Use of translesional coronary flow velocity for interventional decisions in a patient with multiple intermediately severe coronary stenoses

Noninvasive coronary flow velocity reserve measurement in the posterior descending coronary artery for detecting coronary stenosis in the right coronary artery using contrast-enhanced transthoracic Doppler echocardiography

BACKGROUND

Coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) measurement by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography (TTDE) has been found to be useful for assessing left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) stenosis. However, this method has been restricted only for the LAD. The purpose of this study was to detect severe right coronary artery (RCA) stenosis by CFVR measurement using contrast-enhanced TTDE.

METHODS

In 60 consecutive patients with angina pectoris (mean (SD) age: 60 (11), 18 women), coronary flow velocities in the RCA were recorded in the postero-descending coronary artery by contrast-enhanced TTDE at rest and during hyperemia induced by intravenous infusion of adenosine triphosphate (140 mcg/ml/kg). CFVR was calculated as the ratio of hyperemic to basal peak and mean diastolic flow velocity. CFVR measurements by TTDE were compared with the results of coronary angiography performed within 1 week.

RESULTS

Coronary flow velocity was successfully recorded in 49 (82%) of the 60 patients with contrast agent. CFVR (mean (SD)) was 1.4 (0.4) in patients with, and 2.6 (0.6) in patients without significant stenosis in the RCA (%diameter stenosis > 75%, P < 0.001). Using the cutoff value 2.0 for CFVR in the RCA, its sensitivity and specificity in detecting significant stenosis in the RCA were 88% and 91%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

CFVR measurement in the postero-descending coronary artery by contrast enhanced TTDE is a new, noninvasive method to detect significant stenosis in the RCA.

A nonlinear axisymmetric model with fluid-wall interactions for steady viscous flow in stenotic elastic tubes

Arteries with high-grade stenoses may compress under physiologic conditions due to negative transmural pressure caused by high-velocity flow passing through the stenoses. To quantify the compressive conditions near the stenosis, a nonlinear axisymmetric model with fluid-wall interactions is introduced to simulate the viscous flow in a compliant stenotic tube. The nonlinear elastic properties of the tube (tube law) are measured experimentally and used in the model. The model is solved using ADINA (Automatic Dynamic Incremental Nonlinear Analysis), which is a finite element package capable of solving problems with fluid-structure interactions. Our results indicate that severe stenoses cause critical flow conditions such as negative pressure and high and low shear stresses, which may be related to artery compression, plaque cap rupture, platelet activation, and thrombus formation. The pressure filed near a stenosis has a complex pattern not seen in one-dimensional models. Negative transmural pressure as low as -24 mmHg for a 78 percent stenosis by diameter is observed at the throat of the stenosis for a downstream pressure of 30 mmHg. Maximum shear stress as a high as 1860 dyn/cm2 occurs at the throat of the stenoses, while low shear stress with reversed direction is observed right distal to the stenosis. Compressive stresses are observed inside the tube wall. The maximal principal stress and hoop stress in the 78 percent stenosis are 80 percent higher than that from the 50 percent stenosis used in our simulation. Flow rates under different pressure drop conditions are calculated and compared with experimental measurements and reasonable agreement is found for the prebuckling stage.

Improved assessment of coronary stenosis severity using the relative flow velocity reserve

BACKGROUND

Myocardial fractional flow reserve (FFR) is based on pressure measurements. We have now sought to establish a Doppler-based concept of relative flow velocity reserve (RFVR) for the functional assessment of stenosis severity in epicardial coronary arteries. A clear threshold value to discriminate the functional severity of a coronary stenosis does not exist for coronary flow velocity reserve (CVR) based on intracoronary Doppler measurements. In contrast, the concept of FFR, which is based on intracoronary pressure measurements, has been extensively validated. An FFR value below 0.75 reliably indicates a significant stenosis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

RFVR is calculated as the ratio between distal CVR in the stenosed target vessel and distal CVR in a nonstenotic reference vessel. In 21 patients, RFVR was determined in 24 target vessels by use of intracoronary adenosine and correlated to the FFR, determined as the ratio of mean poststenotic to aortic pressures, in the target vessel. Stenosis severity was classified according to quantitative coronary angiography analysis. Reference diameter was 3.0+/-0.4 mm (mean+/-SD), and area stenosis was 74+/-15% (range, 40% to 95%). CVRs in the target and reference vessels were 2.1+/-0.5 and 2.6+/-0.7, respectively. FFR ranged from 0.49 to 0.99 (mean, 0.81+/-0.15) and RFVR from 0.53 to 1.0 (mean, 0.82+/-0.13). Poststenotic CVR did not correlate with either percent area stenosis (r=0.27, P=NS) or FFR (r=0.33, P=NS). In contrast, FFR as well as RFVR showed a curvilinear relation to percent area stenosis (r=0.89, P<0.0001 and r=0.79, P<0.0001, respectively). There was a close linear correlation between FFR and RFVR (r=0.91, P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

