Increased Mars2 expression upon microRNA-4661-5p-mediated KDM5D downregulation is correlated with malignant degree of gastric cancer cells

Single cell regulatory architecture of human pancreatic islets suggests sex differences in β cell function and the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes

Biological sex affects the pathogenesis of type 2 and type 1 diabetes (T2D, T1D) including the development of β cell failure observed more often in males. The mechanisms that drive sex differences in β cell failure is unknown. Studying sex differences in islet regulation and function represent a unique avenue to understand the sex-specific heterogeneity in β cell failure in diabetes. Here, we examined sex and race differences in human pancreatic islets from up to 52 donors with and without T2D (including 37 donors from the Human Pancreas Analysis Program [HPAP] dataset) using an orthogonal series of experiments including single cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq), single nucleus assay for transposase-accessible chromatin sequencing (snATAC-seq), dynamic hormone secretion, and bioenergetics. In cultured islets from nondiabetic (ND) donors, in the absence of the in vivo hormonal environment, sex differences in islet cell type gene accessibility and expression predominantly involved sex chromosomes. Of particular interest were sex differences in the X-linked KDM6A and Y-linked KDM5D chromatin remodelers in female and male islet cells respectively. Islets from T2D donors exhibited similar sex differences in differentially expressed genes (DEGs) from sex chromosomes. However, in contrast to islets from ND donors, islets from T2D donors exhibited major sex differences in DEGs from autosomes. Comparing β cells from T2D and ND donors revealed that females had more DEGs from autosomes compared to male β cells. Gene set enrichment analysis of female β cell DEGs showed a suppression of oxidative phosphorylation and electron transport chain pathways, while male β cell had suppressed insulin secretion pathways. Thus, although sex-specific differences in gene accessibility and expression of cultured ND human islets predominantly affect sex chromosome genes, major differences in autosomal gene expression between sexes appear during the transition to T2D and which highlight mitochondrial failure in female β cells.

Potential prognostic biomarkers of hepatocellular carcinoma based on 4D label-free quantitative proteomics analysis pilot investigation

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma carries a poor prognosis and poses a serious threat to global health. Currently, there are few potential prognostic biomarkers available for the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma.

METHODS

This pilot study used 4D label-free quantitative proteomics to compare the proteomes of hepatocellular carcinoma and adjacent non-tumor tissue. A total of 66,075 peptides, 6363 identified proteins, and 772 differentially expressed proteins were identified in specimens from three hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Through functional enrichment analysis of differentially expressed proteins by Gene Ontology, KEGG pathway, and protein domain, we identified proteins with similar functions.

RESULTS

Twelve differentially expressed proteins (RPL17, RPL27, RPL27A, RPS5, RPS16, RSL1D1, DDX18, RRP12, TARS2, YARS2, MARS2, and NARS1) were selected for identification and validation by parallel reaction monitoring. Subsequent Western blotting confirmed overexpression of RPL27, RPS16, and TARS2 in hepatocellular carcinoma compared to non-tumor tissue in 16 pairs of clinical samples. Analysis of The Cancer Genome Atlas datasets associated the increased expression of these proteins with poor prognosis. Tissue microarray revealed a negative association between high expression of RPL27 and TARS2 and the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma patients, although RPS16 was not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that RPL27 and TARS2 play an important role in hepatocellular carcinoma progression and may be potential prognostic biomarkers of overall survival in hepatocellular carcinoma patients.

Identification and validation of molecular subtypes and prognostic signature for stage I and stage II gastric cancer based on neutrophil extracellular traps

Purpose

This study identified subtypes and prognostic signature of stage I and stage II gastric cancer based on neutrophil extracellular trap (NET)-related genes.

Methods

The gene expression data associated with stage I and stage II gastric cancer were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases. NET-related genes were obtained from previous reference. Differentially expressed NET-related genes were selected by consensus cluster analysis. The differences in immune infiltration between two subtypes were analyzed. Prognosis-related genes were further screened by univariate Cox regression analysis. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) of prognostic signatures was conducted with clusterprofiler. Finally, a miRNA-mRNA-transcription factor (TF) network was constructed.

Results

Total 43 differential NET-related genes were obtained and two subtypes were obtained based on these genes. Patients of cluster 2 had a better prognosis compared to cluster 1. Eight types of immune cells were differential in infiltration level between two subtypes. Following univariate Cox regression analysis, two genes of CXC chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) and nuclear factor, erythroid 2-like 2 (NFE2L2) significantly related to patient survival were selected. GSEA of single gene revealed that CXCR4 was associated with allograft rejection and NFE2L2 was associated with drug metabolism-cytochrome P450. A network with 421 miRNA-mRNA-TF regulatory pairs was constructed.

Conclusion

The present study identified two subtypes and a prognostic signature for stage I and stage II gastric cancer based on NET-related genes.

Characterization of cuproptosis in gastric cancer and relationship with clinical and drug reactions

