Randomized clinical trial comparing liver resection with and without perioperative assessment of liver function

E-AHPBA-ESSO-ESSR Innsbruck consensus guidelines for preoperative liver function assessment before hepatectomy

BACKGROUND

Posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) contributes significantly to morbidity and mortality after liver surgery. Standardized assessment of preoperative liver function is crucial to identify patients at risk. These European consensus guidelines provide guidance for preoperative patient assessment.

METHODS

A modified Delphi approach was used to achieve consensus. The expert panel consisted of hepatobiliary surgeons, radiologists, nuclear medicine specialists, and hepatologists. The guideline process was supervised by a methodologist and reviewed by a patient representative. A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, the Cochrane library, and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry. Evidence assessment and statement development followed Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network methodology.

RESULTS

Based on 271 publications covering 4 key areas, 21 statements (at least 85 per cent agreement) were produced (median level of evidence 2- to 2+). Only a few systematic reviews (2++) and one RCT (1+) were identified. Preoperative liver function assessment should be considered before complex resections, and in patients with suspected or known underlying liver disease, or chemotherapy-associated or drug-induced liver injury. Clinical assessment and blood-based scores reflecting liver function or portal hypertension (for example albumin/bilirubin, platelet count) aid in identifying risk of PHLF. Volumetry of the future liver remnant represents the foundation for assessment, and can be combined with indocyanine green clearance or LiMAx® according to local expertise and availability. Functional MRI and liver scintigraphy are alternatives, combining FLR volume and function in one examination.

CONCLUSION

These guidelines reflect established methods to assess preoperative liver function and PHLF risk, and have uncovered evidence gaps of interest for future research.

Protocol for the CoNoR Study: A prospective multi-step study of the potential added benefit of two novel assessment tools in colorectal liver metastases technical resectability decision-making

INTRODUCTION

Liver resection is the only curative treatment for colorectal liver metastases (CLM). Resectability decision-making is therefore a key determinant of outcomes. Wide variation has been demonstrated in resectability decision-making, despite the existence of criteria. This paper summarises a study protocol to evaluate the potential added value of two novel assessment tools in assessing CLM technical resectability: the Hepatica preoperative MR scan (MR-based volumetry, Couinaud segmentation, liver tissue characteristics and operative planning tool) and the LiMAx test (hepatic functional capacity).

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This study uses a systematic multistep approach, whereby three preparatory workstreams aid the design of the final international case-based scenario survey:Workstream 1: systematic literature review of published resectability criteria.Workstream 2: international hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) interviews.Workstream 3: international HPB questionnaire.Workstream 4: international HPB case-based scenario survey.The primary outcome measures are change in resectability decision-making and change in planned operative strategy, resulting from the novel test results. Secondary outcome measures are variability in CLM resectability decision-making and opinions on the role for novel tools.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study protocol has been approved by a National Health Service Research Ethics Committee and registered with the Health Research Authority. Dissemination will be via international and national conferences. Manuscripts will be published.

REGISTRATION DETAILS

The CoNoR Study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (registration number NCT04270851). The systematic review is registered on the PROSPERO database (registration number CRD42019136748).

Immunomodulation by Hemoadsorption—Changes in Hepatic Biotransformation Capacity in Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Prospective Study

Background: Sepsis is often associated with liver dysfunction, which is an indicator of poor outcomes. Specific diagnostic tools that detect hepatic dysfunction in its early stages are scarce. So far, the immune modulatory effects of hemoadsorption with CytoSorb^® on liver function are unclear. Method: We assessed the hepatic function by using the dynamic LiMAx^® test and biochemical parameters in 21 patients with sepsis or septic shock receiving CytoSorb^® in a prospective, observational study. Points of measurement: T₁: diagnosis of sepsis or septic shock; T₂ and T₃: 24 h and 48 h after the start of CytoSorb^®; T₄: 24 h after termination of CytoSorb^®. Results: The hepatic biotransformation capacity measured by LiMAx^® was severely impaired in up to 95 % of patients. Despite a rapid shock reversal under CytoSorb^®, a significant improvement in LiMAx^® values appeared from T₃ to T₄. This decline and recovery of liver function were not reflected by common parameters of hepatic metabolism that remained mostly within the normal range. Conclusions: Hepatic dysfunction can effectively and safely be diagnosed with LiMAx^® in ventilated ICU patients under CytoSorb^®. Various static liver parameters are of limited use since they do not adequately reflect hepatic dysfunction and impaired hepatic metabolism.

