Percutaneous recanalization of totally occluded pulmonary veins after pulmonary vein isolation-intermediate-term follow-up

Pulmonary vein stenosis: future optimism

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Pulmonary vein stenosis (PVS) is a rare disease with high morbidity and mortality. Prevention of restenosis remains challenging. This review will highlight recent advances in therapy that are beginning to show a survival benefit.

RECENT FINDINGS

Intervention for multivessel pediatric PVS may be surgical or transcatheter, both with high restenosis rates. At a threshold upstream diameter of 7 mm, the risk of restenosis decreases. Close vigilance and frequent reinterventions, typically transcatheter, are now accepted practice to maintain vein patency and achieve upstream growth. Suppressive agents targeting the exuberant myofibroblastic proliferation characteristic of PVS, specifically sirolimus, delivered locally on the surface of balloons and stents, and as adjunct systemic therapy, have been shown to increase survival and decrease reinterventions. Newer surgical techniques focused on shortening and straightening the vein to optimize flow dynamics, coupled with hybrid intraoperative stent placement in selected cases, also show a survival benefit.Adult-onset PVS, most commonly a complication of pulmonary vein isolation, now occurs rarely, and generally responds to transcatheter intervention. Further advances in ablation techniques aim to eliminate this complication.

SUMMARY

An aggressive approach of frequent reinterventions is a necessary strategy rather than treatment failure. More granular understanding of the mechanisms underlying PVS leading to novel muti-pronged anatomic and suppressive therapy are yielding improved survival.Multispecialty PVS teams at the institutional level and multiinstitutional collaboration, now possible via the PVS registry, are crucial to optimal care and future progress.

Serious iatrogenic complications: pulmonary vein stenosis after ablation of atrial fibrillation

Pulmonary vein stenosis (PVS) has been recognized as a clinical entity complicating radiofrequency or cryoenergy ablation for atrial fibrillation. Although reduced by technical and procedural advancements, this complication portends remarkable morbidity and presents insidiously with non-specific symptoms causing frequent misdiagnosis and wrong management that lead to detection delay and major adverse implications. Non-invasive imaging is key for timely diagnosis and transcatheter procedural planning. Most recent consensus on severe and symptomatic PVS management indicates that stenting is the preferred treatment because of superior long-term patency compared to balloon angioplasty, particularly in patients with larger reference vessel diameter. However, the rate of recurrent stent restenosis is high and remains a great challenge. Goal of our manuscript is to provide a comprehensive review regarding pathophysiology, detection, treatment, and prevention of this serious iatrogenic complication.

Comparing Patency of Pulmonary Stent Implantation and Balloon Angioplasty in Pulmonary Vein Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Pulmonary vein stenosis (PVS) is an insidious diagnosis associated with morbidity and mortality. Pharmacologic therapy may suffice initially, but advanced stages demand mechanical intervention. Pulmonary stent implantation (PSI) and pulmonary balloon angioplasty (PBA) are common strategies, both carrying restenosis risks. This meta-analysis compares PSI and PBA to determine the superior revascularization strategy. We systematically searched databases until November 2023, identifying 11 studies with 780 patients. Studies, including those involving patients undergoing balloon angioplasty (BA) or stent angioplasty (SA) for PVS, were selected. Case reports, editorials, and cross-sectional studies were omitted. Primary outcomes included restenosis requiring reintervention, 5-year freedom from restenosis, and procedure-related complications. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model. Meta-regression analysis assessed factors like age and stent size. Study quality was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. This Systematic review and meta-analysis incorporated 11 observational studies. PSI exhibited a lower risk of restenosis requiring reintervention (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.13, 0.87, p = 0.02) and significantly higher 5-year freedom from restenosis (OR 4.42, 95% CI 1.11, 17.62, p = 0.04) compared to PBA, with no significant difference in procedure-related complications. Meta-regression analysis showed age and stent size insignificantly affecting restenosis risk. Our review supports PSI as the preferred revascularization strategy for PVS due to superior patency benefits, emphasizing its role as the initial treatment choice. Further research is warranted for validation, considering individual patient factors in treatment selection.

Prognosis and Management of Recurrent Stenosis After Pulmonary Vein Stenting: A Prospective Study

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary vein stenting is effective for severe pulmonary vein stenosis, which is limited by restenosis. The assessment and management of in-stent restenosis (ISR) are inadequate, and follow-up outcomes after reintervention remain unknown.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to assess the prognosis and management of pulmonary vein ISR and determine whether the modified stent-in-stent strategy is superior to balloon angioplasty (BA) in treating ISR.

METHODS

The authors conducted a prospective observational study on patients with severe pulmonary vein stenosis post radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation.

RESULTS

A total of 107 patients with 174 severely stenosed veins underwent successful stenting. Forty-three veins among 36 patients experienced ISR (24.7%, 43 of 174). Veins developing ISR had smaller diameter stents (7.8 ± 0.8 mm vs 9.2 ± 0.7 mm; P = 0.008). Restenosis veins were assigned to BA group or stent-in-stent group. Success rate was 95.7% for BA and 90.0% for stent-in-stent. Twelve veins experienced recurrent ISR, including 2 in stent-in-stent group (11.1%, 2 of 18) and 10 in BA group (45.5%, 10 of 22). The risk of recurrent stenosis was significantly lower in veins treated with the stent-in-stent method than with BA (HR: 0.21; 95% CI: 0.07-0.64; P = 0.02). Patients in the stent-in-stent group had greater exercise endurance and better World Health Organization cardiac functional class compared with BA group (F = 7.2; P < 0.05; and F = 4.4; P < 0.05, respectively) at 6- and 12-month follow-ups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our modified stent-in-stent implantation approach is superior to BA for treating pulmonary vein ISR, by reducing recurrent restenosis rate and improving exercise endurance.

