Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors on the quality of life of patients with metastatic or recurrent head and neck cancer: a systematic review protocol

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this review is to evaluate the effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors compared to radiation and other systemic therapies, such as chemotherapy and targeted therapies, on the quality of life of patients with metastatic or recurrent head and neck cancer.

INTRODUCTION

Recurrent and metastatic head and neck cancers are associated with high morbidity and mortality. The treatment modalities including radiation and chemotherapy have considerable negative effects on quality of life. Immunotherapy, in particular immune checkpoint inhibitors, is a promising treatment option, offering effective disease control with improved patient-reported outcomes.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

The review will include experimental or observational studies that compare the effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors with either radiation therapy or systemic therapies (eg, chemotherapy, targeted molecular agents) on the quality of life of patients (aged >18 years) with head and neck cancer.

METHODS

The databases to be searched include MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). Sources of unpublished studies and gray literature to be searched will include ClinicalTrials.gov and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. Titles and abstracts will be screened, and full texts of articles that meet the inclusion criteria will be retrieved for further assessment. Two independent reviewers will appraise eligible studies using the JBI tools for experimental and observational research, and will extract data. Where appropriate, meta-analysis will be conducted. The certainty of the findings will be evaluated following the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42024567283.

Future investigative directions for novel therapeutic targets in head and neck cancer

AREAS COVERED

Here we describe novel agents, their mechanism(s) of action, preclinical results, and ongoing clinical trials in HNSCC.

EXPERT OPINION

Established therapeutic targets in HNSCC include EGFR (cetuximab) and PD-1 (pembrolizumab and nivolumab). Despite the detection of many other possible targets in HNSCC cell lines and patient tumors, no other therapies have successfully advanced to date. Identification of predictive biomarkers may guide the use of targeted agents and combination therapies. Clinical trials supported by strong preclinical data in relevant models are more likely to advance treatment options.

Cardiovascular adverse events and immune-related adverse events associated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC)

While some literature has provided limited information about the potential cardiovascular risk and immune-related adverse events (irAEs) risk associated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in the treatment of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC), the exact relevance is still uncertain. To assess the pharmacovigilance (PV), constituent ratio, severity, and reaction outcomes of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and immune-related adverse events (irAEs) related to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors for HNSCC reported to the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). We analyzed reports of cardiovascular adverse events and irAEs associated with drug therapy for HNSCC submitted to FAERS from the 1st quarter 2015 to the 3rd quarter of 2023. Three PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors were identified: nivolumab, pembrolizumab and durvalumab. Our primary composite endpoint was the PV of MACE and irAEs related to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in the treatment of HNSCC, and the secondary endpoint was PV of other cardiovascular events. The software implemented was STATA 17.0 MP. 19,372 suspected drug-adverse event reports related to drug treatment in patients with HNSCC were identified, of which 916 reports were cardiovascular events, including 555 reports of MACE and 361 reports of other cardiovascular events. The PV signal regarding MACE was detected in durvalumab (PRR  = 2.12, 95% CI: 1.24-3.61; χ2  = 7.71; ROR  = 2.19, 95% CI: 1.24-3.86; IC  = 1.01; IC025  = 0.07) but not in nivolumab and pembrolizumab. The constituent ratio of MACE in all adverse events caused by nivolumab (OR  = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.19-0.73) and pembrolizumab (OR  = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.23-0.99) was significantly decreased, compared with durvalumab. A PV signal about other cardiovascular events was detected in durvalumab (PRR  = 3.04, 95% CI: 1.73-5.31; χ2  = 16.13; ROR  = 3.15, 95% CI: 1.74-5.70; IC  = 1.46; IC025  = 0.48), but it was not detected in nivolumab or pembrolizumab. The constituent ratio of other cardiovascular events in all adverse events caused by nivolumab (OR  = 0.25, 95% CI: 0.13-0.48) and pembrolizumab (OR  = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.20-0.80) was significantly decreased, compared with durvalumab. The constituent ratio of other cardiovascular events in all adverse events caused by nivolumab (OR  = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.38-0.99) was significantly decreased, compared with pembrolizumab. There were 40 cases of hypertension. A PV signal about hypertension was detected in pembrolizumab (PRR  = 3.72, 95% CI: 1.87-7.43; χ2  = 15.99; ROR  = 3.75, 95% CI: 1.87-7.51; IC  = 1.53, IC025  = 0.45), but it was not detected in nivolumab. The constituent ratio of hypertension in all adverse events caused by nivolumab (OR  = 0.09, 95% CI: 0.09-0.39) was significantly decreased, compared with pembrolizumab. There were 737 cases of irAEs. A PV signal about irAEs was detected in nivolumab (PPR  = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.05-1.53; χ2  = 6.38; ROR  = 1.28, 95% CI: 1.06-1.56; IC  = 0.29, IC025  = -0.00) and pembrolizumab (PPR  = 2.20, 95% CI: 1.79-2.71; χ2  = 56.55; ROR  = 2.31, 95% CI: 1.84-2.88; IC  = 1.03; IC025  = 0.68), but it was not detected in durvalumab. The constituent ratio of irAEs in all adverse events caused by nivolumab (OR  = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.44-0.76) significantly decreased, compared with pembrolizumab. By comparing the PV signals, constituent ratio, severity, and reaction outcome of the three drugs, we suppose that nivolumab can be used as the safest PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor for HNSCC.

