Preoperative increased pronation angle of the first metatarsus associated with correction loss after hallux valgus surgery: A semi-weight-bearing computed tomography study

BACKGROUND

The effect of preoperative first metatarsal pronation on postoperative prognosis of hallux valgus (HV) surgery is under investigation. Utilizing semi-weight-bearing computed tomography, the preoperative pronation angle was assessed to quantify its impact on postoperative prognosis.

METHODS

In a retrospective analysis of 31 feet, those with re-increased hallux valgus angle postoperatively were classified as the non-maintained group, and the remainder as the maintained group. Preoperative pronation angles were compared to establish a threshold. Subsequently, feet were re-classified into high or low-pronation categories. The relative risk of non-maintenance in high-pronation category was calculated.

RESULTS

The non-maintained group exhibited a significantly higher preoperative pronation angle (p = 0.021), with a 28.4º threshold. The high-pronation category had a relative risk of 2.34 for non-maintenance.

CONCLUSIONS

Increased preoperative first metatarsal pronation angle is associated with correction loss after HV surgery. Utilizing sWBCT to measure the pronation angle provides valuable insights into postoperative prognosis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Sesamoid View Weightbearing Radiography vs Weightbearing Computed Tomography in the Measurement of Metatarsal Pronation Angle

BACKGROUND

First metatarsal pronation angle (MPA) is increasingly relevant in the management of hallux valgus and is assessed on weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT) and sesamoid-view weightbearing radiography (WBR). The purpose of this study is to compare MPA measured by WBCT against WBR to determine if any systematic discrepancy in MPA measurement exists between the 2 modalities.

METHODS

A total of 40 patients with 55 feet were included for study. MPA was measured in all patients by 2 independent readers on both WBCT and WBR with an appropriate washout period between measurement modalities. Mean MPA by WBCT and WBR were analyzed; interobserver reliability was calculated with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) value.

RESULTS

Mean MPA as measured by WBCT was 3.7 ± 7.9 degrees (95% CI, 1.6-5.9; range -11.7 to 20.5). Mean MPA measured on WBR was 3.6 ± 8.4 degrees, (95% CI, 1.4-5.8; range -12.6 to 21.4). There was no difference in MPA as measured by WBCT compared to WBR (P = .529). Interobserver reliability was excellent with an ICC of 0.994 for WBCT and 0.986 for WBR.

CONCLUSION

Measurement of first MPA by WBCT and WBR was not significantly different. In our cohort of patients with and without forefoot pathology, we found that either sesamoid view weightbearing radiographs or weightbearing CT can be used reliably to measure first MPA and will generate similar values.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

Radiological and Anatomical Evaluation of First Metatarsal Pronation in Hallux Valgus Deformity: A Comparison Between Three Different Methods

A frontal plane metatarsal rotational (pronation) has been documented in a high percentage of hallux valgus patients. Pathoanatomical concepts leading to pronation are still debated. Nevertheless, there is no consensus on how to measure this component of the deformity. The aim of the present study was to compare three commonly used radiographic methods to measure the frontal plane deformity in hallux valgus deformity, such as 1. Round sign of the lateral edge of the first metatarsal head on anterior-posterior radiograph, 2. Non-weightbearing CT-scan and 3. Bernard's axial projection of the first metatarsal head. Afterwards, feet were dissected, and a direct measurement of the pronation was done. Our data showed that alpha angle measurements made through the Bernard's axial projection were closer with those obtained during the dissection compared to those made through the CT-scan. The main finding of our study is that osteoarthritic changes at the metatarso-sesamoid joint play an important role in severe hallux valgus cases. The proposed radiographic methods allow surgeons to verify whether rotation can be corrected during Hallux Valgus procedures and to determine which procedure may be the best for each patient.

