Duct-to-mucosa pancreaticogastrostomy is a safe anastomosis following pancreaticoduodenectomy

Peri-operative outcomes of pancreaticoduodenectomy comparing an isolated Roux loop or single loop for reconstruction: An ambispective observational study

BACKGROUND

A post-operative pancreatic fistula is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. We compared two methods of reconstruction of pancreaticojejunal anastomosis, an isolated loop with a single loop, to assess their effects on the incidence and severity of fistula.

METHODS

The data was collected in an ambispective manner. The drain fluid was sent for amylase measurement on post-operative day 3 and a fistula was defined and classified according to the 2016 modification of the International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery definition. The patients were divided into the isolated (Group I) and single (Group II) loop groups and compared for the incidence and severity of clinically relevant fistula along with other parameters.

RESULTS

A total of 349 (Group I: 201, Group II: 148) patients were included in the study. The incidence of clinically relevant fistula was comparable (p = 0.206). Grade C fistula was found to be lower in the group I (7 % vs 11.6 %, p = 0.137), in patients with a soft pancreas (8.5 % vs 18.3 %, p = 0.049) and pancreatic duct diameter less than 5 mm (9.8 % vs 17.2 %, p = 0.036). The operative time was lower in Group I than in Group II (438 min vs 478, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

We found that the incidence of clinically relevant fistula was similar in both the groups but the isolated reconstruction method reduced the incidence of severe fistula. In patients with a smaller pancreatic duct, soft pancreas echotexture and obesity, it provides a safer alternative and can be performed in less time than a single loop reconstruction.

Clinical outcomes and technical description of unstented end to side pancreaticogastrostomy by small posterior gastrotomy

Backgrounds/Aims

Morbidity following Whipple’s surgery largely depends upon the pancreatic stump anastomosis leak. Pancreaticogastrostomy is one of the techniques of pancreatic stump reconstruction and is described variously in the literature. Duct to mucosa pancreaticogastrostomy is described either by a large 3-4 cm posterior gastrotomy or by small gastrotomy of 2-3 mm with the use of internal stents along with. We describe clinical outcomes and technique of 2 layer end to side pancreatico-gastrostomy by a small posterior gastrotomy without the use of internal stents.

Methods

Hospital records of 35 patients where the technique of, small posterior gastrotomy end to side duct to mucosa pancreatico-gastrostomy without internal stents, was used for pancreatic stump reconstruction were studied retrospectively. The data were analyzed for demographic details, stage of the disease, and short term outcomes related to surgical procedure.

Results

The mean duration of surgery was 7.4 hours. Grade A, B, and C POPF were observed in 10 (28.5%), 3 (8.5%), and 1 (2.8%) of patients respectively. The mean time to remove pancreatic drain was 9 days, and the mean time to start oral feeds was 8.9 days. The mean hospital stay was 12.9 days (07-26). Thirty days mortality was 2.8%.

Conclusions

Unstented duct to mucosa end to side pancreatico-gastrostomy technique is comparable with other pancreatico-gastrostomy techniques in outcomes in terms of POPF, morbidity, mortality, and hospital stay. However, to establish the superiority or inferiority of this technique, a larger study is recommended.

Perioperative Complications and Outcomes after Intestinal Autotransplantation for Neoplasms Involving the Superior Mesenteric Artery

BACKGROUND

Intestinal autotransplantation (IATx) is a novel surgical technique for neoplasms arising from the pancreas, duodenum, mesentery, or retroperitoneum with involvement of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA). The value of this aggressive procedure remains to be defined. We describe its surgical indications, postoperative complications, and clinical outcomes after IATx.

METHODS

Fifteen patients aged 20 to 67 years (mean 44.9 years) underwent IATx in our program from January 2011 to January 2018. In all patients, selection and harvesting of a healthy bowel autograft were initially carried out, and an extended en bloc resection of neoplasms was performed afterward.

RESULTS

Of the 15 patients, there was one early death from a pancreatic leak and two late deaths either from disease recurrence or sudden cardiac arrest. Ten patients developed 23 postoperative complications. Of these, one patient lost his bowel autograft due to arterial thrombosis 48 h later. Delayed gastric emptying, pleural effusions, pancreatic fistula, and relaparotomy were the most common complications. In our series, four of nine patients with invasive malignant neoplasms had evidence of disease recurrence at 13, 13, 16, and 18 months after IATx. At a median follow-up of 29.9 months, 11 patients undergoing successful IATx remained alive with a well-functioning bowel graft.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that IATx is technically feasible with acceptable perioperative morbidity and mortality. This procedure should be considered in selected patients presenting with locally invasive neoplasms involving the SMA.

Strategies for pancreatic anastomosis after pancreaticoduodenectomy: What really matters?

BACKGROUND

The postoperative pancreatic fistula rate remains approximately 10-20% even in institutions treating a high-volume of pancreatic cases. The best strategy to restore the continuity between the pancreatic remnant and the digestive tract is still in debate.

DATA SOURCES

Studies were identified by searching PubMed for studies published between January 1934 (when pancreaticogastrostomy was technically feasible) and December 2016. The following search terms were used: "duct-to-mucosa", "invagination", "pancreaticojejunostomy", "pancreaticogastrostomy," and "pancreaticoduodenectomy". The search was limited to English publications.

RESULTS

Many technical methods have been developed and optimized to restore pancreaticoenteric continuity, including pancreaticojejunostomy, pancreaticogastrostomy, and stented drainage of the pancreatic duct, among other modifications. Researchers have also attempted to decrease the postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy by using fibrin glue and somatostatin analogues. However, no significant decrease in postoperative pancreatic fistula has been observed in most of these studies, and only an external pancreatic duct stent has been found to decrease the leakage rate of pancreatic anastomosis after pancreaticojejunostomy.

