1
|
Zhu B, Wang Y, Zhang Z, Wang L, Ma Y, Li M. Development and validation of a radiologically-based nomogram for preoperative prediction of difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Front Med (Lausanne) 2025; 12:1561769. [PMID: 40342585 PMCID: PMC12060169 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1561769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2025] [Accepted: 04/07/2025] [Indexed: 05/11/2025] Open
Abstract
Background Preoperative prediction of difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy (DLC) remains challenging, as intraoperative anatomical complexity significantly increases complication risks. Current studies have not reached consensus on definitive risk factors for DLC. Materials and methods This retrospective study aimed to identify DLC risk factors and develop a predictive model. We analyzed clinical data from 265 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) at the Department of General Surgery, Shijiazhuang People's Hospital, between September 2022 and June 2024. Risk factors were explored through least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, multivariate analysis, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, with a nomogram constructed for prediction. Results Among 265 eligible patients, four independent risk factors were identified: thickness of gallbladder wall (p = 0.0007), cystic duct length (p < 0.0001), cystic duct diameter (p < 0.0001), and gallbladder neck stones (p = 0.0002). The nomogram demonstrated strong predictive performance, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.915 in the training cohort and 0.842 in the validation cohort. Calibration curves indicated excellent model fit. Conclusion and discussion The proposed predictive model integrating gallbladder neck stones, thickness of gallbladder wall, cystic duct length, and cystic duct diameter may assist surgeons in preoperative DLC risk stratification. Further validation through multicenter prospective studies is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Ming Li
- Department of General Surgery, Shijiazhuang People's Hospital, Shijiazhuang, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kaplan U, Handler C, Chazan B, Weiner N, Hatoum OA, Yanovskay A, Kopelman D. The Bacteriology of Acute Cholecystitis: Comparison of Bile Cultures and Clinical Outcomes in Diabetic and Non-Diabetic Patients. World J Surg 2021; 45:2426-2431. [PMID: 33860354 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-021-06107-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acute cholecystitis is one of the most common acute surgical diseases. Diabetic patients have been shown to have an increased risk for gallbladder disease, but the correlation between the severity of gallstone disease and diabetes is still debated. The aim of this study is to examine the possible difference in the disease process between patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and those without. PATIENTS AND METHODS A retrospective study was conducted of all patients who underwent percutaneous cholecystostomy between 2005 and 2015 at Emek Medical Center, Afula, Israel. Demographic and medical history including data on bile and blood culture results, antimicrobial susceptibility, and clinical outcomes were retrieved from patient files. RESULTS The cohort included 272 patients. Mean age was 68 years old, 50.74% were male and 43.75% had diabetes mellitus. Bile cultures were obtained from 252 (92.64%) patients and were positive in 134 (53.2%) patients. In 11 patients (4%) two pathogens were isolated. Blood cultures obtained from 231 patients and were positive in 35 (15.2%). Escherichia coli was the most common isolate, and was seen in 22.3% of positive bile cultures and 40% of blood cultures. Although diabetic patients had significantly more positive bile cultures, the severity of the disease, according to the Tokyo guidelines, was not higher. CONCLUSIONS Acute cholecystitis was neither more severe nor had significant difference in bacteriological properties when comparing diabetic patients to non-diabetic ones.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Uri Kaplan
- Department of General Surgery B, Emek Medical Center, Yitzhak Rabin Boulevard 21, 1834111, Afula, Israel.
