1
|
Pan H, Gao Y, Ruan H, Chi P, Huang Y, Huang S. Transanal local excision versus intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer with stage ypT0-1ycN0 after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: an inverse probability weighting analysis for oncological and functional outcomes. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149:17383-17394. [PMID: 37843558 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-05454-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 09/30/2023] [Indexed: 10/17/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to compare the efficacy of local excision (LE) and intersphincteric resection (ISR) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who achieved a significant or complete pathological response following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of data from patients with stage ypT0-1ycN0 low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy who underwent LE or ISR between June 2016 and June 2021. Baseline characteristics, short-term outcomes, long-term oncological outcomes, and functional outcomes, were compared between the two groups. To reduce the selection bias, inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was performed. RESULTS This study included 106 patients (LE group: n = 51, ISR group: n = 55). There were significant differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups (P < 0.05). After IPTW, there were almost no significant differences in baseline data between the two groups. The LE group showed less postoperative complications and better function outcomes compared to the ISR group. The LE group had significantly lower rates of complications (13.7% vs. 36.4%, P = 0.014). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of long-term oncological outcomes. CONCLUSIONS For patients with locally advanced low rectal cancer achieving significant or complete pathological response after neoadjuvant therapy, both LE and ISR present comparable oncological outcomes. Yet, LE seems to show more advantages in terms of postoperative complications and functional outcomes. These findings offer important insights for surgical decision-making, emphasizing the necessity to consider both oncological and functional outcomes in selecting the optimal surgical approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongfeng Pan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No.29 Xinquan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian Province, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Yihuang Gao
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No.29 Xinquan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian Province, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Haoyang Ruan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No.29 Xinquan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian Province, China
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Pan Chi
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No.29 Xinquan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian Province, China.
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
| | - Ying Huang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No.29 Xinquan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian Province, China.
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
| | - Shenghui Huang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No.29 Xinquan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian Province, China.
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Battersby NJ, Dattani M, Rao S, Cunningham D, Tait D, Adams R, Moran BJ, Khakoo S, Tekkis P, Rasheed S, Mirnezami A, Quirke P, West NP, Nagtegaal I, Chong I, Sadanandam A, Valeri N, Thomas K, Frost M, Brown G. A rectal cancer feasibility study with an embedded phase III trial design assessing magnetic resonance tumour regression grade (mrTRG) as a novel biomarker to stratify management by good and poor response to chemoradiotherapy (TRIGGER): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 2017; 18:394. [PMID: 28851403 PMCID: PMC5576102 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-017-2085-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2016] [Accepted: 07/03/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pre-operative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for MRI-defined, locally advanced rectal cancer is primarily intended to reduce local recurrence rates by downstaging tumours, enabling an improved likelihood of curative resection. However, in a subset of patients complete tumour regression occurs implying that no viable tumour is present within the surgical specimen. This raises the possibility that surgery may have been avoided. It is also recognised that response to CRT is a key determinant of prognosis. Recent radiological advances enable this response to be assessed pre-operatively using the MRI tumour regression grade (mrTRG). Potentially, this allows modification of the baseline MRI-derived treatment strategy. Hence, in a 'good' mrTRG responder, with little or no evidence of tumour, surgery may be deferred. Conversely, a 'poor response' identifies an adverse prognostic group which may benefit from additional pre-operative therapy. METHODS/DESIGN TRIGGER is a multicentre, open, interventional, randomised control feasibility study with an embedded phase III design. Patients with MRI-defined, locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma deemed to require CRT will be eligible for recruitment. During CRT, patients will be randomised (1:2) between conventional management, according to baseline MRI, versus mrTRG-directed management. The primary endpoint of the feasibility phase is to assess the rate of patient recruitment and randomisation. Secondary endpoints include the rate of unit recruitment, acute drug toxicity, reproducibility of mrTRG reporting, surgical morbidity, pathological circumferential resection margin involvement, pathology regression grade, residual tumour cell density and surgical/specimen quality rates. The phase III trial will focus on long-term safety, regrowth rates, oncological survival analysis, quality of life and health economics analysis. DISCUSSION The TRIGGER trial aims to determine whether patients with locally advanced rectal cancer can be recruited and subsequently randomised into a control trial that offers MRI-directed patient management according to radiological response to CRT (mrTRG). The feasibility study will inform a phase III trial design investigating stratified treatment of good and poor responders according to 3-year disease-free survival, colostomy-free survival as well as an increase in cases managed without a major resection. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT02704520 . Registered on 5 February 2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nick J. Battersby
- Pelican Cancer Foundation, The Ark, Basingstoke, RG24 9NN UK
- North Hampshire Hospital Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, RG24 9NA UK
| | - Mit Dattani
- Pelican Cancer Foundation, The Ark, Basingstoke, RG24 9NN UK
| | - Sheela Rao
- Department of Medicine Royal Marsden Hospital Sutton, Sutton, SM2 5PT UK
| | - David Cunningham
- Department of Medicine Royal Marsden Hospital Sutton, Sutton, SM2 5PT UK
| | - Diana Tait
- Department of Medicine Royal Marsden Hospital Sutton, Sutton, SM2 5PT UK
| | - Richard Adams
- Velindre Cancer Centre Velindre Hospital Cardiff, Cardiff, CF4 7XL UK
| | - Brendan J. Moran
- Pelican Cancer Foundation, The Ark, Basingstoke, RG24 9NN UK
- North Hampshire Hospital Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, RG24 9NA UK
| | - Shelize Khakoo
- Gastrointestinal Unit Royal Marsden Hospital Sutton, Sutton, SM2 5PT UK
| | - Paris Tekkis
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Marsden Hospital London, London, SW3 6JJ UK
| | - Shahnawaz Rasheed
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Marsden Hospital London, London, SW3 6JJ UK
| | - Alex Mirnezami
- Department of Surgery and Department for Tissue Microarray analysis, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD UK
| | - Philip Quirke
- Pathology and Tumour Biology, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, Wellcome Trust Brenner Building, St. James’s University Hospital, Leeds, LS9 7TF UK
| | - Nicholas P. West
- Pathology and Tumour Biology, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, Wellcome Trust Brenner Building, St. James’s University Hospital, Leeds, LS9 7TF UK
| | - Iris Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology Radboud University, Nijmegen, 6500HB Netherlands
| | - Irene Chong
- Division of Molecular Pathology Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW3 6JB UK
| | - Anguraj Sadanandam
- Division of Molecular Pathology Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW3 6JB UK
| | - Nicola Valeri
- Division of Molecular Pathology Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW3 6JB UK
| | - Karen Thomas
- Statistics Unit, R&D Royal Marsden Hospital Sutton, Sutton, SM2 5PT UK
| | - Michelle Frost
- Department of Radiology, Royal Marsden Hospital Sutton, Sutton, SM2 5PT UK
| | - Gina Brown
- Department of Radiology, Royal Marsden Hospital Sutton, Sutton, SM2 5PT UK
| |
Collapse
|