1
|
Reinbergs EJ, Rogers ML, Anderson JR, Pryor SM. Firearm carrying and adolescent suicide risk outcomes between 2015 and 2021 across nationally representative samples. Suicide Life Threat Behav 2024; 54:302-309. [PMID: 38223934 DOI: 10.1111/sltb.13042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Revised: 01/02/2024] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 01/16/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Firearms are the most frequent means of youth suicide for the 14-18-year-old age group, and adolescent firearm access confers substantial increases in the risk of suicidal behaviors. There have been significant increases in firearm purchases and firearm violence in the United States since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS This study uses four time points of nationally representative data from the Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS) from 2015 to 2021 to examine the differential associations of reporting having carried a firearm and suicide-related outcomes, after controlling for relevant demographic factors. As a sensitivity analysis, we examined whether a similar risk pattern was seen for the probability of reporting depressed mood. RESULTS Results reveal significant increases in suicide-related outcomes among students who reported carrying a firearm and no significant increases among those who did not. Unlike the suicide-related outcomes, increases in depressed mood overtime were not limited to students who carried firearms, suggesting that the risk associated with firearms may be specific to suicide-related outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Carrying a firearm is associated with significant increases in the risk of suicidal ideation and behaviors among youth and this risk has increased between 2015 and 2021. Implications for youth suicide prevention and directions for future research are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erik J Reinbergs
- Department of Clinical Health and Applied Sciences, University of Houston Clear Lake, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Megan L Rogers
- Department of Psychology, Texas State University, College Station, Texas, USA
| | - Jacqueline R Anderson
- Department of School Psychology, University of Northern Colorado, Greeley, Colorado, USA
| | - Sarah M Pryor
- Department of School Psychology, University of Northern Colorado, Greeley, Colorado, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Baiden P, Eugene DR, Nicholas JK, Spoor S, Brown FA, LaBrenz CA. Misuse of Prescription Opioids and Suicidal Behaviors Among Black Adolescents: Findings from the 2017 and 2019 Youth Risk Behavior Survey. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities 2022:10.1007/s40615-022-01369-5. [PMID: 35861928 DOI: 10.1007/s40615-022-01369-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2022] [Revised: 07/05/2022] [Accepted: 07/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Although some studies have examined the association between prescription opioid misuse and mental health outcomes, few have investigated the effects of prescription opioid misuse on suicidal behaviors among Black adolescents. The objective of this study was to investigate the cross-sectional association between prescription opioid misuse and suicidal ideation, suicide plan, and suicide attempt among Black adolescents. METHODS Data for this study came from the 2017 and 2019 Youth Risk Behavior Survey. An analytic sample of 4798 Black adolescents aged 14-18 years (51.2% female) was analyzed using binary logistic regression. The outcome variables investigated were suicidal ideation, suicide plan, and suicide attempt, and the main explanatory variable was prescription opioid misuse. RESULTS Of the 4798 Black adolescents, 15% reported ever misusing prescription opioids; 16.2% experienced suicidal ideation; 14% made a suicide plan; and 11.3% attempted suicide during the past 12 months. In the multivariate logistic regression models, Black adolescents who misused prescription opioids had 1.39 times higher odds of making a suicide plan and 1.65 times higher odds of making a suicide attempt during the past 12 months when compared to their counterparts who did not misuse prescription opioids. Other significant factors associated with suicidal behaviors include female sex, school bullying, cyberbullying, depressive symptoms, and illicit drug use. In addition, physical activity had a protective effect on suicide attempt. CONCLUSION The findings of the present study demonstrate the effects of prescription opioid misuse and its association with suicidal behaviors among Black adolescents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip Baiden
- School of Social Work, The University of Texas at Arlington, 211 S. Cooper St, Box 19129, Arlington, TX, 76019, USA.
