Association of neurofascin IgG4 and atypical chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy: A Narrative Review of a Systematic Diagnostic Approach to Avoid Misdiagnosis

Chronic inflammatory demyelination polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is a rare autoimmune neuropathy generated by cellular and humoral immune responses. Its course can be chronic, progressive, monophasic, or relapsing-remitting. Misdiagnosis and inappropriate therapy are common in CIDP. Given the scarcity of integrative information, we aimed to briefly summarize the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical phenotypes, diagnostic tools, and diagnostic criteria and provide a systematic diagnostic approach. We reviewed articles on Medline (PubMed) from 2018 to 2023, using Google Scholar to summarize the topics. The results are presented as a narrative review, in accordance with recommendations of the Scale for the Assessment of Narrative Review Articles (SANRA) guidelines. The included evidence showed that CIDP is a challenging neuropathy to diagnose and treat. Pathologic factors initiating typical CIDP and atypical CIDP are still clearly unknown. CIDP is diagnosed using the European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society (EFNS/PNS) criteria, which combine clinical features with electrophysiological evidence of demyelination. However, some patients need to fulfill the requirements. Another challenge is monitoring the disease progression and recognizing patients who do not respond to evidence-based first-line therapy to individualize their treatment. Based on the evidence, we conclude that 2021 EFNS/PNS guidelines allow for a more accurate diagnosis and treatment of CIDP and its variants. New diagnostic tools and molecular approaches are helpful in the diagnosis process but cannot replace clinical and electrodiagnostic criteria.

Clinical and pathophysiological implications of autoantibodies in autoimmune neuropathies

Autoimmune neuropathies are a heterogeneous group of rare and disabling diseases in which the immune system targets peripheral nervous system antigens and that respond to immune therapies. This review focuses on Guillain-Barré syndrome, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, multifocal motor neuropathy, polyneuropathy associated with IgM monoclonal gammopathy, and autoimmune nodopathies. Autoantibodies targeting gangliosides, proteins in the node of Ranvier, and myelin-associated glycoprotein have been described in these disorders, defining subgroups of patients with similar clinical features and response to therapy. This topical review describes the role of these autoantibodies in the pathogenesis of autoimmune neuropathies and their clinical and therapeutic importance.

A first case of childhood chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy associated with alopecia universalis

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is an acquired demyelinating disease of the peripheral nervous system with unknown etiology. Alopecia universalis, an advanced form of alopecia areata (AA), is a condition characterized by complete hair loss. Here we report the first case of childhood CIDP associated with AA who was successfully treated with a combination of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) and corticosteroids. CASE REPORT: This case describes a nine-year-old Japanese girl who developed alopecia, progressive muscle weakness, and eventually loss of walking ability (at ages 2, 4, and 7, respectively). She was treated with IVIg and prednisolone combination therapy, which improved muscle weakness and alopecia. She was positive for serum IgG-GM2 type anti-glycolipid antibodies, which may be associated with this rare combination of diseases.

Autoantibodies in central nervous system and neuromuscular autoimmune disorders: A narrative review

The discovery of novel autoantibodies in neurological disorders contributes to a better understanding of its pathogenesis, improves the accuracy of diagnosis, and leads to new treatment strategies. Advances in techniques for the screening and detection of autoantibodies have enabled the discovery of new antibodies in the central nervous system (CNS) and neuromuscular diseases. Cell-based assays using live or fixed cells overexpressing target antigens are widely used for autoantibody-based diagnosis in clinical practice. Common pathogenic autoantibodies are unknown in most patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP). Novel pathogenic autoantibodies to aquaporin-4 and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) have been identified in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder and MOG antibody-associated disease, respectively. These diseases have clinical similarities to MS, but with the discovery of pathogenic autoantibodies, they are now recognized as distinct disease entities. Antibodies to paranodal membrane proteins such as neurofascin-155, contactin‑1, contactin‑associated protein‑1 in CIDP and muscle-specific kinase and low-density lipoprotein receptor–related protein 4 in myasthenia gravis were added to the profiles of autoantibodies in neurological disorders. Despite the relatively low frequency of seropositivity, autoantibody detection is currently essential for the clinical diagnosis of CNS and neuromuscular autoimmune disorders, and differential approaches to seropositive patients will contribute to more personalized medicine. We reviewed recent discoveries of autoantibodies and their clinical implications in CNS and neuromuscular disorders.

