Impact of radiation dose on late clinical outcome after intracoronary radiation therapy: Three-year follow-up of Long WRIST

A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials assessing drug-eluting stents and vascular brachytherapy in the treatment of coronary artery in-stent restenosis

OBJECTIVE

We undertook a meta-analysis of randomised trials assessing the outcome of vascular brachytherapy (VBT) or DES for the treatment of coronary artery ISR.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Studies utilising DES or VBT for ISR were identified by a systematic search. Data was pooled and combined overall effect measures were calculated for a random effect model in terms of deaths, myocardial infarctions, revascularisation, binary restenosis, mean late luminal loss and major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Fourteen eligible studies (3103 patients) were included. Neither therapy had any effect on mortality or myocardial infarction rate. VBT reduced the rate of revascularisation (RR 0.59, 95%CI 0.50-0.68), MACE (RR 0.58, 95%CI 0.51-0.67), binary restenosis (RR 0.51, 95%CI 0.44-0.59) and late loss (-0.73 mm, 95%CI -0.91 to -0.55 mm) compared to balloon angioplasty and selective bare metal stents (BMS) alone at intermediate follow-up and MACE (RR 0.72, 95%CI 0.61-0.85) at long-term follow-up. DES reduced the rate of revascularisation (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.36-0.71), MACE (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.39-0.79) and binary restenosis (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.40-0.81) compared to VBT but follow-up was limited to 9 months.

CONCLUSIONS

VBT improves the long-term outcome of angioplasty compared with BMS alone in the treatment of ISR. DES appears to provide similar results to that of VBT during short-term follow-up.

Intracoronary beta-irradiation for the treatment of de novo lesions: 5-year clinical follow-up of the BetAce randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Vascular brachytherapy (VBT) has been used for the prevention of restenosis. Despite initial positive results, long-term follow-up has shown a progressive loss of benefit in clinical outcome after beta-irradiation. We report the 5-year follow-up of the BetAce trial.

METHODS

This prospective, randomized, single-blind trial included 61 patients treated for 64 de novo coronary lesions: 31 patients (33 stenoses) were treated with bare metal stents (control group), and 30 patients (31 stenoses) were treated with intracoronary beta-irradiation at the time of stented angioplasty (VBT group).

RESULTS

Baseline and procedural data were similar between treatment arms. At 6 months, VBT reduced the need for target vessel revascularization (13% vs 35.5%, P = .04), but there was no significant difference in the 6- and 12-month event-free survival when clinical events were ranked. Between 1 and 5 years, an increasing number of target vessel failures was observed in both groups, leading to a similar long-term clinical outcome at 5 years (event-free survival 43% and 45% in the VBT and control groups, respectively, log-rank 0.001, P = .9).

CONCLUSIONS

Beta-irradiation in de novo coronary lesions significantly reduced in-stent recurrences at 6 months compared with standard procedures. However, this initial benefit was not sustained in the long term. The results of this randomized study confirm the delayed and progressive restenotic process after beta-irradiation and stent implantation in de novo lesions.

Restenosis following implantation of bare metal coronary stents: pathophysiology and pathways involved in the vascular response to injury

This review summarizes the restenotic process that occurs after the implantation of bare metal coronary stents. The pathology of in-stent restenosis is distinct from that seen after balloon angioplasty and is characterized by neointimal proliferation and extracellular matrix deposition. The degree of neointimal proliferation is proportional to the amount of injury, the intensity of the inflammatory infiltrate and the association of stent struts with lipid-filled plaque. In-stent restenosis also appears to be associated with systemic markers of inflammation. Shear stress has an important influence on restenosis as does the presence and adhesiveness of vascular progenitor cells. Clinical predictors (e.g., artery size, stent length, diabetes, and gender) may affect the incidence of restenosis seen after stent placement. A number of catheter-based interventions have been used to treat in-stent restenosis. Although preliminary data suggest that the use of drug-eluting stents may be effective, only intracoronary radiation has shown consistent efficacy in randomized trials.

La radiothérapie des affections bénignes : quelles indications huit ans plus tard ?

The authors present an update version of the indications for radiotherapy in the management of benign diseases. This is based on available randomized trials and recent international meetings. Validated indications remain the prevention of resected heterotopic bone ossifications, keloïds scars and pterygium and also treatment of arteriovenous malformations; the place of radiotherapy for malignant exophtalmia is more and more restricted. Randomized trials have demonstrated the efficacy of endobrachytherapy in the prevention of restenosis after angioplasty but the use of embedded stent has replaced this indication. Macular degeneration is no more an indication of radiotherapy. Quality requirements for radiotherapy are identical for benign or malignant indications.