1
|
Dantio CD, Fasoranti DO, Teng C, Li X. Seizures in brain tumors: pathogenesis, risk factors and management (Review). Int J Mol Med 2025; 55:82. [PMID: 40116082 PMCID: PMC11964414 DOI: 10.3892/ijmm.2025.5523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2024] [Accepted: 03/05/2025] [Indexed: 03/23/2025] Open
Abstract
Seizures in the context of brain tumors are a relatively common symptom, with higher occurrence rates observed in glioneuronal tumors and gliomas. It is a serious burden that can have a significant impact on the quality of life (QoL) of patients and influence the disease's prognosis. Brain tumor‑related epilepsy (BTRE) is a challenging entity because the pathophysiological mechanisms are not fully understood yet. Nonetheless, neuroinflammation is considered to play a pivotal role. Next to neuroinflammation, findings on the pathogenesis of BTRE have established that certain genetic mutations are involved, of which the most known would be IDH mutations in gliomas. Others discussed more thoroughly in the present review include genes such as PTEN, TP53, IGSF3, and these findings all provide fresh and fascinating insights into the pathogenesis of BTRE. Treatment for BTRE presents unique challenges, mainly related to burdens of polytherapy, debated necessity of anti‑epileptic prophylaxis, and overall impact on the QoL. In fact, there are no established anti‑seizure medications (ASMs) of choice for BTRE, nor is there any protocol to guide the use of these medications at every step of disease progression. Treatment strategies aimed at the tumor, that is surgical procedures, radio‑ and chemotherapy appear to influence seizure control. Conversely, some ASMs have also shown antitumor properties. The present review summarizes and retrospectively analyzes the literature on the pathogenesis and management of BTRE to provide an updated comprehensive understanding. Furthermore, the challenges and opportunities for developing future therapies aimed at BTRE are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cyrille D. Dantio
- Department of Neurosurgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410013, P.R. China
- Hunan International Scientific and Technological Cooperation, Base of Brain Tumor Research, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410013, P.R. China
| | - Deborah Oluwatosin Fasoranti
- Department of Neurosurgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410013, P.R. China
- Hunan International Scientific and Technological Cooperation, Base of Brain Tumor Research, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410013, P.R. China
| | - Chubei Teng
- Department of Neurosurgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410013, P.R. China
- Hunan International Scientific and Technological Cooperation, Base of Brain Tumor Research, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410013, P.R. China
| | - Xuejun Li
- Department of Neurosurgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410013, P.R. China
- Hunan International Scientific and Technological Cooperation, Base of Brain Tumor Research, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410013, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mondia MWL, Batchala PP, Dreicer R, Devitt ME, McCord MR, Mut M, Sheehan JP, Schiff D, Fadul CE. Incidental Brain Metastases From Prostate Cancer Diagnosed With PSMA PET/CT and MRI: A Case Series and Literature Review. Prostate 2025. [PMID: 40079497 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24890] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2024] [Revised: 02/21/2025] [Accepted: 03/04/2025] [Indexed: 03/15/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Brain metastases (BMETS) from prostate cancer are rare. Hence, brain imaging in neurologically asymptomatic patients with advanced prostate cancer (aPC) is not routinely performed. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT uses a radiotracer that binds to prostate cancer epithelial cells and is FDA-approved for initial staging for high-risk prostate cancer, detecting prostate cancer recurrence, and determining eligibility for radionuclide therapy. METHODS We report six patients with asymptomatic BMETS from aPC found on staging PSMA PET/CT or MRI. Along with cranial MRI, PSMA PET/CT may be useful for detecting asymptomatic intracranial metastasis in select patients with prostate cancer. RESULTS Brain metastases were diagnosed in four patients by staging PSMA PET/CT scan-three after systemic disease progression and one during routine surveillance. In two other patients, BMETS were detected using MRI despite negative PSMA PET/CT for brain lesions. All were neurologically asymptomatic. Three patients had undetectable serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentrations; one had neuroendocrine differentiation on histology. CONCLUSION In patients with poorly differentiated or neuroendocrine aPC, BMETS may occur without neurologic symptoms and stable PSA. PSMA PET/CT may complement brain MRI for identifying BMETS in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Willy L Mondia
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Prem P Batchala
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Robert Dreicer
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Departments of Medicine and Urology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Michael E Devitt
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Departments of Medicine and Urology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Matthew R McCord
- Department of Pathology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Melike Mut
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Jason P Sheehan
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - David Schiff
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Camilo E Fadul
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Terry F, Orrego-Gonzalez E, Enríquez-Marulanda A, Pacheco-Barrios N, Merenzon M, Komotar RJ, Vega RA. Temporal Dynamics and Clinical Predictors of Brain Metastasis in Breast Cancer: A Two-Decade Cohort Analysis Toward Tailored CNS Screening. Cancers (Basel) 2025; 17:946. [PMID: 40149281 PMCID: PMC11940119 DOI: 10.3390/cancers17060946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2025] [Revised: 03/01/2025] [Accepted: 03/10/2025] [Indexed: 03/29/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally. It is also the second most frequent source of brain metastases (BMs), contributing to 5-20% of cases. Despite this, routine brain imaging for screening is not recommended and is only conducted when clinical symptoms or physical findings suggest metastasis. This study aims to identify clinical predictors associated with overall survival (OS) and the timing of BM development in breast cancer patients. METHODS We performed a retrospective review of medical records for 113 patients diagnosed with BMs secondary to breast cancer at our institution between 2000 and 2020. Baseline demographic data and clinical characteristics related to BMs were collected. To identify factors associated with OS and time to BM development after breast cancer diagnosis, we conducted univariate analysis using Kaplan-Meier curves, bivariate analysis with the log-rank test, and multivariate analysis via the Cox Proportional Hazard model. RESULTS An early diagnosis of BMs was identified as a significant predictor of prolonged OS (aHR = 0.22; 95% CI: 0.049-0.98, p = 0.05). Post-menopausal status at breast cancer diagnosis (aHR = 1.69; 95% CI: 1.13-2.53, p = 0.01), Asian ethnicity (aHR = 2.30; 95% CI: 1.03-5.16, p = 0.04), and the ER+/HER2+ subtype (aHR = 2.06; 95% CI: 1.14-3.71, p = 0.02) were significantly associated with a shorter time to BM diagnosis. A subgroup analysis of patients with ER+ breast tumors revealed that Hispanic or Arabic ethnicity (aHR = 3.63; 95% CI: 1.34-9.81, p = 0.01) and stage IV diagnosis (aHR = 2.09; 95% CI: 1.16-3.76, p = 0.01) were significantly associated with shorter intervals to BM diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS Breast cancer remains a significant global health burden for women, yet clear guidelines for routine BMs screening are still lacking. Early detection of BMs has been shown to notably improve long-term survival outcomes. Additionally, post-menopausal status, Hispanic or Arabic ethnicity, and the HER2+ tumor subtype are associated with shorter time to BM development, highlighting these factors as potential indicators for central nervous system screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fernando Terry
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Eduardo Orrego-Gonzalez
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | | | - Niels Pacheco-Barrios
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Martin Merenzon
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Ricardo J. Komotar
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33146, USA
| | - Rafael A. Vega
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Li M, Li Z, Zhang H, Wakimoto H, Sun L, Wang T, Zhou S, Zhou L. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of surgical resection for brain metastases from lung adenocarcinoma. Front Oncol 2025; 14:1453177. [PMID: 39906663 PMCID: PMC11790614 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1453177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2024] [Accepted: 12/30/2024] [Indexed: 02/06/2025] Open
Abstract
Objective The purpose of this study was to explore the clinical characteristics, survival time and prognostic factors of patients undergoing craniotomy for brain metastases (BM) from lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). Methods A total of 208 patients with BM from LUAD who underwent craniotomy at the Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Henan province, China from March 2005 to October 2022 were included in this retrospective study. All patients were confirmed as BM of LUAD by histopathology. The clinical data included patient gender, age, occupation, family history of tumor, smoking history, alcohol drinking history, neurological symptoms, history of lung cancer treatment, tumor location, tumor number, tumor size, gene status, expression of S-100, CEA, Ki67, and PD-L1 by immunohistochemistry, KPS after craniotomy, whether tumor therapy was continued after craniotomy, and survival time. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression was used to analyze the prognostic factors of patients undergoing craniotomy for LUAD BM. Results A total of 208 patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria, including 110 males (52.9%) and 98 females (47.1%), with an average age of 61.4 years. 203 patients (97.6%) had neurological symptoms. 84 patients (40.4%) had smoking history, 89 patients (42.8%) had alcohol drinking history, and 31 patients (14.9%) had the family history of tumor. Only 5 patients (2.4%) had received lung cancer treatment before craniotomy. The intracranial location of BM was mostly in the frontal lobe (54, 26.0%) and the metastatic sites were mostly single (117, 56.3%); the metastatic tumor size was mostly between 2-5 cm (141, 67.8%). Genetically, 43.3% patients (90 cases) had EGFR mutations, and immunohistochemical analysis showed that most patients were PD-L1 positive (160, 76.9%) and Ki67 > 30% (137, 65.9%). Most patients (145, 69.7%) had KPS score under 80 after craniotomy. Only 72 patients (34.7%) received continued tumor therapy after craniotomy. 190 patients (91.3%) were successfully followed up. The median survival time was 11.5 months, and the 3-year survival rate was 15.7%. Multivariate analysis revealed that smoking history, Ki67 percentage, KPS after craniotomy, and molecular targeted therapy after craniotomy were independent factors affecting the survival time of patients. Conclusions Although survival remains poor, patients who had no-smoking history, Ki67 percentage ≤30%, KPS≥80 after craniotomy, and molecular targeted therapy after craniotomy can improve the prognosis and prolong the survival time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming Li