CONCLUSION

Pancreatic surgeons should choose a suitable technique according to the characteristics of individual cases.

Isolated Roux-en-Y pancreaticojejunostomy versus conventional pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the advantage between isolated Roux loop pancreaticojejunostomy (IPJ) and conventional pancreaticojejunostomy (CPJ) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).

METHODS

Comparative studies on this topic published between January 1976 and April 2015 in PubMed, EMbase, EBSCO, Science Citation Index Expanded and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library were searched, and selected based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Perioperative outcomes such as postoperative pancreatic fistula, delayed gastric emptying, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative blood transfusion, postoperative bleeding, intra-abdominal abscess, bile leakage, wound infection, morbidity and mortality were compared. Pooled odds ratios (OR) or weighted mean differences (WMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using either fixed- or random-effects model.

RESULTS

Six studies were included with two randomized controlled and four nonrandomized trials. A total of 712 patients (359 patients from the IPJ group and 353 patients from the CPJ group) were analyzed. The pooled results revealed that IPJ had longer operation time (WMD = 36.55, 95% CI 6.98 to 66.11, P = 0.02). However, there were no significant differences between both groups in postoperative pancreatic fistula, intraoperative blood loss, blood transfusion, delayed gastric emptying, postoperative bleeding, intra-abdominal abscess, bile leakage, wound infection, morbidity, mortality and postoperative hospital stay.

CONCLUSIONS

PD with IPJ was comparable to CPJ in intraoperative outcomes and postoperative complications. However, further randomized controlled trials should be undertaken to ascertain these findings.

Pancreatoduodenectomy for trauma: applying novel reconstruction techniques

This single center study evaluated the technical modifications and outcome of reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy for trauma. Prospectively recorded data including reconstructive techniques used in patients who underwent a pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for trauma were analyzed. Twenty patients underwent a PD. Six had an initial damage control procedure. Thirteen had a pylorus-preserving PD and 7 a standard Whipple resection because injury to the pylorus precluded a pylorus-preserving resection. Twelve patients had a pancreatojejunostomy and 8 a pancreatogastrostomy, 3 of whom had a duodenojejunal hepaticojejunal sequence of anastomoses to allow endoscopic biliary stent retrieval. Three patients died postoperatively of multi-organ failure. All 17 survivors had postoperative complications: 5 patients developed pancreatic fistula, 2 had gastric outlet obstruction, 2 had bile leaks, 2 had duodenal anastomotic leaks, all of which resolved with conservative treatment. Pancreatic and biliary reconstructions performed under adverse conditions after a trauma PD required a variety of technical modifications. The pylorus does not have to be sacrificed and posterior gastric implantation is a safe option for an edematous pancreas.

Application of single-layer mucosa-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunal anastomosis in pancreaticoduodenectomy

AIM: To investigate the simplicity, reliability, and safety of the application of single-layer mucosa-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunal anastomosis in pancreaticoduodenectomy.

METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on the data of patients who received pancreaticoduodenectomy completed by the same surgical group between January 2011 and April 2014 in the General Hospital of the People’s Liberation Army. In total, 51 cases received single-layer mucosa-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunal anastomosis and 51 cases received double-layer pancreaticojejunal anastomosis. The diagnoses of pancreatic fistula and clinically relevant pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy were judged strictly by the International Study Group on pancreatic fistula definition. The preoperative and intraoperative data of these two groups were compared. χ² test and Fisher’s exact test were used to analyze the incidences of pancreatic fistula, peritoneal catheterization, abdominal infection and overall complications between the single-layer anastomosis group and double-layer anastomosis group. Rank sum test were used to analyze the difference in operation time, pancreaticojejunal anastomosis time, postoperative hospitalization time, total hospitalization time and hospitalization expenses between the single-layer anastomosis group and double-layer anastomosis group.

RESULTS: Patients with grade A pancreatic fistula accounted for 15.69% (8/51) vs 15.69% (8/51) (P = 1.0000), and patients with grades B and C pancreatic fistula accounted for 9.80% (5/51) vs 52.94% (27/51) (P = 0.0000) in the single-layer and double-layer anastomosis groups. Although there was no significant difference in the percentage of patients with grade A pancreatic fistula, there was a significant difference in the percentage of patients with grades B and C pancreatic fistula between the two groups. The operation time (220.059 ± 60.602 min vs 379.412 ± 90.761 min, P = 0.000), pancreaticojejunal anastomosis time (17.922 ± 5.145 min vs 31.333 ± 7.776 min, P = 0.000), postoperative hospitalization time (18.588 ± 5.285 d vs 26.373 ± 15.815 d, P = 0.003), total hospitalization time (25.627 ± 6.551 d vs 33.706 ± 15.899 d, P = 0.002), hospitalization expenses (116787.667 ± 31900.927 yuan vs 162788.608 ± 129732.500 yuan, P = 0.001), as well as the incidences of pancreatic fistula [13/51 (25.49%) vs 35/51 (68.63%), P = 0.0000], peritoneal catheterization [0/51 (0%) vs 6/51 (11.76%), P = 0.0354], abdominal infection [1/51 (1.96%) vs 11/51 (21.57%), P = 0.0021], and overall complications [21/51 (41.18%) vs 37/51 (72.55%), P = 0.0014] in the single-layer anastomosis group were all lower than those in the double-layer anastomosis group.

