Association of immune-related pneumonitis with clinical benefit of anti-programmed cell death-1 monotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Anti‑PD‑1/PD‑L1 and anti‑CTLA‑4 associated checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis in non‑small cell lung cancer: Occurrence, pathogenesis and risk factors (Review)

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) play a significant anti‑tumor role in the management of non‑small cell lung cancer. The most broadly used ICIs are anti‑programmed death 1 (PD‑1), anti‑programmed cell death‑ligand 1, and anti‑cytotoxic T lymphocyte‑associated antigen‑4 monoclonal antibody. Compared with traditional chemotherapy, ICIs have the advantages of greater efficiency and more specific targeting. However, the resulting immune‑related adverse events limit the clinical application of ICIs, especially checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP). CIP chiefly occurs within 6 months of administration of ICIs. Excessive activation and amplification of cytotoxic T lymphocytes, helper T cells, downregulation of regulatory T cells, and over‑secretion of pro‑inflammatory cytokines are the dominant mechanisms underlying the pathophysiology of CIP. The dysregulation of innate immune cells, such as an increase in inflammatory monocytes, dendritic cells, neutrophils and M1 polarization of macrophages, an increase in IL‑10 and IL‑35, and a decrease in eosinophils, may underlie CIP. Although contested, several factors may accelerate CIP, such as a history of previous respiratory disease, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, administration of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors, PD‑1 blockers, first‑line application of ICIs, and combined immunotherapy. Interestingly, first‑line ICIs plus chemotherapy may reduce CIP. Steroid hormones remain the primary treatment strategy against grade ≥2 CIP, although cytokine blockers are promising therapeutic agents. Herein, the current research on CIP occurrence, clinical and radiological characteristics, pathogenesis, risk factors, and management is summarized to further expand our understanding, clarify the prognosis, and guide treatment.

Risk Factors for Refractory Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-related Pneumonitis in Patients With Lung Cancer

Checkpoint inhibitor-related pneumonitis (CIP) is one of the most important immune checkpoint inhibitors side effects, and it is rare but fatal. Identifying patients at risk of refractory CIP before the start of CIP therapy is important for controlling CIP. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 60 patients with lung cancer who developed CIP. Refractory CIP was defined as CIP with poor response to corticosteroid treatment, including CIP not relieved with corticosteroid administration or CIP recurrence during the corticosteroid tapering period. We analyzed clinical characteristics, peripheral blood biomarkers, treatment, and outcomes in nonrefractory and refractory CIP. Risk factors associated with refractory CIP were assessed. Among 60 patients with CIP, 16 (26.7%) had refractory CIP. The median onset time for patients with nonrefractory and those with refractory CIP was 16.57 (interquartile range [IQR], 6.82-28.14) weeks and 7.43 (IQR, 2.71-19.1) weeks, respectively. The level of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) was significantly higher in the refractory CIP group at baseline (255 [222, 418] vs. 216 [183, 252], P =0.031) and at CIP onset (321.5 [216.75, 487.5] vs. 219 [198. 241], P =0.019). An LDH level >320 U/L at CIP onset was an independent risk factor of refractory CIP (odds ratio [OR], 8.889; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.294-61.058; P =0.026). The incidence of refractory CIP is high among patients with CIP. An increased LDH level at CIP onset is independently associated with refractory CIP. Monitoring LDH levels during immune checkpoint inhibitors treatment is recommended.

Challenges and knowledge gaps with immune checkpoint inhibitors monotherapy in the management of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: a survey of oncologist perceptions

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint-inhibitors (ICIs) are changing outcomes in different cancer settings, notably for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). There are, however, still important gaps of evidence for clinical practice when using these novel treatments. In this study, we assessed physicians' opinion and experience on challenges for clinical practice with ICIs monotherapy in NSCLC.

METHODS

A survey was conducted on experienced physicians treating patients with NSCLC with ICIs. Two rounds of pilot tests were carried out for validation among a group of experts. Topics under analysis were in relation to treatment of elderly populations, performance status, brain metastases, use of steroids or antibiotics, the effects of gut microbiome, autoimmune diseases, human immunodeficiency virus infection, solid organ transplants, use of anti-programmed cell death protein 1 versus anti-programmed death-ligand 1 drugs, atypical tumour responses, predictors of response, duration of treatment and a final open question on additional relevant challenges.

RESULTS

Two hundred and twenty-one answers were collected, including 106 (48%) valid answers from experts for final analysis (physicians who have treated at least 20 patients with NSCLC with ICIs). The vast majority agreed that the selected topics in this study are important challenges ahead and more evidence is needed. Moreover, predictors of response, treating brain metastasis, shorter duration of treatment, the effects of gut microbiome and concomitant use of steroids were voted the most important topics to be further addressed in prospective clinical research.

CONCLUSIONS

This survey contributed to understanding which are the main challenges for clinical practice with ICIs monotherapy in NSCLC. It can also contribute to guide further clinical research, considering the opinions and experience of those who regularly treat NSCLC patients with ICIs.

Nintedanib in an elderly non-small-cell lung cancer patient with severe steroid-refractory checkpoint inhibitor-related pneumonitis: A case report and literature review

Immune checkpoint inhibitors tremendously improve cancer prognosis; however, severe-grade immune-related adverse events may cause premature death. Current recommendations for checkpoint inhibitor-related pneumonitis (CIP) treatment are mainly about immunosuppressive therapy, and anti-fibrotic agents are also needed, especially for patients with poor response to corticosteroids and a longer pneumonitis course. This is because fibrotic changes play an important role in the pathological evolution of CIP. Here, we report a case demonstrating that nintedanib is a promising candidate drug for CIP management or prevention, as it has potent anti-fibrotic efficacy and a safety profile. Moreover, nintedanib could partially inhibit tumor growth in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer, and its efficacy can be improved in combination with other anti-tumor therapies.

