1
|
Alexander AA, Yeager AN, Motamedi K, Seeger LL. Increased signal of the fibular collateral ligament of the knee on MRI, clinically significant? Clin Imaging 2023; 98:22-25. [PMID: 36996596 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2023.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2023] [Revised: 03/10/2023] [Accepted: 03/21/2023] [Indexed: 03/28/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical significance of signal hyperintensity in the proximal fibular collateral ligament (FCL) on coronal proton density (PD) fat-saturated (FS) MRI of the knee, a common finding. This study is unique in that it characterizes the FCL of a comprehensive, large cohort of both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients, which to our knowledge represents the first study with such broad inclusion criteria. METHODS A large case series was performed analyzing MRI of the knee of 250 patients from July 2021 through September 2021 and retrospectively reviewed. All studies were performed on 3-Tesla MRI scanners with a dedicated knee coil and in accordance with standard institutional knee MRI protocol. Signal in the proximal fibular collateral ligament was assessed on coronal PDFS and axial T2-weighted FS images. Increased signal was classified as none, mild, moderate, or severe. A corresponding chart review of clinic notes was performed to determine the presence or absence of lateral knee pain. An FCL sprain or injury was considered present if the medical record described tenderness on palpation of the lateral knee, positive finding against resistance to the leg (varus stress test) or reverse pivot shift, or any clinical suspicion for lateral complex sprain or posterolateral corner injury. RESULTS The majority (74%) of knee MRIs demonstrated the presence of increased signal in the proximal fibular collateral ligament on coronal PD FS images. <5% of these patients had associated clinical findings of fibular collateral ligament and/or lateral supporting structure injury. DISCUSSION Although increased signal in the proximal FCL of the knee is a common finding on coronal PDFS images, the majority are not associated with clinical symptoms. Thus, this increased signal is likely not a pathological finding in the absence of clinical findings of fibular collateral ligament sprain/injury. Our study emphasizes the importance of clinical correlation in identifying increased signal in the proximal FCL as pathologic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alan A Alexander
- University of California Los Angeles, Department of Radiology, Musculoskeletal Section, UCLA Department of Radiology, 757 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States of America.
| | - Ashley N Yeager
- University of California Los Angeles, Department of Radiology, Musculoskeletal Section, UCLA Department of Radiology, 757 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States of America
| | - Kambiz Motamedi
- University of California Los Angeles, Department of Radiology, Musculoskeletal Section, UCLA Department of Radiology, 757 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States of America
| | - Leanne L Seeger
- University of California Los Angeles, Department of Radiology, Musculoskeletal Section, UCLA Department of Radiology, 757 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bolcos PO, Mononen ME, Mohammadi A, Ebrahimi M, Tanaka MS, Samaan MA, Souza RB, Li X, Suomalainen JS, Jurvelin JS, Töyräs J, Korhonen RK. Comparison between kinetic and kinetic-kinematic driven knee joint finite element models. Sci Rep 2018; 8:17351. [PMID: 30478347 PMCID: PMC6255758 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-35628-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2018] [Accepted: 11/08/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Use of knee joint finite element models for diagnostic purposes is challenging due to their complexity. Therefore, simpler models are needed for studies where a high number of patients need to be analyzed, without compromising the results of the model. In this study, more complex, kinetic (forces and moments) and simpler, kinetic-kinematic (forces and angles) driven finite element models were compared during the stance phase of gait. Patella and tendons were included in the most complex model, while they were absent in the simplest model. The greatest difference between the most complex and simplest models was observed in the internal-external rotation and axial joint reaction force, while all other rotations, translations and joint reaction forces were similar to one another. In terms of cartilage stresses and strains, the simpler models behaved similarly with the more complex models in the lateral joint compartment, while minor differences were observed in the medial compartment at the beginning of the stance phase. We suggest that it is feasible to use kinetic-kinematic driven knee joint models with a simpler geometry in studies with a large cohort size, particularly when analyzing cartilage responses and failures related to potential overloads.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul O Bolcos
- Department of Applied Physics, University of Eastern Finland, POB 1627, FI-70211, Kuopio, Finland.
| | - Mika E Mononen
- Department of Applied Physics, University of Eastern Finland, POB 1627, FI-70211, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Ali Mohammadi
- Department of Applied Physics, University of Eastern Finland, POB 1627, FI-70211, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Mohammadhossein Ebrahimi
- Department of Applied Physics, University of Eastern Finland, POB 1627, FI-70211, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Matthew S Tanaka
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, CA, 94158, San Francisco, USA
| | - Michael A Samaan
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, CA, 94158, San Francisco, USA
- Dept. of Kinesiology & Health Promotion, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, 40506, USA
| | - Richard B Souza
- Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of California, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | - Xiaojuan Li
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, CA, 94158, San Francisco, USA
- Program of Advanced Musculoskeletal Imaging (PAMI), Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland Clinic, OH, 44195, Cleveland, USA
| | - Juha-Sampo Suomalainen
- Diagnostic Imaging Centre, Kuopio University Hospital, POB 100, FI-70029, KUH, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Jukka S Jurvelin
- Department of Applied Physics, University of Eastern Finland, POB 1627, FI-70211, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Juha Töyräs
- Department of Applied Physics, University of Eastern Finland, POB 1627, FI-70211, Kuopio, Finland
- Diagnostic Imaging Centre, Kuopio University Hospital, POB 100, FI-70029, KUH, Kuopio, Finland
- School of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, The University of Queensland, QLD-4072, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Rami K Korhonen
- Department of Applied Physics, University of Eastern Finland, POB 1627, FI-70211, Kuopio, Finland
- Diagnostic Imaging Centre, Kuopio University Hospital, POB 100, FI-70029, KUH, Kuopio, Finland
| |
Collapse
|