CONCLUSION: Single-layer mucosa-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunal anastomosis appears to be a simple, reliable, and safe method. Use of this method could reduce the postoperative incidence of complications.

Comparative study between duct to mucosa and invagination pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective randomized study

BACKGROUND

The ideal technical pancreatic reconstruction following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is still debated. The aim of the study was to assess the surgical outcomes of duct to mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) (G1) and invagination PJ (G2) after PD.

METHODS

Consecutive patients treated by PD at our center were randomized into either group. The primary outcome measure was the rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF); secondary outcomes included; operative time, day to resume oral feeding, postoperative morbidity and mortality, exocrine and endocrine pancreatic functions.

RESULTS

One hundred and seven patients treated by PD were randomized. The median operative time for reconstruction was significantly longer in G1 (34 vs. 30 min, P=0.002). POPF developed in 11/53 patients in G1 and 8/54 patients in G 2, P=0.46 (6 vs. 2 patients had a POPF type B or C, P=0.4). Steatorrhea after one year was 21/50 in G1 and 11/50 in G2, respectively (P=0.04). Serum albumin level after one year was 3.4 gm% in G1 and 3.6 gm in G2 (P=0.03). There was no statistically significant difference regarding the incidence of DM preoperatively and one year postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Invagination PJ is easier to perform than duct to mucosa especially in small pancreatic duct. The soft friable pancreatic tissue can be problematic for invagination PJ due to parenchymal laceration. Invagination PJ was not associated with a lower rate of POPF, but it was associated with decreased severity of POPF and incidence of postoperative steatorrhea. CLINICAL TRIALS.

GOV ID

NCT02142517.

Surgical management of pancreatic cancer--pancreaticoduodenectomy

Pancreaticoduodenectomy, the Whipple resection, is a complex operation that is commonly performed for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and other malignant or benign lesions in the head of the pancreas. It can be done with low morbidity and mortality rates, particularly when performed at high-volume hospitals and by high-volume surgeons. While it has been conventionally reserved for patients with early-stage malignant disease, it is being used increasingly for patients with locally extensive tumors who have undergone neoadjuvant therapy and downstaging. This article summarizes the role of pancreaticoduodenectomy for the treatment of patients with pancreatic cancer. It highlights the surgical staging of disease, the technical aspects of the operation and perioperative care, and the oncologic outcome.

Robotic-assisted minimally invasive central pancreatectomy: technique and outcomes

BACKGROUND

Central pancreatectomy is a definitive treatment for low-grade tumors of the pancreatic neck that preserves pancreatic and splenic function at the potential expense of postoperative pancreatic fistula. We analyzed outcomes after robot-assisted central pancreatectomy (RACP) to reexamine the risk-benefit profile in the era of minimally invasive surgery.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of nine RACP performed between August 2009 through June 2010 at a single institution.

RESULTS

The average age of the cohort was 64 (range 18-75 years) with six women (67 %). Indications for surgery included: five benign cystic neoplasm and four pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor. Median operative time was 425 min (range 305-506 min) with 190 ml median blood loss (range 50-350 ml) and one conversion to open due to poor visualization. Median tumor size was 3.0 cm (range 1.9-6.0 cm); all patients achieved R0 status. Pancreaticogastrostomy was performed in seven cases and pancreaticojejunostomy in two. The median length of hospital stay was 10 days (range 7-19). Two clinically significant pancreatic fistulae occurred with one requiring percutaneous drainage. No patients exhibited worsening diabetes or exocrine insufficiency at the 30-day postoperative visit.

CONCLUSIONS

RACP can be performed with safety and oncologic outcomes equivalent to published open series. Although the rate of pancreatic fistula was high, only 22 % had clinically significant events, and none developed worsening pancreatic endocrine or exocrine dysfunction.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes after intraoperative pancreatic duct stent placement during pancreaticoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pancreatic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy is often serious. Although some studies have suggested that stenting the anastomosis can reduce the incidence of this complication, the value of stenting in the setting of pancreaticoduodenectomy remains unclear.

METHODS

Studies comparing outcomes of stent versus no stent, and internal versus external stent placement for pancreaticoduodenectomy were eligible for inclusion. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95 per cent confidence intervals were calculated using fixed- or random-effects models.

RESULTS

From a search of the literature published between January 1973 and September 2011, five randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and 11 non-randomized observational clinical studies (OCS) involving 1726 patients were selected for inclusion in this review. Meta-analysis of RCTs revealed that placing a stent in the pancreatic duct did not reduce the incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula. External stents had no advantage over internal stents in terms of clinical outcome. Subgroup analyses revealed that use of an external stent significantly reduced the incidence of pancreatic fistula (RCTs: OR 0·42, 0·24 to 0·76, P = 0·004; OCS: OR 0·43, 0·27 to 0·68, P < 0·001), delayed gastric emptying (RCTs: OR 0·41, 0·19 to 0·87, P = 0·02) and postoperative morbidity (RCTs: OR 0·55, 0·34 to 0·89, P = 0·02) compared with no stent.

CONCLUSION

Pancreatic duct stenting did not reduce the incidence of pancreatic fistula and other complications in pancreaticoduodenectomy compared with no stenting. Although no difference was found between external and internal stents in terms of efficacy, external stents seemed to reduce the incidence of pancreatic fistula compared with control.