| | - Danielle R Eugene
- School of Social Work, The University of Texas at Arlington, 211 S. Cooper St, Box 19129, Arlington, TX, 76019, USA
| | - Julia K Nicholas
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Louisville, Room 317 Life Sciences Building, Louisville, KY, 40292, USA
| | - Samantha Spoor
- Department of Psychology, University of Wyoming, 1000 E. University Ave, Laramie, WY, 82071, USA
| | - Fawn A Brown
- Department of Psychology, The University of Texas at Arlington, 501 Nedderman Dr, Box 19528, Arlington, TX, 76019, USA
| | - Catherine A LaBrenz
- School of Social Work, The University of Texas at Arlington, 211 S. Cooper St, Box 19129, Arlington, TX, 76019, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ilic I, Zivanovic Macuzic I, Kocic S, Ilic M. Worldwide suicide mortality trends by firearm (1990–2019): A joinpoint regression analysis. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0267817. [PMID: 35613099 PMCID: PMC9132310 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2022] [Accepted: 04/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction
Suicide by firearm is a major public health problem in many countries. But, studies that investigated the mortality of suicide by firearm on a global scale are still limited. The aim of this study was to assess the global, regional and national trends in mortality of suicide by firearm from 1990 to 2019.
Method
Mortality data of suicide by firearm was presented using the age-standardized rates (ASRs, expressed per 100,000). Joinpoint regression analysis was used to assess trends of mortality of suicide by firearm: the average annual percent change (AAPC) with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (95%CI) was calculated.
Results
A total of 52,694 (45,110 male and 7584 female) deaths of suicide by firearm were reported worldwide in 2019. The global ASR of suicide by firearm was six-fold higher in males than in females (1.15 per 100,000 and 0.19 per 100,000, respectively), and varied greatly across countries: the highest rates were in Greenland (24.52 per 100,000 and 2.69 per 100,000, respectively) and the United States of America (10.13 per 100,000 and 1.66 per 100,000, respectively), while the lowest rates (0.05 per 100,000 or less) were observed in China, Japan and Singapore. Globally, the mortality of suicide by firearm had a decreasing tendency from 1990 to 2019 in both sexes together (AAPC = -2.0% per year; 95%CI = -2.1 to -1.9).
Conclusion
Decreasing trends in mortality of suicide by firearm were observed in majority of countries across the world, but not in all. Future research should determine more effective ways to further reduce mortality of suicide by firearm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irena Ilic
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Ivana Zivanovic Macuzic
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, Department of Anatomy, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia
| | - Sanja Kocic
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, Department of Social Medicine, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia
| | - Milena Ilic
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, Department of Epidemiology, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Takada S, Choi KR, Natsui S, Saadi A, Buchbinder L, Easterlin M, Zimmerman FJ. Firearm laws and the network of firearm movement among US states. BMC Public Health 2021; 21:1803. [PMID: 34620159 PMCID: PMC8499462 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-11772-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2020] [Accepted: 09/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The movement of firearm across state lines may decrease the effectiveness of state-level firearm laws. Yet, how state-level firearm policies affect cross-state movement have not yet been widely explored. This study aims to characterize the interstate movement of firearms and its relationship with state-level firearm policies. Methods We analyzed the network of interstate firearm movement using Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives firearm trace data (2010–2017). We constructed the network of firearm movement between 50 states. We used zero-inflated negative binomial regression to estimate the relationship between the number of a state’s firearm laws and number of states for which it was the source of 100 or more firearms, adjusting for state characteristics. We used a similar model to examine the relationship between firearm laws and the number of states for which a given state was the destination of 100 or more firearms. Results Over the 8-year period, states had an average of 26 (Standard Deviation [SD] 25.2) firearm laws. On average, a state was the source of 100 or more crime-related firearms for 2.2 (SD 2.7) states and was the destination of 100 or more crime-related firearms for 2.2 (SD 3.4) states. Greater number of firearm laws was associated with states being the source of 100 or more firearms to fewer states (Incidence Rate Ratio [IRR] 0.58 per SD, p < 0.001) and being the destination of 100 or more firearms from more states (IRR1.73 per SD, p < 0.001). Conclusions Restrictive state-level firearm policies are associated with less movement of firearms to other states, but with more movement of firearms from outside states. The effectiveness of state-level firearm-restricting laws is complicated by a network of interstate firearm movement. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-021-11772-y.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sae Takada
- Division of General Internal Medicine & Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90024, USA. .,U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Health Services Research & Development, Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, & Policy, Los Angeles, CA, 90073, USA.