Gastric cancer (GC) is the fifth most common cancer worldwide. Cuproptosis is associated with cell growth and death as well as tumorigenesis. Aiming to lucubrate the potential influence of CRGs in gastric cancer, we acquired datasets of gastric cancer patients from TCGA and GEO. The identification of molecular subtypes with CRGs expression was achieved through unsupervised learning-cluster analysis. To evaluate the application value of subtypes, the K-M survival analysis was conducted to evaluate the clinical prognostic characteristics. Subsequently, we performed Gene Set Variation Analysis (GSVA) and utilized ssGSEA to quantify the extent of immune infiltration. Further, the K-M survival analysis was used to identify the prognosis-related CRGs. Next, signature genes of diagnostic predictive value were screened using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm from the expression matrix for TCGA, as well as the signature gene-related subtype was clustered by the "ConsensusClusterPlus" package. Finally, the immunological and drug sensitivity assessments of the signature gene-related subtypes were conducted. A total of 173 CRGs were identified, most of the CRGs undergo copy number variation in gastric cancer. Under different patient subtypes, immune cell levels differed significantly, and the subtype exhibiting high expression of the CRGs had a better prognosis. Furthermore, we selected 34 CRGs that were highly correlated with the prognosis of gastric cancer. By constructing a multivariate Cox proportional-hazards model and a hazard scoring system, we were able to categorize patients into high- and low-risk groups based on their hazard score. K-M analysis demonstrated a significant survival disadvantage in the high-risk group. Based on Lasso regression analysis, we screened 16 signature genes, a multivariate logistic regression model [cutoff: 0.149 (0.000, 0.974), AUC:0.987] and a prognosis network diagram was constructed and their prediction efficiency for gastric cancer prognostic diagnosis was well validated. According to the signature genes, the patients were separated to two signature subtypes. We found that patients with higher CRGs expression and better prognosis had lower levels of immune infiltration. Finally, according to the results of drug susceptibility analysis, docetaxel, 5-Fluorouracil, gemcitabin, and paclitaxel were found to be more sensitive to gastric cancer.

Targeting epigenetic regulators to overcome drug resistance in cancers

Drug resistance is mainly responsible for cancer recurrence and poor prognosis. Epigenetic regulation is a heritable change in gene expressions independent of nucleotide sequence changes. As the common epigenetic regulation mechanisms, DNA methylation, histone modification, and non-coding RNA regulation have been well studied. Increasing evidence has shown that aberrant epigenetic regulations contribute to tumor resistance. Therefore, targeting epigenetic regulators represents an effective strategy to reverse drug resistance. In this review, we mainly summarize the roles of epigenetic regulation in tumor resistance. In addition, as the essential factors for epigenetic modifications, histone demethylases mediate the histone or genomic DNA modifications. Herein, we comprehensively describe the functions of the histone demethylase family including the lysine-specific demethylase family, the Jumonji C-domain-containing demethylase family, and the histone arginine demethylase family, and fully discuss their regulatory mechanisms related to cancer drug resistance. In addition, therapeutic strategies, including small-molecule inhibitors and small interfering RNA targeting histone demethylases to overcome drug resistance, are also described.

Expression, Prognostic Value, and Functional Mechanism of the KDM5 Family in Pancreatic Cancer

Background: The histone lysine demethylase KDM5 family is an important epigenetic state-modifying enzyme family. Increasing evidence supports that epigenetic abnormalities in the KDM5 family are related to multiple cancers in humans. However, the role of the KDM5 family in pancreatic cancer is not clear, and related research is very scarce.

Methods: R software, Kaplan–Meier Plotter, cBioPortal, TIMER, LinkedOmics, STRING, Metascape, TISIDB, and the GSCA Lite online tool were utilized for bioinformatics analysis.

Results: KDM5A/B/C was significantly overexpressed in many kinds of tumor tissues, including pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAAD), while the expression of KDM5D was significantly downregulated. The high expression of KDM5A/B/C was related to poor clinical features, such as worse treatment efficacy, higher tumor grade, and more advanced clinical stage. Patients with a family history of breast cancer and melanoma, history of drinking or history chronic pancreatitis were more likely to have KDM5A/B/C gene abnormalities, which were related to a variety of adverse clinical features. The results of gene ontology (GO) and kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes (KEGG) pathway analyses of the KDM5 family and its 800 co-expressed genes showed that many gene terms related to cell proliferation, migration and many carcinogenic pathways. Notably, we found that the expression level of KDM5A/B/C was positively correlated with the expression of multiple key driver genes such as KRAS, BRCA1, and BRCA2 etc. In addition, PPI network analysis showed KDM5 family proteins have strong interactions with histone deacetylase family 1 (HDAC1), which could modify the lysines of histone H3, and co-act on many pathways, including the “longevity-regulating pathway” and “Notch signaling pathway”. Moreover, the upregulation of KDM5A/B/C expression was associated with an increase in the infiltration of B cells, CD8⁺ T cells and other infiltrating immune lymphocytes and the expression levels of immune molecules such as NT5E and CD274. Interestingly, the overexpression of KDM5A/C was also corelated with reduced sensitivity of pancreatic cancer cells to many kinds of pancreatic cancer-targeting or chemotherapeutic drugs, including axitinib and gemcitabine.

Conclusion: KDM5 family members may be prognostic markers and new therapeutic targets for patients with pancreatic cancer.

Y chromosome is moving out of sex determination shadow

Although sex hormones play a key role in sex differences in susceptibility, severity, outcomes, and response to therapy of different diseases, sex chromosomes are also increasingly recognized as an important factor. Studies demonstrated that the Y chromosome is not a ‘genetic wasteland’ and can be a useful genetic marker for interpreting various male-specific physiological and pathophysiological characteristics. Y chromosome harbors male‑specific genes, which either solely or in cooperation with their X-counterpart, and independent or in conjunction with sex hormones have a considerable impact on basic physiology and disease mechanisms in most or all tissues development. Furthermore, loss of Y chromosome and/or aberrant expression of Y chromosome genes cause sex differences in disease mechanisms. With the launch of the human proteome project (HPP), the association of Y chromosome proteins with pathological conditions has been increasingly explored. In this review, the involvement of Y chromosome genes in male-specific diseases such as prostate cancer and the cases that are more prevalent in men, such as cardiovascular disease, neurological disease, and cancers, has been highlighted. Understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying Y chromosome-related diseases can have a significant impact on the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of diseases.