An easy and secure pancreaticogastrostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: transpancreatic suture with a buttress method through an anterior gastrotomy

PURPOSE

The aim of this report was to describe a new reconstructive technique of pancreaticogastrostomy and to also discuss this procedure's effectiveness for reducing the incidence of postoperative complications.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed early surgical outcomes in 21 consecutive patients who underwent this novel pancreaticogastrostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Pancreaticogastrostomy was completed with 2 transpancreatic sutures with buttresses on both the upper and lower edges of the implanted pancreas through the retracted anterior gastrotomy.

RESULTS

Operative mortality was zero and morbidity was 23.8%. A significant pancreatic fistula occurred in 1 patient (4.7%; grade B).

CONCLUSION

This technique is very easy to perform, less traumatic to the pancreatic stump, can be performed through a mini-laparotomy due to good vision and straight sutures, and it is secure owing to anchoring of the invaginated pancreatic stump to the stomach's posterior wall with buttresses. The results of this pilot study indicate that the technique may provide a favorable outcome and could be an alternative method of pancreatoenteric anastomosis. However, to determine its superiority over the conventional procedures, this operative technique should be evaluated more comprehensively in a larger series.

Combined invagination and duct-to-mucosa techniques with modifications: a new method of pancreaticojejunal anastomosis

BACKGROUND

Soft pancreatic texture and a small main pancreatic duct are thought to be the most significant risk factors for the occurrence of pancreatic fistula (PF), a common and serious complication after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). This is in part due to the technical difficulties of pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) posed by a soft gland with a normal-sized duct. To deal with this problem, we developed a new anastomotic technique which combines the two most widely used techniques, namely, the invagination technique and the duct-to-mucosa technique, with a modification of the suture route and insertion of a temporary stent tube.

METHODS

Between January 2003 and December 2009, ninety-two consecutive patients underwent PD in which the new PJ technique was used. Charts and follow-up data of these patients were reviewed for operative details, early postoperative events, and outcomes at 6 months after the operation. PF was defined by the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) guidelines and graded (A, B or C) according to the clinical procedures and outcome.

RESULTS

In this group of 92 patients, there was only 1 early death from acute renal failure. PF was observed in 11 patients (12.0%), 8 in grade A, 1 in grade B, and 2 in grade C. For the 2 patients in grade C, PF was surgically managed. There were no early or late deaths attributable to PF. Six months after the operation, all of the patients were free of PJ-related symptoms except for 2, who were found to have steatorrhea.

CONCLUSIONS

Our modified technique is simple and safe in PD. Present data suggest that this technique produces excellent early and medium-term results.

[Pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: critical analysis of prospective randomised trials]

This is a critical analysis of prospective randomised trials that compare pancreatic reconstruction techniques with the stomach and the intestine, after pancreaticoduodenectomy. A questionnaire with questions from the Evidence Based Medicine Centre of Oxford University (PICO analysis) was used, following the criteria for the evaluation of randomised prospective studies for surgical interventions of the McMaster University in Ontario. It was found that the studies differed in methodological aspects, the most important being the lack of a uniform definition of a pancreatic fistula. The techniques for performing pancreaticogastrostomy and pancreaticojejunostomy were not homogeneous. There were no differences in the percentage of pancreatic fistula in three of these studies; one which modified the pancreaticogastrostomy technique had more favourable results. New comparative studies should use new definitions of the complications of pancreaticoduodenectomy and standardise the pancreatic reconstruction technique.

A grading system can predict clinical and economic outcomes of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: results in 755 consecutive patients

AIM

Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) has a wide range of clinical and economical implications due to the difference of the associated complications and management. The aim of this study is to verify the applicability of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) definition and its capability to predict hospital costs.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study based on prospectively collected data of 755 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy in our institution between November 1996 and October 2006. A number of 147 patients (19.5%) have developed a POPF according to ISGPF definition.

RESULTS

Grade A fistula, which has no clinical impact, occurred in 19% of all cases. Grade B occurred in 70.7% and was successfully managed with conservative therapy or mini-invasive procedures. Grade C (8.8%) was associated to severe clinical complications and required invasive therapy. Pulmonary complications were statistically higher in the groups B and C rather than the group A POPFs (p < 0.005; OR 8). Patients with carcinoma of the ampullary region had a higher incidence of POPF compared to ductal cancer, with a predominance of grade A (p = 0.036). Increasing fistula grades have higher hospital costs (€11,654, €25,698, and €59,492 for grades A, B, and C, respectively; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The development of a POPF does not always determine a substantial change of the postoperative management. Clinically relevant fistulas can be treated conservatively in most cases. Higher fistula severity corresponds to increased costs. The grading system proposed by the ISGPF allows a correct stratification of the complicated patients based on the real clinical and economic impact of the POPF.

Drain data to predict clinically relevant pancreatic fistula

BACKGROUND

Post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a common and potentially devastating complication of pancreas resection. Management of this complication is important to the pancreas surgeon.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether drain data accurately predicts clinically significant POPF.

METHODS

A prospectively maintained database with daily drain amylase concentrations and output volumes from 177 consecutive pancreatic resections was analysed. Drain data, demographic and operative data were correlated with POPF (ISGPF Grade: A--clinically silent, B--clinically evident, C--severe) to determine predictive factors.

RESULTS

Twenty-six (46.4%) out of 56 patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy and 52 (43.0%) out of 121 patients who underwent a Whipple procedure developed a POPF (Grade A-C). POPFs were classified as A (24, 42.9%) and C (2, 3.6%) after distal pancreatectomy whereas they were graded as A (35, 28.9%), B (15, 12.4%) and C (2, 1.7%) after Whipple procedures. Drain data analysis was limited to Whipple procedures because only two patients developed a clinically significant leak after distal pancreatectomy. The daily total drain output did not differ between patients with a clinical leak (Grades B/C) and patients without a clinical leak (no leak and Grade A) on post-operative day (POD) 1 to 7. Although the median amylase concentration was significantly higher in patients with a clinical leak on POD 1-6, there was no day that amylase concentration predicted a clinical leak better than simply classifying all patients as 'no leak' (maximum accuracy = 86.1% on POD 1, expected accuracy by chance = 85.6%, kappa = 10.2%).

