Rapid, label-free enrichment of lymphocytes in a closed system using a flow-through microfluidic device

Separation of platelets by size in a microfluidic device based on controlled incremental filtration

The significant biological and functional differences between small and large platelets suggested by recent studies could have profound implications for transfusion medicine. However, investigating the relationship between platelet size and function is challenging because separating platelets by size without affecting their properties is difficult. A standard approach is centrifugation, but it inevitably leads to premature activation and aggregation of separated platelets. This paper describes the development and validation of a microfluidic device based on controlled incremental filtration (CIF) for separating platelets by size without the cell damage and usability limitations associated with centrifugation. Platelet samples derived from whole blood were used to evaluate the dependence of the CIF device separation performance on design parameters and flow rate, and to compare the properties of PLT fractions generated by the CIF device with those produced using a centrifugation protocol in a split-sample study. This was accomplished by quantifying the platelet size distribution, mean platelet volume (MPV), platelet-large cell ratio (P-LCR) and platelet activation before and after processing for all input and output samples. The 'large platelet' fractions produced by the CIF device and the centrifugation protocol were essentially equivalent (no significant difference in MPV and P-LCR). Platelets in the 'small platelet' fraction produced by the CIF device were significantly smaller than those produced by centrifugation (lower MPV and P-LCR). This was because the CIF 'small platelet' fraction was contaminated by much fewer large platelets (∼2-times lower recovery of >12 fL platelets) and retained the smallest platelets that were discarded by the centrifugation protocol. There was no significant difference in platelet activation between the two methods. However, centrifugation required a substantial amount of additional anticoagulant to prevent platelet aggregation during pelleting. Unlike centrifugation, the CIF device offered continuous, flow-through, single-step processing that did not cause platelet aggregation. Such a capability has the potential to accelerate the basic studies of the relationship between platelet size and function, and ultimately improve transfusion practice, particularly in the pediatric setting, where the need for low-volume, high-quality platelet transfusions is most urgent.