| | - Chovav Handler
- Department of General Surgery B, Emek Medical Center, Yitzhak Rabin Boulevard 21, 1834111, Afula, Israel
| | - Bibiana Chazan
- Infectious Disease Unit, Emek Medical Center, Yitzhak Rabin Boulevard 21, 1834111, Afula, Israel
- Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology,, Efron st. 1, Bat Galim,, 3525433, Haifa, Israel
| | - Noam Weiner
- Department of General Surgery B, Emek Medical Center, Yitzhak Rabin Boulevard 21, 1834111, Afula, Israel
| | - Ossama A Hatoum
- Department of General Surgery B, Emek Medical Center, Yitzhak Rabin Boulevard 21, 1834111, Afula, Israel
- Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology,, Efron st. 1, Bat Galim,, 3525433, Haifa, Israel
| | - Anna Yanovskay
- Infectious Disease Unit, Emek Medical Center, Yitzhak Rabin Boulevard 21, 1834111, Afula, Israel
- Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology,, Efron st. 1, Bat Galim,, 3525433, Haifa, Israel
| | - Doron Kopelman
- Department of General Surgery B, Emek Medical Center, Yitzhak Rabin Boulevard 21, 1834111, Afula, Israel
- Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology,, Efron st. 1, Bat Galim,, 3525433, Haifa, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Surgical trends in the management of acute cholecystitis during pregnancy. Surg Endosc 2020; 35:5752-5759. [PMID: 33025256 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-08054-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2020] [Accepted: 09/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since 2007, clinical practice guidelines by the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) recommend early surgical management with laparoscopic cholecystectomy for pregnant women with symptomatic gallbladder disease regardless of trimester. However, little is known about practice patterns in the management of pregnant patients with acute cholecystitis. This study aims to examine nationwide trends in the surgical management of acute cholecystitis, as well as their impact on clinical outcomes during pregnancy. METHODS The National Inpatient Sample was queried for all pregnant women diagnosed with acute cholecystitis between January 2003 and September 2015. After applying appropriate weights, multivariate regression analysis adjusted for patient- and hospital-level characteristics and quantified the impact of discharge year (2003-2007 versus 2008-2015) on cholecystectomy rates and timing of surgery. Multivariate regression analysis was also used to examine the impact of same admission cholecystectomy and its timing on maternal and fetal outcomes. RESULTS A total of 23,939 pregnant women with acute cholecystitis satisfied our inclusion criteria. The median age was 26 years (interquartile range: 22-30). During the study period, 36.3% were managed non-operatively while 59.6% and 4.1% underwent laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy, respectively. After adjusting for covariates, laparoscopic cholecystectomy was more commonly performed after 2007 (odds ratio [OR] 1.333, p < 0.001). Furthermore, time from admission to surgery was significantly shorter in the latter study period (regression coefficient -0.013, p < 0.001). Compared to non-operative management, laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis was significantly associated with lower rates of preterm delivery, labor, or abortion (OR 0.410, p < 0.001). Each day that laparoscopic cholecystectomy was delayed significantly associated with an increased risk of fetal complications (OR 1.173, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS This nationwide study exhibits significant trends favoring surgical management of acute cholecystitis during pregnancy. Although further studies are still warranted, early laparoscopic cholecystectomy should be considered in pregnant patients with acute cholecystitis.
Collapse
|
4
|
Łącka M, Obłój P, Spychalski P, Łaski D, Rostkowska O, Wieszczy P, Kobiela J. Clinical presentation and outcomes of cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis in patients with diabetes - A matched pair analysis. A pilot study. Adv Med Sci 2020; 65:409-414. [PMID: 32823170 DOI: 10.1016/j.advms.2020.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2019] [Revised: 06/06/2020] [Accepted: 08/06/2020] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The primary aim of this study is to compare the clinical course and laboratory parameters of acute cholecystitis in patients with diabetes vs. patients without diabetes. MATERIALS AND METHODS The study involved patients who underwent emergency cholecystectomy in the Department of General, Endocrine and Transplant Surgery of University Clinical Center in Gdansk (Poland) between 2007 and 2017. There were 267 patients included in the study. The control group of 197 patients was age and sex matched at a 3:1 ratio. The following was compared between the groups: symptoms at admission, course of surgery, postoperative course, length of hospitalization, total costs of hospitalization and antibiotic therapy, other than routine perioperative prophylaxis. RESULTS There was no significant difference between the patients with and without diabetes regarding symptoms at admission. Operative and postoperative complication rates were significantly higher in the patients with diabetes. The operative time and length of hospitalization were significantly longer in the study group. The conversion rate was not higher in the study group, but classic surgery was performed significantly more often. The patients without diabetes had less pronounced symptoms with more locally advanced disease. CONCLUSIONS Our study demonstrates that patients with diabetes have a significantly more eventful course of acute cholecystitis than patients without diabetes. Patients with diabetes should therefore be qualified for cholecystectomy early in the course of acute cholecystitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monika Łącka
- Department of General, Endocrine and Transplant Surgery, University Clinical Center, Gdansk, Poland.