CONCLUSION

Drain amylase data in the early post-operative period are not a sensitive or specific predictor of which patients will develop clinically significant POPF after pancreas resection.

Do transanastomotic pancreatic ductal stents after pancreatic resections improve outcomes?

OBJECTIVES

Despite strategies aimed at reducing a postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after pancreatectomies, the overall incidence remains unchanged. One such procedure, until now incompletely explored, is transanastomotic pancreatic (TAP) ductal stenting.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from 1983-2008 to determine if TAP ductal stents provide any benefit and, if so, in which clinical scenarios they can be recommended.

RESULTS

Stents can be internal or external, intraoperative only, or temporary (several days). One randomized trial on internal stents across pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) suggested a higher POPF rate in the stented group. One nonrandomized study using an internal stent for pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) revealed a 0% POPF rate. Results from studies where external stents were used across PJ/PG reported a lower incidence of POPF. No statistically significant difference was reported in a POPF incidence when internal stents were compared with externalized stents. Available data suggest improved outcomes of pancreatoenteric anastomosis when TAP ductal stent is inserted in small ducts (< or =3 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence to support or refute improved outcomes after TAP ductal stent insertion in patients with PJ/PG with small ducts (< or =3 mm) or soft pancreata. More evidence of benefit is needed before use of external stents can be recommended.

Toward improving uniformity and standardization in the reporting of pancreatic anastomoses: a new classification system by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS)

BACKGROUND

To date, there is no uniform and standardized manner of defining pancreatic anastomoses after pancreatic resection.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed to determine the various factors, either related to the pancreatic remnant after pancreatic resection or to types of pancreatoenteric anastomoses that have been shown to influence failure rates of pancreatic anastomoses.

RESULTS

Based on the data obtained, we formulated a new classification that incorporates factors related to the pancreatic remnant, such as pancreatic duct size, length of mobilization, and gland texture, as well as factors related to the pancreatoenteric anastomosis, such as the use of pancreatojejunostomy/pancreatogastrostomy; duct-to-mucosa anastomosis; invagination (dunking) of the remnant into the jejunum or stomach; and the use of a stent (internal or external) across the anastomosis.

CONCLUSION

By creating a standardized classification for recording and reporting of the pancreatoenterostomy, future publications would allow a more objective comparison of outcomes after pancreatic surgery. In addition, use of such a classification might encourage studies evaluating outcomes after specific types of anastomoses in certain clinical situations that could lead to the formulation of best practice guidelines of anastomotic techniques for a particular combination of findings in the pancreatic remnant.

Modified pancreaticogastrostomy for digestive tract reconstruction after pancreatoduodenectomy

AIM: To investigate the safety and efficacy of modified pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) for digestive tract reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).

METHODS: A total of 44 patients who underwent modified PG after PD at our hospital from March 2006 to July 2009 were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS: The mean operation time was 260 min (range: 200-420 min). The mean blood loss was 260 mL (range: 150-1600 mL). No mortality occurred postoperatively. The postoperative pancreatic leakage occurred in 2 patients (4.55%, 2/44), both of which were cured by conservative management. Delayed gastric emptying occurred in 5 patients (11.36%, 5/44). The bleeding of the pancreatic stump occurred in 1 patient (2.27%, 1/44). No surgical wound infection or abdominal infection occurred. The mean postoperative length of stay (LOS) was 15 days (range: 13-27 days). The postoperative follow-up, which lasted from 3 months to 3 years, was carried out in all patients, and no long-term complications were found.

CONCLUSION: Modified PG after PD is a safe and easy procedure for digestive tract reconstruction.

Prediction of post-operative pancreatic fistula in pancreaticoduodenectomy patients using pre-operative MRI: a pilot study

BACKGROUND

Post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is one of the most fearful complications which may occur after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). The methods used to predict POPF pre-operatively have not been studied in great detail. We analyzed correlation between various parameters related to PD including pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) signal intensity (SI), pathology of pancreatic fibrosis and occurrence rates of POPF, and verified that MRI SI results could be the determining values for pre-operative prediction of POPF.

METHODS

From January 2005 to August 2006, we retrospectively examined 43 cases of PDs by reviewing abdominal MRI findings, degree of fibrosis of remnant pancreatic stump, and other surgery-related parameters.

RESULTS

POPF encountered in PD were 11 cases (25.6%). Operation time and degree of fibrosis of remnant pancreatic cut surface were related to POPF (P= 0.030, P= 0.010). The pancreas-liver SI ratio (PLSI) between fistula group and no fistula group was -0.0009 +/- 0.2 and -0.1297 +/- 0.2, respectively (P= 0.0004). The pancreas-spleen SI ratio (PSSI) in each group was 0.423 +/- 0.25 and 0.288 +/- 0.32, respectively (P= 0.014). Using quantitative analysis, the SI ratios were 1.27 and 0.66 in each group (P= 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

When analyzing the results of POPF in 43 patients who underwent PD, PLSI, PSSI and qualitative analysis, fistula group differed significantly from no fistula group. Using these results, it will be helpful for us to predict the occurrence of POPF pre-operatively using MRI in PD patients.