The LiMAx Test as Selection Criteria in Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery

Background: Liver failure is a crucial predictor for relevant morbidity and mortality after hepatic surgery. Hence, a good patient selection is mandatory. We use the LiMAx test for patient selection for major or minor liver resections in robotic and laparoscopic liver surgery and share our experience here. Patients and methods: We identified patients in the Magdeburg registry of minimally invasive liver surgery (MD-MILS) who underwent robotic or laparoscopic minor or major liver surgery and received a LiMAx test for preoperative evaluation of the liver function. This cohort was divided in two groups: patients with normal (LiMAx normal) and decreased (LiMAx decreased) liver function measured by the LiMAx test. Results: Forty patients were selected from the MD-MILS regarding the selection criteria (LiMAx normal, n = 22 and LiMAx decreased, n = 18). Significantly more major liver resections were performed in the LiMAx normal vs. the LiMAx decreased group (13 vs. 2; p = 0.003). Hence, the mean operation time was significantly longer in the LiMAx normal vs. the LiMAx decreased group (356.6 vs. 228.1 min; p = 0.003) and the intraoperative blood transfusion significantly higher in the LiMAx normal vs. the LiMAx decreased group (8 vs. 1; p = 0.027). There was no significant difference between the LiMAx groups regarding the length of hospital stay, intraoperative blood loss, liver surgery related morbidity or mortality, and resection margin status. Conclusion: The LiMAx test is a helpful and reliable tool to precisely determine the liver function capacity. It aids in accurate patient selection for major or minor liver resections in minimally invasive liver surgery, which consequently serves to improve patients’ safety. In this way, liver resections can be performed safely, even in patients with reduced liver function, without negatively affecting morbidity, mortality and the resection margin status, which is an important predictive oncological factor.

Profound decrease of liver maximum function capacity test of isoflurane sedated patients: A report of three cases

LiMAx 13C-methacetin breath test results should be interpreted with caution in patients sedated with isoflurane.

[Surgery in patients with liver cirrhosis]

Hintergrund und Ziel der Arbeit

Patienten mit einer Leberzirrhose, die eine operative Behandlung benötigen, weisen eine hohe Krankenhausmortalität auf. Die vorliegende Studie untersucht die postoperative Morbidität sowie Krankenhausmortalität nach stattgehabter Operation von Patienten mit einer Leberzirrhose.

Material und Methode

Retrospektiv wurden im Zeitraum von 01/2010 bis 12/2017 321 Patienten mit einer Leberzirrhose in unserer Klinik operativ behandelt. Erfasst wurden leberspezifische Scoringsysteme wie MELD(Model of End Stage Liver Disease)- und Child-Pugh-Score (CPS), die Krankenhausletalität und die postoperative Morbidität wurden mittels der Dindo-Clavien-Klassifikation erhoben.

Ergebnisse

Von den 321 Patienten (68 % männlich) wurden 21,2 % als Notfall versorgt. Die Letalität der Notfallpatienten war mit 60 % signifikant höher als die der elektiv operierten Patienten (12 %, p < 0,0001). Komplexe Eingriffe zeigen insgesamt eine Letalität von 41 %, kleinere Eingriffe immer noch 20,5 % (p = 0,0001). Die postoperativen Komplikationsrate und Mortalität zeigten sich nach CPS signifikant unterschiedlich bei 11,8 % bzw. 6,3 % in der CPS-A-Kategorie im Vergleich zu 84 % bzw. 73 % in der CPS-C-Kategorie (p = 0,001). Statistisch steigt die Krankenhausletalität um etwa 20 % mit jedem MELD-Anstieg um einen Punkt (OR 1,23, p = 0,0001). Am schwerwiegendsten ist das Vorliegen einer hepatischen Dekompensation.