| | - Paweł Obłój
- Department of General, Endocrine and Transplant Surgery, University Clinical Center, Gdansk, Poland
| | - Piotr Spychalski
- Department of General, Endocrine and Transplant Surgery, University Clinical Center, Gdansk, Poland
| | - Dariusz Łaski
- Department of General, Endocrine and Transplant Surgery, University Clinical Center, Gdansk, Poland
| | - Olga Rostkowska
- Department of General, Endocrine and Transplant Surgery, University Clinical Center, Gdansk, Poland
| | - Paulina Wieszczy
- Central Coordination Center for Cervical Cancer Screening Program, Department of Cancer Prevention, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Institute-Oncology Center, Warsaw, Poland; Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Oncology, Medical Center for Postgraduate Education, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Jarek Kobiela
- Department of General, Endocrine and Transplant Surgery, University Clinical Center, Gdansk, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Thangavelu A, Rosenbaum S, Thangavelu D. Timing of Cholecystectomy in Acute Cholecystitis. J Emerg Med 2018; 54:892-897. [PMID: 29752150 DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2018.02.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2018] [Accepted: 02/24/2018] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cholecystitis is an inflammation of the gallbladder that most commonly occurs as a result of obstruction of the cystic duct by gallstones. The current standard of treatment for acute cholecystitis is cholecystectomy. OBJECTIVE Our goal was to discuss the benefits of and compare early laparoscopic cholecystectomy and delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS A Medline literature search was performed dating from January 1982 to July 2015. We limited the search to human studies written in English and using the keywords "Acute Cholecystitis," early vs. delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy, surgical management, and surgical complications. RESULTS There were 225 articles reviewed, of which 25 met criteria for selection. Our recommendations are based on these 25 articles. CONCLUSION Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is preferred over delayed, due to overall better quality of life, lower morbidity rates, and lower hospital cost. Ultimately, management of acute cholecystitis by emergency physicians should be made based on patient's clinical status and available resources in their particular hospital.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arasi Thangavelu
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Archbold Medical Center, Thomasville, Georgia; Florida State University, College of Medicine, Tallahassee, Florida
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Recent studies showed new insights in the indication and timing of cholecystectomy in gallstone disease. This review will provide an overview. RECENT FINDINGS Considerable variations in indication for gallbladder surgery have been noticed leading to a significant number of unnecessary cholecystectomies. As a consequence, up to 33% of patients with uncomplicated symptomatic gallstone disease have persistent abdominal pain after cholecystectomy. On the other hand, studies showed that certain patients with acute cholecystitis, common bile duct stones and biliary pancreatitis benefit from same admission instead of delayed cholecystectomy. SUMMARY A critical view on indications for cholecystectomy in patients with uncomplicated symptomatic gallstone disease prevents unnecessary cholecystectomies. In patients with mild-to-moderate complicated symptomatic gallstone disease, same-admission cholecystectomy reduces the risk of recurrent complications.
