Prospective study of the effect of rectopexy on colonic motility in patients with rectal prolapse

Rectal prolapse and intussusception

Rectal prolapse continues to be problematic for both patients and surgeons alike, in part because of increased recurrence rates despite several well-described operations. Patients should be aware that although the prolapse will resolve with operative therapy, functional results may continue to be problematic. This article describes the recommended evaluation, role of adjunctive testing, and outcomes associated with both perineal and abdominal approaches.

Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for fecal incontinence associated with high-grade internal rectal prolapse

BACKGROUND

The role of internal rectal prolapse in the origin of fecal incontinence remains to be defined. In our institution, laparoscopic ventral rectopexy is offered to patients with high-grade internal prolapse and fecal incontinence.

OBJECTIVE

The present study was designed to evaluate the functional outcome after laparoscopic ventral rectopexy in patients with fecal incontinence associated with high-grade internal rectal prolapse.

DESIGN

This study was designed as a prospective observational study.

SETTINGS

The study took place in a university hospital.

PATIENTS

Between 2009 and 2011, 72 patients with fecal incontinence not responding to maximum medical treatment (including biofeedback) were included. All patients had a grade III or grade IV rectal prolapse.

INTERVENTION

Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy was performed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Preoperative endoanal ultrasonography and anorectal manometry were performed. Fecal continence was evaluated by using the Rockwood Fecal Incontinence Severity Index score before and 1 year after surgery.

RESULTS

The median fecal incontinence severity index score 1 year after surgery was lower than the median score before surgery (15 versus 31; p < 0.01), representing an improvement in fecal continence.

LIMITATIONS

This was a preliminary observational study with no control group, no postoperative proctography, and no postoperative anal physiology.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy can improve symptoms of fecal incontinence in patients with a high-grade internal rectal prolapse. Internal rectal prolapse contributes to the multifactorial origin of fecal incontinence.

Colonic transit before and after resection rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to measure the change in colonic transit time after resection rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse.

METHODS

We prospectively carried out isotope colonic transit studies before resection rectopexy in 38 patients with full-thickness complete rectal prolapse and invited them to attend for a postoperative transit study at least 1 year after resection rectopexy.

RESULTS

Preoperatively, 27 (70 %) patients had abnormally prolonged colonic transit times, while 11 had normal colonic transit. Twenty-two (61 %) patients agreed to attend for a three-day colonic transit study. Resection rectopexy failed to correct delayed colonic transit in all patients with abnormal preoperative tests, while 4 patients developed new delayed transit and 2 with normal transit were unchanged.

CONCLUSIONS

The study suggests that most prolapse patients have a pan-colonic motility disorder that is not corrected by rectopexy and resection of most of the left colon. If resection rectopexy fails to correct abnormal transit, this study questions the rationale for continuing to offer resection and supports less invasive surgical procedures such as ventral rectopexy.

Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for external rectal prolapse improves constipation and avoids de novo constipation

OBJECTIVE

Abdominal rectopexy is ideal for otherwise healthy patients with rectal prolapse because of low recurrence, yet after posterior rectopexy, half of the patients complain of severe constipation. Resection mitigates this dysfunction but risks a pelvic anastomosis. The novel nerve-sparing ventral rectopexy appears to avoid postero-lateral rectal dissection denervation and thus postoperative constipation. We aimed to evaluate our functional results with laparoscopic ventral rectopexy.

METHOD

Consecutive rectal prolapse patients undergoing laparoscopic ventral rectopexy were prospectively assessed (Wexner Constipation and Faecal Incontinence Severity Index scores) pre-, 3 months postoperatively, and late (> 12 months).