| | - Kristen R Choi
- Division of General Internal Medicine & Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90024, USA.,University of California Los Angeles School of Nursing, Los Angeles, CA, 90024, USA
| | - Shaw Natsui
- Division of General Internal Medicine & Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90024, USA.,NYC Health + Hospitals, New York, NY, 10013, USA
| | - Altaf Saadi
- Division of General Internal Medicine & Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90024, USA.,Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02120, USA
| | - Liza Buchbinder
- Division of General Internal Medicine & Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90024, USA.,Center for Social Medicine and Humanities, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA
| | - Molly Easterlin
- Division of General Internal Medicine & Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90024, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA.,Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, LAC+USC Medical Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
| | - Frederick J Zimmerman
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Fielding School of Public Health University of California, Los Angeles, 90024, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW We review recent evidence on suicide among older adults, examine risk factors contributing to vulnerability to late-life suicide, and summarize possible interventions. RECENT FINDINGS We found a steadily increasing rate of late-life suicide in the USA in the past decade. Evidence supporting the integration of depression care managers into primary care for risk reduction is among the strongest to date. Pharmacologic and neuromodulation studies should be considered in geriatric depression complicated by suicidality. Broad societal campaigns about suicide education, as well as active outreach to psychiatric patients after discharge or a suicidal crisis, prevent suicidal behavior. Growing research supports an integrative multidisciplinary approach. Suicide is a complex and multifaceted behavior with numerous casual points for intervention. Access to deadly means, presence of depression, disease, disability, and social disconnection are factors that increase vulnerability. Quality geriatric care, regular screening in primary and emergency care settings, and a multidisciplinary approach are necessary to mitigate risk factors. The COVID-19 pandemic amplifies need for a more aggressive approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivia J Ding
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Gary J Kennedy
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Bronx, NY, USA.
- Division of Geriatric Psychiatry, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Scantling DR, Hynes AM, Kaufman EJ, Byrne J, Holena DN, Seamon MJ. Bang for the buck: The impact of political financial contributions on firearm law. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2021; 91:54-63. [PMID: 33605700 DOI: 10.1097/ta.0000000000003117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND One hundred thousand Americans are shot annually, and 39,000 die. State laws restricting firearm sales and use have been shown to decrease firearm deaths, yet little is known about what impacts their passage or repeal. We hypothesized that spending by groups that favor firearm restrictive legislation would increase new state firearm restrictive laws (FRLs) and that states increasing these laws would endure fewer firearm deaths. METHODS We acquired 2013 to 2018 state data on spending by groups against firearm restrictive legislation and for firearm restrictive legislation regarding lobbying, campaign, and independent and total expenditures from the National Institute on Money in State Politics. State-level political party representation data were acquired from the National Conference of State Legislatures. Mass shooting data were obtained from the Mass Shooter Database of the Violence Project, and firearm death rates were obtained from Centers for Disease Control Wide-ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research and Federal Bureau of Investigation Uniform Crime Reporting databases. Firearm restrictive laws were obtained from the State Firearms Law Database. A univariate panel linear regression with fixed effect for state was performed with change in FRLs from baseline as the outcome. A final multivariable panel regression with fixed effect for state was then used. Firearm death rates were compared by whether states increased, decreased, or had no change in FRLs. RESULTS Twenty-two states gained and 13 lost FRLs, while 15 states had no net change (44%, 26%, and 30%; p = 0.484). In multivariable regression accounting for partisan control of state government, for-firearm restrictive legislation groups outspending against-firearm restrictive legislation groups had the largest association with increased FRLs (β = 1.420; 95% confidence interval, 0.63-2.21; p < 0.001). States that gained FRLs had significantly lower firearm death rates (p < 0.001). Relative to states with no change in FRLs, states that lost FRLs had an increase in overall firearm death of 1 per 100,000 individuals. States that gained FRLs had a net decrease in median overall firearm death of 0.5 per 100,000 individuals. CONCLUSION Higher political spending by groups in favor of restrictive firearm legislation has a powerful association with increasing and maintaining FRLs. States that increased their FRLs, in turn, showed lower firearm death rates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Epidemiological, level I.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dane R Scantling
