Impact of diabetes mellitus status on coronary pathoanatomy and interventional treatment: Insights from the Euro heart survey PCI registry

Impact of Chronic Kidney Disease on Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The impact of chronic kidney disease (CKD) on adverse cardiovascular outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) is still unclear. This study aimed to systematically assess evidence on this topic.

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL databases were searched for studies comparing mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), or revascularization outcomes between patients with DM with and without CKD.

RESULTS

In 11 studies, the presence of CKD was associated with significantly increased risk of early all-cause mortality (risk ratio [RR], 3.45; 95% CI, 3.07-3.87; I2 = 0%; P < .001), late all-cause mortality (RR, 2.78; 95% CI, 1.92-4.02; I2 = 83%; P < .001), cardiac mortality (RR, 2.90; 95% CI, 1.99-4.22; I2 = 29%; P < .001), and MI (RR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.06-1.85; I2 = 13%; P = .02) compared with no CKD. There was no difference in the risk of any revascularization between those with and without CKD. Analysis of adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) indicated significantly increased risk of mortality (HR, 2.64; 95% CI, 1.91-3.64; I2 = 0%; P < .001) in the CKD group but only a nonsignificant tendency of increased MI (HR, 1.59; 95% CI, 0.99-2.54; I2 = 0%; P = .05) and revascularization (HR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.94-1.63; I2 = 2%; P = .12) in the CKD group.

CONCLUSION

The presence of CKD in patients with DM significantly increases the risk of mortality and MI. However, CKD had no impact on revascularization rates.

General glycosylated hemoglobin goals potentially increase myocardial infarction severity in diabetes patients with comorbidities: Insights from a nationwide multicenter study

AIMS/INTRODUCTION

We aimed to investigate the relationship between glycemic status and coronary artery disease (CAD) extent and severity in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients, and further examine whether diabetes patients could benefit from glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) below the recommended level.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Consecutive STEMI patients admitted in 2015-2017 across 244 hospitals were included in the China STEMI Care Project-2. We carried out a cross-sectional study comprising 8,370 participants with a record of HbA1c testing after admission. CAD extent and severity were assessed by admission heart rate, Killip classification and the number of stenosed vessels based on the coronary angiogram.

RESULTS

Diabetes patients showed a greater risk for higher Killip class, admission tachycardia (admission heart rate ≥100 b.p.m.) and multivessel CAD (presence of left main and/or triple vessel disease). Likewise, HbA1c level was significantly associated with CAD extent and severity. While dividing diabetes patients according to general HbA1c targets (HbA1c ≤6.5, 6.5-7.0 and ≥7.0%), diabetes patients with HbA1c ≤6.5% showed a 1.30-fold higher risk for multivessel CAD (adjusted odds ratio 1.30, 95% confidence interval 1.05-1.62). In stratified analysis, the association was even stronger in patients with hypertension (adjusted odds ratio 1.41, 95% confidence interval 1.08-1.86) or hyperlipidemia (adjusted odds ratio 1.57, 95% confidence interval 1.17-2.12).

CONCLUSIONS

HbA1c level is independently correlated with CAD extent and severity in STEMI patients. HbA1c below generally recommended levels might still increase the risk of CAD progression, especially for diabetes patients with hypertension or hyperlipidemia.

Effect of renal insufficiency and diabetes mellitus on in-hospital mortality after acute coronary syndromes treated with primary PCI. Results from the ALKK PCI Registry