Which method should we select for pancreatic anastomosis after pancreaticoduodenectomy?

BACKGROUND

This study was designed to compare surgical, morphological, and functional outcomes of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) according to the types of pancreaticoenterostomy performed and to suggest a proper anastomotic method after PD.

METHODS

From January 2001 to December 2006, 147 PDs were performed at Ajou University Medical Center. Surgical, morphological, functional, and nutritional outcomes after PD were retrospectively compared according to the types of management of pancreatic remnant and whether pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) or pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ), including duct-to-mucosa or invagination method, was performed.

RESULTS

For the reconstruction method, 43 PG (30 duct-to-mucosa and 13 invagination) and 100 PJ (33 duct-to-mucosa and 67 invagination) were performed. Pancreatic leak rate in PG group (7%) was less than that in PJ group (13%); however, it was not significant (P > 0.05). On the other hand, there was a significant difference in pancreatic leak between duct-to-mucosa and invagination (3.2 vs. 17.5%, P < 0.05). Surprisingly, there was no pancreatic leak in PG duct-to-mucosa anastomosis after PD. There were no significant differences in the change of remnant pancreatic duct size, pancreatic thickness, presence of steatorrhea, and new-onset diabetes mellitus (DM) between PG and PJ. In the invagination group, the main pancreatic duct diameter was increased and pancreatic thickness was progressively reduced.

CONCLUSION

The duct-to-mucosa method is safer and has a good duct patency and low pancreas atrophy compared with the invagination method. In addition, PG duct-to-mucosa is safer than PG invagination, but not in the PJ group. Therefore, we recommend PG duct-to-mucosa for reconstruction after PD because of safety and good duct patency, especially for inexperienced surgeons.

Randomized clinical trial to assess the efficacy of ulinastatin for postoperative pancreatitis following pancreaticoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Ulinastatin, an intrinsic trypsin inhibitor, has proved to be effective for the prevention of acute pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of ulinastatin for postoperative pancreatitis following pancreaticoduodenectomy in a randomized clinical trial.

METHODS

Patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy were randomized to receive perioperative ulinastatin or placebo. Levels of serum amylase, drain amylase, and urine trypsinogen-2 were measured.

RESULTS

A total of 42 patients were enrolled (20 in the ulinastatin group, 20 in the placebo group, 2 excluded). Two patients in the ulinastatin group and nine patients in the placebo group developed hyperamylasemia (P = 0.013) No patient in the ulinastatin group and five patients in the placebo group developed pancreatitis (P = 0.016). One patient in the ulinastatin group and two patients in the placebo group developed grade A pancreatic fistula (P = 0.548). Serum amylase levels at 4 hr and postoperative days 1, 2, and 3, and drain amylase levels on days 2 and 3 were significantly lower in the ulinastatin group than in the placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic administration of ulinastatin reduced the levels of serum and drain amylase and the incidence of postoperative pancreatitis following pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Pancreatic fistula: definition and current problems

Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is the most common major complication after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) and it can lead to prolonged hospital stay, increased costs, and mortality. The POPF rate is strictly correlated to the definition applied, but there are so many different definitions in the literature that comparison between published series of patients is difficult. The International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula (IGSPF) has developed a new definition, with a grading system able to stratify complicated patients into three groups, based upon the clinical implications and costs of their postoperative course. The most important risk factors identified are a soft pancreatic texture and a main pancreatic duct diameter of 3 mm or less. Several surgical techniques have been studied in order to prevent anastomotic leakage, but none has been demonstrated to be superior to others. The use of somatostatin analogues is still matter of controversy. Conservative management of POPF is usually effective, but in patients with deteriorating clinical status with evidence of sepsis, surgical management is needed.

Isolated roux loop pancreaticojejunostomy vs single loop pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic anastomotic leaks are a major cause of morbidity and mortality following pancreaticoduodenectomy, and no single technique of reconstruction has shown to be superior. The aim of this study was to review the experience of single loop versus isolated Roux loop pancreaticojejunostomy in a series of patients undergoing pancreatic head resection.

METHODS

A retrospective review involving 111 patients who underwent pancreatic head resections over 13year period (1994-2006) for malignant (n=106) and benign (n=5) disease was performed. Reconstruction of the pancreatic remnant was done using a single loop in 51 patients and by an isolated Roux loop in 60 patients. All pancreatic anastomosis were performed as a duct to mucosa anastomosis, in two layers, with pancreatic stent and closed suction drainage. Pancreatic fistula was defined as drainage of greater than 50ml of amylase rich fluid for more than 7days postoperatively.

RESULTS

The two groups were comparable as regards to their demographic profiles, preoperative laboratory values and disease status in terms of pathology, pancreatic texture and pancreatic duct diameters. The overall incidence of pancreatic anastomotic leak was 11% (12) and was similar in both the groups; single loop 12% (6) and isolated Roux loop 10% (6). Isolated Roux loop pancreaticojejunostomy was associated with a significant prolongation of operative time (7.25+/-1.14h vs 6.07+/-1.12h) (p<0.05) and the need for more blood transfusion (2.25+/-0.84units vs 2.62+/-0.69units) (p<0.05). There was no significant difference in the morbidity or mortality between the two groups. Forty five percent (23) patients had complications in the single loop group and 48% (29) patients had complications in the isolated group. There were 8% (4) death in the single loop group and 8% (5) in the isolated group (p>0.05).

CONCLUSION

There does not appear to be a significant difference in the rates of pancreatic fistula following either method of reconstruction. However, performance of an isolated Roux loop pancreaticojejunostomy entails a prolongation of operative time and more intraoperative requirement of blood transfusions.