- Department of Neurosurgery, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital, People’s Hospital of Zhengzhou University, People’s Hospital of Henan University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Zhiying Li
- Department of Neurosurgery, The 7th People's Hospital of Zhengzhou, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Hang Zhang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital, People’s Hospital of Zhengzhou University, People’s Hospital of Henan University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Hiroaki Wakimoto
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Linlin Sun
- Department of Neurosurgery, The 7th People's Hospital of Zhengzhou, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Tiantian Wang
- Department of Neurology, The 7th People's Hospital of Zhengzhou, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Shengli Zhou
- Department of Pathology, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital, People’s Hospital of Zhengzhou University, People’s Hospital of Henan University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Liyun Zhou
- Department of Neurosurgery, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital, People’s Hospital of Zhengzhou University, People’s Hospital of Henan University, Zhengzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Weller M, Remon J, Rieken S, Vollmuth P, Ahn MJ, Minniti G, Le Rhun E, Westphal M, Brastianos PK, Soo RA, Kirkpatrick JP, Goldberg SB, Öhrling K, Hegi-Johnson F, Hendriks LEL. Central nervous system metastases in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A review of the therapeutic landscape. Cancer Treat Rev 2024; 130:102807. [PMID: 39151281 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2024.102807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2023] [Revised: 07/19/2024] [Accepted: 07/29/2024] [Indexed: 08/19/2024]
Abstract
Up to 40% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) develop central nervous system (CNS) metastases. Current treatments for this subgroup of patients with advanced NSCLC include local therapies (surgery, stereotactic radiosurgery, and, less frequently, whole-brain radiotherapy), targeted therapies for oncogene-addicted NSCLC (small molecules, such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and antibody-drug conjugates), and immune checkpoint inhibitors (as monotherapy or combination therapy), with multiple new drugs in development. However, confirming the intracranial activity of these treatments has proven to be challenging, given that most lung cancer clinical trials exclude patients with untreated and/or progressing CNS metastases, or do not include prespecified CNS-related endpoints. Here we review progress in the treatment of patients with CNS metastases originating from NSCLC, examining local treatment options, systemic therapies, and multimodal therapeutic strategies. We also consider challenges regarding assessment of treatment response and provide thoughts around future directions for managing CNS disease in patients with advanced NSCLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Jordi Remon
- Paris-Saclay University, Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
| | - Stefan Rieken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Göttingen (UMG), Göttingen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Lower Saxony (CCC-N), University Hospital Göttingen (UMG), Göttingen, Germany.
| | - Philipp Vollmuth
- Division for Computational Radiology & Clinical AI, Clinic for Neuroradiology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany; Division for Medical Image Computing, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Myung-Ju Ahn
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
| | - Giuseppe Minniti
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Anatomical Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy.
| | - Emilie Le Rhun
- Departments of Neurosurgery and Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Manfred Westphal
- Department of Neurosurgery and Institute for Tumor Biology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
| | | | - Ross A Soo
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
| | - John P Kirkpatrick
- Departments of Radiation Oncology and Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
| | - Sarah B Goldberg
- Department of Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale School of Medicine, Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT, USA.
| | | | - Fiona Hegi-Johnson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Clinical Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Lizza E L Hendriks
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mostafavi M, Ghazi F, Mehrabifard M, Alivirdiloo V, Hajiabbasi M, Rahimi F, Mobed A, Taheripak G, Ramezani Farani M, Huh YS, Bakhtiyari S, Alipourfard I. State-of-the-art application of nanoparticles in radiotherapy: a platform for synergistic effects in cancer treatment. Strahlenther Onkol 2024:10.1007/s00066-024-02301-y. [PMID: 39367110 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-024-02301-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2024] [Accepted: 07/24/2024] [Indexed: 10/06/2024]
Abstract
Radiotherapy (RT) is a gold standard cancer treatment worldwide. However, RT has limitations and many side effects. Nanoparticles (NPs) have exclusive properties that allow them to be used in cancer therapy. Consequently, the combination of NP and RT opens up a new frontier in cancer treatment. Among NPs, gold nanoparticles (GNPs) are the most extensively studied and are considered ideal radiosensitizers for radiotherapy due to their unique physicochemical properties and high X‑ray absorption. This review analyzes the various roles of NPs as radiosensitizers in radiotherapy of glioblastoma (GBS), prostate cancer, and breast cancer and summarizes recent advances. Furthermore, the underlying mechanisms of NP radiosensitization, including physical, chemical, and biological mechanisms, are discussed, which may provide new directions for next-generation GNP optimization and clinical transformation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehrnaz Mostafavi
- Faculty of Allied Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Farhood Ghazi
- Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Science, Tabriz, Iran
| | | | - Vahid Alivirdiloo
- Ramsar Campus, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Ramsar, Iran
| | | | - Fatemeh Rahimi
- Division of Clinical Laboratory, Zahra Mardani Azar Children Training Research and Treatment Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Ahmad Mobed
- Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Gholamreza Taheripak
- Department of Biochemistry, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Marzieh Ramezani Farani
- NanoBio High-Tech Materials Research Center, Department of Biological Sciences and Bioengineering, Inha University, Incheon, Korea (Republic of)
| | - Yun Suk Huh
- NanoBio High-Tech Materials Research Center, Department of Biological Sciences and Bioengineering, Inha University, Incheon, Korea (Republic of)
| | - Salar Bakhtiyari
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, School of Medicine, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam, Iran
| | - Iraj Alipourfard
- Iraj Alipourfard, Institute of Physical Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences, Marcina Kasprzaka 44/52, 01-224, Warsaw, Poland.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Raghavendra AS, Ibrahim NK. Breast Cancer Brain Metastasis: A Comprehensive Review. JCO Oncol Pract 2024; 20:1348-1359. [PMID: 38748968 PMCID: PMC11477856 DOI: 10.1200/op.23.00794] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Revised: 03/13/2024] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 10/16/2024] Open
Abstract
The mechanisms underlying breast cancer brain metastasis (BCBM) development are complex, and its clinical presentation varies depending on the number, location, and size of brain metastases. Common symptoms include headache, neurologic deficits, and seizures. Diagnosis of BCBM typically relies on neuroimaging techniques, such as magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography scans. Local therapies, such as surgery and stereotactic radiosurgery, can be used to control tumor growth and relieve symptoms. Whole-brain radiotherapy has been a mainstay of treatment for BCBM, but its use has been associated with cognitive decline. Systemic therapy with chemotherapy and targeted agents plays an increasingly important role in the management of BCBM. Novel agents, such as human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted therapies and tyrosine kinase inhibitors, have shown promising results in improving survival for patients with HER2-positive and triple-negative BCBM. This comprehensive review synthesizes current knowledge, clinical insights, and evolving paradigms to provide a robust understanding and roadmap for optimizing the diagnosis and management of BCBM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akshara S. Raghavendra
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Nuhad K. Ibrahim
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ene CI, Abi Faraj C, Beckham TH, Weinberg JS, Andersen CR, Haider AS, Rao G, Ferguson SD, Alvarez-Brenkenridge CA, Kim BYS, Heimberger AB, McCutcheon IE, Prabhu SS, Wang CM, Ghia AJ, McGovern SL, Chung C, McAleer MF, Tom MC, Perni S, Swanson TA, Yeboa DN, Briere TM, Huse JT, Fuller GN, Lang FF, Li J, Suki D, Sawaya RE. Response of treatment-naive brain metastases to stereotactic radiosurgery. Nat Commun 2024; 15:3728. [PMID: 38697991 PMCID: PMC11066027 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-47998-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2023] [Accepted: 04/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/05/2024] Open
Abstract
With improvements in survival for patients with metastatic cancer, long-term local control of brain metastases has become an increasingly important clinical priority. While consensus guidelines recommend surgery followed by stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for lesions >3 cm, smaller lesions (≤3 cm) treated with SRS alone elicit variable responses. To determine factors influencing this variable response to SRS, we analyzed outcomes of brain metastases ≤3 cm diameter in patients with no prior systemic therapy treated with frame-based single-fraction SRS. Following SRS, 259 out of 1733 (15%) treated lesions demonstrated MRI findings concerning for local treatment failure (LTF), of which 202 /1733 (12%) demonstrated LTF and 54/1733 (3%) had an adverse radiation effect. Multivariate analysis demonstrated tumor size (>1.5 cm) and melanoma histology were associated with higher LTF rates. Our results demonstrate that brain metastases ≤3 cm are not uniformly responsive to SRS and suggest that prospective studies to evaluate the effect of SRS alone or in combination with surgery on brain metastases ≤3 cm matched by tumor size and histology are warranted. These studies will help establish multi-disciplinary treatment guidelines that improve local control while minimizing radiation necrosis during treatment of brain metastasis ≤3 cm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chibawanye I Ene
