Surface marking of the deep inguinal ring

Age-related changes in inguinal region anatomy from 0 to 19 years of age

Knowledge of the age-related changes in inguinal region anatomy is essential in pediatric urological and abdominal surgery, yet little is published. This study aimed to determine the position of inguinal region structures and growth of the surrounding pelvis and inguinal ligament in subjects from 0 to 19 years of age. Anonymized contrast-enhanced CT DICOM datasets of 103 patients (63 male: 40 female) aged from 0 to 19 years had left and right sides analyzed by three independent observers. Exclusion criteria were applied. Growth of the pelvis and inguinal ligament were determined using fixed bony reference points. The position of the deep inguinal ring and femoral vasculature were determined as ratio of inguinal ligament length, measured from the anterior superior iliac spine. Growth of the pelvis in vertical and horizontal dimensions and of the inguinal ligament followed a positive polynomial relationship with increasing age, with no observed increase in growth rate during puberty. From 0 to 19 years, the deep inguinal ring moved superolaterally with respect to the inguinal ligament (from 0.74 to 0.60 of the distance along the inguinal ligament) and the femoral artery and vein moved medially (from 0.50 to 0.58, and 0.61 to 0.65 of the distance along the inguinal ligament, respectively). The position of the femoral artery, vein, and deep inguinal ring followed a logarithmic relationship with age. No significant left:right side or male:female differences were observed. From 0 to 19 years of age the femoral vasculature and deep inguinal ring change position as the pelvis grows around them. Clin. Anat. 32:794-802, 2019. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

A new accurate method of physical examination for differentiation of inguinal hernia types

BACKGROUND

It is generally stated that preoperative differentiation between indirect and direct inguinal hernias by physical examination is inaccurate and irrelevant. With the expansion of the laparoscopic technique, new relevance has emerged. Laparoscopic correction of an indirect hernia is more challenging and time consuming than laparoscopic correction of a direct hernia. Preoperative knowledge concerning the type of hernia informs the laparoscopic surgeon about the required expertise and the expected operative time, and this knowledge is useful for training programs and management. The authors therefore developed a new accurate and easy method of physical examination to differentiate types of inguinal hernia. A prospective study was conducted to determine the accuracy of this new method that combines physical examination with a hand-held Doppler device (not ultrasound) to differentiate types of inguinal hernia.

METHODS

This prospective diagnostics study consisted of two consecutive parts. Each part included 100 consecutive patients presenting with an inguinal hernia. The inguinal occlusion test was used to differentiate the types of inguinal hernia during physical examination in the first part of the study. A hand-held Doppler device was used for adequate localization of the epigastric vessels in addition to the occlusion test in the second part of the study. Preoperative remarks were compared with findings during laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. The McNemar symmetry χ (2) test was used for statistical evaluation

RESULTS

The first part of the study showed a preoperative accuracy of 35 % for direct inguinal hernias and 86 % for indirect inguinal hernias (p < 0.001). The second part of the study showed a preoperative accuracy of 79 % for direct inguinal hernias and 93 % for indirect inguinal hernias (p < 0.001) CONCLUSION: The inguinal occlusion test combined with the use of a handheld Doppler device is accurate in distinguishing direct and indirect inguinal hernias and provides useful management information in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

Defining the position of the deep inguinal ring using findings at laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair

PURPOSE

We aim to establish the surface marking of the deep inguinal ring by laparoscopy and investigate if the patient's build influences it.

METHODS

Sixty consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic hernia repairs were studied. The bony landmarks, anterior-superior iliac spine (ASIS) and pubic tubercle (PT), and the two traditional landmarks, the mid-inguinal point (MIP) and midpoint of inguinal ligament (MPIL), were marked on the anaesthetized patient before the surgery. The deep ring was located by indenting the surface until laparoscopy shows the deep ring being occluded.

RESULTS

The true surface marking of the deep ring was found to lie at a mean distance of 9.6 mm medial to the MPIL landmark and 4.5 mm lateral to the MIP, approximately one-third of the distance from the MIP to the MPIL. Multivariate analysis confirmed that age, gender, race, BMI or pelvic habitus did not vary it.

CONCLUSIONS

The deep ring is located under a point just lateral to the MIP, which is the midpoint of a line drawn joining the ASIS and pubic symphysis. This should be taught to future generations of medical students as the point to apply occluding pressure to differentiate clinically between direct and indirect inguinal hernias.

Defining the position of deep inguinal ring in patients with indirect inguinal hernias

A preliminary survey of surgeons of all grades in our hospital revealed confusion about the position of the deep inguinal ring. Standard teaching is that the deep inguinal ring is lateral to the femoral artery. The aim of this study was to define the position of the deep ring in patients undergoing elective inguinal hernia repair. Thirty consecutive male patients undergoing indirect inguinal hernia repair under local anaesthesia were studied. The following landmarks were marked on the patient with a felt pen: anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS), femoral artery (FA), deep inguinal ring (DR), pubic tubercle (PT) and pubic symphysis (PS). The distance of each point from the ASIS was measured in centimetres. The relation of the femoral artery to the deep inguinal ring was confirmed by palpation through the deep ring during surgery. The femoral artery was consistently identified midway between the anterior superior iliac spine and pubic symphysis (mid-inguinal point). The deep inguinal ring was located medial (22/30) or above (8/30) the femoral artery, but never lateral. The mean distances from the anterior superior iliac spine to the deep ring and femoral artery were 8.8 and 7.7 cm, respectively. Contrary to standard teaching, this study demonstrates that the deep inguinal ring lies medial, not lateral, to the femoral artery. This may clarify some of the variations in textbook anatomy, and explain the difficulty in distinguishing direct and indirect inguinal hernias pre-operatively.