Weight-bearing cone-beam CT: the need for standardised acquisition protocols and measurements to fulfill high expectations-a review of the literature

Weight bearing CT (WBCT) of the lower extremity is gaining momentum in evaluation of the foot/ankle and knee. A growing number of international studies use WBCT, which is promising for improving our understanding of anatomy and biomechanics during natural loading of the lower extremity. However, we believe there is risk of excessive enthusiasm for WBCT leading to premature application of the technique, before sufficiently robust protocols are in place e.g. standardised limb positioning and imaging planes, choice of anatomical landmarks and image slices used for individual measurements. Lack of standardisation could limit benefits from introducing WBCT in research and clinical practice because useful imaging information could become obscured. Measurements of bones and joints on WBCT are influenced by joint positioning and magnitude of loading, factors that need to be considered within a 3-D coordinate system. A proportion of WBCT studies examine inter- and intraobserver reproducibility for different radiological measurements in the knee or foot with reproducibility generally reported to be high. However, investigations of test-retest reproducibility are still lacking. Thus, the current ability to evaluate, e.g. the effects of surgery or structural disease progression, is questionable. This paper presents an overview of the relevant literature on WBCT in the lower extremity with an emphasis on factors that may affect measurement reproducibility in the foot/ankle and knee. We discuss the caveats of performing WBCT without consensus on imaging procedures and measurements.

Intra‑ and Interobserver Reliability of Yamaguchi's Method for the Assessment of First Metatarsal Pronation in Hallux Valgus Deformity

Pronation of the first metatarsal is a risk factor for the formation and progression of the hallux valgus deformity. Recently, Yamaguchi et al published a study that showed how the round sign increases on digitally reconstructed radiography taken from a CT scan when pronation is applied. In this study, the shape of the lateral edge of the first metatarsal head was evaluated on weightbearing dorsoplantar radiographs. Yamaguchi's signs were presented to observers after the visual presentation of each foot as an image. The best-fit circle was drawn using the PACS drawing function. Ninety radiographs of adults presenting hallux valgus deformities were classified as mild-to-moderate, based on hallux valgus angle and intermetatarsal angle. The global average observations were 3.72 ± 3.92 (range 2.3°-4.6°). The interclass correlation (Fleiss Kappa index κ = 0.225) and the Spearman correlation (0.16 of Kappa) coefficients were poor for interobserver measurements and statistically significant. Using the linear model, there was no significant variability between the repetitions corresponding to each observer (t-value -1.527, p value .127). Our findings show that the Yamaguchi method can be very subjective and should not be the exclusive technique to assess the rotation of the first metatarsal or head roundness.

A novel anteroposterior axis of the tibia for total knee arthroplasty: An upright weight-bearing computed tomography analysis

BACKGROUND

The traditional anteroposterior (AP) axis (i.e., Akagi's line) has been widely used as the tibial component AP axis during total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, this AP axis has been defined based on computed tomography (CT) in a non-weight-bearing supine position. In this study, AP axes of the tibial plateau from upright CT in weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing positions were determined and compared.

METHODS

This study included 43 knees from 23 healthy volunteers. CT images were obtained in weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing standing positions using a 320-detector row upright CT scanner. The line perpendicular to surgical transepicondylar axis projected onto the tibia plateau was determined as the AP axis in upright weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing conditions. Angular differences between these two conditions were measured.

RESULTS

The upright weight-bearing AP axis was positioned in a mean of 7.4 ± 4.3° of internal rotation relative to the traditional AP axis. Distance between the traditional and upright weight-bearing AP axis was 2.9 ± 1.6 mm at the edge of the tibial plateau. The upright non-weight-bearing AP axis was positioned in a mean of 3.5 ± 4.1° of internal rotation relative to the traditional AP axis. Mean angular difference between weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing conditions was 3.9 ± 4.1°.

CONCLUSIONS

The upright weight-bearing AP axis was positioned in 7.4° of internal rotation relative to the traditional AP axis, showing one-seventh of the tibial tuberosity away from the medial border of the tibial tubercle, which represents a practical landmark for the tibial component AP axis during TKA.

Imaging Findings and First Metatarsal Rotation in Hallux Valgus

BACKGROUND

Failure to identify and correct malrotation of the first metatarsal may lead to recurrent hallux valgus deformity. We aimed to identify the proportion of hallux valgus patients with increased first metatarsal pronation using weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT) and to identify the relationship with conventional radiographic measurements.