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Christina Abi Faraj
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Thomas H Beckham
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jeffrey S Weinberg
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Clark R Andersen
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ali S Haider
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ganesh Rao
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sherise D Ferguson
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Betty Y S Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Amy B Heimberger
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Malnati Brain Tumor Institute of the Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Ian E McCutcheon
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sujit S Prabhu
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Chenyang Michael Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Amol J Ghia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Susan L McGovern
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Caroline Chung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mary Frances McAleer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Martin C Tom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Subha Perni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Todd A Swanson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Debra N Yeboa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Tina M Briere
- Department of Radiation Physics, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jason T Huse
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Gregory N Fuller
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Frederick F Lang
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jing Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Dima Suki
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Raymond E Sawaya
- Faculty of Medicine and Medical Affairs, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ramirez F, Riva H, Digbeu B, Samaniego M, Fernandez L, Mansour S, Vasquez R, Lopez DS, Chacon J. Effects of treatment methods on cutaneous melanoma related mortality and all-cause mortality in Texas: TCR-Medicare 2007-2017 database. Cancer Causes Control 2024; 35:265-275. [PMID: 37702966 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-023-01780-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2022] [Accepted: 08/18/2023] [Indexed: 09/14/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The incidence of cutaneous melanoma is rising, and Melanoma related deaths are highest among people aged 65-74. Herein, we aim to understand the impact of novel and established melanoma treatment methods on CM related mortality and all-cause mortality. We further compared these effects among Hispanic and non-Hispanic Whites (NHW). METHODS The data was extracted from the Texas Cancer Registry from 2007 to 2017. A Cox Proportional Hazard regression analysis was performed to assess treatment effect on melanoma mortality and all-cause mortality, with race-ethnicity as an effect modifier. RESULTS A higher percentage of Hispanic patients presented with CM-related mortality (22.11%) compared to NHW patients (14.39%). In both the Hispanic and NHW, post-diagnosis radiation (HR = 1.610, 95% CI 0.984-2.634, HR = 2.348, 95% CI 2.082-2.648, respectively), post-diagnosis chemotherapy (HR = 1.899, 95% CI 1.085-3.322, HR = 2.035, 95% CI 1.664-2.489, respectively), and post-diagnosis immunotherapy (HR = 2.100, 95% CI 1.338-3.296, HR = 2.402, 95% CI 2.100-2.748) are each associated with an increased risk in CM-related mortality. Similar results were seen with post-diagnosis radiation (Hispanic HR = 1.640, 95% CI 1.121-2.400, NHW HR = 1.800, 95% CI 1.644-1.971), post-diagnostic chemotherapy (Hispanic HR = 1.457, 95% CI 0.898-2.364, NHW HR = 1.592, 95% CI 1.356-1.869), and post-diagnosis immunotherapy (Hispanic HR = 2.140, 95% CI 1.494-3.065, NHW HR = 2.190, 95% CI 1.969-2.435) with respect to all-cause mortality. Post-diagnosis surgery (HR = 0.581, 95% CI 0.395-0.856, HR = 0.622, 95% CI 0.571-0.678) had the opposite effect in CM-related mortality for Hispanics and NHWs respectively. CONCLUSION Our results propose differences in all-cause and CM-only related mortality with separate treatment modalities, particularly with chemotherapy, radiation therapy and immunotherapy. In addition, this retrospective cohort study showed that health disparities exist in the Hispanic Medicare population of Texas with CM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabiola Ramirez
- Department of Medical Education, Paul L. Foster School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso, 5001 El Paso Dr, El Paso, TX, 79905, USA
| | - Hannah Riva
- Department of Medical Education, Paul L. Foster School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso, 5001 El Paso Dr, El Paso, TX, 79905, USA
| | - Biai Digbeu
- School of Public and Population Health, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Michelle Samaniego
- Department of Medical Education, Paul L. Foster School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso, 5001 El Paso Dr, El Paso, TX, 79905, USA
| | - Lorena Fernandez
- Department of Medical Education, Paul L. Foster School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso, 5001 El Paso Dr, El Paso, TX, 79905, USA
| | - Sara Mansour
- Department of Medical Education, Paul L. Foster School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso, 5001 El Paso Dr, El Paso, TX, 79905, USA
| | - Rebecca Vasquez
- Department of Dermatology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - David S Lopez
- School of Public and Population Health, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
- Department of Epidemiology, Medical Branch, The University of Texas, 301 University Blvd., Galveston, TX, 77555, USA.
| | - Jessica Chacon
- Department of Medical Education, Paul L. Foster School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso, 5001 El Paso Dr, El Paso, TX, 79905, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Zheng Y, Zhang Z, Zhao J, Teo K, Nga VDW, Yeo TT, Lim MJR. Effect of blood type on mortality among patients with brain metastases. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2023; 233:107963. [PMID: 37703616 DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.107963] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Revised: 09/01/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 09/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE ABO blood type has been associated with mortality among patients with cancer, but this association has thus far not been investigated among patients with brain metastases. Hence, we aimed to investigate the association between ABO blood type and mortality among patients who underwent surgical resection of brain metastases. METHODS A single-center retrospective study of patients who underwent surgical resection of brain metastases between 2011 and 2019 was conducted. Cox proportional hazards models were constructed, adjusting for potential confounders, to evaluate whether blood type was independently associated with overall mortality. RESULTS A total of 158 patients were included in the analysis. The mean (SD) age of the cohort was 59.3 (12.0) years, and 67.7% of patients were female. The median overall survival of patients with blood type AB was 11.2 months, while the median overall survival of patients with blood types O, B, and A were 11.7, 13.5, and 14.4 months respectively. On univariate analysis, patients with blood type AB had a higher risk of overall mortality (p = 0.017). On multivariate analysis adjusting for potential confounders, blood type AB was again associated with a higher risk of overall mortality (HR: 2.29, 95% CI: 1.11-4.72, p = 0.025). CONCLUSION Blood type AB was independently associated with a higher risk of overall mortality among patients who underwent surgical resection of brain metastases, indicating the potential prognostic value of ABO blood type in brain metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yilong Zheng
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Zheting Zhang
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
| | - Jiashen Zhao
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Kejia Teo
- Division of Neurosurgery, National University Hospital, Singapore
| | | | - Tseng Tsai Yeo
- Division of Neurosurgery, National University Hospital, Singapore
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Semenescu LE, Tataranu LG, Dricu A, Ciubotaru GV, Radoi MP, Rodriguez SMB, Kamel A. A Neurosurgical Perspective on Brain Metastases from Renal Cell Carcinoma: Multi-Institutional, Retrospective Analysis. Biomedicines 2023; 11:2485. [PMID: 37760926 PMCID: PMC10526360 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11092485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Revised: 09/02/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND While acknowledging the generally poor prognostic features of brain metastases from renal cell carcinoma (BM RCC), it is important to be aware of the fact that neurosurgery still plays a vital role in managing this disease, even though we have entered an era of targeted therapies. Notwithstanding their initial high effectiveness, these agents often fail, as tumors develop resistance or relapse. METHODS The authors of this study aimed to evaluate patients presenting with BM RCC and their outcomes after being treated in the Neurosurgical Department of Clinical Emergency Hospital "Bagdasar-Arseni", and the Neurosurgical Department of the National Institute of Neurology and Neurovascular Diseases, Bucharest, Romania. The study is based on a thorough appraisal of the patient's demographic and clinicopathological data and is focused on the strategic role of neurosurgery in BM RCC. RESULTS A total of 24 patients were identified with BM RCC, of whom 91.6% had clear-cell RCC (ccRCC) and 37.5% had a prior nephrectomy. Only 29.1% of patients harbored extracranial metastases, while 83.3% had a single BM RCC. A total of 29.1% of patients were given systemic therapy. Neurosurgical resection of the BM was performed in 23 out of 24 patients. Survival rates were prolonged in patients who underwent nephrectomy, in patients who received systemic therapy, and in patients with a single BM RCC. Furthermore, higher levels of hemoglobin were associated in our study with a higher number of BMs. CONCLUSION Neurosurgery is still a cornerstone in the treatment of symptomatic BM RCC. Among the numerous advantages of neurosurgical intervention, the most important is represented by the quick reversal of neurological manifestations, which in most cases can be life-saving.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liliana Eleonora Semenescu
- Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Str. Petru Rares nr. 2–4, 710204 Craiova, Romania; (L.E.S.); (A.D.)
