1
|
Bramblet RM, Bakkum-Gamez JN, Slettedahl SW, Foote PH, Taylor WR, Berger CK, Gysbers BJ, Arndt J, Chen L, Doering KA, Burger KN, Mahoney DW, Sherman ME, Kisiel JB, Samadder NJ. Methylated DNA Markers for Sporadic Colorectal and Endometrial Cancer Are Strongly Associated with Lynch Syndrome Cancers. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2023; 16:611-620. [PMID: 37728516 PMCID: PMC10870731 DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.capr-23-0107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2023] [Revised: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2023]
Abstract
Lynch syndrome (LS) markedly increases risks of colorectal and endometrial cancers. Early detection biomarkers for LS cancers could reduce the needs for invasive screening and surgical prophylaxis.To validate a panel of methylated DNA markers (MDM) previously identified in sporadic colorectal cancer and endometrial cancer for discrimination of these cancers in LS.In a case-control design, previously identified MDMs for the detection of colorectal cancer and endometrial cancer were assayed by qMSP on tissue-extracted DNA. Results were normalized to ACTB values within each sample. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator models to classify colorectal cancer and endometrial cancer were trained on sporadic cases and controls and then applied to classify colorectal cancer and endometrial cancer, in those with LS, and cross-validated.We identified colorectal cancer cases (23 with LS, 48 sporadic), colorectal controls (32 LS, 48 sporadic), endometrial cancer cases (30 LS, 48 sporadic), and endometrial controls (29 LS, 37 sporadic). A 3-MDM panel (LASS4, LRRC4, and PPP2R5C) classified LS-CRC from LS controls with an AUC of 0.92 (0.84-0.99); results were similar for sporadic colorectal cancer. A 6-MDM panel (SFMBT2, MPZ, CYTH2, DIDO1, chr10.4479, and EMX2OS) discriminated LS-EC from LS controls with an AUC of 0.92 (0.83-1.0); the AUC for sporadic endometrial cancer versus sporadic controls was nominally higher, 0.99 (0.96-1.0).MDMs previously identified in sporadic endometrial cancer and colorectal cancer discriminate between endometrial cancer and benign endometrium and colorectal cancer and benign colorectum in LS. This supports the inclusion of patients with LS within future prospective clinical trials evaluating endometrial cancer and colorectal cancer MDMs and may provide a new avenue for cancer screening or surveillance in this high-risk population. PREVENTION RELEVANCE Lynch syndrome (LS) markedly increases risks of colorectal and endometrial cancers. Early detection biomarkers for LS cancers could reduce the needs for invasive screening and surgery. Methylated DNA markers previously identified in sporadic endometrial cancer and colorectal cancer discriminate between benign and cancer tissue in LS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Patrick H. Foote
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - William R. Taylor
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Calise K. Berger
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Brianna J. Gysbers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Jacquelyn Arndt
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Longwen Chen
- Division of Anatomic Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - Karen A. Doering
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Kelli N. Burger
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN
| | | | - Mark E. Sherman
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
| | - John B. Kisiel
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - N. Jewel Samadder
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yao Y, Shi L, Zhu X. Serum Anti-Mullerian Hormone Levels Might Indicate Premenopausal Endometrial Lesions. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:3301. [PMID: 37958197 PMCID: PMC10650321 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13213301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2023] [Revised: 10/08/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endometrial proliferative lesions (EPL) usually refer to endometrial hyperplasia (EH) and endometrial cancer (EC). Among patients with premenopausal EPL who wish to preserve their fertility, only those with EH and early-stage EC have the possibility to undergo fertility preservation therapy. However, there is currently a lack of specific and reliable screening criteria and models for identifying these patients. METHODS This study utilized a retrospective diagnostic study design. The training set included medical record information that met the criteria between August 2017 and October 2022, while the validation set consisted of medical record information that met the criteria from November 2022 to May 2023. The endometrial pathological test served as the gold standard. The serum anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) level before endometrial sampling and a regression model were employed to predict EPL. RESULTS The study included a total of 1209 patients with PCOS (1119 in the control group and 90 in the endometrial proliferative lesion group) and 5366 women without PCOS (5249 in the control group and 117 in the proliferative lesion group). In the case of PCOS patients aged 20-39 years, the most effective screening threshold for AMH was found to be a serum AMH level of ≤5.39 ng/mL. The model used for this group was logit(p) = -2.562 - 0.430 × AMH + 0.127 × BMI + 1.512 × hypertension + 0.956 × diabetes -1.145 × regular menstruation. On the other hand, for non-PCOS women aged 20-39 years, the optimal screening threshold for AMH was determined to be a serum AMH value of ≤2.18 ng/mL. The model used for this group was logit(p) = -3.778 - 0.823 × AMH + 0.176 × BMI + 2.660 × diabetes -1.527 × regular menstruation -1.117 × dysmenorrhea. It is important to note that all of these findings have successfully passed internal verification. CONCLUSION For PCOS and non-PCOS women aged 20-39 years, the serum AMH test and related multiple regression models were obtained for the warning of EPL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yingsha Yao
- Women’s Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310006, China; (Y.Y.); (L.S.)