METHODS

WBCT scans were analyzed for 102 feet with a hallux valgus angle (HVA) and intermetatarsal angle (IMA) greater than or equal to 16 and 9 degrees, respectively. Metatarsal pronation angle (MPA), alpha angle, sesamoid rotation angle (SRA), and sesamoid position were measured on standardized coronal WBCT slices. Pronation was recorded as positive. Hindfoot alignment angle (HAA) was assessed using dedicated software. Pearson correlation and multiple regression analyses were used to assess differences between groups.

RESULTS

Mean HVA was 29.8±9.4 degrees and mean IMA was 14.1±3.7 degrees. Mean MPA was 11.9±5.8 (range 0-26) degrees and mean alpha angle was 11.9±6.8 (range -3 to 29) degrees. In a previous study, we demonstrated the upper limit of normal MPA as 16 degrees and alpha angle as 18 degrees. Based on these criteria, we identified abnormal metatarsal pronation in 32 feet (31.4%). We found a strong positive correlation between SRA and HVA/IMA (R = 0.67/0.60, respectively, P < .001). IMA and HAA weakly correlated with MPA and alpha angle (IMA: R = 0.26/0.27, respectively, P < .01; HAA: R = 0.26/0.27, respectively, P < .01). Regression analyses suggested that increasing IMA was the most significant radiographic predictor of increased pronation. In this cohort, there was no correlation between HVA or sesamoid position and MPA / alpha angle (HVA: P = .36/.12, respectively, sesamoid position, P = .86/.77, respectively).

CONCLUSION

In this cohort of 102 feet that met plain radiographic criteria for hallux valgus deformity, first metatarsal pronation was found abnormal in 31.4% of patients. We found a weak association between the IMA and hindfoot valgus, but not the HVA.

Knee varus alters three-dimensional ankle alignment in standing- a study with upright computed tomography

Background

For knee osteoarthritis (OA) treatment, it is important to correct the lower limb alignment including the foot. However, in the upright position, lower limb alignment is generally assessed from the body surface or radiographs, and it is a challenge to capture the exact characteristics of three-dimensional lower limb alignment. The purpose of the study was to measure lower limb alignment in patients with knee OA using upright computed tomography (CT) and radiography, and to identify features of knee joint deformity.

Methods

A total of 45 limbs in 25 patients with knee OA were enrolled. The subjects underwent both upright CT and radiography for the whole lower limb in the standing position. The joint angles were calculated on both images. The degree of knee OA was classified according to Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade by referring to radiography, which is mainly based on the degree of articular cartilage loss and severity of osteophytes, and the characteristics or correlation between knee and ankle joint in each group was investigated.

Results

In KL-I, there was an association between varus of the knee joint and internal rotation of the talocrural joint (r = 0.76, P < 0.05). In KL-II, there was an association between varus of the knee joint and eversion of the subtalar joint (r = 0.63, P < 0.05) and talocrural joint (r = − 0.65, P < 0.05). In KL-III, there was an association between varus of the knee joint and internal rotation of the subtalar joint (r = − 0.62, P < 0.05), and in KL-IV, there was an association between varus of the knee joint and internal rotation of the subtalar joint (r = − 0.58, P < 0.05).

Conclusions

The lower limb alignment of patients with knee OA in the standing position was found that as knee OA worsened, it became apparent that compensatory knee joint alignment depended on the ankle joint rather than the subtalar joint. The results may help in the rehabilitation of patients with knee OA, since the ankle joint alignment has a significant impact on the knee joint during coarse movements involving load.

Increase in tibial internal rotation due to weight-bearing is a key feature to diagnose early-stage knee osteoarthritis: a study with upright computed tomography

Background

The classification of knee osteoarthritis is an essential clinical issue, particularly in terms of diagnosing early knee osteoarthritis. However, the evaluation of three-dimensional limb alignment on two-dimensional radiographs is limited. This study evaluated the three-dimensional changes induced by weight-bearing in the alignments of lower limbs at various stages of knee osteoarthritis.