Diskussion

Operative Eingriffe von Patienten mit Leberzirrhose sind mit einer hohen Komplikationsrate und Krankenhausletalität verbunden. CPS und MELD können bei der objektiven Risikoeinschätzung helfen, während auch die klinische Untersuchung auf Zeichen einer hepatischen Dekompensation von Bedeutung ist. Natrium, Kreatinin und andere Laborwerte können diese Einschätzung ergänzen.

The effect of mobilization protocol on mobilization start time and patient care outcomes in patients undergoing abdominal surgery

AIM

To evaluate the effect of mobilization protocol on mobilization start time, maintenance of mobilization and patient care outcomes in patients who underwent major abdominal open surgery.

BACKGROUND

Early mobilization in the first 24 hours postoperatively is recommended. Early mobilization is one of the evidence-based, effective nursing interventions that improve patient care outcomes.

DESIGN

A quasi-experimental non-randomised design was used in the study.

METHODS

In the study, the groups were followed sequentially and the data of the control group (n = 21) were collected before the intervention group (n = 21). The patients in the control group were mobilised postoperatively by the nurses according to the decision of the nurse and physician in the intensive care unit (ICU) on the day of the operation. There was no standard protocol for mobilization in the ICU. Mobilization training was given to the patients in the intervention group by the researcher nurse the evening before the operation, and a mobilization protocol was applied on the 0th postoperative day. Data on patient care outcomes were collected until the day when the patient was discharged from the hospital. The TREND checklist was followed.

RESULTS

According to the postoperative comparison of the patients in the intervention group to those in the control group, patients in the intervention group started mobilization earlier after admission in intensive care unit (6.22 ± 1.95 hours versus 12.21 ± 3.76 hours), had higher postoperative 0^th -day total mobilization time (128 minutes versus 34 minutes), had a shorter passage of flatus time and length of intensive care unit and hospital stay and had higher sleep quality and satisfaction scores.

CONCLUSIONS

The structured mobilization protocol is effective in the management of early mobilization and improvement of patient care outcomes.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

mobilization protocols ensure that the mobilization process is maintained effectively.

Pericarditis Caused by Enterococcus faecium with Acute Liver Failure Treated by a Multifaceted Approach including Antimicrobials and Hemoadsorption

Background

Sepsis and septic shock are still life-threatening diseases with a high mortality rate. We report a complex case of peritonitis with pericarditis and acute liver failure caused by septic shock. Potentially hepatotoxic antibiotic therapy levels were monitored using the liver maximum capacity (LiMAx®) test, and standard treatment was supplemented by adjunctive hemoadsorption with CytoSorb®. Case Presentation. The case features a 29-year-old woman with a history of Crohn's disease and cachexia. Peritonitis caused by Enterococcus faecium was diagnosed later due to an ileum perforation. The hematogenic spread led to pericarditis. In addition, sepsis-related acute liver failure complicated antimicrobial therapy further. The combination of standard therapy, anti-infective medication, and blood purification was associated with inflammation control, hemodynamic stabilization, and a concomitant decrease in vasopressor support. An efficient, sustained reduction in plasma bilirubin levels was achieved while maintaining liver function.

Conclusions

This case shows how complex infectious diseases with an atypical infectious focus resulting in septic shock can be successfully treated. A combination of antimicrobial (tigecycline and caspofungin) and long-term adjunctive hemoadsorption therapy was administered while hepatotoxic antibiotic medication was monitored by liver function testing.

Preoperative Liver Function Guiding HCC Resection in Normal and Cirrhotic Liver

Background

Liver resection is the most effective available therapy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The accurate selection of patients for surgery requires determination of technical resectability and the risk of recurrence, as well as assessment of liver function and functional reserve to avoid postoperative liver failure. Previous studies have underlined the effectiveness and reliability of the LiMAx® test to evaluate liver function preoperatively. Nevertheless, data concerning HCC evaluation are lacking.

