The surgical anatomy of the sural nerve: An ultrasound study

Morphometry of the sural nerve in diabetic neuropathy: a systematic review

PURPOSE

The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the usefulness of sural nerve ultrasonography in diagnosing diabetes mellitus (DM) and diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN), the latter of which is a common long-term complication for diabetic patients that frequently involves the sural nerve.

METHODOLOGY

A meta-analysis of the cross-sectional areas (CSAs) of sural nerves in healthy individuals and patients with diabetes mellitus based on a total of 32 ultrasonographic-based studies from 2015 to 2023 was performed. Sub-analyses were performed for factors such as geographical location and measurement site.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis showed that the mean CSA of the sural nerve was significantly larger in DM patients with DPN only compared to healthy individuals across all regions and when pooled together. An age-dependent increase in the CSA of healthy sural nerves is apparent when comparing the paediatric population with adults.

CONCLUSION

Sural nerve ultrasonography can distinguish diabetic adults with DPN from healthy adults based on cross-sectional area measurement. Future studies are needed to clarify the relationships between other parameters, such as body metrics and age, with sural nerve CSAs. Cut-offs for DPN likely need to be specific for different geographical regions.

A Bilateral Symmetrical Variant Formation of the Sural Nerve

Typically, the sural nerve is formatted by the connection of the lateral sural cutaneous nerve (branch of the common fibular nerve) and the medial sural cutaneous nerve (branch of the tibial nerve). The current cadaveric report aims to describe a quite unusual symmetrical variant of the sural nerve. Classical dissection was performed on an 84-year-old donated male cadaver. On both sides, the sural nerve was formatted directly by the sciatic nerve. After its emanation, it continued its typical course between the gastrocnemius muscle heads. Sural nerve formation has been extensively studied due to its great clinical significance. The identified variant corresponds to one of the rarest types of sural nerve formation. Knowledge of sural nerve variants may play a crucial role in lower limb surgery and nerve harvest for reconstruction.

An Extremely Rare Case of a Sciatic Nerve Variant

The sciatic nerve (SN) is the nerve of the posterior compartment of the thigh and typically traverses beneath the piriformis muscle (PM) before continuing along a vertical course deep to the gluteus maximus and biceps femoris. However, cadaveric studies have often revealed significant variations in the structural features of the SN in relation to the piriformis. Knowledge of such variations is not only useful for clinicians treating pathophysiologies such as piriformis syndrome and sciatica but is also essential for surgeons carrying out procedures involving the hip and sacroiliac joints to avoid iatrogenic injury to the SN. During routine cadaveric dissection, one such anatomical variant was identified with the SN passing over the superior border of the piriformis muscle. To our knowledge, such a variant is exceedingly rare.

Variations in sural nerve formation and course in fetuses

To investigate variations regarding the formation and course of the sural nerve (SN). We dissected 60 formalin-fixed Brazilian fetuses (n = 120 lower limbs) aged from the 16th to 34th weeks of gestational age. Three incisions were made in the leg to expose the SN, and the gastrocnemius muscle was retracted to investigate the SN course. Statistical analyses regarding laterality and sex were performed using the Chi-square test. Eight SN formation patterns were classified after analysis. Type 4 (in which the SN is formed by the union of the MSCN with the LSCN) was the most common SN formation pattern. Although there was no statistical association between the formation patterns and the lower limb laterality (p = 0.9725), there was as to sex (p = 0.03973), indicating an association between anatomical variation and sex. The site of branch joining was in the distal leg most time (53.75%). In all lower limbs, the SN or its branches crossed from the medial aspect of the leg to the lateral margin of the calcaneal tendon (CT). Most often, the SN is formed by joining the MSCN and the LSCN in the distal leg. The SN or its branches ran close to the saphenous vein, crossed the CT from medial to lateral, and distributed around the lateral malleolus.

Anatomical patterns of the sural nerve: a meta-analysis with clinical and surgical considerations

BACKGROUND

The sural nerve (SN) supplies the posterolateral aspect of the leg and the lateral aspects of the ankle and foot and descends through the gastrocnemius muscle along the lower third of leg. Because in-depth knowledge about SN anatomy is essential for clinical and surgical approaches, our study aims to review SN anatomical patterns.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, Lilacs, Web of Science, and SpringerLink databases to find relevant articles for meta-analysis. We assessed the quality of the studies using the Anatomical Quality Assessment tool. We used proportion meta-analysis to analyze the SN morphological variables and simple mean meta-analysis to analyze the SN morphometric variables (nerve length and distance to anatomical landmarks).