Methods

Forty five knees of 25 patients (69.9 ± 8.9 years) with knee OA were examined in the study. CT images of the entire leg were obtained in the supine and standing positions using conventional CT and 320-row detector upright CT, respectively. Next, the differences in the three-dimensional alignment of the entire leg in the supine and standing positions were obtained using 3D-3D surface registration technique, and those were compared for each Kellgren–Lawrence grade.

Results

Greater flexion, adduction, and tibial internal rotation were observed in the standing position, as opposed to the supine position. Kellgren–Lawrence grades 1 and 4 showed significant differences in flexion, adduction, and tibial internal rotation between two postures. Grades 2 and 4 showed significant differences in adduction, while grades 1 and 2, and 1 and 3 showed significant differences in tibial internal rotation between standing and supine positions.

Conclusions

Weight-bearing makes greater the three-dimensional deformities in knees with osteoarthritis. Particularly, greater tibial internal rotation was observed in patients with grades 2 and 3 compared to those with grade 1. The greater tibial internal rotation due to weight-bearing is a key pathologic feature to detect early osteoarthritic change in knees undergoing osteoarthritis.

Repeatability of Weightbearing Computed Tomography Measurement of First Metatarsal Alignment and Rotation

BACKGROUND

Weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT) can be used to assess alignment and rotation of the first metatarsal. It is unknown whether these measures remain consistent on sequential WBCTs in the same patient when a patient's standing position may be different. The aim of this study was to establish the repeatability (test-retest) of measurements of first metatarsal alignment and rotation in patients without forefoot pathology on WBCT.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 42 feet in 26 patients with sequential WBCT studies less than 12 months apart. Patients with surgery between scans, previous forefoot surgery or hallux rigidus were excluded. Hallux valgus angle (HVA) and intermetatarsal angle (IMA) were measured using digitally reconstructed radiographs. Two methods of calculating metatarsal rotation (metatarsal pronation angle [MPA] and alpha angle) were measured on standardized coronal CT slices. Interobserver agreement and test-retest repeatability were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimally detectable change (MDC95) were calculated.

RESULTS

Interobserver agreement was excellent for HVA and IMA (ICC 0.96 and 0.90, respectively) and was good for MPA and alpha angle (ICC 0.81 and 0.80, respectively). There was excellent test-retest repeatability for HVA (ICC=0.90) and good test-retest repeatability for IMA (ICC=0.77). There was excellent test-retest repeatability for MPA (ICC=0.91) and good test-retest repeatability for alpha angle (ICC=0.87). The MDC95 was 4.6 degrees for MPA and 6.1 degrees for alpha angle. Five percent of patients had a difference outside of the MDC95 for the alpha angle, compared with 2% for the MPA.

CONCLUSION

Measurements of first metatarsal alignment and rotation are reliable between assessors and repeatable between sequential WBCTs in patients without forefoot pathology. Subtle differences in patient positioning during image acquisition do not significantly affect measurements, supporting the validity of this method of assessment in longitudinal patient care.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective case series.

Assessing the Rotation of the First Metatarsal on Computed Tomography Scans: A Systematic Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Hallux valgus is a multiplanar deformity that is often treated on the basis of 2-dimensional (2D) parameters and radiographs. Recurrence rates after surgical correction remain high, and failure to correct pronation of the metatarsal is increasingly stipulated as being part of the problem. Multiple methods of assessing metatarsal pronation have been proposed.

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature review identifying studies that measured metatarsal pronation and torsion on computed tomography (CT) scans. Specific methodology, patient groups, results, and reliability assessments were all reported.

RESULTS

We identified 14 studies that fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Eleven studies measured 2D values on CT scan, and 3 studies used computer-based 3-dimensional (3D) modeling and artificial intelligence systems to help calculate pronation. Metatarsal pronation angle, α angle, sesamoid rotation angle, and measurements for torsion were the most commonly used methods. All angles and measurements were performed as 2D measurements, but the metatarsal pronation angle was also performed with 3D modeling. Reliability and reproducibility of the α angle and metatarsal pronation angle were excellent, despite being performed on studies with small numbers.