Clinical and Laboratory Features in Anti-NF155 Autoimmune Nodopathy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To study the clinical and laboratory features of antineurofascin-155 (NF155)-positive autoimmune nodopathy (AN).

METHODS

Patients with anti-NF155 antibodies detected on routine immunologic testing were included. Clinical characteristics, treatment response, and functional scales (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] and Inflammatory Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale [I-RODS]) were retrospectively collected at baseline and at the follow-up. Autoantibody and neurofilament light (NfL) chain levels were analyzed at baseline and at the follow-up.

RESULTS

Forty NF155+ patients with AN were included. Mean age at onset was 42.4 years. Patients presented with a progressive (75%), sensory motor (87.5%), and symmetric distal-predominant weakness in upper (97.2%) and lower extremities (94.5%), with tremor and ataxia (75%). Patients received a median of 3 (2-4) different treatments in 46 months of median follow-up. Response to IV immunoglobulin (86.8%) or steroids (72.2%) was poor in most patients, whereas 77.3% responded to rituximab. HLA-DRB1*15 was detected in 91.3% of patients. IgG4 anti-NF155 antibodies were predominant in all patients; anti-NF155 titers correlated with mRS within the same patient (r = 0.41, p = 0.004). Serum NfL (sNfL) levels were higher in anti-NF155+ AN than in healthy controls (36.47 vs 7.56 pg/mL, p < 0.001) and correlated with anti-NF155 titers (r = 0.43, p = 0.001), with I-RODS at baseline (r = -0.88, p < 0.001) and with maximum I-RODS achieved (r = -0.58, p = 0.01). Anti-NF155 titers and sNfL levels decreased in all rituximab-treated patients.

DISCUSSION

Anti-NF155 AN presents a distinct clinical profile and good response to rituximab. Autoantibody titers and sNfL are useful to monitor disease status in these patients. The use of untagged-NF155 plasmids minimizes the detection of false anti-NF155+ cases.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class IV evidence that anti-NF155 antibodies associate with a specific phenotype and response to rituximab.

Neurofascin-155 Immunoglobulin Subtypes: Clinicopathologic Associations and Neurologic Outcomes

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Multiple studies highlighting diagnostic utility of neurofascin 155 (NF155)-IgG4 in chronic demyelinating inflammatory polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) have been published. However, few studies comprehensively address the long-term outcomes, or clinical utility of NF155-IgM or NF155-IgG, in the absence of NF155-IgG4. In this study we evaluate phenotypic and histopathological specificity, and differences in outcomes between these NF155 antibody isotypes or IgG subclasses. We also compare NF155-IgG4 seropositive cases to other seropositive demyelinating neuropathies.

METHODS

In this study, neuropathy patient sera seen at Mayo Clinic were tested for NF155-IgG4, NF155-IgG and NF155-IgM autoantibodies. Demographic and clinical data of all seropositive cases were reviewed.

