation. If repair is required, a prosthetic mesh technique should be considered. Further randomized clinical trials (particularly of extraperitoneal stoma construction) are needed.

Surgical treatment of parastomal hernia complicating sigmoid colostomies

PURPOSE

Parastomal hernia is a common late complication of colostomy. Surgical approach to the repair of parastomal hernia is controversial. Results of surgical treatment are disappointing. The aim of this study was to assess the outcome of surgical treatment of parastomal hernia.

METHOD

This article reports a retrospective review of those patients who had undergone a surgical treatment of parastomal hernia complicating sigmoid colostomy. The indications, surgical procedures, complications, and outcome were carefully studied.

RESULTS

There were 43 surgical treatments of parastomal hernia. Sixteen underwent simple local repair; 25 stomas were relocated, and 2 were locally repaired with mesh. Overall recurrence was 18 of 40 (45 percent). Recurrences for fascial repair and stoma relocation were 6 of 13 (46 percent) and 10 of 25 (40 percent), respectively. Stoma relocation could be accomplished without formal laparotomy in 19 of 25 cases. Incisional hernia occurred in only 2 of these 25 relocations.

CONCLUSION

Fascial repair alone can be performed for symptomatic small hernias because of its advantage of minimal morbidity. Stoma relocation without formal laparotomy can be advocated for larger hernias. A combination of local resite together with mesh reinforcement may be the alternative for further improvement of results.