Comprehensive review of pulmonary vein stenosis post-atrial fibrillation ablation: diagnosis, management, and prognosis

Pulmonary vein stenosis (PVS) can occasionally occur in the follow-up after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for atrial fibrillation (AF). During PVI, ablation is performed at the PV ostium or distal part, leading to tissue damage. This damage can result in fibrosis of the necrotic myocardium, proliferation, and thickening of the vascular intima, as well as thrombus formation, further advancing PVS. Mild-to-moderate PVS often remains asymptomatic, but severe PVS can cause symptoms, such as dyspnea, cough, fatigue, decreased exercise tolerance, chest pain, and hemoptysis. These symptoms are due to pulmonary hypertension and pulmonary infarction. Imaging evaluations such as contrast-enhanced computed tomography are essential for diagnosing PVS. Early suspicion and detection are necessary, as underdiagnosis can lead to inappropriate treatment, disease progression, and poor outcomes. The long-term prognosis of PVS remains unclear, particularly regarding the impact of mild-to-moderate PVS over time. PVS treatment focuses on symptom management, with no established definitive solutions. For severe PVS, transcatheter PV angioplasty is performed, though the risk of restenosis remains high. Restenosis and reintervention rates have improved with stent implantation compared with balloon angioplasty. The role of subsequent antiplatelet therapy remains uncertain. Dedicated evaluation is essential for accurate diagnosis and appropriate management to avoid significant long-term impacts on patient outcomes.

Efficacy of Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty in Pulmonary Vein Stenosis or Total Occlusion

BACKGROUND

Current therapies for pulmonary vein stenosis (PVS) or pulmonary vein total occlusion (PVTO) involving angioplasty and stenting are hindered by high rates of restenosis.

OBJECTIVES

This study compares a novel approach of drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty and stenting with the current standard of care in PVS or PVTO due to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI).

METHODS

A retrospective single-center study analyzed patients with PVS or PVTO due to PVI who underwent either angioplasty and stenting (NoDCB group; December 2012-December 2016) or DCB angioplasty and stenting (DCB group; January 2018-January 2021). Multivariable Andersen-Gill regression analysis assessed the risk of restenosis and target lesion revascularization (TLR).

RESULTS

The NoDCB group comprised 58 patients and 89 veins, with a longer median follow-up of 35 months, whereas the DCB group included 26 patients and 33 veins, with a median follow-up of 11 months. The DCB group exhibited more PVTO (NoDCB: 12.3%; DCB: 42.4%; P = 0.0001), with a smaller reference vessel size (NoDCB: 10.2 mm; DCB: 8.4 mm; P = 0.0004). Follow-up computed tomography was performed in 82% of NoDCB and 85% of DCB, revealing lower unadjusted rates of restenosis (NoDCB: 26%; DCB: 14.3%) and TLR (NoDCB: 34.2%; DCB: 10.7%) in the DCB group. DCB use was associated with a significantly lower risk of restenosis and TLR (HR: 0.003: CI: 0.00009-0.118; P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

The novel approach of DCB angioplasty followed by stenting is effective and safe and significantly reduces the risk of restenosis and reintervention compared with the standard of care in PVS or PVTO due to PVI.

Pulmonary Vein Intervention for Severe Pulmonary Vein Stenosis After Atrial Fibrillation Ablation - A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary vein (PV) stenosis (PVS) is a serious complication of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. The objective of this study was to describe interventional treatments for PVS after AF ablation and long-term outcomes in Japanese patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This multicenter retrospective observational study enrolled 30 patients (26 [87%] male; median age 55 years) with 56 severe PVS lesions from 43 PV interventional procedures. Twenty-seven (90%) patients had symptomatic PVS and 19 (63%) had a history of a single AF ablation. Of the 56 lesions, 41 (73%) were de novo lesions and 15 (27%) were retreated. Thirty-three (59%) lesions were treated with bare metal stents, 14 (25%) were treated with plain balloons, and 9 (16%) were treated with drug-coated balloons. All lesions were successfully treated without any systemic embolic event. Over a median follow-up of 584 days (interquartile range 265-1,165 days), restenosis rates at 1 and 2 years were 35% and 47%, respectively. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed devices <7 mm in diameter (hazard ratio [HR] 2.52; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-6.0; P=0.040) and totally occluded lesions (HR 3.33; 95% CI 1.21-9.15; P=0.020) were independent risk factors for restenosis.

CONCLUSIONS

All PVS lesions were successfully enlarged by the PV intervention; however, restenosis developed in approximately half the lesions within 2 years.

Radiologic review of acquired pulmonary vein stenosis in adults

Acquired pulmonary vein stenosis (PVS) is an uncommon occurrence in adults, but one that carries significant morbidity/mortality. PVS can be secondary to neoplastic infiltration/extrinsic compression, non-neoplastic infiltration/extrinsic compression, or iatrogenic intervention. This article: (I) reviews the common causes of acquired PVS; (II) illustrates direct and indirect cross-sectional imaging findings in acquired PVS (in order to avoid misinterpretation of these imaging findings); and (III) details the role of imaging before and after the treatment of acquired PVS.