| | - Ligia Gabriela Tataranu
- Neurosurgical Department, Clinical Emergency Hospital “Bagdasar-Arseni”, Soseaua Berceni 12, 041915 Bucharest, Romania; (G.V.C.); (S.M.B.R.); (A.K.)
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Carol Davila”, 020022 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Anica Dricu
- Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Str. Petru Rares nr. 2–4, 710204 Craiova, Romania; (L.E.S.); (A.D.)
| | - Gheorghe Vasile Ciubotaru
- Neurosurgical Department, Clinical Emergency Hospital “Bagdasar-Arseni”, Soseaua Berceni 12, 041915 Bucharest, Romania; (G.V.C.); (S.M.B.R.); (A.K.)
| | - Mugurel Petrinel Radoi
- Neurosurgical Department, National Institute of Neurology and Neurovascular Diseases, Soseaua Berceni 10, 041914 Bucharest, Romania;
| | - Silvia Mara Baez Rodriguez
- Neurosurgical Department, Clinical Emergency Hospital “Bagdasar-Arseni”, Soseaua Berceni 12, 041915 Bucharest, Romania; (G.V.C.); (S.M.B.R.); (A.K.)
| | - Amira Kamel
- Neurosurgical Department, Clinical Emergency Hospital “Bagdasar-Arseni”, Soseaua Berceni 12, 041915 Bucharest, Romania; (G.V.C.); (S.M.B.R.); (A.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bowden SG, Lopez Ramos CG, Cheaney B, Richie E, Yaghi NK, Munger DN, Mazur-Hart DJ, Tan H, Wood MD, Cetas JS, Dogan A, Raslan AM, Han SJ. Response to Preoperative Dexamethasone Predicts Postoperative Neurological Improvement of Focal Neurological Deficits in Patients With Brain Metastases. Neurosurgery 2023; 92:1227-1233. [PMID: 36728251 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2022] [Accepted: 11/08/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Steroids are used ubiquitously in the preoperative management of patients with brain tumor. The rate of improvement in focal deficits with steroids and the prognostic value of such a response are not known. OBJECTIVE To determine the rate at which focal neurological deficits respond to preoperative corticosteroids in patients with brain metastases and whether such an improvement could predict long-term recovery of neurological function after surgery. METHODS Patients with brain metastases and related deficits in language, visual field, or motor domains who received corticosteroids before surgery were identified. Characteristics between steroid responders and nonresponders were compared. RESULTS Ninety six patients demonstrated a visual field (13 patients), language (19), or motor (64) deficit and received dexamethasone in the week before surgery (average cumulative dose 43 mg; average duration 2.7 days). 38.5% of patients' deficits improved with steroids before surgery, while 82.3% of patients improved by follow-up. Motor deficits were more likely to improve both preoperatively ( P = .014) and postoperatively ( P = .010). All 37 responders remained improved at follow-up whereas 42 of 59 (71%) of nonresponders ultimately improved ( P < .001). All other clinical characteristics, including dose and duration, were similar between groups. CONCLUSION A response to steroids before surgery is highly predictive of long-term improvement postoperatively in brain metastasis patients with focal neurological deficits. Lack of a response portends a somewhat less favorable prognosis. Duration and intensity of therapy do not seem to affect the likelihood of response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen G Bowden
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Christian G Lopez Ramos
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Barry Cheaney
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Emma Richie
- Department of Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Nasser K Yaghi
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Daniel N Munger
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - David J Mazur-Hart
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Hao Tan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
- School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Matthew D Wood
- Department of Pathology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Justin S Cetas
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Arizona, Tuscon, Arizona, USA
| | - Aclan Dogan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Ahmed M Raslan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Seunggu J Han
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Stanford Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Matsui JK, Perlow HK, Upadhyay R, McCalla A, Raval RR, Thomas EM, Blakaj DM, Beyer SJ, Palmer JD. Advances in Radiotherapy for Brain Metastases. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2023; 32:569-586. [PMID: 37182993 DOI: 10.1016/j.soc.2023.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/07/2023]
Abstract
Radiotherapy remains a cornerstone treatment of brain metastases. With new treatment advances, patients with brain metastases are living longer, and finding solutions for mitigating treatment-related neurotoxicity and improving quality of life is important. Historically, whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) was widely used but treatment options such as hippocampal sparing WBRT and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) have emerged as promising alternatives. Herein, we discuss the recent advances in radiotherapy for brain metastases including the sparing of critical structures that may improve long-term neurocognitive outcomes (eg, hippocampus, fornix) that may improve long-term neurocognitive outcome, evidence supporting preoperative and fractionated-SRS, and treatment strategies for managing radiation necrosis.
Collapse
|
14
|
Re-Irradiation by Stereotactic Radiotherapy of Brain Metastases in the Case of Local Recurrence. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15030996. [PMID: 36765953 PMCID: PMC9913463 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15030996] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2023] [Revised: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a second course of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT2) treatment for a local recurrence of brain metastases previously treated with SRT (SRT1), using the Hypofractionated Treatment Effects in the Clinic (HyTEC) reporting standards and the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology guidelines. METHODS From December 2014 to May 2021, 32 patients with 34 brain metastases received salvage SRT2 after failed SRT1. A total dose of 21 to 27 Gy in 3 fractions or 30 Gy in 5 fractions was prescribed to the periphery of the PTV (99% of the prescribed dose covering 99% of the PTV). After SRT2, multiparametric MRI, sometimes combined with 18F-DOPA PET-CT, was performed every 3 months to determine local control (LC) and radionecrosis (RN). RESULTS After a median follow-up of 12 months (range: 1-37 months), the crude LC and RN rates were 68% and 12%, respectively, and the median overall survival was 25 months. In a multivariate analysis, the performance of surgery was predictive of a significantly better LC (p = 0.002) and survival benefit (p = 0.04). The volume of a normal brain receiving 5 Gy during SRT2 (p = 0.04), a dose delivered to the PTV in SRT1 (p = 0.003), and concomitant systemic therapy (p = 0.04) were associated with an increased risk of RN. CONCLUSION SRT2 is an effective approach for the local recurrence of BM after initial SRT treatment and is a potential salvage therapy option for well-selected people with a good performance status. Surgery was associated with a higher LC.
