Cervical lymph node carcinoma metastasis from unknown primary site: a retrospective analysis of 154 patients

Survival outcomes in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary: A national cohort study

INTRODUCTION

To investigate factors influencing survival in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary (HNSCCUP).

METHODS

A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted, over 5 years from January 2015, in UK Head and Neck centres, of consecutive adults undergoing 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose-PET-CT within 3 months of diagnosis with metastatic cervical squamous cell carcinoma. Patients treated as HNSCCUP underwent survival analysis, stratified by neck dissection and/or radiotherapy to the ipsilateral neck, and by HPV status.

RESULTS

Data were received from 57 centres for 965 patients, of whom 482 started treatment for HNSCCUP (65.7% HPV-positive, n = 282/429). Five-year overall survival (OS) for HPV-positive patients was 85.0% (95% CI 78.4-92.3) and 43.5% (95% CI 32.9-57.5) for HPV-negative. HPV-negative status was associated with worse OS, disease-free (DFS), and disease-specific (DSS) survival (all p < .0001 on log-rank test) but not local control (LC) (p = .16). Unilateral HPV-positive disease treated with surgery alone was associated with significantly worse DFS (p < .0001) and LC (p < .0001) compared to radiotherapy alone or combined modalities (5-year DFS: 24.9%, 82.3% and 94.3%; 5-year LC: 41.8%, 98.8% and 98.6%). OS was not significantly different (p = .16). Unilateral HPV-negative disease treated with surgery alone was associated with significantly worse LC (p = .017) (5-year LC: estimate unavailable, 93.3% and 96.6%, respectively). Small numbers with bilateral disease precluded meaningful sub-group analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

HPV status is associated with variable management and outcomes in HNSCCUP. Unilateral neck disease is treated variably and associated with poorer outcomes when managed with surgery alone. The impact of diagnostic oropharyngeal surgery on primary site emergence, survival and functional outcomes is unestablished.

Head and Neck Cancer of Unknown Primary: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort study in Northern Thailand, an Endemic Nasopharyngeal Cancer Area

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the characteristics and oncological outcomes of head and neck carcinoma of unknown primary (HNCUP) patients in an endemic nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) area.

METHODS

One hundred and forty-four HNCUP patients curatively treated between January 1995 and December 2022 from 5 centers were retrospectively recruited onto the study to analyze the clinicopathological characteristics and oncological outcomes and compare them with historical data. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model analysis was performed to evaluate factors affecting survival outcomes. A propensity-matched pair analysis of the patients with positive and negative EBV-encoded small RNA (EBER) staining was applied to compare the characteristics and outcomes between the two groups.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 45 months. Most patients (88.2%) received total mucosal irradiation (TMI). Primary tumor emergence (PTE) was detected in 6 patients (4.2%) who did not have TMI. The 5-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival, and locoregional recurrence-free survival were 51.3%, 64.9%, and 72.7%, respectively. Extranodal extension and N3 compared with the N1 stage were the significant independent predictors for OS (HR 2.90, 95% CI 1.12-7.51, p = 0.028 and HR 3.66, 95%CI 1.23-11.89, p = 0.031, respectively). The matched-pair analysis demonstrated comparable all survival outcomes between the EBER-positive and -negative groups. All patients in the matched pair analysis received TMI, and no PTE was detected.

CONCLUSION

Our survival outcomes were comparable to previous studies with a low rate of PTE. The matched pair analysis of EBER-positive and -negative groups revealed similar oncological outcomes and no primary tumor emergence when total mucosal irradiation was administered.

Transoral robotic surgery in HPV+ oropharyngeal cancer of unknown primary

PURPOSE

This study was designed to assess trends in and outcomes associated with TORS-treated HNCUP using a large national database.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

HPV+ oropharyngeal HNCUPs were isolated from the 2004-2017 National Cancer Database. Overall survival (OS) was assessed, with patients stratified by 1) use of TORS and 2) whether the occult tumor was ultimately located. Demographic and oncologic predictors of survival were evaluated on regression.