CONCLUSION

Multiple methods have been reported to demonstrate first metatarsal pronation on CT, of which the α angle and the metatarsal pronation angle are the most pragmatic and useful in a clinical setting. Further work is needed to further validate the reliability of these measurements in larger series and to identify normal pronation and metatarsal torsion on weightbearing imaging. Further work is required to determine whether addressing pronation reduces recurrence rates and improves outcomes in surgery for hallux valgus.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Visualization and quantification of the degenerative pattern of the distal tibia and fibula in unilateral varus ankle osteoarthritis

The present study aimed to quantify and visualize the degenerative patterns of the distal tibia and fibula due to ankle osteoarthritis (OA). We analyzed differences in tibial and fibular surface deviation between sides of patients with unilateral varus ankle OA (medial talar tilt > 4°) by registering each surface model to the mirror image of corresponding bone. Computed tomography images of both feet of 33 patients (OA: 22, control: 11) were examined. Statistically significant surface depression of approximately 2.5 mm on the anterior articular surface of the medial malleolus, and surface elevation of approximately 1 mm on the anterodistal edge of the tibiofibular joint and the lateral malleolus were observed in OA patients. These bone degenerations were found to be correlated with those on the other side of the ankle joint, the medial margin of the talar trochlea and the lateral articular surface of the talus, respectively. In contrast, the amount of bone depression on the plafond was smaller than previously anticipated. Such quantitative information about stereotypical patterns of bone degeneration in ankle OA would contribute to better understanding of the development of ankle OA and possible therapeutic interventions.

The Assessment of First Metatarsal Rotation in the Normal Adult Population Using Weightbearing Computed Tomography

BACKGROUND

The importance of the rotational profile of the first metatarsal is increasingly recognized in the surgical planning of hallux valgus. However, rotation in the normal population has only been measured in small series. We aimed to identify the normal range of first metatarsal rotation in a large series using weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT).

METHODS

WBCT scans were retrospectively analyzed for 182 normal feet (91 patients). Hallux valgus angle, intermetatarsal angle, anteroposterior/lateral talus-first metatarsal angle, calcaneal pitch, and hindfoot alignment angle were measured using digitally reconstructed radiographs. Patients with abnormal values for any of these measures and those with concomitant pathology, previous surgery, or hallux rigidus were excluded. Final assessment was performed on 126 feet. Metatarsal pronation (MPA) and α angles were measured on standardized coronal computed tomography slices. Pronation was recorded as positive. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).

RESULTS

Mean MPA was 5.5 ± 5.1 (range, -6 to 25) degrees, and mean α angle was 6.9 ± 5.5 (range, -5 to 22) degrees. When considering the normal range as within 2 standard deviations of the mean, the normal range identified was -5 to 16 degrees for MPA and -4 to 18 degrees for α angle. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability were excellent for both MPA (ICC = 0.80 and 0.97, respectively) and α angle (ICC = 0.83 and 0.95, respectively). There was a moderate positive correlation between MPA and α angle (Pearson coefficient 0.68, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Metatarsal rotation is variable in normal feet. Normal MPA can be defined as less than 16 degrees, and normal α angle can be defined as less than 18 degrees. Both MPA and α angle are reproducible methods for assessing rotation. Further work is needed to evaluate these angles in patients with deformity and to determine their significance when planning surgical correction of hallux valgus.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Normative Distribution of First Metatarsal Axial Rotation

BACKGROUND

First metatarsal (M1) axial rotation is recognized as a clinically relevant component of hallux valgus deformity. Methods to realign the M1 in 3 dimensions have been developed. One goal of these operations is to restore normal rotation of the first ray. The aim of this study is to provide estimates for the normal distribution of M1 rotation in patients without relevant anatomic pathology.

METHODS

Using stringent clinical and radiographic criteria, we evaluated a set of plain radiograph and weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT) images of 62 feet from a consecutive patient database. Subjects included had normal foot alignment without bunion symptoms. M1 rotation of each foot was measured using 2 unique methods (Saltzman et al and Kim et al methods). Measurement of rotation was performed by 2 observers from coronal WBCT images. Mean values and confidence intervals (CIs) of M1 rotation were calculated for each method. Inter- and intraobserver reliability values were also reported.