| | - Liujing Shi
- Women’s Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310006, China; (Y.Y.); (L.S.)
| | - Xiaoming Zhu
- Women’s Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310006, China; (Y.Y.); (L.S.)
- Key Laboratory of Women’s Reproductive Health of Zhejiang Province, Women’s Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310006, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dellino M, Cerbone M, Laganà AS, Vitagliano A, Vimercati A, Marinaccio M, Baldini GM, Malvasi A, Cicinelli E, Damiani GR, Cazzato G, Cascardi E. Upgrading Treatment and Molecular Diagnosis in Endometrial Cancer-Driving New Tools for Endometrial Preservation? Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:ijms24119780. [PMID: 37298731 DOI: 10.3390/ijms24119780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Revised: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 06/01/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
One emerging problem for onco-gynecologists is the incidence of premenopausal patients under 40 years of age diagnosed with stage I Endometrial Cancer (EC) who want to preserve their fertility. Our review aims to define a primary risk assessment that can help fertility experts and onco-gynecologists tailor personalized treatment and fertility-preserving strategies for fertile patients wishing to have children. We confirm that risk factors such as myometrial invasion and The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging should be integrated into the novel molecular classification provided by The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). We also corroborate the influence of classical risk factors such as obesity, Polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS), and diabetes mellitus to assess fertility outcomes. The fertility preservation options are inadequately discussed with women with a diagnosis of gynecological cancer. A multidisciplinary team of gynecologists, oncologists, and fertility specialists could increase patient satisfaction and improve fertility outcomes. The incidence and death rates of endometrial cancer are rising globally. International guidelines recommend radical hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy as the standard of care for this cancer; however, fertility-sparing alternatives should be tailored to motivated women of reproductive age, establishing an appropriate cost-benefit balance between childbearing desire and cancer risk. New molecular classifications such as that of TCGA provide a robust supplementary risk assessment tool that can tailor the treatment options to the patient's needs, curtail over- and under-treatment, and contribute to the spread of fertility-preserving strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam Dellino
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Marco Cerbone
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Antonio Simone Laganà
- Unit of Gynecologic Oncology, ARNAS "Civico-Di Cristina-Benfratelli", Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE), University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Amerigo Vitagliano
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Antonella Vimercati
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Marco Marinaccio
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy
| | | | - Antonio Malvasi
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Ettore Cicinelli
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Gianluca Raffaello Damiani
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Gerardo Cazzato
- Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, Pathology Section, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Eliano Cascardi
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10124 Turin, Italy
- Pathology Unit, FPO-IRCCS Candiolo Cancer Institute, 10060 Candiolo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bakkum-Gamez JN, Sherman ME, Slettedahl SW, Mahoney DW, Lemens MA, Laughlin-Tommaso SK, Hopkins MR, VanOosten A, Shridhar V, Staub JK, Cao X, Foote PH, Clarke MA, Burger KN, Berger CK, O'Connell MC, Doering KA, Podratz KC, DeStephano CC, Schoolmeester JK, Kerr SE, Wentzensen N, Taylor WR, Kisiel JB. Detection of endometrial cancer using tampon-based collection and methylated DNA markers. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 174:11-20. [PMID: 37141817 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.04.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2022] [Revised: 04/16/2023] [Accepted: 04/16/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Alterations in DNA methylation are early events in endometrial cancer (EC) development and may have utility in EC detection via tampon-collected vaginal fluid. METHODS For discovery, DNA from frozen EC, benign endometrium (BE), and benign cervicovaginal (BCV) tissues underwent reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS) to identify differentially methylated regions (DMRs). Candidate DMRs were selected based on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) discrimination, methylation level fold-change between cancers and controls, and absence of background CpG methylation. Methylated DNA marker (MDM) validation was performed using qMSP on DNA from independent EC and BE FFPE tissue sets. Women ≥45 years of age with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) or