RESULTS

The cohort contained 284,734 cases, of which 8336 were HNCUPs. HNCUPs represented 2.49 % of all HNSCC in 2010 versus 3.13 % in 2017. 3897 (46.7 %) of these unknown primaries were ultimately identified. The proportion of cases treated with TORS increased from 6.9 % in 2010 to 18.1 % in 2017 (p < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis of 2991 HPV+ oropharyngeal HNCUPs demonstrated higher 5-year overall survival (OS) for patients treated with robotic surgery versus no robotic surgery (95.4 % ± 1.7 % standard error [SE] versus 84.0 % ± 0.9 % SE; p < 0.001). Patients with primary tumors identified during treatment had improved OS compared to those whose tumors were not located (5-year OS was 90.5 % ± 0.9 % SE and 77.3 % ± 1.5 % SE, respectively; p < 0.001). For patients in which the primary tumor was found, those who received robotic surgery survived longer than those who did not (96.5 % ± 1.4 % SE versus 89.1 % ± 1.0 % SE 5-year OS; p < 0.001). The relationship between TORS and OS remained significant on Cox regression controlling for confounders.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of TORS in the workup for HPV+ HNCUP is associated with higher rates of tumor identification and improved OS.

Intraosseous carcinoma of the anterior maxilla identified as the occult primary tumour of carcinoma of unknown primary

Carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP) is defined as lymph node metastasis without a detectable origin until after the initial treatment has been performed. The most common occult primary site in the head and neck, as revealed by a review of the published literature, is the oropharynx. An occult primary site in the oral region is extremely rare. We report a rare case of head and neck CUP (HNCUP) in a 69-year-old female patient, wherein the occult primary lesion was a primary intraosseous carcinoma (PIOC) invading the anterior maxilla. During the course of the initial diagnostic workup, no primary lesion could be identified; however, cervical lymph node metastasis to left levels IB and IIA were observed in the patient. A neck dissection followed by adjuvant radiotherapy was performed. However, the PIOC of the anterior maxilla was identified 6 months after neck treatment and was confirmed as the occult primary tumour of the HNCUP. This case is quite rare and required a comprehensive workup to guide optimal treatment. Careful follow-up or active biopsy should be considered if osteolytic changes are observed in the jaw.

A Systematic Review of Cancer of Unknown Primary in the Head and Neck Region

Background

Despite the vivid progress in molecular and genetic profiling, extensive diagnosis and multiple therapeutic modalities, cancers of unknown primary in the head and neck region continue to be a formidable challenge.

Aim

The purpose of the review is to present the most recent and well-established findings concerning cancers of unknown primary (CUPs) in the head and neck patients and consequently to provide medical specialists with essential information regarding the biology, pathology, histology, diagnosis and treatment of CUP in the head and neck region.

Material and Methods

The Medline/PubMed database was searched by using the following keywords “CUP”, “cancer of unknown primary”, “CUP biology”, “head and neck”. The references of the publications of interest were also screened for relevant papers. There were no limitations in regard to the publication date.

Conclusion

Unique biology and pathophysiology prompt the management of CUP to be demanding. The vivid rise in HPV-related CUPs during the last 20 years has put more focus on this phenomenon. New findings concerning the enigmatic biology of CUP provide fundaments for targeted therapy. Despite the availability of various diagnostic methods, the diagnosis of CUP continues to be a time-consuming, strenuous process that eventually provides answers. It remains controversial as to what combination of treatment methods is the most effective. There is no consensus on the value of combining chemotherapy with radiotherapy. Highly specific surgical treatments for particular histological types of CUP produce more satisfactory results. It is paramount to establish reliable guidelines concerning the diagnosis and treatment of CUP patients.

The prognostic role of radiotherapy and radiotherapy target in cervical lymph node metastatic squamous cell carcinoma with unknown primary: a retrospective study

OBJECTIVES

Aim to analyze the effect of radiotherapy for cervical lymph node metastatic carcinoma with unknown primary (CCUP) and compare the survival benefits between Comprehensive radiotherapy and Involved Field radiotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The patients diagnosed with CCUP between 2009 and 2019 in our institution were analyzed retrospectively. The categorical variables were tested by χ² test. Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis. Log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards regression were performed with overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) as the primary outcome variables.