RESULTS

Thirty-six studies comprised this meta-analysis. Overall, Type 2A (63.68% [95% CI 42.36-82.64]), Type 1A (51.17% [95% CI 33.16-69.04]) and Type 1B (32.19% [95% CI 17.83-48.38]) were the most common SN formation patterns. The lower third of leg (42.40% [95% CI 32.24-52.86]) and middle third of leg (40.00% [95% CI 25.21-53.48]) were the most common SN formation sites. The pooled SN length from nerve formation to the lateral malleolus was 144.54 mm (95% CI 123.23-169.53) in adults, whereas the SN length was 25.10 mm (95% CI 23.20-27.16) in fetuses in the second trimester of gestation and 34.88 mm (95% CI 32.86-37.02) in fetuses in the third trimester of gestation.

CONCLUSIONS

The most prevalent SN formation pattern was the union of the medial sural cutaneous nerve with the lateral sural cutaneous nerve. We found differences regarding geographical subgroup and subject age. The most common SN formation sites were the lower and middle thirds of the leg.

Ultrasound evaluation of a new surface reference line to describe sural nerve location and safe zones to consider in posterior leg approaches

PURPOSE

Several authors have described methods to predict the sural nerve pathway with non-proportional numerical distances, but none have proposed a person-proportional, reproducible method with anatomical references. The aim of this research is to describe ultrasonographically the distance and crossing zone between a surface reference line and the position of the sural nerve.

METHODS

Descriptive cross-sectional study, performed between January and April 2022 in patients requiring foot surgery who met inclusion criteria. The sural nerve course in the posterior leg was located and marked using ultrasound. Landmarks were drawn with a straight line from the medial femoral condyle to the tip of the fibula. Four equal zones were established in the leg by subdividing the distal half of the line. This way, areas based on simple anatomical proportions for each patient were studied. The distance between the marking and the ultrasound nerve position was measured in these 4 zones, creating intersection points and safety areas. Location and distances from the sural nerve to the proposed landmarks were assessed.

RESULTS

One-hundred and four lower limbs, 52 left and 52 right, assessed in 52 patients were included. The shortest median distance of the nerve passage was 2.9 mm from Point 2. The sural nerve intersection was 60/104 (57.7%) in Zone B, 21/104 (20.1%) in Zone C and 19/104 (18.3%) in Zone A. Safety zones were established. Average 80.5% of coincidence in sural nerve localization was found in the distal half of the leg, in relation to the surface reference line when comparing both legs of each patient.

CONCLUSIONS

This study proposes a simple, reproducible, non-invasive and, for the first time, person-proportional method, that describes the distance and location of the main areas of intersection of the sural nerve with points and zones (risk and safe zones) determined by a line guided by superficial anatomical landmarks. Its application when surgeons plan and perform posterior leg approaches will help to avoid iatrogenic nerve injuries.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

An Anatomic Study of the Lateral Dorsal Cutaneous Nerve Using 3-Tesla MRI: A Comparison to Cadaveric Data With Surgical Applications

BACKGROUND

The lateral dorsal cutaneous nerve (LDCN) and the anastomotic branch of the sural nerve (AB) are cutaneous sensory nerves at risk of iatrogenic injury during lateral foot surgery. This study is the first to use a large cohort of high-resolution magnetic resonance images (MRIs) of the ankle to better describe the course of these nerves in vivo in order to aid surgeons intraoperatively. Our study intends to build on the "high and inside" approach to the proximal 5MT by accounting for variations in course of the LDCN and AB.

METHODS

One hundred twenty-five 3-tesla (T) MRI studies of the ankle were analyzed. Three reviewers measured the distance from the LDCN and AB to landmarks including the most proximal aspect of the fifth metatarsal tuberosity (5MT) and the peroneus brevis tendon (PBT).

RESULTS

Mean vertical distance from the LDCN to the 5MT was 0.8 ± 0.2 cm. Presence of an AB was visualized in 59 of 125 studies (47.2%) and was found 2.2 ± 0.5 cm dorsal to the 5MT. The AB was found to become superior to PBT at a horizontal distance 1.9 ± 0.5 cm proximal to the 5MT. The LDCN was found superior to the PBT at its insertion onto the 5MT in approximately 10% (n = 12) of our studies. During these instances, the LDCN was located an average of 0.3 cm dorsal to the PBT.