Effect of BioGlue on the incidence of pancreatic fistula following pancreas resection

BACKGROUND

Despite numerous modifications of surgical technique, pancreatic fistula remains a serious problem and occurs in about 10% of patients following pancreas resection. BioGlue is a new sealant that creates a flexible mechanical seal within minutes independent of the body's clotting mechanism.

HYPOTHESIS

Application of BioGlue sealant will reduce the incidence of pancreatic fistula following pancreas resection.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed with 64 patients undergoing pancreas resection. BioGlue sealant was applied to the pancreatic anastomosis (Whipple) or resection margin (distal pancreatectomy) in 32 cases. Factors that could affect the rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula were recorded. Pancreatic fistula was defined as greater than 50 ml of drain output with an amylase content greater than three times normal serum value after postoperative day 10. To improve the sensitivity of our study, we also examined pancreatic fistula with a strict definition of any drain output on or after postoperative day 3 with a high amylase content and graded the fistulas in terms of clinical severity. Grade A leaks were defined as subclinical. Grade B leaks required some response such as making the patient nil per os, parenteral nutrition, octreotide, antibiotics, or a prolonged hospital stay. Grade C leaks were defined as serious and life threatening. They were associated with hemorrhage, sepsis, resulted in deterioration of other organ systems, and mandated intensive care. Comparisons between the two groups were made using the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and by the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous variables. P values of 0.05 or less were deemed statistically significant.

RESULTS

There were no differences between the patients who received BioGlue and the control cohort in terms of comorbid conditions, tumor location, texture of the pancreas, size of the pancreatic duct, or surgical technique. By the common definition, pancreatic fistula occurred in 6% (control) vs. 22% (BioGlue). By the strict definition, a fistula occurred in 41% (control) vs. 60% (BioGlue). In the control group, ten were subclinical (grade A) and two were clinically apparent leaks (grade B). In the BioGlue group, seven were subclinical (grade A), five were clinically apparent (grade B), and three were severe (grade C). There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence or severity grades of postoperative pancreatic fistulas between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Application of BioGlue sealant probably does not reduce the incidence of pancreatic fistula following pancreas resection.

No mortality after 150 consecutive pancreatoduodenctomies with duct-to-mucosa pancreaticogastrostomy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The mortality rate after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) remains 0-5% at major surgical centers with the major cause of operative death being a leak at the pancreaticojejunal anastomosis. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the safety of duct-to-mucosa pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) at a single institute.

METHODS

One hundred fifty consecutive patients with pancreato-biliary diseases undergoing duct-to-mucosa PG following PD between 1995 and 2005 were evaluated. One hundred forty patients underwent a pylorus-preserving PD and 10 patients underwent a conventional PD (Whipple operation). External drainage of pancreatic juice was performed in 77 cases.

RESULTS

The mean operating time was 378 min and the mean blood loss was 1,640 ml. Blood transfusion was not required in 97 patients (65%). The morbidity rate was 50% (75/150), but the mortality rate was 0%. Pancreatic fistulae occurred in 11 patients (7%). Gender, age, operative procedure, portal vein resection, external drainage of the pancreatic juice, operative time, blood loss and blood transfusion did not affect the rate of pancreatic fistula. The rate of pancreatic fistulae tended to be lower in pancreatic carcinoma (3%) than non-pancreatic carcinoma (11%).

CONCLUSIONS

Duct-to-mucosa PG is a safe procedure for reconstruction following PD.

An easier method for performing a pancreaticojejunostomy for the soft pancreas using a fast-absorbable suture

AIM: To clarify the usefulness of a new method for performing a pancreaticojejunostomy by using a fast-absorbable suture material irradiated polyglactin 910, and a temporary stent tube for a narrow pancreatic duct with a soft pancreatic texture.

METHODS: Among 63 consecutive patients with soft pancreas undergoing a pancreaticoduodenectomy from 2003 to 2006, 35 patients were treated with a new reconstructive method. Briefly, after the pancreatic transaction, a stent tube was inserted into the lumen of the pancreatic duct and ligated with it by a fast-absorbable suture. Another tip of the stent tube was introduced into the intestinal lumen at the jejunal limb, where a purse-string suture was made by another fast-absorbable suture to roughly fix the tube. The pancreaticojejunostomy was completed by ligating two fast-absorbable sutures to approximate the ductal end and the jejunal mucosa, and by adding a rough anastomosis between the pancreatic parenchyma and the seromuscular layer of the jejunum. The initial surgical results with this method were retrospectively compared with those of the 28 patients treated with conventional duct-to-mucosa anastomosis.

RESULTS: The incidences of postoperative morbidity including pancreatic fistula were comparable between the two groups (new; 3%-17% vs conventional; 7%-14% according to the definitions). There was no mortality and re-admission. Late complications were also rarely seen.

CONCLUSION: A pancreaticojejunostomy using an irradiated polyglactin 910 suture material and a temporary stent is easy to perform and is feasible even in cases with a narrow pancreatic duct and a normal soft pancreas.