- From the Division of Traumatology, Surgical Critical Care and Emergency Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cramer RJ, Crow BE, Kaniuka AR. Introduction to the public health approaches to suicide prevention special issue. Suicide Life Threat Behav 2021; 51:185-188. [PMID: 33876489 DOI: 10.1111/sltb.12692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Bruce E Crow
- Department of Veterans Affairs Suicide Prevention Program
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
A multi-state evaluation of the association between mental health and firearm storage practices. Prev Med 2021; 145:106389. [PMID: 33385422 PMCID: PMC7956108 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2020] [Revised: 12/19/2020] [Accepted: 12/24/2020] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
Firearm storage method is a potentially modifiable risk factor for suicide. Using data from a large, multi-state survey, we sought to determine whether there is an association between mental health and household firearm storage practices, and characterize that association by state of residence. Participants who endorsed the presence of a household firearm and answered the mental health questions in the 2016-2017 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System from eight states were included (n=26,949). Exposures were recent poor mental health (≥14 vs. 0-13 days/past month), and diagnosis of depression. Outcomes were household firearm storage practices (loaded, and both loaded and unlocked). Using Poisson regression, we calculated adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) overall and stratified by state of residence. Of adults endorsing a household firearm, 35.1% reported storing a firearm loaded, and of those, 53.4% reported that the firearm was both loaded and unlocked. Neither recent poor mental health nor depression was associated with loaded (aPR 1.14 [95% CI: 0.95-1.37] and aPR 0.94 [95% CI 0.80-1.09], respectively) or loaded and unlocked (aPR 1.08 [95% CI 0.88-1.42] and aPR 1.04 [95% CI 0.88-1.22], respectively) firearm storage. In the setting of highly prevalent loaded firearm storage, no differences in storage practices by mental health indicators were observed across eight states despite disparate firearm policies and local culture. The lack of difference in storage practices by mental health indicators across several states highlights an opportunity to improve means safety counseling practices, and the need for dedicated evaluation of state-level firearm storage policies.
Collapse
|
9
|
Comparisons between suicide in persons with serious mental illness, other mental disorders, or no known mental illness: Results from 37 U.S. states, 2003-2017. Schizophr Res 2021; 228:74-82. [PMID: 33434737 PMCID: PMC7987877 DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2020.11.058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2020] [Revised: 08/18/2020] [Accepted: 11/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Suicide is a leading cause of death in persons with schizophrenia and other serious mental illnesses (SMI), however, little is known about the characteristics and circumstances of suicide decedents with SMI in the US compared to those with other or no known mental illness. METHODS This study was a retrospective analysis of suicide deaths in individuals aged ≥18 years from the National Violent Death Reporting System, 2003-2017. Odds ratios compared sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, cause of death, precipitating circumstances, and post-mortem toxicology results. All analyses were stratified by gender. RESULTS Of the 174,001 suicide decedents, 8.7% had a known SMI, 33.0% had other mental disorders, and 58.2% had no known mental illness. Relative to persons with other mental disorders, SMI decedents were younger and more likely to have previous suicide attempts and co-occurring drug use. Problems with intimate partners, poor physical health, and recent institutional release were the most common precipitating circumstances for SMI decedents. Firearms were the most common suicide method for males with SMI. Although 67.0% male and 76.0% of female SMI decedents were currently in treatment, toxicology results suggest many were not taking antipsychotic or antidepressant medications at the time of death. CONCLUSIONS Persons with SMI are over-represented in suicide deaths. Efforts to improve treatment of co-occurring substance use disorders, continuity of care following hospitalization, medication adherence, and to reduce access to firearms are important suicide prevention strategies.