RFVR correlates closely to FFR and to percent area stenosis, whereas the correlation of CVR with FFR and percent area stenosis is rather poor. RFVR is a promising new concept for assessment of coronary stenosis severity and clinical decision making based on Doppler measurements.

Current concepts of coronary flow reserve for clinical decision making during cardiac catheterization

Measurements of coronary flow reserve, once used only for research, have gained wide acceptance as an additional diagnostic approach in the decision-making process of diagnostic cardiac catheterization and coronary interventions. Apart from the noninvasive determination of coronary flow reserve, intracoronary Doppler flow wires have facilitated decision making in the catheterization laboratory. Different techniques, unstandardized procedures, and data from uncomparable patient populations have remained a confounding factor. This review examines current concepts of coronary flow reserve as well as methodologic considerations and pitfalls. Applications of coronary flow reserve for periinterventional assessment are evaluated on the background of practical guidance. According to a detailed examination of arterial structure and function, a normal coronary flow reserve exceeds a value of 3.0. Values below 3.0 suggest involvement of microvascular disease caused by functional or structural alterations. The influences of various factors such as age, hemodynamics, hypercholesterolemia, hypertrophy, hypertension, syndrome X, and coronary artery disease are discussed in relation to the effect on coronary flow reserve. From available information, measurements of coronary flow reserve are an adjunct to current interventional technology to optimize individual patient care. Further efforts should be undertaken to incorporate these new methods into our routine clinical decision making.

Alternation in the coronary blood flow velocity pattern in patients with no reflow and reperfused acute myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

Experimental and clinical evidence indicates that myocardial ischemia often damages the coronary microvasculature ("no-reflow" phenomenon). In this study, we examined the effect of this phenomenon on the coronary blood flow velocity pattern in patients with reperfused acute myocardial infarction.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We measured coronary blood flow velocity after coronary angioplasty in 42 patients with acute myocardial infarction using a Doppler guidewire. Myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) was also performed before and after angioplasty. Thirty-one patients showed good contrast reperfusion (MCE reflow), whereas the other 11 showed no reflow (MCE no reflow). Peak velocity and duration of systolic coronary flow were significantly less in patients with MCE no reflow than in those with MCE reflow (8 +/- 4 versus 17 +/- 10 cm/s and 207 +/- 79 versus 289 +/- 55 ms, respectively; P < .01). Early systolic retrograde flow was frequently observed in patients with MCE no reflow, whereas it was observed in only 1 patient among those with MCE reflow (95% versus 3%; P < .001). Although peak diastolic flow velocity was similar between the two subsets, diastolic deceleration rate was significantly higher in patients with MCE no reflow than in those with MCE reflow (107 +/- 76 versus 56 +/- 31 cm/s2; P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

The coronary flow velocity pattern in patients with the no-reflow phenomenon was characterized by the appearance of systolic retrograde flow, diminished systolic antegrade flow, and rapid deceleration of diastolic flow. Thus, the Doppler guidewire allows us to assess the presence of microvascular dysfunction in AMI.

Dobutamine stress testing in the cardiac catheterization laboratory

Dobutamine stress ventriculography is a safe test that appears to separate groups of patients with and without significant coronary artery stenoses. In this study, all 7 patients with significant coronary artery stenoses who reached a heart rate > or = 110 beats/min had a positive stress test, whereas 9 of 10 control patients had a negative stress test.

Translesional pressure-flow velocity assessment in patients: Part I

Interventional physiology presents the operator with objective data to facilitate decision making. A thorough and validated understanding of the alterations of pressure and flow in the human coronary circulation is currently in progress. As illustrated in the case studies, some situations have data which may initially appear contradictory or unhelpful to clinical practice. These data should provide a framework to understand the dynamic physiology producing the clinical syndromes in patients undergoing coronary interventional procedures. Future Interventional Physiology Rounds will examine coronary pressure-flow responses during directional atherectomy, stents, and acute myocardial infarction.