A soft pancreatic remnant is associated with increased drain fluid pancreatic amylase and serum CRP levels following pancreatoduodenectomy

The aim of this prospective study was to clarify differences in postoperative changes of serum or drainage fluid pancreatic amylase levels and serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels between patients with a soft pancreatic texture and those with a hard pancreatic texture undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) with pancreaticogastrostomy. A total of 61 consecutive patients with resectable periampullary tumors undergoing PD were recruited. This population was divided into 27 patients with a hard pancreatic texture and 34 patients with a soft pancreatic texture. Drainage fluid total amylase or pancreatic amylase levels, serum total amylase or pancreatic amylase levels, and serum CRP levels were measured postoperatively. Clinicopathological data were also compared between two groups. Postoperative complications more frequently occurred in patients with a soft pancreatic texture compared with those with a hard pancreatic texture (P=0.029). Serum or drainage fluid pancreatic amylase levels and serum CRP levels of patients with a soft pancreatic texture were significantly higher than those of patients with a hard pancreatic texture after PD on postoperative days 1 and 2 (P<0.05). A soft pancreatic texture was identified as an only independent predictive factor of increased drainage fluid pancreatic amylase levels (P=0.006) and serum CRP levels (P=0.047). A soft pancreatic texture is closely associated with increased drainage fluid pancreatic amylase and serum CRP levels after PD. More careful post-PD management is needed for patients with a soft pancreatic texture.

Risk factors, predictors and prevention of pancreatic fistula formation after pancreatoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Although the operative mortality and morbidity associated with pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) has been decreasing, pancreatic fistula remains a potentially fatal complication. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors and predictors of pancreatic fistula formation, and ways to prevent this in a consecutive series of PD patients in a single institution.

METHODS

The association between pancreatic fistula formation and various clinical parameters was investigated in 50 patients who underwent PD at Kochi Medical School from January 1991 through February 2006.

RESULTS

The incidence of pancreatic fistula in these patients was 28%. Multivariate analysis identified three independent factors correlated with the occurrence of pancreatic fistula: (1) absence of fibrotic texture of the pancreas examined intraoperatively (relative risk [RR], 1.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-2.0; P = 0.01); (2) serum amylase concentration greater than 195 U/l (1.69 times the normal upper limit) on the first postoperative day (RR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.0-5.7; P = 0.01); and (3) not having early postoperative enteral nutrition (RR, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.2-9.0; P = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Soft texture of the pancreas and increased serum amylase the day after PD are both risk factors with predictive value for pancreatic fistula. The incidence of fistula formation is reduced by early postoperative enteral nutrition.

Enucleation of pancreatic neoplasms

BACKGROUND

Standard resections for benign and borderline neoplasms of the pancreas are associated with a significant risk of long-term functional impairment, whereas enucleation preserves healthy parenchyma and pancreatic function. The aim of this study was to evaluate postoperative and long-term oncological and functional results after pancreatic enucleation.

METHODS

Data collected prospectively from 61 consecutive patients who underwent pancreatic enucleation were analysed.

RESULTS

There were no deaths. A clinically significant pancreatic fistula was reported in 14 patients (23 per cent), and five patients (8 per cent) had a further operation for fistula-related complications. The most common indication for surgery was endocrine neoplasm (38 patients; 62 per cent) and two patients (3 per cent) had a final histopathological diagnosis of malignant neoplasm. At a median follow-up of 61 months no patient had developed tumour recurrence or exocrine insufficiency. Two elderly patients developed non-insulin-dependent diabetes.

CONCLUSION

Enucleation is an effective procedure for the radical treatment of benign and borderline neoplasms of the pancreas, with good long-term outcomes.

Pancreatic transection using a sharp hook-shaped ultrasonically activated scalpel

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The operative mortality and morbidity associated with pancreatic surgery has been decreasing; however, pancreatic fistula remains a major cause of a potentially fatal complication. Although different devices and techniques have been proposed to reduce of the postoperative pancreatic fistula, none has gained unanimous acceptance. We herein describe a new technique for pancreatic transection using a sharp hook-shaped ultrasonically activated scalpel (UAS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between December 2004 and June 2006, 32 patients who had undergone pancreatectomies performed using the sharp hook-shaped UAS (Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Cincinnati, OH, USA) were studied.

RESULTS

The incidence of pancreatic fistula in these patients was 6.3% (2/32). Both cases underwent a distal pancreatectomy. No patient had systemic organ failure induced by postoperative pancreatic fistula, and conservative drainage management improved the pancreatic fistula. No pancreatic fistulas developed in patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy with a duct-to-mucosa anastomosis pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreatic transection using the sharp hook-shaped UAS.

CONCLUSION

Pancreatic transection using the sharp hook-shaped UAS is an easy and useful method that facilitates detection of the main pancreatic duct with minimal blood loss. It may contribute to lower morbidity and mortality after pancreatic resection.

Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy: systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) and pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) are the commonly preferred methods of anastomosis after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). The ideal choice of anastomosis remains a matter of debate.

DATA SOURCES

Articles published until end of March 2006 comparing PJ and PG after PD were searched.

STUDY SELECTION

Two reviewers independently assessed quality and eligibility of the studies and extracted data for further analysis. Meta-analysis was performed with a random-effects model by using weighted odds ratios.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Sixteen articles were included; meta-analysis of 3 randomized controlled trials (RCT) revealed no significant difference between PJ and PG regarding overall postoperative complications, pancreatic fistula, intra-abdominal fluid collection, or mortality. On the contrary, analysis of 13 nonrandomized observational clinical studies (OCSs) showed significant results in favor of PG for the outcome parameters with a reduction of pancreatic fistula and mortality in favor of PG.

CONCLUSIONS

All OCSs reported superiority of PG over PJ, most likely influenced by publication bias. In contrast, all RCTs failed to show advantage of a particular technique, suggesting that both PJ and PG provide equally good results. This meta-analysis yet again highlights the singular importance of performing well-designed RCTs and the role of evidence-based medicine in guiding modern surgical practice.