Collapse
|
7
|
Haltmeier T, Benjamin E, Beale E, Inaba K, Demetriades D. Insulin-Treated Patients with Diabetes Mellitus Undergoing Emergency Abdominal Surgery Have Worse Outcomes than Patients Treated with Oral Agents. World J Surg 2017; 40:1575-82. [PMID: 26913730 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-016-3469-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a known risk factor for worse outcomes after emergency abdominal surgery (EAS). However, it is unclear if the type of diabetes treatment (insulin or oral agents) has any effect on outcomes after EAS. METHODS Matched cohort study utilizing the ACS NSQIP database. Patients with DM undergoing EAS were divided into insulin and oral agent treatment groups. A 1:1 cohort matching of insulin-treated and oral agent-treated patients was performed (matched for sex, age, ASA score, BMI category, operative procedure, and preoperative acute renal failure, pneumonia, SIRS, sepsis, septic shock, and corticosteroid use). Outcomes of matched insulin- and oral agent-treated patients were compared with univariable and multivariable regression analysis. RESULTS A total of 7401 patients with DM underwent EAS, 3182 (43 %) of which were insulin treated and 4219 (57 %) were treated with oral agents. Matching resulted in 2280 matched cases, which formed the basis of this analysis. Insulin-treated patients were more likely to have postoperative complications (OR 1.279, CI 1.119-1.462), had a higher 30-day mortality rate in patients with sepsis at hospital admission (OR 3.421, CI 1.959-5.974), and a longer total hospital length of stay (RC 1.115, CI 1.065-1.168) and postoperative LOS (RC 1.082, CI 1.031-1.135). CONCLUSIONS In patients with DM undergoing emergency abdominal surgery, insulin-treated patients have worse outcomes than oral agent-treated patients. Insulin-treated patients with DM therefore should be monitored and treated more intensively in anticipation of potential complications after emergency abdominal surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tobias Haltmeier
- Division of Acute Care Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Los Angeles County and University of Southern California Medical Center, University of Southern California, 1200 N. State St, Inpatient Tower (C) - Rm C5L100, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
| | - Elizabeth Benjamin
- Division of Acute Care Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Los Angeles County and University of Southern California Medical Center, University of Southern California, 1200 N. State St, Inpatient Tower (C) - Rm C5L100, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
| | - Elizabeth Beale
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Los Angeles County and University of Southern California Medical Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Kenji Inaba
- Division of Acute Care Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Los Angeles County and University of Southern California Medical Center, University of Southern California, 1200 N. State St, Inpatient Tower (C) - Rm C5L100, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
| | - Demetrios Demetriades
- Division of Acute Care Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Los Angeles County and University of Southern California Medical Center, University of Southern California, 1200 N. State St, Inpatient Tower (C) - Rm C5L100, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ko-iam W, Sandhu T, Paiboonworachat S, Pongchairerks P, Chotirosniramit A, Chotirosniramit N, Chandacham K, Jirapongcharoenlap T, Junrungsee S. Predictive Factors for a Long Hospital Stay in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Int J Hepatol 2017; 2017:5497936. [PMID: 28239497 PMCID: PMC5292377 DOI: 10.1155/2017/5497936] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2016] [Accepted: 12/28/2016] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background. Although the advantages of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) over open cholecystectomy are immediately obvious and appreciated, several patients need a postoperative hospital stay of more than 24 hours. Thus, the predictive factors for this longer stay need to be investigated. The aim of this study was to identify the causes of a long hospital stay after LC. Methods. This is a retrospective cohort study with 500 successful elective LC patients being included in the analysis. Short hospital stay was defined as being discharged within 24 hours after the operation, whereas long hospital stay was defined as the need for a stay of more than 24 hours after the operation. Results. Using multivariable analysis, ten independent predictive factors were identified for a long hospital stay. These included patients with cirrhosis, patients with a history of previous acute cholecystitis, cholangitis, or pancreatitis, patients on anticoagulation with warfarin, patients with standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum, patients who had been given metoclopramide as an intraoperative antiemetic drug, patients who had been using abdominal drain, patients who had numeric rating scale for pain > 3, patients with an oral analgesia requirement > 2 doses, complications, and private ward admission. Conclusions. LC difficulties were important predictive factors for a long hospital stay, as well as medication and operative factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wasana Ko-iam