RESULTS

We identified 32 NF155 patients (25 NF155-IgG positive [20 NF155-IgG4 positive], 7 NF155-IgM seropositive). NF155-IgG4 seropositive patients clinically presented with distal more than proximal muscle weakness, positive sensory symptoms (prickling, asymmetric paresthesia, neuropathic pain) and gait ataxia. Cranial nerve involvement (11/20, 55%) and papilledema (4/12, 33%) occurred in many. Electrodiagnostic testing (EDX) demonstrated demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (19/20, 95%). Autonomic involvement occurred in 45% (n=9, median CASS score 3.5, range 1-7). Nerve biopsies from the NF155-IgG4 patients (n=11) demonstrated grouped segmental demyelination (50%), myelin reduplication (45%) and paranodal swellings (50%). Most patients needed 2^nd and 3^rd line immunosuppression but had favorable long-term outcomes (n=18). Among 14 patients with serial EDX over 2 years, all except one demonstrated improvement after treatment. NF155-IgG positive NF155-IgG4 negative (NF155-IgG positive) and NF155-IgM positive patients were phenotypically different from NF155-IgG4 seropositive patients. Sensory ataxia, neuropathic pain, cerebellar dysfunction and root/plexus MRI abnormalities were significantly more common in NF155-IgG4 positive compared to MAG-IgM neuropathy. Chronic immune sensory polyradiculopathy (CISP)/CISP-plus phenotype was more common among Contactin-1 neuropathies compared to NF155-IgG4 positive cases. NF155-IgG4 positive cases responded favorably to immunotherapy compared to MAG-IgM seropositive cases with distal acquired demyelinating symmetric neuropathy (p<0.001) and had better long-term clinical outcomes compared to contactin-1 IgG (p=0.04).

DISCUSSION

We report long-term follow-up and clinical outcome of NF155-IgG4 patients. NF155-IgG4 but not IgM or IgG patients have unique clinical-electrodiagnostic signature. We demonstrate NF155-IgG4 positive patients, unlike classical CIDP with neuropathic pain and dysautonomia common at presentation. Long-term outcomes were favorable.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class III evidence that NF155-IgG4 seropositive patients, compared to typical CIDP patients, present with distal more than proximal muscle weakness, positive sensory symptoms, and gait ataxia.

European Academy of Neurology/Peripheral Nerve Society guideline on diagnosis and treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: Report of a joint Task Force-Second revision

OBJECTIVE

To revise the 2010 consensus guideline on chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP).

METHODS

Seventeen disease experts, a patient representative, and two Cochrane methodologists constructed 12 Population/Intervention/Comparison/Outcome (PICO) questions regarding diagnosis and treatment to guide the literature search. Data were extracted and summarized in GRADE summary of findings (for treatment PICOs) or evidence tables (for diagnostic PICOs).

RESULTS

Statements were prepared according to the GRADE Evidence-to-Decision frameworks. Typical CIDP and CIDP variants were distinguished. The previous term "atypical CIDP" was replaced by "CIDP variants" because these are well characterized entities (multifocal, focal, distal, motor, or sensory CIDP). The levels of diagnostic certainty were reduced from three (definite, probable, possible CIDP) to only two (CIDP and possible CIDP), because the diagnostic accuracy of criteria for probable and definite CIDP did not significantly differ. Good Practice Points were formulated for supportive criteria and investigations to be considered to diagnose CIDP. The principal treatment recommendations were: (a) intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) or corticosteroids are strongly recommended as initial treatment in typical CIDP and CIDP variants; (b) plasma exchange is strongly recommended if IVIg and corticosteroids are ineffective; (c) IVIg should be considered as first-line treatment in motor CIDP (Good Practice Point); (d) for maintenance treatment, IVIg, subcutaneous immunoglobulin or corticosteroids are recommended; (e) if the maintenance dose of any of these is high, consider either combination treatments or adding an immunosuppressant or immunomodulatory drug (Good Practice Point); and (f) if pain is present, consider drugs against neuropathic pain and multidisciplinary management (Good Practice Point).