CONCLUSION

Our proposed "safe zone" for the approach to the proximal 5MT remains superior to the LDCN and inferior to the AB and avoids crossing directly over either nerve in >95% of analyzed MRI studies. This incision begins 1.5 cm dorsal to the most proximal aspect of the 5MT and extends no more than 1 cm posteriorly. Careful dissection and identification of the LDCN and possible AB is necessary prior to further extension of incision.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

An Anatomic Study of the Sural Nerve Using 3-Tesla MRI: A Comparison to Cadaveric Data With Surgical Applications

BACKGROUND

The sural nerve (SN) is a sensory cutaneous nerve that is at risk of iatrogenic injury during surgery at the lateral ankle. Prior anatomic studies of the SN are limited primarily to cadaveric studies with small sample sizes. Our study analyzed a large cohort of magnetic resonance images (MRIs) of the ankle to obtain a more generalizable, in vivo sample of distal SN course.

METHODS

A total of 204 3-tesla MRI studies of the ankle were analyzed. Three reviewers measured the distance from the SN to various landmarks including the distal tip of the lateral malleolus (DTLM) and the lateral border of the Achilles tendon (LBA).

RESULTS

Mean vertical distance from SN to DTLM was 2.2 cm (range, 0.9-3.6 cm). Mean horizontal distance from SN to DTLM and to LBA at the level of DTLM was 1.7 cm (range, 0.8-3.0 cm) and 1.9 cm (range, 1.0-2.9 cm), respectively. Mean horizontal distance from SN to LBA at the level of superior Achilles tendon insertion onto the calcaneus (SAI) was 2.6 cm (range, 1.4-3.7 cm), and mean horizontal distance from SN to LBA at 5 cm above SAI was 0.9 cm (range, 0.4-1.8 cm).

CONCLUSION

The variation in SN course observed in our study allowed us to propose "safe zones" for several surgical approaches including the extensile lateral approach to the calcaneus (ELAC), the sinus tarsi approach (STA), the direct lateral approach to the lateral malleolus (DLA), and the posterolateral approach to the ankle (PLA), which we hope will minimize iatrogenic injury to the SN.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

Anatomy of the sural nerve complex: Unaccounted anatomic variations and morphometric data

BACKGROUND

The sural nerve (SN) is a cutaneous sensory nerve innervating the posterolateral leg. The SN is formed from a highly variable set of contributing nerves called the sural nerve complex (SNC). The SNC is made up of the lateral sural cutaneous nerve, medial sural cutaneous nerve, sural communicating branch, and SN. The SN is frequently cited as the most common donor nerve graft and is commonly injured in procedures of the lower extremity. Recent meta-analysis standardized six morphologies of the SNC and established a required reporting criterion for the group of nerves forming the SN. Due to the inconsistencies in previous literature, this study will group observed SNC's by one of these six SNC morphologies to assess and validate the meta-analysis grouping criteria. This study will also collect the same morphometric data previously outlined in order to grow the number of samples that are reported in a standardized fashion.

METHODS

100 formalin and 4 Theil preserved cadavers (n = 208) lower limbs were bilaterally dissected at Kansas City University and Creighton University School of Dentistry to observe the SNC in its entirety on the posterolateral leg. Anatomic data was captured utilizing the standardized morphologies types 1-6 with two sub-typing. Nerves that were found to be outside of this categorization were placed in an unassigned grouping.

RESULTS

The most prevalent SNCs were type 1 at 41.35% (n = 86) and type 3 nerves at 34.62% (n = 72). Type 2 was found 8.65% (n = 18), type 4 and 5 were found each at 0.48% (n = 1). Type 6 was not observed. When comparing the present studies frequency of nerve types 1-6 to the meta-analysis a sub-grouping of "North American" cadaveric studies a X² = .903 p = .030 was found. Two distinct and previously unassigned formations of the SNC were 10.58% (n = 20) and 3.85% (n = 8) of data. These two SNC are termed type 7 & 8, these represent two formations of SN that are outside of what was previously reported. 15.87% (n = 33) did not match visual descriptions based on nerve origin of a type 1 SNC but met written definitions. These were termed type 1A1 and type 1A2. The SNC was asymmetrical in 57.69% (n = 120). The pooled mean length of the SN was 32.97 ± 14.12 cm (31.05-34.88), mean diameter was 2.31 ± 0.83 mm (2.20-2.42, and the distance of the posterior border of the lateral malleolus to the SN was found to be 1.72 ± 0.70 cm (1.63-1.80).

CONCLUSION

Anatomic variation in the SNC is highly variable, yet is consistent with previously observed literature. This study demonstrates two unaccounted formations of the SNC as well as two additional subcategories of SNC that were not included in the previous meta-analysis. These four variants warrant inclusion as standard formations of the SNC due to the high prevalence observed in this study as well as historical consistency observed in previous literature and case reports. These two SNC formations increase the risk of iatrogenic injury during surgical interventions of the lower extremity. Morphometric data describing the spatial relationship of this nerve complex on the posterolateral leg is consistent with previously reported data and aids in generating a large data set for future studies to characterize spatial properties of this nerve complex.