Collapse
|
15
|
Byun J, Kim JH. Revisiting the Role of Surgical Resection for Brain Metastasis. Brain Tumor Res Treat 2023; 11:1-7. [PMID: 36762802 PMCID: PMC9911712 DOI: 10.14791/btrt.2022.0028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2022] [Revised: 01/07/2023] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Brain metastasis (BM) is the most common type of brain tumor in adults. The contemporary management of BM remains challenging. Advancements in systemic cancer treatment have increased the survival of patients with cancer. Although the treatment of BM is still complicated, advances in radiotherapy, including stereotactic radiosurgery and chemotherapy, have improved treatment outcomes. Surgical resection is the traditional treatment for BM and its role in the surgical resection of BM has been well established. However, refinement of the surgical resection technique and strategy for BM is needed. Herein, we discuss the evolving role of surgery in patients with BM and the future of BM treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joonho Byun
- Department of Neurosurgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jong Hyun Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Andrews LJ, Thornton ZA, Saleh R, Dawson S, Short SC, Daly R, Higgins JPT, Davies P, Kurian KM. Genomic landscape and actionable mutations of brain metastases derived from non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review. Neurooncol Adv 2023; 5:vdad145. [PMID: 38130901 PMCID: PMC10734675 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdad145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Brain metastases derived from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represent a significant clinical problem. We aim to characterize the genomic landscape of brain metastases derived from NSCLC and assess clinical actionability. Methods We searched Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and BIOSIS from inception to 18/19 May 2022. We extracted information on patient demographics, smoking status, genomic data, matched primary NSCLC, and programmed cell death ligand 1 expression. Results We found 72 included papers and data on 2346 patients. The most frequently mutated genes from our data were EGFR (n = 559), TP53 (n = 331), KRAS (n = 328), CDKN2A (n = 97), and STK11 (n = 72). Common missense mutations included EGFR L858R (n = 80) and KRAS G12C (n = 17). Brain metastases of ever versus never smokers had differing missense mutations in TP53 and EGFR, except for L858R and T790M in EGFR, which were seen in both subgroups. Of the top 10 frequently mutated genes that had primary NSCLC data, we found 37% of the specific mutations assessed to be discordant between the primary NSCLC and brain metastases. Conclusions To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review to describe the genomic landscape of brain metastases derived from NSCLC. These results provide a comprehensive outline of frequently mutated genes and missense mutations that could be clinically actionable. These data also provide evidence of differing genomic landscapes between ever versus never smokers and primary NSCLC compared to the BM. This information could have important consequences for the selection and development of targeted drugs for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lily J Andrews
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit (IEU), Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Cancer Research Integrative Cancer Epidemiology Programme, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Zak A Thornton
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit (IEU), Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Cancer Research Integrative Cancer Epidemiology Programme, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Ruqiya Saleh
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Sarah Dawson
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Susan C Short
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Richard Daly
- Cellular Pathology Department, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Julian P T Higgins
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Philippa Davies
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit (IEU), Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Cancer Research Integrative Cancer Epidemiology Programme, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Kathreena M Kurian
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit (IEU), Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Cancer Research Integrative Cancer Epidemiology Programme, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Brain Tumour Research Centre, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Zheng Y, Yang Y, Ng MH, Chew AYH, Goh CP, Chua CYK, Rathakrishnan R, Ang Y, Wong ALA, Vellayappan B, Teo K, Nga VDW, Yeo TT, Lim MJR. Effect of perioperative seizures on mortality and recurrence in patients with brain metastases. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1048304. [DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1048304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2022] [Accepted: 10/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
ObjectiveTo identify the independent risk factors for 30-day perioperative seizures, as well as to evaluate the effect of perioperative seizures on overall mortality and tumor recurrence among patients who underwent surgical resection of brain metastases.MethodsPatients who underwent surgical resection of brain metastases at our institution between 2011 and 2019 were included. 30-day perioperative seizures were defined as the presence of any preoperative or postoperative seizures diagnosed by a neurosurgeon or neurologist within 30 days of metastases resection. Independent risk factors for 30-day perioperative seizures were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression models. Kaplan-Meier plots and Cox regression models were constructed to evaluate the effects of 30-day perioperative seizures on overall mortality and tumor recurrence. Subgroup analyses were conducted for 30-day preoperative and 30-day postoperative seizures.ResultsA total of 158 patients were included in the analysis. The mean (SD) age was 59.3 (12.0) years, and 20 (12.7%) patients had 30-day perioperative seizures. The presence of 30-day preoperative seizures (OR=41.4; 95% CI=4.76, 924; p=0.002) was an independent risk factor for 30-day postoperative seizures. Multivariate Cox regression revealed that any 30-day perioperative seizure (HR=3.25; 95% CI=1.60, 6.62; p=0.001) was independently and significantly associated with overall mortality but not tumor recurrence (HR=1.95; 95% CI=0.78, 4.91; p=0.154).ConclusionsAmong patients with resected brain metastases, the presence of any 30-day perioperative seizure was independently associated with overall mortality. This suggests that 30-day perioperative seizures may be a prognostic marker of poor outcome. Further research evaluating this association as well as the effect of perioperative antiepileptic drugs in patients with resected brain metastases may be warranted.
Collapse
|
18
|
Hasanov E, Yeboa DN, Tucker MD, Swanson TA, Beckham TH, Rini B, Ene CI, Hasanov M, Derks S, Smits M, Dudani S, Heng DYC, Brastianos PK, Bex A, Hanalioglu S, Weinberg JS, Hirsch L, Carlo MI, Aizer A, Brown PD, Bilen MA, Chang EL, Jaboin J, Brugarolas J, Choueiri TK, Atkins MB, McGregor BA, Halasz LM, Patel TR, Soltys SG, McDermott DF, Elder JB, Baskaya MK, Yu JB, Timmerman R, Kim MM, Mut M, Markert J, Beal K, Tannir NM, Samandouras G, Lang FF, Giles R, Jonasch E. An interdisciplinary consensus on the management of brain metastases in patients with renal cell carcinoma. CA Cancer J Clin 2022; 72:454-489. [PMID: 35708940 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2021] [Revised: 03/28/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Brain metastases are a challenging manifestation of renal cell carcinoma. We have a limited understanding of brain metastasis tumor and immune biology, drivers of resistance to systemic treatment, and their overall poor prognosis. Current data support a multimodal treatment strategy with radiation treatment and/or surgery. Nonetheless, the optimal approach for the management of brain metastases from renal cell carcinoma remains unclear. To improve patient care, the authors sought to standardize practical management strategies. They performed an unstructured literature review and elaborated on the current management strategies through an international group of experts from different disciplines assembled via the network of the International Kidney Cancer Coalition. Experts from different disciplines were administered a survey to answer questions related to current challenges and unmet patient needs. On the basis of the integrated approach of literature review and survey study results, the authors built algorithms for the management of single and multiple brain metastases in patients with renal cell carcinoma. The literature review, consensus statements, and algorithms presented in this report can serve as a framework guiding treatment decisions for patients. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72:454-489.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elshad Hasanov
- Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Debra Nana Yeboa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Mathew D Tucker
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Todd A Swanson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Thomas Hendrix Beckham
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Brian Rini
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Chibawanye I Ene
- Department of Neurosurgery, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Merve Hasanov
- Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Sophie Derks
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marion Smits
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Shaan Dudani
- Division of Oncology/Hematology, William Osler Health System, Brampton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Daniel Y C Heng
- Tom Baker Cancer Center, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Priscilla K Brastianos
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Axel Bex
- The Royal Free London National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- University College London Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sahin Hanalioglu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Jeffrey S Weinberg
- Department of Neurosurgery, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Laure Hirsch
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cochin University Hospital, Public Assistance Hospital of Paris, Paris, France
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Maria I Carlo
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Ayal Aizer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Paul David Brown
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Mehmet Asim Bilen
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
- Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Eric Lin Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, California, Los Angeles
| | - Jerry Jaboin
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - James Brugarolas
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Toni K Choueiri
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Michael B Atkins
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC
| | - Bradley A McGregor
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lia M Halasz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Toral R Patel
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Scott G Soltys