European Academy of Neurology/Peripheral Nerve Society guideline on diagnosis and treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: Report of a joint Task Force-Second revision

To revise the 2010 consensus guideline on chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP). Seventeen disease experts, a patient representative, and two Cochrane methodologists constructed 12 Population/Intervention/Comparison/Outcome (PICO) questions regarding diagnosis and treatment to guide the literature search. Data were extracted and summarized in GRADE summary of findings (for treatment PICOs) or evidence tables (for diagnostic PICOs). Statements were prepared according to the GRADE Evidence-to-Decision frameworks. Typical CIDP and CIDP variants were distinguished. The previous term "atypical CIDP" was replaced by "CIDP variants" because these are well characterized entities (multifocal, focal, distal, motor, or sensory CIDP). The levels of diagnostic certainty were reduced from three (definite, probable, possible CIDP) to only two (CIDP and possible CIDP), because the diagnostic accuracy of criteria for probable and definite CIDP did not significantly differ. Good Practice Points were formulated for supportive criteria and investigations to be considered to diagnose CIDP. The principal treatment recommendations were: (a) intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) or corticosteroids are strongly recommended as initial treatment in typical CIDP and CIDP variants; (b) plasma exchange is strongly recommended if IVIg and corticosteroids are ineffective; (c) IVIg should be considered as first-line treatment in motor CIDP (Good Practice Point); (d) for maintenance treatment, IVIg, subcutaneous immunoglobulin or corticosteroids are recommended; (e) if the maintenance dose of any of these is high, consider either combination treatments or adding an immunosuppressant or immunomodulatory drug (Good Practice Point); and (f) if pain is present, consider drugs against neuropathic pain and multidisciplinary management (Good Practice Point).

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Autoantibodies for Diagnosis and Prognosis in Patients With Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy

Objectives: To review the available evidence on sensitivity and specificity of anti-NF155 antibody detection in diagnosing a specific subset of patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) and to calculate the frequencies of different autoantibodies to paranodal proteins. Background: Diagnosis of CIDP relies on clinical and neurophysiologic criteria and lacks useful diagnostic biomarkers. A subset of CIDP patients exhibit atypical clinical phenotypes and impaired response to conventional treatments. These patients were reported as having autoantibodies targeting paranodal protein neurofascin isoform 155 (NF155), contactin-1 (CNTN1), and contactin-associated protein-1 (CASPR1). Here, we conducted a meta-analysis to summarize evidence on the diagnostic and prognostic value of these autoantibodies, especially for anti-NF155 antibody. Methods: We searched the following electronic bibliographic databases: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science. Eligible studies provided information to calculate the frequencies of anti-NF155 antibody and anti-CNTN1 antibody, the sensitivity and specificity of anti-NF155 antibody, and the incidence of improvement and deterioration among anti-NF155 antibody seropositive CIDP patients. Heterogeneity was assessed using Q and I ² statistics. Results: The pooled frequency of anti-NF155 autoantibody across 14 studies was 7% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.05-0.10] with high heterogeneity; the overall pooled sensitivity and specificity of anti-NF155 antibody for the diagnosis of a specific subgroup of CIDP patients were 0.45 (95% CI: 0.29-0.63) and 0.93 (95% CI: 0.86-0.97), respectively. Conclusions: For diagnosing of a specific subset of CIDP characterized by poor response to intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), we found a moderate sensitivity and a high specificity. The anti-NF155 antibody test should be used as a confirmatory test rather than a screening test. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO, identifier: CRD42020203385 and CRD42020190789.

Neurofascin antibodies in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: from intrinsic genetic background to clinical manifestations

There are bunch of autoantibodies, particularly autoantibodies against proteins located at the node of Ranvier, have been discovered and transformed the clinical management of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP). Neurofascin (NF) plays an important role in both the nodal and paranodal regions of the node of Ranvier. In this review, we focus on the two characteristic forms of neurofascin: NF186 and NF155, comparing the similarities and differences between them, reviewing the current knowledge on genetic backgrounds, pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and management of patients with anti-neurofascin positive CIDP. Autoantibodies against neurofascin were mainly IgG4 isotype. Mutation of NFASC gene in human causes severe neurodevelopment disorders, and HLA DRB1*15 may be a strong risk factor for the development of anti-NF155 antibodies. Motor impairment, sensory ataxia, and tremor were the typical presentations of patients with anti-NF155+ CIDP, while tetraplegia and cranial nerve involvement were more common in patients with anti-NF186+ CIDP. Recent studies have depicted a relatively clear picture of anti-NF155+ CIDP, and the strong clinical correlation of NF186 with CIDP remains unclear. The genetic background of neurofascin will assist in future explorations.