Sihler's staining of the cutaneous nerves of the leg and its implications for sensory reconstruction

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to reveal the entire cutaneous nerve distribution pattern of the leg and provide a morphological basis for sensory reconstruction during skin flap transplantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twelve adult cadavers were fixed with formalin, and the whole leg skin with subcutaneous fat was removed close to the muscle surface. The cutaneous nerves were visualized using modified Sihler's staining to reveal the distribution and innervation density of the cutaneous nerves.

RESULTS

The saphenous nerve innervated the anterior part, 82.2% of the upper-middle region of the lateral part of the anterolateral leg, and the upper 63.4% of the medial posterior leg. The superficial peroneal nerve innervated 90.1% of the lateral lower one-third of the anterolateral leg. The medial sural cutaneous nerve covered 26.4% of the posterior leg. The lateral sural cutaneous nerve covered 42.3% (approximately 28.6% overlap with the saphenous nerve) of the upper-middle region of the anterolateral and posterolateral leg. The number of branches differed between certain cutaneous nerves in the leg. Communications were observed between the arborizations of the four cutaneous nerves mentioned above. The highest density of primary and secondary nerve branches was observed in the upper one-third of the lateral posterior leg. The upper one-third of the posteromedial leg contained the highest density of intracutaneous nerve branches and highest number of total nerve branches.

CONCLUSIONS

These results may be used to map sensory regions when designing leg skin flaps for reconstruction surgery to obtain improved sensory recovery.

Could Ultrasound-Guided Stimulation of Sural Nerve Affect Nerve Conduction Study?

Objective

To determine anatomical variation of the sural nerve (SN) by ultrasonography (US) and compare sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) of the SN obtained by a control method to that obtained with adjusted method using US.

Methods

Eighty legs of 40 healthy volunteers were enrolled. The location and formation of SN were investigated through US. Two methods of nerve conduction study (NCS) were then performed. In the control method, the cathode was placed 14 cm proximal to the lateral malleolus and the greatest SNAP amplitude was obtained by moving the cathode medially or laterally from just lateral to the calf-mid line. In adjusted NCS, the exact SN union site was stimulated in type 1. In other SN types, the stimulation was done directly over the nerve and the distance from the lateral malleolus was set to be 14 cm.

Results

It was found that 73.8% of the SNs were type 1, 22.5% were direct continuation of MSCN (type 2), and 3.8% were MSCN and LSCN without communicating (type 4). However, type 3 was not found. The union point in type 1 SN was 12.6±2.5 cm proximal to the lateral malleolus and 1.4±0.7 cm lateral to the calf-midline. After stimulation adjustment, SNAP amplitude in type 1 SN was significantly increased (20.7±5.5 μV vs. 27.1±6.7 μV).

Conclusion

Anatomical variation of SN and its location were verified by US. US provides additional information for conducting sural NCS and helps obtain more accurate results.

The anatomical relationship between the sural nerve and small saphenous vein: An ultrasound study of healthy participants

Procedures involving the small saphenous vein (SSV) can result in sural nerve (SN) damage due to the proximity of the two structures. The relationship between the SN and SSV has previously been described in cadaveric studies with limited scope on surface landmarks. This study investigates the relationship between the SN and SSV in vivo through ultrasound. Transverse/short-axis ultrasound scans of 128 legs (64 healthy participants) were taken by a single observer using a GE Logiq e ultrasound system with a 5-13 Hz linear transducer (GE Logiq 12L-RS). The SN was identified and traced from the lateral malleolus to the popliteal fossa noting its course and proximity to the SSV. The distance between the SN and SSV was measured at points representing the distal 50% and 25% of the total leg length (the distance between the medial tibial condyle and the inferior edge of the medial malleolus). The SN and SSV were visualized in all participants regardless of BMI and atypical anatomical relationship were noted in 20.3%. The SN pierced the fascia in the distal 25.9% ± 5.3% of the total leg length. The distance between the SN and SSV was 4.06 ± 1.8 mm and 3.4 ± 1.4 mm in the distal 50% and 25% points of the total leg length, respectively. There was no significant effect of sex or body side. The SSV is a viable option for multiple vein harvest. Ultrasound visualization can be a beneficial tool for delineating variations of the SN in relation to SSV prior to surgery. Clin. Anat. 32:277-281, 2019. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.