- Clinical Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | - Trichak Sandhu
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | | | | | - Anon Chotirosniramit
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | | | - Kamtone Chandacham
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | | | - Sunhawit Junrungsee
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ansaloni L, Pisano M, Coccolini F, Peitzmann AB, Fingerhut A, Catena F, Agresta F, Allegri A, Bailey I, Balogh ZJ, Bendinelli C, Biffl W, Bonavina L, Borzellino G, Brunetti F, Burlew CC, Camapanelli G, Campanile FC, Ceresoli M, Chiara O, Civil I, Coimbra R, De Moya M, Di Saverio S, Fraga GP, Gupta S, Kashuk J, Kelly MD, Koka V, Jeekel H, Latifi R, Leppaniemi A, Maier RV, Marzi I, Moore F, Piazzalunga D, Sakakushev B, Sartelli M, Scalea T, Stahel PF, Taviloglu K, Tugnoli G, Uraneus S, Velmahos GC, Wani I, Weber DG, Viale P, Sugrue M, Ivatury R, Kluger Y, Gurusamy KS, Moore EE. 2016 WSES guidelines on acute calculous cholecystitis. World J Emerg Surg 2016; 11:25. [PMID: 27307785 PMCID: PMC4908702 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-016-0082-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 179] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2016] [Accepted: 06/02/2016] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Acute calculus cholecystitis is a very common disease with several area of uncertainty. The World Society of Emergency Surgery developed extensive guidelines in order to cover grey areas. The diagnostic criteria, the antimicrobial therapy, the evaluation of associated common bile duct stones, the identification of “high risk” patients, the surgical timing, the type of surgery, and the alternatives to surgery are discussed. Moreover the algorithm is proposed: as soon as diagnosis is made and after the evaluation of choledocholitiasis risk, laparoscopic cholecystectomy should be offered to all patients exception of those with high risk of morbidity or mortality. These Guidelines must be considered as an adjunctive tool for decision but they are not substitute of the clinical judgement for the individual patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Ansaloni
- General Surgery I, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Piazza OMS 1, 24127 Bergamo, Italy
| | - M Pisano
- General Surgery I, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Piazza OMS 1, 24127 Bergamo, Italy
| | - F Coccolini
- General Surgery I, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Piazza OMS 1, 24127 Bergamo, Italy
| | - A B Peitzmann
- Department of Surgery, UPMC, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA USA
| | - A Fingerhut
- Department of Surgical Research, Medical Univeristy of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - F Catena
- Department of Emergency and Trauma Surgery of the University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - F Agresta
- Department of General Surgery, Adria Civil Hospital, Adria (RO), Italy
| | - A Allegri
- General Surgery I, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Piazza OMS 1, 24127 Bergamo, Italy
| | - I Bailey
- University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Z J Balogh
- Department of Traumatology, John Hunter Hospital and University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW Australia
| | - C Bendinelli
- Department of Traumatology, John Hunter Hospital and University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW Australia
| | - W Biffl
- Acute Care Surgery, Queen's Medical Center, School of Medicine of the University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI USA
| | - L Bonavina
- Department of Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, University of Milan Medical School, Milan, Italy
| | | | - F Brunetti
- Unit of Digestive, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Henri Mondor Hospital AP-HP, Université Paris Est-UPEC, Créteil, France
| | - C C Burlew
- Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Department of Surgery, Denver Health Medical Center, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, USA
| | - G Camapanelli
- General Surgery - Day Surgery Istituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, Insubria University, Milan, Italy
| | - F C Campanile
- Ospedale San Giovanni Decollato - Andosilla, Civita Castellana, Italy
| | - M Ceresoli
- General Surgery I, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Piazza OMS 1, 24127 Bergamo, Italy
| | - O Chiara
- Emergency Department, Trauma Center, Niguarda Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - I Civil
- Department of Surgery, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - R Coimbra
- Division of Trauma, Surgical Critical Care, Burns, and Acute Care Surgery, University of California San Diego Health Sciences, San Diego, CA USA
| | - M De Moya
- Harvard University, Cambridge, MA USA
| | - S Di Saverio
- General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Maggiore Hospital Trauma Center, Bologna, Italy