Diagnostic challenges in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) consists of a spectrum of autoimmune diseases of the peripheral nerves, causing weakness and sensory symptoms. Diagnosis often is challenging, because of the heterogeneous presentation and both mis- and underdiagnosis are common. Nerve conduction study (NCS) abnormalities suggestive of demyelination are mandatory to fulfil the diagnostic criteria. On the one hand, performance and interpretation of NCS can be difficult and none of these demyelinating findings are specific for CIDP. On the other hand, not all patients will be detected despite the relatively high sensitivity of NCS abnormalities. The electrodiagnostic criteria can be supplemented with additional diagnostic tests such as CSF examination, MRI, nerve biopsy, and somatosensory evoked potentials. However, the evidence for each of these additional diagnostic tests is limited. Studies are often small without the use of a clinically relevant control group. None of the findings are specific for CIDP, meaning that the results of the diagnostic tests should be carefully interpreted. In this update we will discuss the pitfalls in diagnosing CIDP and the value of newly introduced diagnostic tests such as nerve ultrasound and testing for autoantibodies, which are not yet part of the guidelines.

Contactin-1 autoimmunity: Serologic, neurologic, and pathologic correlates

OBJECTIVE

To determine serologic characteristics, frequency, phenotype, paraneoplastic associations, and electrodiagnostic and histopathologic features accompanying contactin-1 autoimmunity.

METHODS

Archived sera known to produce synaptic tissue-based immunofluorescence patterns were reevaluated, and contactin-1 specificity was confirmed by recombinant protein assays. Screening of 233 chronic/relapsing demyelinating neuropathies for additional cases was performed.

RESULTS

We identified 10 contactin-1 IgG seropositive cases. Frequency of contactin-1 immunoglobulin (Ig) G among tested Mayo Clinic chronic/relapsing demyelinating neuropathies was 2%. Sensory predominant presentations (n = 9, 90%), neuropathic pain (n = 6, 60%), and subacute progression (n = 5, 50%) were commonly encountered among contactin-1 neuropathies. Two patients had chronic immune sensory polyradiculopathy-like phenotype at presentation. Electrodiagnostic studies were consistent with demyelination (slowed conduction velocities and/or prolonged distal latencies) without conduction block. Markedly elevated CSF protein (median 222 mg/dL, range 69-960 mg/dL), thickening/gadolinium enhancement of nerve roots (4/5), and subperineural edema on nerve biopsy (4/4) were other characteristic features. Three cases were diagnosed with paraneoplastic demyelinating neuropathies (thymoma, n = 1; breast cancer, n = 1; plasmacytoma, n = 1). Four of the 9 patients treated with IV immunoglobulin demonstrated initial clinical improvement, but the favorable response was sustained in only 1 case (median follow-up, 60 months). Sustained clinical stabilization or improvement was observed among 3 of the 6 cases in whom second-line therapies (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, and azathioprine) were used.

CONCLUSION

Contactin-1 IgG has a distinct sensory predominant presentation commonly associated with neuropathic pain, with demyelinating changes on electrophysiologic studies. A paraneoplastic cause should be considered. Testing of contactin-1 IgG among cases with similar presentations may guide immunotherapy selection, especially second-line immunotherapy consideration.

Longitudinal study on nerve ultrasound and corneal confocal microscopy in NF155 paranodopathy

We report the case of a 27‐year‐old patient with subacute anti‐neurofascin‐155 neuropathy with bifacial palsy, who showed excellent response to rituximab. We provide longitudinal data of established clinical scores, nerve conduction studies, antibody titers, and novel imaging methods (nerve ultrasonography and corneal confocal microscopy). Clinical and electrophysiological improvement followed the reduction of serum antibody titer and correlated with a reduction of corneal inflammatory cellular infiltrates whereas the increase in the cross‐sectional area of the peripheral nerves remained 12 months after first manifestation. Our findings suggest that novel techniques provide useful follow‐up parameters in paranodopathies.