Methods

From 2014 to 2019, 92 patients with HCC underwent additional assessment of liver function using the LiMAx test prior to decision for or against liver resection. Preoperative LiMAx results were compared between cirrhotic and noncirrhotic liver. The clinical decision for surgery was evaluated applying the various liver function parameters available.

Results

Forty-six patients underwent liver resection. The LiMAx results were higher in resected patients (388 vs. 322 µg/kg/h; p = 0.004). LiMAx values were an independent risk factor for the presence of liver cirrhosis in multivariate analysis. In 17 patients, surgical treatment was cancelled due to major impairment of liver function. Only 4 out of 46 resected patients presented with post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) grade ≥B. Histologic assessment revealed liver cirrhosis in 10 resected patients without PHLF.

Conclusion

Preoperative determination of liver function by the LiMAx test enables effective and safe patient selection for HCC resection in both cirrhotic and noncirrhotic liver.

Postoperative complications and mobilisation following major abdominal surgery with vs. without fitness tracker-based feedback (EXPELLIARMUS): study protocol for a student-led multicentre randomised controlled trial (CHIR-Net SIGMA study group)

BACKGROUND

Postoperative complications following major abdominal surgery are frequent despite progress in surgical technique and perioperative care. Early and enhanced postoperative mobilisation has been advocated to reduce postoperative complications, but it is still unknown whether it can independently improve outcomes after major surgery. Fitness trackers (FTs) are a promising tool to improve postoperative mobilisation, but their effect on postoperative complications and recovery has not been investigated in clinical trials.

METHODS

This is a multicentre randomised controlled trial with two parallel study groups evaluating the efficacy of an enhanced and early mobilisation protocol in combination with FT-based feedback in patients undergoing elective major abdominal surgery. Participants are randomly assigned (1:1) to either the experimental group, which receives daily step goals and a FT giving feedback about daily steps, or the control group, which is mobilised according to hospital standards. The control group also receives a FT, however with a blackened screen; thus no FT-based feedback is possible. Randomisation will be stratified by type of surgery (laparoscopic vs. open). The primary endpoint of the study is postoperative morbidity within 30 days measured via the Comprehensive Complication Index. Secondary endpoints include number of steps as well as a set of functional, morbidity and safety parameters. A total of 348 patients will be recruited in 15 German centres. The study will be conducted and organised by the student-led German Clinical Trial Network SIGMA.

DISCUSSION

Our study aims at investigating whether the implementation of a simple mobilisation protocol in combination with FT-based feedback can reduce postoperative morbidity in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. If so, FTs would offer a cost-effective intervention to enhance postoperative mobilisation and improve patient outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien (DRKS, German Clinical Trials Register): DRKS00016755, UTN U1111-1228-3320. Registered on 06.03.2019.

Dosing of Antimycotic Treatment in Sepsis-Induced Liver Dysfunction by Functional Liver Testing with LiMAx®

Background

Sepsis-treatment is one of the major challenges in our time. Especially fungal infections play an important role in patient's morbidity and mortality. In patients with septic shock, liver function is often significantly impaired and therefore also hepatic drug metabolism is altered.

Case Presentation

We report about a 56-year-old man suffering from invasive fungal infection with multiorgan failure, after complicated medical history due to symptomatic infrarenal aortic aneurysm. On the first postoperative day, a CT scan was undertaken due to massive back pain showing renal infarction on both sides. As qualitative and quantitative renal function was impaired, hemodialysis was started immediately. Subsequently, the patient developed a compartment syndrome of the left leg and underwent fasciotomy. On admission day 7, the patient presented with hematochezia leading to colonoscopy. During this procedure, an ischemic colitis was observed. As conservative treatment failed, the patient underwent Hartmann's procedure due to progredient ischemia followed by a worsening of the clinical status due to sepsis. The patient suffered from an invasive fungal infection with Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp. Systemic antifungal treatment was initiated. Although azoles are considered first-line treatment in these cases we chose the echinocandin caspofungin for its presumed lower impact on liver function compared to azoles like voriconazole or Amphothericin B. However, caspofungin is also metabolised in the liver and can cause hepatotoxic effects. Therefore we measured metabolic liver function capacity using LiMAx®and adapted the patient's dose of caspofungin to the evaluated liver function capacity to achieve an effective and liver-protective level of the active drug. After complicated medical history with 15 weeks of hospital stay, the patient was discharged in general good condition.