| | - G P Fraga
- Division of Trauma Surgery, University of Campinas, Campinas, SP Brazil
| | - S Gupta
- Department of Surgery, Government Medical College, Chandigarh, India
| | - J Kashuk
- Tel Aviv University Sackler School of Medicine, Assia Medical Group, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - M D Kelly
- Acute Surgical Unit, Canberra Hospital, Canberra, ACT Australia
| | - V Koka
- Surgical Department, Mozyr City Hospital, Mozyr, Belarus
| | - H Jeekel
- Erasmus MC Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Holland Netherlands
| | - R Latifi
- University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ USA
| | | | - R V Maier
- Department of Surgery, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA USA
| | - I Marzi
- Department of Trauma, Hand, and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - F Moore
- Department of Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL USA
| | - D Piazzalunga
- General Surgery I, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Piazza OMS 1, 24127 Bergamo, Italy
| | - B Sakakushev
- First General Surgery Clinic, University Hospital St. George/Medical University, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | - M Sartelli
- Department of Surgery, Macerata Hospital, Macerata, Italy
| | - T Scalea
- Shock Trauma Center, Critical Care Services, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD USA
| | - P F Stahel
- Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, CO USA
| | - K Taviloglu
- Taviloglu Proctology Center, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - G Tugnoli
- General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Maggiore Hospital Trauma Center, Bologna, Italy
| | - S Uraneus
- Department of Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - G C Velmahos
- Emergency Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA USA
| | - I Wani
- DHS, Srinagar, Kashmir India
| | - D G Weber
- Trauma and General Surgery & The University of Western Australia, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia
| | - P Viale
- Infectious Disease Unit, Teaching Hospital, S. Orsola-Malpighi Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - M Sugrue
- Letterkenny University Hospital & Donegal Clinical Research Academy, Donegal, Ireland
| | - R Ivatury
- Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA USA
| | - Y Kluger
- Division of General Surgery, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - K S Gurusamy
- Royal Free Campus, University College London, London, UK
| | - E E Moore
- Taviloglu Proctology Center, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Cao AM, Eslick GD, Cox MR. Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is superior to delayed acute cholecystitis: a meta-analysis of case-control studies. Surg Endosc 2016; 30:1172-1182. [PMID: 26139487 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4325-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2015] [Accepted: 06/08/2015] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since the advent of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) there has been continued debate regarding the management of acute cholecystitis with either early or delayed LC. Nearly all studies have demonstrated that early LC has a significantly shorter total length of hospital stay compared with delayed LC. Although previous randomized controlled trials and meta-analysis have shown clinical outcomes to favour early surgery, clinical practice continues to vary significantly worldwide. In addition, there is much confusion in the optimal timing for early LC with definitions of early varying from 72 h to 7 days. There have been numerous case-control studies investigating the timing of LC in acute cholecystitis. The aim of this paper is to pool the results from all case-control studies to investigate outcomes including mortality rates, complication rates, length of hospital stay and conversion rates to open procedures. METHODS A search of electronic databases was performed for case-control studies published between 1985-February 2015. RESULTS Results from 77 case-control studies showed statistically significant reductions in mortality, complications, bile duct leaks, bile duct injuries, wound infections, conversion rates, length of hospital stay and blood loss associated with early LC. Although LC within the 72-h window is optimal, patients operated after this window still benefit from early surgery compared to delayed surgery. The duration of symptoms in acute cholecystitis should not influence the surgeons' willingness to operate acutely. CONCLUSIONS Early LC is clearly superior to delayed LC in acute cholecystitis. The most recent evidence-based practice strongly suggests that early LC should be standard of care in the management of acute cholecystitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy M Cao
- The Whiteley-Martin Research Centre, Discipline of Surgery, Nepean Hospital, The University of Sydney, Level 5, South Block, P.O. Box 63, Penrith, NSW, 2751, Australia
| | - Guy D Eslick
- The Whiteley-Martin Research Centre, Discipline of Surgery, Nepean Hospital, The University of Sydney, Level 5, South Block, P.O. Box 63, Penrith, NSW, 2751, Australia.