postmenopausal bleeding (PMB) or any age with biopsy-proven EC self-collected vaginal fluid using a tampon prior to clinically indicated endometrial sampling or hysterectomy. Vaginal fluid DNA was assayed by qMSP for EC-associated MDMs. Random forest modeling analysis was performed to generate predictive probability of underlying disease; results were 500-fold in-silico cross-validated. RESULTS Thirty-three candidate MDMs met performance criteria in tissue. For the tampon pilot, 100 EC cases were frequency matched by menopausal status and tampon collection date to 92 BE controls. A 28-MDM panel highly discriminated between EC and BE (96% (95%CI 89-99%) specificity; 76% (66-84%) sensitivity (AUC 0.88). In PBS/EDTA tampon buffer, the panel yielded 96% (95% CI 87-99%) specificity and 82% (70-91%) sensitivity (AUC 0.91). CONCLUSION Next generation methylome sequencing, stringent filtering criteria, and independent validation yielded excellent candidate MDMs for EC. EC-associated MDMs performed with promisingly high sensitivity and specificity in tampon-collected vaginal fluid; PBS-based tampon buffer with added EDTA improved sensitivity. Larger tampon-based EC MDM testing studies are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamie N Bakkum-Gamez
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America.
| | - Mark E Sherman
- Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States of America
| | - Seth W Slettedahl
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| | - Douglas W Mahoney
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| | - Maureen A Lemens
- Surgery Research, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| | - Shannon K Laughlin-Tommaso
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| | - Matthew R Hopkins
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| | - Ann VanOosten
- Surgery Research, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| | - Viji Shridhar
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Experimental Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| | - Julie K Staub
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Experimental Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| | - Xiaoming Cao
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| | - Patrick H Foote
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| | - Megan A Clarke
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, United States of America
| | - Kelli N Burger
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| | - Calise K Berger
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| | - Maria C O'Connell
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| | - Karen A Doering
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| | - Karl C Podratz
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| | - Christopher C DeStephano
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States of America
| | - J Kenneth Schoolmeester
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Anatomic Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| | - Sarah E Kerr
- Hospital Pathology Associates, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America
| | - Nicolas Wentzensen
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, United States of America
| | - William R Taylor
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| | - John B Kisiel
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Shen Y, Yang W, Liu J, Zhang Y. Minimally invasive approaches for the early detection of endometrial cancer. Mol Cancer 2023; 22:53. [PMID: 36932368 PMCID: PMC10022290 DOI: 10.1186/s12943-023-01757-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2022] [Accepted: 03/07/2023] [Indexed: 03/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Endometrial cancer (EC) is one of the most common gynecologic cancers and its incidence is rising globally. Although advanced EC has a poor prognosis; diagnosing EC at an earlier stage could improve long-term patient outcomes. However, there is no consensus on the early detection strategies for EC and the current diagnostic practices such as transvaginal ultrasound, hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsy are invasive, costly and low in specificity. Thus, accurate and less invasive screening tests that detect EC in women with early stages of the disease are needed. Current research has revolutionized novel EC early detection methodologies in many aspects. This review aims to comprehensively characterizes minimally invasive screening techniques that can be applied to EC in the future, and fully demonstrate their potential in the early detection of EC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yufei Shen
- Department of Gynecology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Wenqing Yang
- Department of Gynecology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
- Gynaecology Oncology Research and Engineering Central of Hunan Province, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Jiacheng Liu
- The Center of Systems Biology and Data Science, School of Basic Medical Science, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
| | - Yu Zhang
- Department of Gynecology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