Collapse
|
10
|
Butterworth SE, Daruwala SE, Anestis MD. The Role of Reason for Firearm Ownership in Beliefs about Firearms and Suicide, Openness to Means Safety, and Current Firearm Storage. Suicide Life Threat Behav 2020; 50:617-630. [PMID: 32011028 DOI: 10.1111/sltb.12619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2019] [Accepted: 10/30/2019] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Firearm means safety strategies, such as safe storage, are effective in reducing suicide rates but are not widely implemented in the United States. This study examined the association between reason for firearm ownership, beliefs about firearm ownership and storage and suicide risk, willingness to engage in means safety, and current firearm storage practices. METHOD A sample of 300 American firearm owners (53.0% male; 82.3% White; Mage = 36.11, age range = 20-69) completed an online survey via Amazon's Mechanical Turk (mTurk) program. RESULTS Firearm owners who own a firearm for protection, compared to owning a firearm for other reasons, (1) endorsed decreased belief in the relationship between firearm ownership and storage and suicide risk, (2) were less willing to engage in the means safety measures of storing firearms safely and allowing a trusted individual to temporarily remove firearms from the home, and (3) were more likely to store their firearms loaded. CONCLUSIONS Reason for firearm ownership influences views regarding firearms and suicide, willingness to engage in firearm means safety, and firearm storage practices. It is essential to understand how differences in reason for firearm ownership impact these outcomes so appropriate, efficacious messaging can be developed and implemented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah E Butterworth
- Department of Psychology, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, MS, USA
| | - Samantha E Daruwala
- Department of Psychology, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, MS, USA
| | - Michael D Anestis
- Department of Psychology, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, MS, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Schmutte TJ, Wilkinson ST. Suicide in Older Adults With and Without Known Mental Illness: Results From the National Violent Death Reporting System, 2003-2016. Am J Prev Med 2020; 58:584-590. [PMID: 32001049 PMCID: PMC7089842 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2019] [Revised: 11/16/2019] [Accepted: 11/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Suicide risk increases with age, and evidence exists for the underdiagnosis and undertreatment of suicide risk in older adults. Recent data suggest that many U.S. adults who die from suicide do not have a known mental health condition. This study compares the characteristics and precipitating circumstances of geriatric suicide decedents with and without known mental illnesses. METHODS This study was a retrospective analysis of suicide deaths for adults aged ≥65 years from the National Violent Death Reporting System, 2003-2016 (n=26,884). ORs compared sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, cause of death, and precipitating circumstances based on coroner/medical examiner and law enforcement reports. Data were collected and analyzed in 2019. RESULTS Most older male (69.1%) and female (50.2%) suicide decedents did not have a known mental illness. A physical health problem was the most prevalent precipitating circumstance but was more common among older adults without known mental illness. Past suicide attempt, disclosure of suicidal intent, depressed mood, and substance use were more common among those with a known mental illness. More than three fourths of suicide decedents did not disclose their suicidal intent. Most suicide deaths involved firearms, which were disproportionately used by decedents without known mental illness (81.6% of male and 44.6% of female decedents) compared with those with known mental illness (70.5% of male and 30.0% of female decedents). CONCLUSIONS Most older adults who die from suicide do not have a known mental health condition. The rapidly growing U.S. geriatric population calls for more effective methods to identify and treat at-risk older adults, particularly those who are male.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy J Schmutte
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
| | - Samuel T Wilkinson
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|