| | - Michael R Cox
- The Whiteley-Martin Research Centre, Discipline of Surgery, Nepean Hospital, The University of Sydney, Level 5, South Block, P.O. Box 63, Penrith, NSW, 2751, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Cao AM, Eslick GD, Cox MR. Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is superior to delayed acute cholecystitis: a meta-analysis of case-control studies. Surg Endosc 2016; 30:1172-1182. [PMID: 26139487 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4471-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2015] [Accepted: 06/08/2015] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since the advent of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) there has been continued debate regarding the management of acute cholecystitis with either early or delayed LC. Nearly all studies have demonstrated that early LC has a significantly shorter total length of hospital stay compared with delayed LC. Although previous randomized controlled trials and meta-analysis have shown clinical outcomes to favour early surgery, clinical practice continues to vary significantly worldwide. In addition, there is much confusion in the optimal timing for early LC with definitions of early varying from 72 h to 7 days. There have been numerous case-control studies investigating the timing of LC in acute cholecystitis. The aim of this paper is to pool the results from all case-control studies to investigate outcomes including mortality rates, complication rates, length of hospital stay and conversion rates to open procedures. METHODS A search of electronic databases was performed for case-control studies published between 1985-February 2015. RESULTS Results from 77 case-control studies showed statistically significant reductions in mortality, complications, bile duct leaks, bile duct injuries, wound infections, conversion rates, length of hospital stay and blood loss associated with early LC. Although LC within the 72-h window is optimal, patients operated after this window still benefit from early surgery compared to delayed surgery. The duration of symptoms in acute cholecystitis should not influence the surgeons' willingness to operate acutely. CONCLUSIONS Early LC is clearly superior to delayed LC in acute cholecystitis. The most recent evidence-based practice strongly suggests that early LC should be standard of care in the management of acute cholecystitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy M Cao
- The Whiteley-Martin Research Centre, Discipline of Surgery, Nepean Hospital, The University of Sydney, Level 5, South Block, P.O. Box 63, Penrith, NSW, 2751, Australia
| | - Guy D Eslick
- The Whiteley-Martin Research Centre, Discipline of Surgery, Nepean Hospital, The University of Sydney, Level 5, South Block, P.O. Box 63, Penrith, NSW, 2751, Australia.
| | - Michael R Cox
- The Whiteley-Martin Research Centre, Discipline of Surgery, Nepean Hospital, The University of Sydney, Level 5, South Block, P.O. Box 63, Penrith, NSW, 2751, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Chong JU, Lee JH, Yoon YC, Kwon KH, Cho JY, Kim SJ, Kim JK, Kim SH, Choi SB, Kim KS. Influencing factors on postoperative hospital stay after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. KOREAN JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SURGERY 2016; 20:12-6. [PMID: 26925145 PMCID: PMC4767266 DOI: 10.14701/kjhbps.2016.20.1.12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2015] [Revised: 11/09/2015] [Accepted: 11/20/2015] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUNDS/AIMS Laparoscopic cholecystectomy can reduce postoperative pain and recovery time. However, some patients experience prolonged postoperative hospital stay. We aimed to identify factors influencing the postoperative hospital stay after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS Patients (n=336) undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallbladder pathology at 8 hospitals were enrolled and divided into 2 groups: 2 or less and more than 2 days postoperative stay. Perioperative factors and patient factors were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS The patient population median age was 52 years, and consisted of 32 emergency and 304 elective operations. A univariate analysis of perioperative factors revealed significant differences in operation time (p<0.001), perioperative transfusion (p=0.006), emergency operation (p<0.001), acute inflammation (p<0.001), and surgical site infection (p=0.041). A univariate analysis of patient factors revealed significant differences in age (p<0.001), gender (p=0.036), diabetes mellitus (p=0.011), preoperative albumin level (p=0.024), smoking (p=0.010), and American Society of Anesthesiologists score (p=0.003). In a multivariate analysis, operation time (p<0.001), emergency operation (p<0.001), age (p=0.014), and smoking (p=0.022) were identified as independent factors influencing length of postoperative hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS Operation time, emergency operation, patient age, and smoking influenced the postoperative hospital stay and should be the focus of efforts to reduce hospital stay after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jae Uk Chong
- Department of Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin Ho Lee
- Department of Surgery, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea
| | - Young Chul Yoon
- Department of Surgery, Incheon St. Mary Hospital, Catholic University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
| | - Kuk Hwan Kwon
- Department of Surgery, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea
| | - Jai Young Cho
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Say-Jun Kim
- Department of Surgery, Daejeon St. Mary Hospital, Catholic University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Jae Keun Kim