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, California
| | - David F McDermott
- Division of Medical Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - James Bradley Elder
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Mustafa K Baskaya
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison, School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - James B Yu
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Robert Timmerman
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Michelle Miran Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Melike Mut
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - James Markert
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Kathryn Beal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Nizar M Tannir
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - George Samandouras
- Victor Horsley Department of Neurosurgery, The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, United Kingdom
- University College London Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, Queen Square, London, United Kingdom
| | - Frederick F Lang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Rachel Giles
- International Kidney Cancer Coalition, Duivendrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Eric Jonasch
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Bruzzaniti P, Lapolla P, D'Amico A, Zancana G, Katsev M, Relucenti M, Familiari G, Mingoli A, D'Andrea G, Frati A, Salvati M, Santoro A, Familiari P. En Bloc Resection of Solitary Brain Metastasis: The Role of Perilesional Edema. In Vivo 2022; 36:1274-1284. [PMID: 35478118 PMCID: PMC9087063 DOI: 10.21873/invivo.12827] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2022] [Revised: 03/22/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM The treatment of solitary brain metastasis is a challenging intervention since the incidence increases and prognosis is poor. This study investigated the role of perilesional edema in the overall mass effect of solitary brain metastasis. PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis on 88 patients with single supratentorial brain metastasis and concomitant perilesional edema undergoing en bloc resection. Each patient was evaluated for perilesional brain edema grading. We stratified patients into three groups based on the size of the metastatic lesion and the extent of perilesional edema. RESULTS The grade of perilesional edema at 30 days after surgical removal did not correlate with the maximum diameter of the metastasis (Pearson's correlation 0.098, p=0.494). In patients with a maximal metastatic diameter ≤2 cm, the grade of perilesional edema before surgical treatment was 1.63 (STD 0.43), while 30 days after removal it was significantly reduced; 0.47 (STD 0.26), p<0.001. CONCLUSION The overall mass effect of solitary supratentorial brain metastases is not correlated to the size of the lesion and the grade of the associated perilesional edema should be considered. Surgical en bloc resection can be considered the first choice of treatment in the presence of solitary metastasis ≤2 cm in maximal diameter but with high-grade edema, since this treatment reduces the overall mass effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Placido Bruzzaniti
- Department of Human Neurosciences, Division of Neurosurgery, Policlinico Umberto I University Hospital, Sapienza, University of Rome, Rome, Italy
- Neurosurgery Division of "Spaziani" Hospital, Frosinone, Italy
| | - Pierfrancesco Lapolla
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, U.K
- Department of Anatomy, Histology, Forensic Medicine and Orthopedics, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
- Department of Surgery "Pietro Valdoni", "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessia D'Amico
- Department of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza, University of Rome, Rome, Italy
- Unit of Rehabilitation, Istituto Neurotraumatologico Italiano, Division of Grottaferrata, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppa Zancana
- Department of Human Neurosciences, Division of Neurosurgery, Policlinico Umberto I University Hospital, Sapienza, University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Michael Katsev
- Department of Human Neurosciences, Division of Neurosurgery, Policlinico Umberto I University Hospital, Sapienza, University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Michela Relucenti
- Department of Anatomy, Histology, Forensic Medicine and Orthopedics, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Familiari
- Department of Anatomy, Histology, Forensic Medicine and Orthopedics, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Mingoli
- Department of Surgery "Pietro Valdoni", "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Alessandro Frati
- Department of Human Neurosciences, Division of Neurosurgery, Policlinico Umberto I University Hospital, Sapienza, University of Rome, Rome, Italy
- Department of Neurosurgery, IRCCS Neuromed Pozzilli IS, Isernia, Italy
| | - Maurizio Salvati
- Department of Neurosurgery, Policlinico "Tor Vergata", University of Rome ''Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Santoro
- Department of Human Neurosciences, Division of Neurosurgery, Policlinico Umberto I University Hospital, Sapienza, University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Pietro Familiari
- Department of Human Neurosciences, Division of Neurosurgery, Policlinico Umberto I University Hospital, Sapienza, University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Heßler N, Jünger ST, Meissner AK, Kocher M, Goldbrunner R, Grau S. Recurrent brain metastases: the role of resection of in a comprehensive multidisciplinary treatment setting. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:275. [PMID: 35291972 PMCID: PMC8922794 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09317-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2021] [Accepted: 02/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Treatment decision for recurrent symptomatic brain metastases (BM) is challenging with scarce data regarding surgical resection. We therefore evaluated the efficacy of surgery for pretreated, recurrent BM in a comprehensive multidisciplinary treatment setting. Methods In a retrospective single center study, patients were analyzed, who underwent surgical resection of recurrent BM between 2007 and 2019. Intracranial event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated by Kaplan-Maier and Cox regression analysis. Results We included 107 patients with different primary tumor entities and individual previous treatment for BM. Primary tumors comprised non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (37.4%), breast cancer (19.6%), melanoma (13.1%), gastro-intestinal cancer (10.3%) and other, rare entities (19.6%). The number of previous treatments of BM ranged from one to four; the adjuvant treatment modalities comprised: none, focal or whole brain radiotherapy, brachytherapy and radiosurgery. The median pre-operative Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) was 70% (range 40–100) and improved to 80% (range 0-100) after surgery. The complication rate was 26.2% and two patients died during the perioperative period. Sixty-seven (62.6%) patients received postoperative local radio-oncologic and/or systemic therapy. Median postoperative EFS and OS were 7.1 (95%CI 5.8–8.2) and 11.1 (95%CI 8.4–13.6) months, respectively. The clinical status (postoperative KPS ≥ 70 (HR 0.27 95%CI 0.16–0.46; p < 0.001) remained the only independent factor for survival in multivariate analysis. Conclusions Surgical resection of recurrent BM may improve the clinical status and thus OS but is associated with a high complication rate; therefore a very careful patient selection is crucial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadine Heßler
- Center for Neurosurgery, Department of General Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Stephanie T Jünger
- Center for Neurosurgery, Department of General Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Centre for Integrated Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Anna-Katharina Meissner
- Center for Neurosurgery, Department of General Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Centre for Integrated Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Martin Kocher
- Center for Neurosurgery, Department of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Roland Goldbrunner
- Center for Neurosurgery, Department of General Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Centre for Integrated Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Stefan Grau
- Center for Neurosurgery, Department of General Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany. .,Centre for Integrated Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany. .,Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Fulda gAG, Academic Hospital of the University of Marburg, Fulda, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Michel A, Darkwah Oppong M, Rauschenbach L, Dinger TF, Barthel L, Pierscianek D, Wrede KH, Hense J, Pöttgen C, Junker A, Schmidt T, Iannaccone A, Kimmig R, Sure U, Jabbarli R. Prediction of Short and Long Survival after Surgery for Breast Cancer Brain Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14061437. [PMID: 35326590 PMCID: PMC8946189 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14061437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2022] [Accepted: 03/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Brain metastases requiring surgical treatment determine the prognosis of patients with breast cancer. We aimed to develop the scores for the prediction of short (<6 months) and long (≥3 years) survival after BCBM surgery. Methods: Female patients with BCBM surgery between 2008 and 2019 were included. The new scores were constructed upon independent predictors for short and long postoperative survival. Results: In the final cohort (n = 95), 18 (18.9%) and 22 (23.2%) patients experienced short and long postoperative survival, respectively. Breast-preserving surgery, presence of multiple brain metastases and age ≥ 65 years at breast cancer diagnosis were identified as independent predictors of short postoperative survival. In turn, positive HER2 receptor status in brain metastases, time interval ≥ 3 years between breast cancer and brain metastases diagnosis and KPS ≥ 90% independently predicted long survival. The appropriate short and long survival scores showed higher diagnostic accuracy for the prediction of short (AUC = 0.773) and long (AUC = 0.775) survival than the breast Graded Prognostic Assessment score (AUC = 0.498/0.615). A cumulative survival score (total score) showed significant association with overall survival (p = 0.001). Conclusion: We identified predictors independently impacting the prognosis after BCBM surgery. After external validation, the presented scores might become useful tools for the selection of proper candidates for BCBM surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Michel
- Department of Neurosurgery and Spine Surgery, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (M.D.O.); (L.R.); (T.F.D.); (L.B.); (D.P.); (K.H.W.); (U.S.); (R.J.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-201-723-1230; Fax: +49-201-723-1220
| | - Marvin Darkwah Oppong
- Department of Neurosurgery and Spine Surgery, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (M.D.O.); (L.R.); (T.F.D.); (L.B.); (D.P.); (K.H.W.); (U.S.); (R.J.)
| | - Laurèl Rauschenbach
- Department of Neurosurgery and Spine Surgery, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (M.D.O.); (L.R.); (T.F.D.); (L.B.); (D.P.); (K.H.W.); (U.S.); (R.J.)