RESULTS

Sixty-five consecutive patients with external rectal prolapse (median age 72 years, 34% > 80 years, median follow up 19 months) underwent laparoscopic ventral rectopexy. There was one recurrence (2%) and one conversion. Morbidity (17%) and mortality (0%) were low. Median operating time was 140 min and median length of stay 2 days. At 3 months, constipation was improved in 72% and mildly induced in 2% (median pre-and postoperative Wexner scores 9 vs 4, P < 0.0001). Continence was improved in 83% and mild incontinence was induced or worsened in 5% (median pre- and postoperative incontinence score 40 vs 4, P < 0.0001). Significant improvement in both constipation and incontinence (P < 0.0001) remained at median 24 months late follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Ventral rectopexy has a recurrent prolapse rate of < 5%, similar to that of posterior rectopexy. Its correction of preoperative constipation and avoidance of de novo constipation appear superior to historical functional results of posterior rectopexy. A laparoscopic approach allows low morbidity and short hospital stay, even in those patients over 80 years of age in whom a perineal approach is usually preferred for safety.

A new technique for suture rectopexy without resection for rectal prolapse

BACKGROUND

We surmised that if rectopexy was performed without dissection of the lateral rectal stalks in patients with full-thickness rectal prolapse and normal preoperative transit, sigmoid resection may not be required. This study evaluated a new approach to abdominal suture rectopexy for rectal prolapse.

METHODS

A total of 81 patients (57 male, 24 female; median age 37 years, range 5-82 years) with rectal prolapse were assessed by clinical examination, anal manometry (maximum resting pressure, MRP, and squeeze pressure, MSP) and radioopaque marker transit studies. Of the 81 patients, 70 with normal preoperative transit underwent suture fixation alone, without resection, performed under spinal anaesthesia, through a 7-cm transverse left lower quadrant incision gaining access to the presacral space via a left pararectal "window", preserving the lateral stalks.

RESULTS

Average surgical time was 50 min, mortality was zero, and morbidity was 9% (three patients with wound infection, four with urinary retention). Anal incontinence improved in 43 of 53 patients (81%, p=0.001). MRP and MSP had improved at 3 months after surgery: MRP from a mean of 27.6+/-1.4 mmHg (range 2-30 mmHg) before surgery to 32.5+/-2.21 mmHg (2-60 mmHg) after surgery (p=0.008); MSP from 69.25+/-6.4 mmHg (8-153 mmHg) before surgery to 79+/-4.77 mmHg (35-157 mmHg) after surgery (p=0.001).. Transit was unchanged in 18 of 20 patients (90%) who were evaluated before and after surgery; none was constipated after surgery. At 56 months, prolapse had recurred in five patients (7%).

CONCLUSION

Abdominal suture rectopexy with a left pararectal approach without sigmoid resection in those with normal preoperative transit resulted in an improvement in anal incontinence and satisfactory long-term control of prolapse. The operation did not alter transit and did not result in significant constipation.

Laparoscopic Rectopexy without Resection: A Worthwhile Treatment for Rectal Prolapse in Patients without Prior Constipation

Anterior resection with rectopexy is considered by many to be the best operation for rectal prolapse. It is feared that if sigmoid redundancy created by rectal mobilization is not resected, colonic motility (specifically constipation) could be disabling. We contend that resection is not necessary in patients without preexisting constipation. We tested this hypothesis using a laparoscopic approach to minimize hospital stay. Twelve patients were treated (eight women); mean age was 45 years (range, 25–82 years). No patient had preexisting constipation; one had irritable bowel syndrome. Three patients had prior prolapse operations. Full rectal mobilization was undertaken down to the levator hiatus; neither the mesenteric vessels nor the lateral ligaments were divided. Rectopexy to the presacral fascia was done with one to two Nurolon sutures on either side of the rectum. There were no complications; mean hospital stay was 4 days. Mean follow up was 32 months (range; 3–75 months); there have been no recurrences. Only the patient with irritable bowel syndrome developed significant constipation. We conclude: 1) rectopexy can be safely done laparoscopically, 2) resection is not required in the absence of prior constipation, and 3) rectal mobilization and rectopexy does not predispose to future constipation in these selected patients.