- Department of Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sung Hoon Kim
- Department of Surgery, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea
| | - Sae Byeol Choi
- Department of Surgery, Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyung Sik Kim
- Department of Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Reply to: "Early Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis, How Early Should It Be?". Ann Surg 2015; 263:e59. [PMID: 26692075 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000001206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/07/2022]
|
14
|
Diabetes Mellitus in Patients Presenting with Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction: Delaying Surgical Intervention Results in Worse Outcomes. World J Surg 2015; 40:863-9. [DOI: 10.1007/s00268-015-3338-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
15
|
Acute cholecystitis: risk factors for conversion to an open procedure. J Surg Res 2015; 199:357-61. [PMID: 26092215 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.05.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2015] [Revised: 04/21/2015] [Accepted: 05/21/2015] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is one of the most common general surgical procedures performed. Conversion to an open procedure (CTO) is associated with increased morbidity and length of stay. Patients presenting with acute cholecystitis are at higher risk for CTO. Studies have attempted to examine risk factors for CTO in patients who undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis but are limited by small sample size. The aim of this study was to identify preoperative variables that predict higher risk for CTO in patients presenting with acute cholecystitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis from 2005-2011 were identified from the American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Participant Use File. Patients who underwent successful laparoscopic surgery were compared with those who required CTO. Demographics, comorbidities, and 30-d outcomes were analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression was used for variables with P value <0.1, with CTO used as the dependent variable. RESULTS A total of 7242 patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. CTO was reported in 436 patients (6.0%). Those who required conversion were older (60.7 ± 16.2 versus 51.6 ± 18.0, P = 0.0001) and mean body mass index was greater (30.8 ± 7.6 versus 30.0 ± 7.3, P = 0.033) compared with those whose procedure was completed laparoscopically. Vascular, cardiac, renal, pulmonary, neurologic, hepatic disease, diabetes, and bleeding disorders were more prevalent in CTO patients. Mortality (2.3% versus 0.7%, P < 0.0001), overall morbidity (21.8% versus 6.0%, P < 0.0001), serious morbidity (14.9% versus 3.8%, P < 0.0001), reoperation (3.4% versus 1.4%, P = 0.001), and surgical site infection (9.2% versus 1.8%, P < 0.0001) rates, as well as length of stay (8.6 ± 13.0 versus 3.4 ± 6.7, P < 0.0001) were greater in those requiring CTO. The following factors were independently associated with CTO: age (odds ratio [OR], 1.01, P = 0.015), male gender (OR, 1.77, P = 0.005), body mass index (OR, 1.04, P < 0.0001), preoperative alkaline phosphatase (OR, 1.01, P = 0.0005), white blood cell count (OR, 1.06, P = 0.0001), and albumin (OR, 0.52, P = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS CTO for acute cholecystitis remains low but not clinically negligible. The identified risk factors can potentially guide management and patient selection for delayed intervention for acute cholecystitis.
Collapse
|
16
|
Early versus delayed same-admission laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis in elderly patients with comorbidities. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2015; 78:801-7. [PMID: 25742252 DOI: 10.1097/ta.0000000000000577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal timing of same-admission laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for acute cholecystitis (AC) in elderly patients, especially those with significant comorbidities, is not clear. METHODS This is a National Surgical Quality Improvement Program study, which included patients older than 65 years undergoing LC for AC. Patients with choledocholithiasis were excluded. Patients were divided into two subgroups as follows: no significant comorbidities (American Society of Anesthesiologists [ASA] score ≤ 2) and significant comorbidities (ASA score > 2). Patients undergoing LC within 24 hours of admission (early LC) were compared with patients undergoing LC later than 24 hours after admission (delayed LC), using univariable and multivariable regression analyses. RESULTS A total of 4,011 patients were included in the study. Early LC was performed in 38.0% and delayed LC in 62.0% of the patients. Regression analysis identified early LC as an independent predictor for shorter anesthesia time and postoperative length of stay, overall and in the subgroup with an ASA score greater than 2. CONCLUSION Early, within 24 hours of admission, LC for AC in patients older than 65 years with significant comorbidities is associated with shorter postoperative stay and no increase in postoperative complications or conversion to open cholecystectomy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic study, level IV.
Collapse
|
17
|
Can it wait until morning? A comparison of nighttime versus daytime cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Am J Surg 2014; 208:911-8; discussion 917-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2014] [Revised: 09/14/2014] [Accepted: 09/15/2014] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
|
18
|
Slim K, Launay Savary MV. Ne « refroidissez » plus les cholécystites aiguës lithiasiques ! ANNALES FRANCAISES DE MEDECINE D URGENCE 2014. [DOI: 10.1007/s13341-014-0418-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|