RESULTS

Of 139 patients, 64.7% (90/139) of them received radiotherapy. Of the 90 patients who underwent radiotherapy, 45.6% (41/90) received Involved Field radiotherapy and the rest 49 patients received Comprehensive radiotherapy. The median follow-up of 139 patients is 69 months. The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year OS rates are 87%, 62%, and 39%, respectively, and the DFS rates are 73%, 45%, and 29%, respectively. Multivariate analysis of 139 patients with CCUP shows that differentiation grade, N stage, radiotherapy, and the length of the largest lymph node (D_maxLN) are the independent prognostic factors for both OS and DFS. Subgroup analysis of 90 patients who received radiotherapy shows that the Comprehensive radiotherapy group has a better OS (P < 0.001) and DFS (P < 0.001) compared with Involved Field radiotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Radiotherapy is the independent prognostic factor for CCUP. Comprehensive radiotherapy may be superior to Involved Field radiotherapy in survival benefits.

Technical feasibility of radiomics signature analyses for improving detection of occult tonsillar cancer

Diagnosis of occult palatine tonsil squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) using conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is difficult in patients with cervical nodal metastasis from an unknown primary site at presentation. We aimed to establish a radiomics approach based on MRI features extracted from the volume of interest in these patients. An Elastic Net model was developed to differentiate between normal palatine tonsils and occult palatine tonsil SCC. The diagnostic performances of the model with radiomics features extracted from T1-weighted image (WI), T2WI, contrast-enhanced T1WI, and an apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map had area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve values of 0.831, 0.840, 0.781, and 0.807, respectively, for differential diagnosis. The model with features from the ADC alone showed the highest sensitivity of 90.0%, while the model with features from T1WI + T2WI + contrast-enhanced T1WI showed the highest AUROC of 0.853. The added sensitivity of the radiomics feature analysis were 34.6% over that of conventional MRI to detect occult palatine tonsil SCC. Therefore, we concluded that adding radiomics feature analysis to MRI may improve the detection sensitivity for occult palatine tonsil SCC in patients with a cervical nodal metastasis from cancer of an unknown primary site.

Carcinoma of unknown primary detected by whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging: A case report and review of the literature

Carcinoma of unknown primary accounts for 2%-5% of all head and neck tumors. Identification of the primary site is challenging. We present a case report of a 43-year-old man with metastatic cervical lymphadenopathy for 3 year, and the primary tumor was unknown after routine examinations, including positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging was performed to detect small lesions in the nasopharynx, and a biopsy confirmed the lesions as squamous cell carcinoma. Therefore, the primary tumor site was found in a patient with carcinoma of unknown primary, suggesting that whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging can be very helpful in detecting small occult cancer.

Failure patterns of cervical lymph nodes in metastases of unknown origin according to target volume

Purpose

This study was aim to evaluate the patterns of failure according to radiotherapy (RT) target volume for cervical lymph nodes in metastases of unknown primary origin in head and neck region (HNMUO).

Materials and Methods

Sixty-two patients with HNMUO between 1998 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. We analyzed the clinical outcomes and primary site failure depending on the radiation target volume. The target volume was classified according to whether the potential head and neck mucosal sites were included and whether the neck node was treated involved side only or bilaterally.

Results

Potential mucosal site RT (mucosal RT) was done to 23 patients and 39 patients did not receive mucosal RT. Mucosal RT showed no significant effect on overall survival (OS) and locoregional recurrence (LRR). The location of primary site failure encountered during follow-up period was found to be unpredictable and 75% of patients with recurrence received successful salvage therapies. No significant differences in OS and LRR were found between patients treated to unilateral (n = 35) and bilateral neck irradiation (n = 21). Treatment of both necks resulted in significantly higher mucositis.

conclusions

We found no advantages in OS and LRR of patients with HNMUO when mucosal sites and bilateral neck node were included in the radiation target volume.

Long-term results of elective mucosal irradiation for head and neck cancer of unknown primary in Chinese population: The EMICUP study

Objective

Controversy still exists regarding the volume of radiation for head and neck cancer of unknown primary (HNCUP). Theoretically, elective mucosal irradiation (EMI) should achieve a balance between survival and toxicity. This prospective study was conducted to evaluate the long‐term benefit of EMI in Chinese HNCUP patients.

Methods

A phase II, single‐arm trial was performed at two centers in China. HNCUP patients with pathologically confirmed metastatic squamous cell carcinoma or poorly differentiated carcinoma were enrolled. Patients with metastatic lymph nodes limited to level IV and/or the supraclavicular fossa were excluded. The EMI approach was specifically customized to Chinese patients by differentiating HNCUP as putative nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) or non‐putative NPC. The primary endpoint was 3‐year mucosal recurrence‐free survival (MRFS).