Chinese expert consensus on the multidisciplinary management of pneumonitis associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have successfully treated a number of different types of cancer, which is of great significance for cancer treatment. With the widespread use of ICIs in clinical practice, the increasing checkpoint inhibitor pneumonia (CIP) will be a challenge to clinicians. To guide the diagnosis and treatment of CIP, we conducted in-depth discussions based on the latest evidence, forming a consensus among Chinese experts on the multidisciplinary management of CIP.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-related pneumonitis in non-small cell lung cancer: A review

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown definite therapeutic effects in various types of cancers, especially non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, ICIs have unique side effects, called immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which can occur in various systems throughout the body. Among such irAEs, immune checkpoint inhibitor-related pneumonitis (ICI-P) is a fatal adverse reaction. In this review, we discussed the risk factors, pathogenesis, clinical characteristics, radiological manifestations, pathological features, diagnosis, grading, and management of ICI-P in NSCLC and the relationship between ICI-P and the efficacy of ICI therapy. In addition, we discussed the predictive factors for ICI-P. This review will play a crucial role in the prediction, evaluation, and management of ICI-P for widespread application of immunotherapy.

Imaging Mass Cytometry Analysis of immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Related Pneumonitis: A Case Report

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-related pneumonitis (CIP) is a rare but well-recognized immune-related adverse event (irAE), causes 35% of irAE related deaths. However, the mechanism of CIP remains unclear and no evidence-based treatment except for glucocorticoids is available. Herein, we report the case of a patient with metastatic bladder cancer who received tislelizumab and was diagnosed with CIP. The patient underwent transbronchial cryobiopsy. The patient was treated with glucocorticoid, but CIP recurred when the glucocorticoid tapering. The paraffine-embedded lung tissue was sectioned, stained with 31 heavy-metal tagged antibodies, and analyzed using imaging mass cytometry (IMC) technology. We identified multiple immune cell subsets in the lung tissue and observed the infiltration of memory T cells and the CD4+ DC subset. The data indicated the great potential of IMC technology in the identification and characterization of irAEs. Further investigation is warranted to identify the mechanism of action of CIP.

OUP accepted manuscript

Background

Cardiovascular immune-related adverse events (CV–irAEs) associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) may have been underreported given that most previous reports were retrospective. We aimed to evaluate the incidence, clinical characteristics, and predictors of CV–irAEs and determine the feasibility of serial cardiac monitoring using a combination of B-type natriuretic peptide, cardiac troponin T, and electrocardiogram for the prediction of future symptomatic (grade ≥2) CV–irAEs.

Materials and Methods

This was a prospective observational study that included 129 consecutive patients with non–small-cell lung cancer who received ICI monotherapy at a single center. Serial cardiac monitoring was performed during ICI monotherapy.

Results

A total of 35 (27%) patients developed any grade ≥1 CV–irAEs with a median time of onset of 72 (interquartile range 44-216) days after ICI treatment initiation. Multivariate Fine–Gray regression analysis showed that prior acute coronary syndrome (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 3.15 (95% [CI], 2.03-4.91), prior heart failure hospitalization (adjusted HR 1.65 [95% CI, 1.17-2.33]), and achievement of disease control (adjusted HR 1.91, [95% CI, 1.16-3.14]) were significantly associated with grade ≥1 CV–irAEs. Serial cardiac monitoring revealed that patients with preceding grade 1 CV–irAEs were associated with a significantly higher risk of onset of grade ≥2 CV–irAEs compared with those without preceding grade 1 CV–irAEs (HR: 6.17 [95% CI, 2.97-12.83]).

Conclusion

CV–irAEs were more common than previously recognized and have several predictors. Moreover, serial cardiac monitoring may be feasible for the prediction of future grade ≥2 CV–irAEs.

Association of immune-related pneumonitis with clinical benefit of anti-programmed cell death-1 monotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The association between the development of checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP) with tumor response and survival has remained unclear so far. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the association between CIP and the clinical efficacy of anti-programmed cell death-1 antibody in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Between January 2016 and August 2019, 203 advanced NSCLC patients were administered with nivolumab or pembrolizumab. Comparisons were made between patients with and without CIP. We evaluated the time-to-treatment failure (TTF), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

CIP was observed in 28 (14%) patients. CIP was associated with a longer PFS (18.9 months [95% confidence interval, CI: 8.7 months-not reached] vs. 3.9 months [95% CI: 3.4-5.1 months, p < 0.01]) and longer OS (27.4 [95% CI: 20.7 months-not reached] vs. 14.8 months [95% CI: 11.2-17.9 months, p = 0.003]). Most patients discontinued the immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment when they developed CIP. Seven patients (25%) lived for more than 300 days from treatment discontinuation and did not show any long-term tumor growth after treatment discontinuation.

CONCLUSION

CIP was associated with prolonged PFS and OS. Additionally, 25% of CIP patients did not show any tumor growth for long periods after treatment discontinuation. Careful management of CIP can help in obtaining the best clinical efficacy from anti-PD-1 antibody.