Conclusions

To our knowledge, this is the first report that relates antimycotic drug dosing to a functional liver test. We provide a new approach for sepsis treatment considering liver function capacity to optimize dosage of hepatically metabolised drugs with potential hepatotoxic effects.

Enzymatic liver function measured by LiMAx - a reliable diagnostic and prognostic tool in chronic liver disease

Chronic liver disease (CLD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Non-invasive assessment of hepatic disease severity represents a relevant issue to further improve clinical management and therapeutic treatment. We retrospectively compared the diagnostic and prognostic performance of different non-invasive tools (LiMAx, transient elastography (TE), and biomarkers) in detecting different severity stages during the course of CLD. Patients were divided into four groups based on clinical parameters: (1) patients without CLD (control group), (2) patients suffering from CLD without having cirrhosis, (3) patients with CLD and compensated cirrhosis, and finally, (4) patients with CLD and decompensated cirrhosis. Patients with acute liver failure were excluded from the analysis. A total of 464 patients who underwent LiMAx measurement at the University Clinic of Essen between 10/2016 and 11/2017 were included in this study. Distribution of the different groups were n = 72 patients for group 1, n = 134 patients for group 2, n = 160 patients for group 3, and n = 98 patients for group 4, respectively. Median LiMAx values significantly declined with respect to increasing degree of CLD: (1) 510 µg/h/kg, (2) 390 µg/h/kg, (3) 264 µg/h/kg, and (4) 151 µg/h/kg (p < 0.001). When comparing the diagnostic accuracy of the LiMAx test in detecting patients with presence of cirrhosis (groups 1 and 2 vs. groups 3 and 4), an AUROC of 0.942 was found (cut-off 322 µg/h/kg, sensitivity 86.1%, specificity 91.3%, p < 0.0001). LiMAx was superior to TE and serum biomarkers in predicting patients’ outcome by 90-day mortality (AUROC 0.811, p < 0.001). Enzymatic liver function measured by LiMAx was closely associated with different severity stages of CLD and was a reliable diagnostic and prognostic tool with an accuracy comparable to current standard methods.

Noninvasive Evaluation of Liver Function in Morbidly Obese Patients

Background

More than half of the obese patients develop nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), which may further progress to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and cirrhosis. The aim of this study was to assess alterations in liver function in obese patients with a noninvasive liver function test.

Methods

In a prospective cohort study 102 morbidly obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery were evaluated for their liver function. Liver function capacity was determined by the LiMAx® test (enzymatic capacity of cytochrome P450 1A2). Liver biopsy specimens were obtained intraoperatively and classified according to the NAFLD Activity Score (NAS). NASH clinical score was additionally calculated from laboratory and clinical parameters.

Results

Median liver function capacity was 286 (IQR = 141) μg/kg/h. 27% of patients were histologically categorized as definite NASH, 39% as borderline, and 34% as not NASH. A significant correlation was observed between liver function capacity and NAS (r = −0.492; p < 0.001). The sensitivity and specificity of the LiMAx® test to distinguish between definite NASH and not NASH were 85.2% and 82.9% (AUROC 0.859), respectively. According to the NASH clinical scoring system, 14% were classified as low risk, 31% as intermediate, 26% as high, and 29% as very high risk. Liver function capacity is also significantly correlated with the NASH clinical scoring system (r = −0.411; p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Obese patients show a diminished liver function capacity, especially those suffering from type 2 diabetes. The liver function capacity correlates with histological and clinical scoring systems. The LiMAx® test may be a valuable tool for noninvasive screening for NASH in obese patients.