| | - Thiemo Florin Dinger
- Department of Neurosurgery and Spine Surgery, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (M.D.O.); (L.R.); (T.F.D.); (L.B.); (D.P.); (K.H.W.); (U.S.); (R.J.)
| | - Lennart Barthel
- Department of Neurosurgery and Spine Surgery, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (M.D.O.); (L.R.); (T.F.D.); (L.B.); (D.P.); (K.H.W.); (U.S.); (R.J.)
| | - Daniela Pierscianek
- Department of Neurosurgery and Spine Surgery, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (M.D.O.); (L.R.); (T.F.D.); (L.B.); (D.P.); (K.H.W.); (U.S.); (R.J.)
| | - Karsten H. Wrede
- Department of Neurosurgery and Spine Surgery, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (M.D.O.); (L.R.); (T.F.D.); (L.B.); (D.P.); (K.H.W.); (U.S.); (R.J.)
| | - Jörg Hense
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany;
| | - Christoph Pöttgen
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany;
| | - Andreas Junker
- Department of Neuropathology, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany;
| | - Teresa Schmidt
- Department of Neurooncology, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany;
| | - Antonella Iannaccone
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (A.I.); (R.K.)
| | - Rainer Kimmig
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (A.I.); (R.K.)
| | - Ulrich Sure
- Department of Neurosurgery and Spine Surgery, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (M.D.O.); (L.R.); (T.F.D.); (L.B.); (D.P.); (K.H.W.); (U.S.); (R.J.)
| | - Ramazan Jabbarli
- Department of Neurosurgery and Spine Surgery, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (M.D.O.); (L.R.); (T.F.D.); (L.B.); (D.P.); (K.H.W.); (U.S.); (R.J.)
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Kotecha R, Ahluwalia MS, Siomin V, McDermott MW. Surgery, Stereotactic Radiosurgery, and Systemic Therapy in the Management of Operable Brain Metastasis. Neurol Clin 2022; 40:421-436. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ncl.2021.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
23
|
Kahl KH, Balagiannis N, Höck M, Schill S, Roushan Z, Shiban E, Müller H, Grossert U, Konietzko I, Sommer B, Maurer CJ, Berlis A, Heidecke V, Janzen T, Stüben G. Intraoperative radiotherapy with low-energy x-rays after neurosurgical resection of brain metastases-an Augsburg University Medical Center experience. Strahlenther Onkol 2021; 197:1124-1130. [PMID: 34415358 PMCID: PMC8604815 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-021-01831-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2021] [Accepted: 07/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE External-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is the predominant method for localized brain radiotherapy (LBRT) after resection of brain metastases (BM). Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) with 50-kV x‑rays is an alternative way to focally irradiate the resection cavity after BM surgery, with the option of shortening the overall treatment time and limiting normal tissue irradiation. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of all patients who underwent neurosurgical resection of BM and 50-kV x‑ray IORT between 2013 and 2020 at Augsburg University Medical Center. RESULTS We identified 40 patients with 44 resected BM treated with 50-kV x‑ray IORT. Median diameter of the resected metastases was 2.8 cm (range 1.5-5.9 cm). Median applied dose was 20 Gy. All patients received standardized follow-up (FU) including 3‑monthly MRI of the brain. Mean FU was 14.4 months, with a median MRI FU for alive patients of 12.2 months. Median overall survival (OS) of all treated patients was 26.4 months (estimated 1‑year OS 61.6%). The observed local control (LC) rate of the resection cavity was 88.6% (estimated 1‑year LC 84.3%). Distant brain control (DC) was 47.5% (estimated 1‑year DC 33.5%). Only 25% of all patients needed WBI in the further course of disease. The observed radionecrosis rate was 2.5%. CONCLUSION IORT with 50-kV x‑rays is a safe and appealing way to apply LBRT after neurosurgical resection of BM, with low toxicity and excellent LC. Close MRI FU is paramount to detect distant brain failure (DBF) early.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Klaus-Henning Kahl
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Stenglinstraße 2, 86156 Augsburg, Germany
| | - Nikolaos Balagiannis
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Stenglinstraße 2, 86156 Augsburg, Germany
| | - Michael Höck
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Stenglinstraße 2, 86156 Augsburg, Germany
| | - Sabine Schill
- Medizinische Physik und Strahlenschutz, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Zoha Roushan
- Medizinische Physik und Strahlenschutz, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Ehab Shiban
- Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Heiko Müller
- Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Ute Grossert
- Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Ina Konietzko
- Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Björn Sommer
- Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Christoph J. Maurer
- Klinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie und Neuroradiologie, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Ansgar Berlis
- Klinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie und Neuroradiologie, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Volkmar Heidecke
- Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Tilman Janzen
- Medizinische Physik und Strahlenschutz, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Georg Stüben
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Stenglinstraße 2, 86156 Augsburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Perng PS, Lee PH, Hsu HH, Huang CC, Huang CY, Lee JS. Technical Case Report of a Cranioplasty With ex vivo Frozen Ostoblastic Bone Graft From Large Skull Metastasis. Front Surg 2021; 8:746034. [PMID: 34621783 PMCID: PMC8490705 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.746034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2021] [Accepted: 08/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: Liquid nitrogen cryotherapy has shown efficacy in the treatment of bone tumors of the extremities with good oncologic and functional outcomes. However, its application in metastatic skull tumors has been rarely reported and whether the adjuvant radiotherapy affects the future bone healing is not yet explored. We report an immediate cranioplasty with the resected osteoblastic bone, which underwent ex vivo cryotherapy, and discuss the surgical techniques and postoperative images. Methods: A 58-year-old man with esophageal adenocarcinoma, undergoing chemoradiotherapy, presented with a rapidly enlarging scalp mass for 5 months. Imaging revealed an enhancing mass, centered in the frontal skull bone with extracranial and intracranial invasion, suggestive of osteoblastic metastasis. After preoperative transarterial embolization, the tumor was excised en bloc. Immediate cranioplasty was performed with the osteoblastic bone graft after ex vivo cryotherapy. It was soaked in liquid nitrogen for 20 min, thawed at room temperature for 15 min, and soaked in povidone-iodine solution for 10 min. Then, the bone graft was fixed to its original place. Pathologic examination revealed metastasis originating from the esophagus. He underwent adjuvant radiotherapy for local tumor control. Results: He had an uneventful clinical course without any neurologic deficit. Brain imaging during the six-month follow-up showed no tumor recurrence and partial bony union. Conclusions: Cranioplasty using an autologous bone graft with ex vivo cryotherapy was helpful in the reconstruction of osteoblastic metastatic skull tumor treatment. It was a simple and cost-effective procedure that achieved satisfactory cosmetic results without negatively impacting bone healing, even after adjuvant radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pang-Shuo Perng
- Section of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Po-Hsuan Lee
- Section of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Hao-Hsiang Hsu
- Section of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Chi-Chen Huang
- Section of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Yuan Huang
- Section of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Jung-Shun Lee
- Section of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.,Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.,Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Wiwatchaitawee K, Quarterman JC, Geary SM, Salem AK. Enhancement of Therapies for Glioblastoma (GBM) Using Nanoparticle-based Delivery Systems. AAPS PharmSciTech 2021; 22:71. [PMID: 33575970 DOI: 10.1208/s12249-021-01928-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2020] [Accepted: 01/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most aggressive type of malignant brain tumor. Current FDA-approved treatments include surgical resection, radiation, and chemotherapy, while hyperthermia, immunotherapy, and most relevantly, nanoparticle (NP)-mediated delivery systems or combinations thereof have shown promise in preclinical studies. Drug-carrying NPs are a promising approach to brain delivery as a result of their potential to facilitate the crossing of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) via two main types of transcytosis mechanisms: adsorptive-mediated transcytosis (AMT) and receptor-mediated transcytosis (RMT). Their ability to accumulate in the brain can thus provide local sustained release of tumoricidal drugs at or near the site of GBM tumors. NP-based drug delivery has the potential to significantly reduce drug-related toxicity, increase specificity, and consequently improve the lifespan and quality of life of patients with GBM. Due to significant advances in the understanding of the molecular etiology and pathology of GBM, the efficacy of drugs loaded into vectors targeting this disease has increased in both preclinical and clinical settings. Multitargeting NPs, such as those incorporating multiple specific targeting ligands, are an innovative technology that can lead to decreased off-target effects while simultaneously having increased accumulation and action specifically at the tumor site. Targeting ligands can include antibodies, or fragments thereof, and peptides or small molecules, which can result in a more controlled drug delivery system compared to conventional drug treatments. This review focuses on GBM treatment strategies, summarizing current options and providing a detailed account of preclinical findings with prospective NP-based approaches aimed at improving tumor targeting and enhancing therapeutic outcomes for GBM patients.