- Gynaecology Oncology Research and Engineering Central of Hunan Province, Changsha, Hunan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Raffone A, Raimondo D, Raspollini A, Oliviero A, Travaglino A, Santoro A, Renzulli F, Lopez G, Maio CMD, Casadio P, Zannoni GF, Seracchioli R, Mollo A. Accuracy of cytological examination of Tao brush endometrial sampling in diagnosing endometrial premalignancy and malignancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2022; 159:615-621. [PMID: 35365908 PMCID: PMC9790584 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2022] [Revised: 03/27/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Although Tao brush has become one of the most studied and used endometrial cytological samplers, concerns remain about the adequacy of the cytological sample compared with definitive histology. We aimed to assess accuracy of cytological examination from Tao brush sampling in diagnosing endometrial premalignancy and malignancy through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Seven electronic databases were searched from January 2000 to July 2021 for all studies which allowed assessment of accuracy of Tao brush in diagnosing endometrial premalignancy and malignancy. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+ and LR-), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and area under the curve (AUC) on summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve. Five studies with 774 patients were included. In diagnosing endometrial premalignancy and malignancy, cytological examination from Tao brush endometrial sampling showed pooled sensitivity of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.90-0.98), specificity of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.90-0.94), LR+ of 12.73 (95% CI, 3.94-41.18), LR- of 0.09 (95% CI, 0.05-0.18), DOR of 184.84 (95% CI, 24.37-1401.79), AUC of 0.9757 (standard error: 0.013). In conclusion, cytological examination from Tao brush seems to have a high diagnostic accuracy and might be proposed as both screening and diagnostic tool. However, further studies are necessary to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Raffone
- Division of Gynaecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC)IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero‐Universitaria di Bologna. S. Orsola Hospital. University of BolognaBolognaItaly,Gynecology and Obstetrics Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of MedicineUniversity of Naples Federico IINaplesItaly
| | - Diego Raimondo
- Division of Gynaecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC)IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero‐Universitaria di Bologna. S. Orsola Hospital. University of BolognaBolognaItaly
| | - Arianna Raspollini
- Division of Gynaecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC)IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero‐Universitaria di Bologna. S. Orsola Hospital. University of BolognaBolognaItaly
| | - Alessia Oliviero
- Gynecology and Obstetrics Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry "Schola Medica Salernitana"University of SalernoBaronissiItaly
| | - Antonio Travaglino
- Gynecopathology and Breast Pathology Unit, Department of Woman's Health ScienceAgostino Gemelli University PolyclinicRomeItaly,Anatomic Pathology Unit, Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, School of MedicineUniversity of Naples Federico IINaplesItaly
| | - Angela Santoro
- Gynecopathology and Breast Pathology Unit, Department of Woman's Health ScienceAgostino Gemelli University PolyclinicRomeItaly
| | - Federica Renzulli
- Division of Gynaecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC)IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero‐Universitaria di Bologna. S. Orsola Hospital. University of BolognaBolognaItaly
| | - Giovanni Lopez
- Gynecology and Obstetrics Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry "Schola Medica Salernitana"University of SalernoBaronissiItaly
| | - Carlo Michele Di Maio
- Gynecology and Obstetrics Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry "Schola Medica Salernitana"University of SalernoBaronissiItaly
| | - Paolo Casadio
- Division of Gynaecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC)IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero‐Universitaria di Bologna. S. Orsola Hospital. University of BolognaBolognaItaly
| | - Gian Franco Zannoni
- Gynecopathology and Breast Pathology Unit, Department of Woman's Health ScienceAgostino Gemelli University PolyclinicRomeItaly
| | - Renato Seracchioli
- Division of Gynaecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC)IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero‐Universitaria di Bologna. S. Orsola Hospital. University of BolognaBolognaItaly
| | - Antonio Mollo
- Gynecology and Obstetrics Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry "Schola Medica Salernitana"University of SalernoBaronissiItaly