Distinguish CIDP with autoantibody from that without autoantibody: pathogenesis, histopathology, and clinical features

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is considered to be an immune-mediated heterogeneous disease involving cellular and humoral immunity. In recent years, autoantibodies against nodal/paranodal protein neurofascin155 (NF155), neurofascin186 (NF186), contactin-1 (CNTN1), and contactin-associated protein 1 (CASPR1) have been identified in a small subset of patients with CIDP, which disrupt axo-glial interactions at nodes/paranodes. Although CIDP electrodiagnosis was made in patients with anti-nodal/paranodal component autoantibodies, macrophage-induced demyelination, the characteristic of typical CIDP, was not observed. Apart from specific histopathology, the pathogenic mechanisms and clinical manifestations of CIDP with autoantibody are also distinct. We herein compared pathogenesis, histopathology, clinical manifestations, and therapeutic response in CIDP with autoantibody vs. CIDP without autoantibody. CIDP with autoantibodies should be considered as an independent disease entity, not a subtype of CIDP due to many differences. They possibly should be classified as CIDP-like chronic nodo-paranodopathy, which can better characterize these disorders, help diagnose and make the most effective therapeutic decisions.

Antibodies against nodo-paranodal proteins are not present in genetic neuropathies

OBJECTIVE

To study the presence of nodal and paranodal immunoglobulin M (IgM) and immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies in patients with genetic neuropathies.

METHODS

A total of 108 patients with genetic neuropathies from 3 different centers were included. The presence of IgG and IgM antibodies against neurofascin-155 (NF155), nodal neurofascin (NF186 and NF140), and contactin-1 (CNTN1) were investigated with a cell-based assay (CBA) using immunocytochemistry in transfected HEK293 cells. Sera with positive or uncertain results were further tested by ELISA and immunohistochemistry in pig teased-nerve fibers.

RESULTS

Six patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) had an uncertain staining pattern for IgM against nodal neurofascin that was not confirmed by ELISA. Two patients with CMT had an uncertain staining pattern for IgG against nodal neurofascin that was not confirmed by ELISA or immunohistochemistry. One patient with CMT with a confirmed GJB1 mutation tested positive for IgG against NF155 by CBA and ELISA (1/900), but was not confirmed by immunohistochemistry and was ultimately classified as negative.

CONCLUSIONS

Antibodies against nodal or paranodal antigens were not detected in our cohort of patients with CMT, as previously reported. Some patients may falsely test positive for any of the techniques; confirmatory techniques should be incorporated into the routine testing.

Association of neurofascin IgG4 and atypical chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is the most commonly observed phenotype among chronic acquired demyelinating polyneuropathies and is clinically variable. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the diagnostic value and characteristics of CIDP targeting neurofascin 155 (NF155).

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed on March 2018, and two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias on MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library to identify relevant articles.

RESULTS

Ten articles for the NF155 protein test with 1,161 patients and 1,636 controls were identified. The results showed that the pooled sensitivity was 0.09 (95% CI: 0.06-015), and specificity was 1.00 (95% CI: 0.98-1.00) of the NF155 for CIDP. The meta-analysis revealed that the sensory ataxic occurrence rate (OR: 10.79, 95% CI: 5.24-22.22) and tremor occurrence rate (OR: 6.71, 95% CI: 3.37-13.39) were higher among patients positive for NF155 compared with NF155-negative CIDP patients. However, the rate of good treatment response to intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) (OR: 0.09, 95% CI: 0.02-0.42) was lower in NF155-positive CIDP patients.

CONCLUSIONS

NF155 is a specific protein marker for CIDP, but its diagnostic value has been questioned due to low sensitivity. However, as an antibody against paranodal antigens, NF155 seems more valuable in defining clinical subsets of CIDP.