RESULTS

Mean M1 rotation values of 2.1 degrees (95% CI: 0.9-3.4) and 6.1 degrees (95% CI: 4.4-7.8) were identified using the Saltzman et al and Kim et al methods, respectively. Inter- and intraobserver reliability values were interpreted as excellent for both methods.

CONCLUSION

In this study, we describe the natural distribution of the M1 axial rotation in subjects without bunion or other identifiable bony foot deformities. This information should provide a normative reference for surgeons correcting rotational issues of the first metatarsal.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Frontal Plane Rotation of the First Ray in Hallux Valgus using Standing Computerized Tomography (CT)

The purpose of the present study was to analyze the difference in frontal plane rotation of the entire first ray in patients with and without hallux valgus using standing weightbearing computed tomography (CT). Ten feet of 10 patients with hallux valgus and 36 feet of 36 patients without hallux valgus were examined. Standing weightbearing CT scans and radiographs were taken for all subjects. Frontal plane measurements of the sesamoid apparatus, first metatarsal head, first metatarsal base, and medial cuneiform were performed. Frontal plane rotation of the first tarsometatarsal joint and intrinsic first metatarsal torsion was calculated. An independent 2 sample t test was used to compare means of outcomes of interest across control and treatment groups. Statistical significance was set at an alpha level of 0.05. There was a significant increase in pronation of the sesamoid apparatus (23.49° vs 6.60°) and first metatarsal head (17.79° vs 9.81°) in patients with hallux valgus. There was a significant increase in first metatarsal torsion toward pronation in patients with hallux valgus (22.28° vs 13.52°). No significant difference was detected in the rotation at the first tarsometatarsal joint or the frontal plane orientations of the first metatarsal base and medial cuneiform. By examining the frontal plane position of the entire first ray during weightbearing using standing CT in patients with and without hallux valgus, we determined the level at which pronation originates to be within the first metatarsal bone rather than the first tarsometatarsal joint.

Anatomic and diagnostic considerations of facial mobility for understanding the effectiveness of facial massage: A pilot study

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of facial massage is often explained by the resulting increases in the blood and lymphatic flow. However, it is difficult to explain the lifting effect on the cheeks. The aim of this study was to analyze facial mobility to further current understanding of the effectiveness of facial massage.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two kinds of analytical methods were designed using a cadaveric head as well as advanced computed tomography (CT). The cadaveric face was divided into three sections, and three different colors of ink were injected into each section. It was kept in a supine position for 24 hours, and the ink distribution was observed. Upright and supine CT examinations were performed on six healthy adult volunteers. The images of both were superimposed by a three-dimensional image analysis system, and changes in facial contours were analyzed.

RESULTS

The three colors of ink spread craniocaudally and were distributed differently from the gravitational vector. When both CT images were superimposed, two distinct lines were formed, which represented overlapping of the facial contours due to the two different CT images. These lines were found to correspond to the border of each color of the ink.

CONCLUSION

Focusing on the mobility of the face, the soft tissue of the face had vertical mobility, and it was speculated that this mobility is involved in the effectiveness of facial massage. Our results could provide useful information for cosmetic treatment and contribute to the collection of scientific knowledge for anti-aging medicine.

A cone beam CT based 3D-assessment of bony forefoot geometry after modified Lapidus arthrodesis

BACKGROUND

Modified Lapidus arthrodesis (MLA) is a well-established treatment modality for hallux valgus deformities (HVD) associated with instability of the first ray. Although the three-dimensional (3D) nature of HVD has long been recognized, diagnostics still focus on plain radiographs. The objective of this study was to validate 3D Cone Beam CT (CBCT) in the perioperative assessment of HVD with focus on the alignment of the forefoot.

METHODS

In a prospective clinical study, MLA was performed on 30 patients (25 females, 5 males; mean age: 63.2 years). Pre- and postoperatively standard radiographs and CBCT with full weight-bearing were acquired. For the CBCT based assessment, reproducible criteria have been defined, measured, and correlated with established radiological indicators.