Collapse
|
26
|
Bander ED, Yuan M, Reiner AS, Panageas KS, Ballangrud ÅM, Brennan CW, Beal K, Tabar V, Moss NS. Durable 5-year local control for resected brain metastases with early adjuvant SRS: the effect of timing on intended-field control. Neurooncol Pract 2021; 8:278-289. [PMID: 34055375 DOI: 10.1093/nop/npab005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Adjuvant stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) improves the local control of resected brain metastases (BrM). However, the dependency of long-term outcomes on SRS timing relative to surgery remains unclear. Methods Retrospective analysis of patients treated with metastasectomy-plus-adjuvant SRS at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK) between 2013 and 2016 was conducted. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to describe overall survival (OS) and cumulative incidence rates were estimated by type of recurrence, accounting for death as a competing event. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) and competing risks regression modeling assessed prognostic variables and associated events of interest. Results Two hundred and eighty-two patients with BrM had a median OS of 1.5 years (95% CI: 1.2-2.1) from adjuvant SRS with median follow-up of 49.8 months for survivors. Local surgical recurrence, other simultaneously SRS-irradiated site recurrence, and distant central nervous system (CNS) progression rates were 14.3% (95% CI: 10.1-18.5), 4.9% (95% CI: 2.3-7.5), and 47.5% (95% CI: 41.4-53.6) at 5 years, respectively. Median time-to-adjuvant SRS (TT-SRS) was 34 days (IQR: 27-39). TT-SRS was significantly associated with surgical site recurrence rate (P = 0.0008). SRS delivered within 1 month resulted in surgical site recurrence rate of 6.1% (95% CI: 1.3-10.9) at 1-year, compared to 9.2% (95% CI: 4.9-13.6) if delivered between 1 and 2 months, or 27.3% (95% CI: 0.0-55.5) if delivered >2 months after surgery. OS was significantly lower for patients with TT-SRS >~2 months. Postoperative length of stay, discharge to a rehabilitation facility, urgent care visits, and/or disease recurrence between surgery and adjuvant SRS associated with increased TT-SRS. Conclusions Adjuvant SRS provides durable local control. However, delays in initiation of postoperative SRS can decrease its efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evan D Bander
- Department of Neurosurgery and Brain Metastasis Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Department of Neurosurgery, New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Melissa Yuan
- Department of Neurosurgery and Brain Metastasis Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Anne S Reiner
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Katherine S Panageas
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Åse M Ballangrud
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Cameron W Brennan
- Department of Neurosurgery and Brain Metastasis Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Kathryn Beal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Viviane Tabar
- Department of Neurosurgery and Brain Metastasis Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Nelson S Moss
- Department of Neurosurgery and Brain Metastasis Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Brain Metastases in Elderly Patients-The Role of Surgery in the Context of Systemic Treatment. Brain Sci 2021; 11:brainsci11010123. [PMID: 33477588 PMCID: PMC7831306 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11010123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2020] [Revised: 12/25/2020] [Accepted: 01/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
In patients with brain metastases (BM), advanced age is considered a negative prognostic factor. To address the potential reasons for that, we assessed 807 patients who had undergone BM resection; 315 patients aged at least 65 years (group A) were compared with 492 younger patients (group B). We analyzed the impact of the pre- and postoperative Karnofsky performance status (KPS), postoperative treatment structure and post-treatment survival. BM resection significantly improved KPS scores in both groups (p = 0.0001). Median survival after BM resection differed significantly between the groups (A: 5.81 vs. B: 8.12 months; p = 0.0015). In both groups, patients who received postoperative systemic treatment showed significantly longer overall survival (p = 0.00001). However, elderly patients less frequently received systemic treatment (p = 0.0001) and the subgroup of elderly patients receiving such therapies had a significantly higher postsurgical KPS score (p = 0.0007). In all patients receiving systemic treatment, age was no longer a negative prognostic factor. Resection of BM improves the functional status of elderly patients, thus enhancing the likeliness to receive systemic treatment, which, in turn, leads to longer overall survival. In the context of such a treatment structure, age alone is no longer a prognostic factor for survival.
Collapse
|
28
|
Navigated 3D Ultrasound in Brain Metastasis Surgery: Analyzing the Differences in Object Appearances in Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL 2020. [DOI: 10.3390/app10217798] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Background: Implementation of intraoperative 3D ultrasound (i3D US) into modern neuronavigational systems offers the possibility of live imaging and subsequent imaging updates. However, different modalities, image acquisition strategies, and timing of imaging influence object appearances. We analyzed the differences in object appearances in ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in 35 cases of brain metastasis, which were operated in a multimodal navigational setup after intraoperative computed tomography based (iCT) registration. Method: Registration accuracy was determined using the target registration error (TRE). Lesions segmented in preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (preMRI) and i3D US were compared focusing on object size, location, and similarity. Results: The mean and standard deviation (SD) of the TRE was 0.84 ± 0.36 mm. Objects were similar in size (mean ± SD in preMRI: 13.6 ± 16.0 cm3 vs. i3D US: 13.5 ± 16.0 cm3). The Dice coefficient was 0.68 ± 0.22 (mean ± SD), the Hausdorff distance 8.1 ± 2.9 mm (mean ± SD), and the Euclidean distance of the centers of gravity 3.7 ± 2.5 mm (mean ± SD). Conclusion: i3D US clearly delineates tumor boundaries and allows live updating of imaging for compensation of brain shift, which can already be identified to a significant amount before dural opening.
Collapse
|
29
|
[What is the place of surgery in the management of brain metastases in 2020?]. Cancer Radiother 2020; 24:470-476. [PMID: 32773281 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2020.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2020] [Revised: 05/22/2020] [Accepted: 05/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Brain metastases are the most common intracranial tumors and are associated with a dismal prognosis. The management of patients with brain metastases has become more important because of the increased incidence of these tumours, the better treatment of the systemic disease and the improvement of surgical techniques. The treatment requires multidisciplinary approaches and become complex because of new emerging systemic therapy and advancements in neurosurgery and radiation oncology. The surgical treatment has an indispensable role to obtain a tissue diagnosis, in relieving intracranial effect mass and improving neurological status by improving induced encephalopathy. An understanding of the role and indications of the surgery in patients with metastatic brain lesions is essential for the effective management of this growing population.
Collapse
|
30
|
Sankey EW, Tsvankin V, Grabowski MM, Nayar G, Batich KA, Risman A, Champion CD, Salama AKS, Goodwin CR, Fecci PE. Operative and peri-operative considerations in the management of brain metastasis. Cancer Med 2019; 8:6809-6831. [PMID: 31568689 PMCID: PMC6853809 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.2577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2019] [Revised: 09/07/2019] [Accepted: 09/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The number of patients who develop metastatic brain lesions is increasing as the diagnosis and treatment of systemic cancers continues to improve, resulting in longer patient survival. The role of surgery in the management of brain metastasis (BM), particularly multiple and recurrent metastases, remains controversial and continues to evolve. However, with appropriate patient selection, outcomes after surgery are typically favorable. In addition, surgery is the only means to obtain a tissue diagnosis and is the only effective treatment modality to quickly relieve neurological complications or life-threatening symptoms related to significant mass effect, CSF obstruction, and peritumoral edema. As such, a thorough understanding of the role of surgery in patients with metastatic brain lesions, as well as the factors associated with surgical outcomes, is essential for the effective management of this unique and growing patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric W. Sankey
- Department of NeurosurgeryDuke University Medical CenterDurhamNCUSA
| | - Vadim Tsvankin
- Department of NeurosurgeryDuke University Medical CenterDurhamNCUSA
| | | | - Gautam Nayar
- Department of NeurosurgeryUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical CenterPittsburghPAUSA
| | | | - Aida Risman
- School of MedicineMedical College of GeorgiaAugustaGAUSA
| | | | | | - C. Rory Goodwin
- Department of NeurosurgeryDuke University Medical CenterDurhamNCUSA
| | - Peter E. Fecci
- Department of NeurosurgeryDuke University Medical CenterDurhamNCUSA
| |
Collapse
|