BACKGROUND

It is known that patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and diabetes mellitus (DM) are at higher risk for in-hospital adverse events. However, we hypothesized that the higher event rate is due to the patients' subgroup with renal failure (RF), a common sequel of DM.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We used data of the prospective ALKK-PCI registry including all consecutive percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) for ACS of 48 hospitals between 2008 and 2013. We divided 69,651 patients in four groups according to their history of DM and RF (GFR < 60 ml/min). All-cause, in-hospital mortality of the following four groups: noDM/noRF, DM/noRF, DM/RF, RF/noDM, was: 3.5%, 6.6%, 21.9%, and 14.1% for STEMI and 1.5%, 2.1%, 7.2%, and 5.4% for NSTE-ACS. In a multivariate analysis we looked for independent mortality-predictors. Odds ratios with confidence intervals for the following variables: DM without RF, DM with RF, RF without DM were: 1.62 (1.37-1.90), 3.02 (2.43-3.76), and 2.13 (1.80-2.52) for STEMI and 1.20 (0.99-1.45), 2.72 (2.18-3.88), and 2.08 (1.69-2.56) for NSTE-ACS. We also calculated mortality in four groups (60-90, 45-60, 45-30, <30 ml/min) according to the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Mortality rates were: 5.0%, 12.8%, 17.7%, and 31.5% for STEMI and 2.1%, 3.8%, 7.1%, and 12.0% for NSTE-ACS (p for trend <0.0001 for both).

CONCLUSIONS

In-hospital death after PCI in patients with ACS and DM is mainly observed in the subgroup with co-existing RF. In a multivariate analysis, DM without RF was a significant mortality-predictor in STEMI, but not in NSTE-ACS. RF, irrespective of co-existent DM, was a stronger predictor than DM alone for both ACS-types (OR > 3) and mortality increased with decreasing eGFR.

Sex differences in characteristics and outcome in acute coronary syndrome patients in the Netherlands

Background

Sex differences in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) have been reported, but little is known about the situation in the Netherlands.

Methods

This registry is a merge of available data on ACS patients in the electronic data capture systems of 11 centres with 24/7 interventional cardiology services. We included patients >18 years undergoing a cardiac catheterisation between 2010–2012. We evaluated sex differences in clinical and procedural characteristics and 1‑year mortality.

Results

A total of 29,265 ACS patients (8,720 women and 20,545 men) were registered. Women were on average 4.5 years older (68.5 vs 63.0 years, p < 0.001) and had a higher prevalence of hypertension (62.7 vs 49.8%, p < 0.001) and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (9.6 vs 6.8%, p < 0.001) than men. Women less often presented with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (43.7% vs 47.6%, p < 0.001) and appeared to have less extensive coronary artery disease than men. Women less often underwent coronary angiography by radial access (52.5 vs 55.9%, p < 0.001). One-year mortality was higher in women than in men (7.3% and 5.6%, p < 0.001). More specific, the relationship between sex and mortality was age-dependent and showed higher mortality in women ≤71 years, but lower mortality in older women compared with men (p-interaction <0.001).

Conclusion

We found differences in clinical and procedural characteristics and outcome between women and men admitted for ACS, which are in line with other Western countries. The limitations of our registry, based on existing local databases, can be overcome by the use of the prospective Netherlands Heart Registry that is currently in development.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s12471-019-1271-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Diabetic patients with acute coronary syndromes in contemporary European registries: characteristics and outcomes

Aims

Among patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS), those with diabetes mellitus (DM) are at particularly high risk of recurrent cardiovascular events and premature death. We aimed to provide a descriptive overview of unadjusted analyses of patient characteristics, ACS management, and outcomes up to 1 year after hospital admission for an ACS/index-ACS event, in patients with DM in contemporary registries in Europe.