RESULTS

Evaluation of standard radiographic parameters (hallux-valgus angle [HVA], intermetatarsal angle 1-2 [IMA 1-2], distal metatarsal articular angle [DMAA], tibial sesamoid position [TSP]) showed significant improvement postoperatively. Comparison of measurements obtained from plain radiographs and CBCT were significantly correlated between both measuring techniques, indicating high reliability. Pronation of the first metatarsal and the sesamoids were significantly reduced by the procedure. Due to this repositioning effect, the second metatarsal head was elevated by 3.1mm, and the lateral sesamoid was lowered by 3.8mm. However, there was no correlation between the amount of pronation and conventional radiographic measures.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to plain radiographs, CBCT allows a more detailed view of the forefoot alignment in the coronal plain after MLA. MLA was able to recenter the sesamoids under der first metatarsal head and conversely led to elevation of the second metatarsal head.

Metatarsal Pronation in Hallux Valgus Deformity: A Review

Hallux valgus deformity is a multiplanar deformity, where the rotational component has been recognized over the past 5 to 10 years and given considerable importance. Years ago, a rounded shape of the lateral edge of the first metatarsal head was identified as an important factor to detect after surgery because a less rounded metatarsal head was associated to less recurrence. More recently, pronation of the metatarsal bone was identified as the cause for the rounded appearance of the metatarsal head, and therefore, supination stress was found to be useful to achieve a better correction of the deformity. Using CT scans, up to 87% of hallux valgus cases have been shown to present with a pronated metatarsal bone, which highlights the multiplanar nature of the deformity. This pronation explained the perceived shape of the metatarsal bone and the malposition of the medial sesamoid bone in radiological studies, which has been associated as one of the most important factors for recurrence after treatment. Treatment options are discussed briefly, including metatarsal osteotomies and tarsometatarsal arthrodesis.

Three-dimensional kinematic change of hindfoot during full weightbearing in standing: an analysis using upright computed tomography and 3D-3D surface registration

Background

Weightbearing of the hindfoot affects positional changes of the ankle joint and subtalar joint (ankle-joint complex [AJC]). However, it is difficult to assess the kinematic changes in the hindfoot in a natural full weightbearing condition using conventional CT or cone beam computed tomography (CT) due to limitations of acquiring foot images under a physiological weightbearing condition using those imaging modalities. Analysis of AJC kinematics using fluoroscopy and 2D-3D registration technique requires data on the number of steps and amount of time to build and match the bones. This study aimed to analyze the effect of full weightbearing on hindfoot motion when standing using upright CT and 3D-3D surface registration.

Methods

Forty-eight AJCs of 24 asymptomatic volunteers (13 women, 11 men) were examined under no weightbearing, 50% weightbearing, and single leg full weightbearing conditions while standing. The CT images were acquired from the distal femur to the whole foot using a 320-row upright CT scanner. The condition of each weightbearing stance was measured using a pressure mat. Bone-to-bone rotations of the talus relative to the tibia and calcaneus relative to the talus were evaluated using the surface registration technique. Image quality of the CT and intra- and interobserver reliabilities of the rotation angle were also evaluated.

Results

All CT images were excellent or good quality and the intra- and interobserver correlation coefficients for the angle were 0.996 and 0.995, respectively. The motion of the ankle joint and subtalar joint under 50% and 100% weightbearing were as follows (in degrees); the talus plantarflexed (5.1 ± 4.5 and 6.8 ± 4.8), inverted (1.3 ± 1.4 and 2.0 ± 1.6), and internally rotated (2.4 ± 4.2 and 4.3 ± 4.6) relative to the tibia, and the calcaneus dorsiflexed (2.8 ± 1.4 and 3.8 ± 1.7), everted (5.3 ± 2.6 and 8.0 ± 3.6), and externally rotated (3.0 ± 2.0 and 4.1 ± 2.4) relative to the talus, respectively.

Conclusions

The effect of weightbearing was clearly identified using an upright CT and the 3D-3D registration technique. Three-dimensional kinematics under static full weightbearing were opposite between the ankle and subtalar joints on their respective axes.