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Warring SK, Borah B, Moriarty J, Gullerud R, Lemens MA, Destephano C, Sherman ME, Bakkum-Gamez JN. The cost of diagnosing endometrial cancer: Quantifying the healthcare cost of an abnormal uterine bleeding workup. Gynecol Oncol 2022; 164:93-97. [PMID: 34756471 PMCID: PMC8724459 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.10.079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2021] [Revised: 10/13/2021] [Accepted: 10/15/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The evaluation of women with perimenopausal abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) and postmenopausal bleeding (PMB) to detect endometrial cancer (EC) and its precursors is not standardized and can vary widely. Consequently, costs associated with the workup and management undoubtedly vary. This study aimed to quantify costs of AUB/PMB evaluation to understand the healthcare burden associated with securing a pathologic diagnosis. METHODS Women ≥45 years of age presenting to a single institution gynecology clinic with AUB/PMB for diagnostic workup were prospectively enrolled February 2013-October 2017 for a lower genital tract biospecimen research study. Clinical workup of AUB/PMB was determined by individual provider discretion. Costs of care were collected from administrative billing systems from enrollment to 90 days post enrollment. Costs were standardized and inflation-adjusted to 2017 US Dollars (USD). RESULTS In total, there were 1017 women enrolled with 5.6% diagnosed with atypical hyperplasia or endometrial cancer (EC). Within the full cohort, 90-day median cost for AUB/PMB workup and management was $2279 (IQR $512-4828). Among patients with a diagnostic biopsy, median 90-day costs ranged from $2203 (IQR $499-3604) for benign or disordered proliferative endometrium (DPE) diagnosis to $21,039 (IQR $19,084-24,536) for a diagnosis of EC. CONCLUSIONS The costs for diagnostic evaluation of perimenopausal AUB and PMB vary greatly according to ultimate tissue-based diagnosis. Even reassuring benign findings that do not require further intervention-the most common in this study's cohort-yield substantial costs. The development of sensitive, specific, and more cost-effective diagnostic strategies is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Bijan Borah
- Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - James Moriarty
- Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Rachel Gullerud
- Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | | | - Jamie N. Bakkum-Gamez
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN,Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
DeJong SR, Bakkum-Gamez JN, Clayton AC, Henry MR, Keeney GL, Zhang J, Kroneman TN, Laughlin-Tommaso SK, Ahlberg LJ, VanOosten AL, Weaver AL, Wentzensen N, Kerr SE. Tao brush endometrial cytology is a sensitive diagnostic tool for cancer and hyperplasia among women presenting to clinic with abnormal uterine bleeding. Cancer Med 2021; 10:7040-7047. [PMID: 34532991 PMCID: PMC8525073 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2021] [Revised: 08/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Abnormal uterine bleeding requires the investigation of the endometrium. Histology is typically used but there remains room for the improvement and use of cytology. Methods Women presenting for clinically indicated office endometrial biopsy were prospectively enrolled. Tao endometrial brushing and office endometrial biopsy were performed, and surgical procedure if clinically indicated. Tao brush cytology specimens were blindly reviewed by up to three pathologists, consensus obtained, and scored as: benign, atypical (favor benign), suspicious, positive for malignancy, or non‐diagnostic. Cytology and histology were compared to surgical pathology to determine sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values to detect AH (atypical hyperplasia) or EC (endometrial cancer). Results Clinical indications of 197 enrolled patients included postmenopausal bleeding (90, 45.7%), abnormal uterine bleeding (94, 47.7%), and abnormal endometrium on ultrasound without bleeding (13, 6.6%). Of the 197 patients, 185 (93.9%) had cytology score consensus and a total of 196 (99.5%) had consensus regarding cytology positivity. Surgical pathology diagnoses (N = 85) were 13 (15.3%) FIGO grade 1 or 2 EC, 3 (3.5%) AH, and 69 (81.2%) benign endometrium. Sensitivity and specificity to detect EC or AH were 93.7% and 100%, respectively, via endometrial biopsy; 87.5% and 63.8%, respectively, via endometrial cytology when scores of malignancy, suspicious, or atypical were considered positive. Conclusions In a high‐risk population, Tao brush endometrial cytology showed high sensitivity to detect AH and EC comparable to biopsy histology when considering scores of malignancy, suspicious, atypical, and non‐diagnostic. Revisiting the potential value of endometrial cytology in the contemporary era of endometrial diagnostic workup is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie R DeJong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jamie N Bakkum-Gamez
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Amy C Clayton
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Michael R Henry
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Gary L Keeney
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jun Zhang
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | | | | - Lisa J Ahlberg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Ann L VanOosten
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Amy L Weaver
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Nicolas Wentzensen
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Sarah E Kerr
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.,Currently: Hospital Pathology Associates, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|