Methods and results

A total of 10 registries provided data in a systematic manner on ACS patients with DM (total n =28 899), and without DM (total n= 97 505). In the DM population, the proportion of patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) ranged from 22.1% to 64.6% (other patients had non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI-ACS) or unstable angina). All-cause mortality in the registries ranged from 1.4% to 9.4% in-hospital; 2.8% to 7.9% at 30 days post-discharge; 5.1% to 10.7% at 180 days post-discharge; and 3.3% to 10.5% at 1 year post-discharge. Major bleeding events were reported in up to 3.8% of patients while in hospital (8 registries); up to 1.3% at 30 days (data from two registries only), and 2.0% at 1 year (one registry only). Registries differed substantially in terms of study setting, site, patient selection, definition and schedule of endpoints, and use of various P2Y12 inhibitors. In most, but not all, registries, event rates in DM patients were higher than in patients without DM. Pooled risk ratios comparing cohorts with DM vs. no DM were in-hospital significantly higher in DM for all-cause death (1.66; 95% CI 1.42-1.94), for cardiovascular death (2.33; 1.78 - 3.03), and for major bleeding (1.35; 1.21-1.52).

Conclusion

These registry data from real-life clinical practice confirm a high risk for recurrent events among DM patients with ACS, with great variation across the different registries.

Comparison of clinical outcomes after drug-eluting stent implantation in diabetic versus nondiabetic patients in China: A retrospective study

Diabetes mellitus (DM) has been proved to be a predictor of adverse outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Drug-eluting stents (DESs) could reduce the adverse events in DM patients. In this study, we aimed to analyze the clinical outcome after DES implantation in diabetic versus nondiabetic patients in China. Totally, 200 Chinese DM patients and 400 Chinese non-DM patients were enrolled in this retrospective study. Compared with non-DM patients, DM patients were more likely to have a higher incidence of cardiac death (3.5% vs. 1.0%, P = .048), stent thrombosis (2.5% vs. 0.5%, P = .044), target lesion revascularization (6.0% vs. 1.8%, P = .005), target vessel failure (15.5% vs. 8.0%, P < .001), target lesion failure (14.0% vs. 4.3%, P < .001), myocardial infarction (4.5% vs. 1.5%, P = .030), and major adverse cardiac events (12.5% vs. 5.0%, P = .001) at 2-year follow-up. However, the incidence of target vessel revascularization (7.5% vs. 5.5%, P = .340) was similar between DB and non-DB patients. Patients with DB (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.54, P = .001), older than 80 years (HR = 1.33, P = .027) with hypercholesterolemia (HR = 1.03, P < .001), serum creatinine >177 μmol/L (HR = 3.04, P = .011), a history of cerebral vascular accident (HR = 4.29, P = .010), or a history of myocardial infarction (HR = 31.4, P < .001) were more likely to experience adverse events. In China, DM could also be served as an independent predictor of adverse outcomes after DES implantation. These patients should be reexamined more frequently.

Incidence and Clinical Impact of Stroke Complicating Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Background—

Stroke is a rare but serious complication of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). So far, scant information is available about the incidence and outcome of patients developing stroke after PCI for stable angina or acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in daily clinical practice in Europe today.

Methods and Results—

Between 2005 and 2008, 46 888 patients undergoing PCI were enrolled into the PCI Registry of the Euro Heart Survey Programme (176 centers in 33 European countries) to document patient’s characteristics, PCI details, and hospital complications in different PCI indications. Stroke was observed in 0.4% of the procedures in the total population, in 0.3% of PCIs in elective patients, and in 0.6% in PCIs performed for ACS. The overall in-hospital mortality was 19.2% for patients who developed stroke (elective PCIs, 10.0%; PCI for ACS, 23.2%) compared with 1.3% for those without stroke (elective PCIs, 0.2%; PCI for ACS, 2.3%). In multivariate analysis hemodynamic instability, age ≥75 years, history of stroke, and congestive heart failure were found to be independent predictors for periprocedural stroke in ACS, whereas only PCI of a bypass graft and renal failure could be identified as independent predictors for stroke in elective patients.

Conclusions—

Stroke as complication of PCI occurs rarely (0.4%) in clinical practice in Europe today. However, peri-interventional stroke is still associated with an exceedingly high in-hospital mortality rate. Most predictors for periprocedural stroke are not modifiable and cannot be diminished before PCI. Therefore, treatment of patients with stroke after PCI needs further research.