Clinical applications and perspectives of immune checkpoint inhibitors in oral squamous cell carcinoma

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) promote antitumour immune responses by blocking inhibitory signals expressed by T cells and have significant clinical benefits in the treatment of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). With the advancement of immunotherapy, an increasing number of ICIs have been developed or are in clinical trial stages. However, drug resistance and immune-related adverse events (irAEs) associated with ICIs have limited the clinical application of immunotherapy in OSCC, and the optimal drug regimen for ICIs and the optimal duration of ICIs administration also deserves to be further discussed. New therapeutic regimens and drug delivery technologies are key to promoting the further development of ICIs. This article elucidates the mechanism of ICIs’ action and presents a review of their clinical applications and current development status in OSCC. Additionally, it summarizes the current challenges and outlines future research directions for ICIs therapy, with the aim of offering fresh insights to researchers.

Emerging Targets and Therapeutics in Immuno-Oncology: Insights from Landscape Analysis

In the ever-evolving landscape of cancer research, immuno-oncology stands as a beacon of hope, offering novel avenues for treatment. This study capitalizes on the vast repository of immuno-oncology-related scientific documents within the CAS Content Collection, totaling over 350,000, encompassing journals and patents. Through a pioneering approach melding natural language processing with the CAS indexing system, we unveil over 300 emerging concepts, depicted in a comprehensive "Trend Landscape Map". These concepts, spanning therapeutic targets, biomarkers, and types of cancers among others, are hierarchically organized into eight major categories. Delving deeper, our analysis furnishes detailed quantitative metrics showcasing growth trends over the past three years. Our findings not only provide valuable insights for guiding future research endeavors but also underscore the merit of tapping the vast and unparalleled breadth of existing scientific information to derive profound insights.

Toxicity profiles of immune checkpoint inhibitors for recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are widely used in recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC); however, the toxicity profiles are inconclusive.

METHODS

Clinical trials evaluating ICIs for R/M HNSCC were searched from online databases. The characteristics of the studies and the results of incidences of any grade treatment-related adverse events (trAEs), grade three or more trAEs, treatment-related deaths, trAEs leading to discontinuation of treatment, and specific trAEs were extracted.

RESULTS

Twenty studies with 3756 patients were included. The pooled incidences of any grade trAEs, grade three or more trAEs, treatment-related deaths, trAEs leading to discontinuation of treatment for overall population were 62.07% (95% CI, 59.07%-65.02%), 13.82% (95% CI, 11.23%-16.62%), 0.39% (95% CI, 0.15%-0.71%), 3.99% (95% CI, 2.36%-5.95%), respectively. Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors monotherapy and ICIs combination therapy had significantly higher incidences of any grade trAEs (odds ratio [OR], 1.25, 95% CI, 1.05-1.49 and 1.36, 95% CI, 1.15-1.60, respectively), grade three or more trAEs (OR, 1.41, 95% CI, 1.08-1.84 and 1.79, 95% CI, 1.39-2.30, respectively), trAEs leading to discontinuation of treatment (OR, 3.98, 95% CI, 2.06-7.70 and 10.14, 95% CI, 5.49-18.70, respectively) compared with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors monotherapy. ICIs combination therapy had a significantly higher incidence of grade three or more trAEs compared with PD-1 inhibitors monotherapy (OR, 1.27, 95% CI, 1.03-1.55); however, the incidences of any grade trAEs and trAEs leading to discontinuation of treatment were not significant different.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that the incidences of grade three or more trAEs, treatment-related deaths, and trAEs leading to discontinuation of treatment are low in R/M HNSCC patients treated with ICIs. PD-L1 inhibitors monotherapy may be safer compared with PD-1 inhibitors monotherapy and ICIs combination therapy.

Recent Advances in the Targeting of Head and Neck Cancer Stem Cells

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is a very heterogeneous cancer with a poor overall response to therapy. One of the reasons for this therapy resistance could be cancer stem cells (CSCs), a small population of cancer cells with self-renewal and tumor-initiating abilities. Tumor cell heterogeneity represents hurdles for therapeutic elimination of CSCs. Different signaling pathway activations, such as Wnt, Notch, and Sonic-Hedgehog (SHh) pathways, lead to the expression of several cancer stem factors that enable the maintenance of CSC features. Identification and isolation of CSCs are based either on markers (CD133, CD44, and aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH)), side populations, or their sphere-forming ability. A key challenge in cancer therapy targeting CSCs is overcoming chemotherapy and radiotherapy resistance. However, in novel therapies, various approaches are being employed to address this hurdle such as targeting cell surface markers, other stem cell markers, and different signaling or metabolic pathways, but also, introducing checkpoint inhibitors and natural compounds into the therapy can be beneficial.