Results

A total of 48 patients were enrolled between 02/02/2010 and 08/01/2018; 46 patients were analyzed, including 24 putative NPC and 22 non‐putative NPC patients. No primary recurrence was observed during a median follow‐up period of 70 months, and only 1 patient experienced out of field recurrence in the contralateral neck. The 3‐year MRFS was 90.6% (95%CI: 76.4%‐96.4%). The 5‐year MRFS, regional‐recurrence free survival (RRFS) and overall survival (OS) were 90.6% (95%CI: 76.4%‐96.4%), 86.0% (95%CI: 71.1%‐93.7%), and 90.6% (95%CI: 76.4%‐96.4%), respectively. No grade 4 acute or late toxicities occurred, and the most frequent grade 3 acute toxicity was oral mucositis (45.7%).

Conclusion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first prospective study to evaluate the long‐term outcomes of EMI in Chinese HNCUP patients. Excellent MRFS and OS rates were observed. Further randomized studies are warranted.

Accuracy of contrast-enhanced CT and predictive factors for extracapsular spread in unknown primary head and neck squamous cell cancer

AIM

To determine the accuracy of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) for nodal extracapsular spread (ECS) and identify predictive radiological signs and clinicopathological features for ECS in unknown-primary head and neck squamous cell cancer (UPHNSCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The CECT imaging of patients who underwent primary neck dissection for UPHNSCC during 2011-2015 was analysed. The largest pathological-looking node at each radiologically involved level was evaluated in consensus by two head and neck radiologists. Parameters included longest diameter, margin sharpness, haziness in adjacent fat, necrosis, and loss of fat plane with adjacent structures. Independent assessment was also made regarding the presence/absence of ECS. Findings and clinicopathological parameters were correlated with histopathology.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients with 39 neck levels had metastatic nodal involvement determined on CECT. Confirmed ECS was found at 26 levels in 23 patients. Sensitivity of radiological assessment for ECS by nodal level was 81-85% (95% confidence interval [CI]=65-93%) and specificity 46-54% (95% CI=19-81%); kappa 0.87. On univariate analysis based on the largest involved node per patient, longest diameter being ≥30 mm (p=0.007), haziness in adjacent fat (p=0.023), increasing age (p=0.006), and more advanced pathological nodal status (p=0.027) were statistically significantly associated with ECS. Haziness and increasing age were independent predictors on multivariate analysis (odds ratio [OR]=26.4 and 1.24).

CONCLUSION

Expert assessment of ECS on CECT had good sensitivity with excellent interobserver agreement. A longest nodal diameter of ≥30 mm, haziness in the surrounding fat on CECT, advanced pathological nodal status, and advancing patient age were significantly associated with ECS in UPHNSCC patients, findings not previously reported.

The impact of the patient's condition, diagnostic procedures and treatment on the survival of carcinoma of unknown primary site patients

Introduction

Carcinoma of unknown primary site (CUP) refers to 1–5% of all head and neck neoplasms. Very often, the primary site remains difficult to determine. Squamous cell carcinoma is the most frequent histopathological type diagnosed in the head and neck region. According to statistics, a primary site is usually located in the oropharynx.

Study objective

The study presents diagnostic difficulties and the methods of diagnosing and the therapy of CUP and primary sites in patients treated in the region of Lower Silesia and Silesia. The aim of the study was to show a retrospective analysis of 233 CUP patients to assess how clinical features, diagnosis and treatment affect the survival of patients.

Material and methods

The diagnostics of patients included panendoscopy with specimen collection (nasoendoscopy, laryngoscopy, esophagoscopy, brochoscopy), computed tomography examination of the neck, chest, abdomen and pelvis minor, as well as positron emission tomography examination. Tonsilletomy was performed in 37 patients. Neck dissection was carried out in 109 subjects and 165 patients were treated bt radiotherapy, and 135 by chemotherapy.

Conclusions

Tonsillectomy is required in CUP patients with the negative results of biopsy and imaging tests. It gives a possibility of detecting the primary site and improves the results of treatment and survival of CUP patients.Combination therapy, including surgical treatment and chemoradiotherapy, gives the best therapeutic results in CUP patients. The general condition of patient and younger age have an impact on prognosis and survival.