Clinical outcome of patients with and without diabetes mellitus after percutaneous coronary intervention with the resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent: 2-year results from the prospectively pooled analysis of the international global RESOLUTE program

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to describe the process to obtain Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for the expanded indication for treatment with the Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (R-ZES) (Medtronic, Inc., Santa Rosa, California) in patients with coronary artery disease and diabetes.

BACKGROUND

The R-ZES is the first drug-eluting stent specifically indicated in the United States for percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with diabetes.

METHODS

We pooled patient-level data for 5,130 patients from the RESOLUTE Global Clinical Program. A performance goal prospectively determined in conjunction with the FDA was established as a rate of target vessel failure at 12 months of 14.5%. In addition to the FDA pre-specified cohort of less complex patients with diabetes (n = 878), we evaluated outcomes of the R-ZES in all 1,535 patients with diabetes compared with all 3,595 patients without diabetes at 2 years.

RESULTS

The 12-month rate of target vessel failure in the pre-specified diabetic cohort was 7.8% (upper 95% confidence interval: 9.51%), significantly lower than the performance goal of 14.5% (p < 0.001). After 2 years, the cumulative incidence of target lesion failure in patients with noninsulin-treated diabetes was comparable to that of patients without diabetes (8.0% vs. 7.1%). The higher risk insulin-treated population demonstrated a significantly higher target lesion failure rate (13.7%). In the whole population, including complex patients, rates of stent thrombosis were not significantly different between patients with and without diabetes (1.2% vs. 0.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

The R-ZES is safe and effective in patients with diabetes. Long-term clinical data of patients with noninsulin-treated diabetes are equivalent to patients without diabetes. Patients with insulin-treated diabetes remain a higher risk subset. (The Medtronic RESOLUTE Clinical Trial; NCT00248079; Randomized, Two-arm, Non-inferiority Study Comparing Endeavor-Resolute Stent With Abbot Xience-V Stent [RESOLUTE-AC]; NCT00617084; The Medtronic RESOLUTE US Clinical Trial (R-US); NCT00726453; RESOLUTE International Registry: Evaluation of the Resolute Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent System in a 'Real-World' Patient Population [R-Int]; NCT00752128; RESOLUTE Japan-The Clinical Evaluation of the MDT-4107 Drug-Eluting Coronary Stent [RJ]; NCT00927940).

How to best manage glycemia and non-glycemia during the time of acute myocardial infarction

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is common in patients with diabetes. Reasons for this are multifactorial, but all relate to a variety of maladaptive responses to acute hyperglycemia. Persistent hyperglycemia is associated with worse left ventricular function and higher mortality during AMI, but intervention data are far from clear. Although there is a theoretical basis for the use of glucose-insulin-potassium infusion during AMI, lack of outcome efficacy (and inability to reach glycemic targets) in recent randomized trials has resulted in little enthusiasm for this strategy. Based on the increasing understanding of the dangers of hypoglycemia, while at the same time appreciating the role of hyperglycemia in AMI patients, goal glucose levels of 140-180 mg/dL using an intravenous insulin infusion while not eating seem reasonable for most patients and hospital systems. Non-glycemic therapy for patients with diabetes and AMI has benefited from more conclusive data, as this population has greater morbidity and mortality than those without diabetes. For ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), reperfusion therapy with primary percutaneous coronary intervention or fibrinolysis, antithrombotic therapy to prevent acute stent thrombosis following percutaneous coronary intervention or rethrombosis following thrombolysis, and initiation of β-blocker therapy are the current standard of care. Emergency coronary artery bypass graft surgery is reserved for the most critically ill. For those with non-STEMI, initial reperfusion therapy or fibrinolysis is not routinely indicated. Overall, there have been dramatic advances for the treatment of people with AMI and diabetes. The use of continuous glucose monitoring in this population may allow better ability to safely reach glycemic targets, which it is hoped will improve glycemic control.