Intracardiac versus transesophageal echocardiography for left atrial appendage occlusion with watchman

Clinical Protocol for Selecting Intracardiac or Transesophageal Echocardiography-Guided Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion

Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) has emerged as an alternative to transesophageal echo (TEE) to guide left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO). We established a protocol to select patients appropriate for ICE guidance. Patients who underwent LAAO with the Watchman or Watchman FLX device (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Massachusetts) from January 2018 to March 2022 at a large United States center were included. The novel protocol prospectively selected TEE or ICE guidance beginning in January 2020; previous LAAO procedures were retrospectively included. ICE was selected for patients with uninterrupted anticoagulation and appropriate LAA anatomy, renal function, and moderate sedation tolerance. In-hospital outcomes with successful implantation without conversion to TEE guidance, no peridevice leak, and no procedural complications were compared. Composite 1-year outcome included freedom from peridevice leak, device-related thrombus, stroke, and all-cause mortality. A total of 234 patients were included; the mean age was 76.1 ± 8.3 years old, and 42.3% were female. ICE guidance was used for 63 procedures; TEE guidance was used for 171 procedures. For the composite outcome, ICE-guided LAAO was superior to TEE-guided LAAO (risk difference 0.102, 96.8% vs 86.5%, 95% confidence interval 0.003 to 0.203, p = 0.029). In comparison to the TEE-guided group, ICE-guided procedures were shorter (89.1 ± 26.3 vs 99.8 ± 30.0 min, p = 0.0087) with less general anesthesia (26.6% vs 98.8%, p <0.0001). One-year composite adverse outcomes did not differ significantly (80.7% vs 88.9%, p = 0.17). In conclusion, the protocol to select appropriate patients for ICE versus TEE guidance for LAAO is safe and effective. Larger studies are indicated to validate this approach to improve outcomes, shorten procedures, and avoid general anesthesia.

Impact of intracardiac echocardiography versus transesophageal echocardiography guidance on left atrial appendage occlusion procedures: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) is increasingly used during left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) as an alternative to transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of ICE versus TEE guidance during LAAO on procedural characteristics and acute outcomes, as well the presence of peri-device leaks and residual septal defects during follow-up.

METHODS

All studies comparing ICE-guided versus TEE-guided LAAO were identified. The primary outcomes were procedural efficacy and occurrence of procedure-related complications. Secondary outcomes included lab efficiency (defined as a reduction in in-room time), procedural time, fluoroscopy time, and presence of peri-device leaks and residual interatrial septal defects (IASD) during follow-up.

RESULTS

Twelve studies (n = 5637) were included. There were no differences in procedural success (98.3% vs. 97.8%; OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.42-1.27, p = .27; I2  = 0%) or adverse events (4.5% vs. 4.4%; OR 0.81 95% CI 0.56-1.16, p = .25; I2  = 0%) between the ICE-guided and TEE-guided groups. ICE guidance reduced in in-room time (mean-weighted 28.6-min reduction in in-room time) without differences in procedural time or fluoroscopy time. There were no differences in peri-device leak (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.68-1.27, p = 0.64); however, an increased prevalence of residual IASD was observed with ICE-guided versus TEE-guided LAAO (46.3% vs. 34.2%; OR 2.23, 95% CI 1.05-4.75, p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

ICE guidance is associated with similar procedural efficacy and safety, but could result in improved lab efficiency (as established by a significant reduction in in-room time). No differences in the rate of periprocedural leaks were found. A higher prevalence of residual interatrial septal defects was observed with ICE guidance.

Intracardiac vs Transesophageal Echocardiography for Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion With Watchman FLX in the U.S

BACKGROUND

Intraprocedural imaging is critical for device delivery in transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO). Although pivotal trials of LAAO devices were conducted using transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) is an emerging imaging modality.

OBJECTIVES

This study compared outcomes after ICE- and TEE-guided Watchman FLX implantation in the SURPASS (SURveillance Post Approval AnalySiS Plan) nationwide LAAO registry.

METHODS

Baseline characteristics were compared using chi-square and t-tests. Outcomes were reported in unadjusted and adjusted comparisons via propensity weighting.

RESULTS

Between August 2020 and September 2021, LAAO was attempted in 39,759 patients at 698 sites, including 2,272 cases (5.7%) with ICE and 31,835 (80.0%) with TEE. ICE and TEE patients had similar baseline characteristics and mean procedural times (ICE 82 minutes vs TEE 78 minutes). ICE patients were less likely to receive general anesthesia (54% vs 98%, P < 0.01). Successful device implantation (98.3% vs 97.6%) and complete seal rates at 45 days were similar (n = 25,280; 83% vs 82%). Most adverse event rates were similar; unadjusted mortality rates at 45 days were 1.1% for ICE vs 0.8% for TEE (P = 0.14), and 1.0% vs 0.7% (P = 0.27) in adjusted analyses. Even after adjustment, pericardial effusion rates requiring intervention were significantly higher with ICE at 45 days (1.0% vs 0.5%; P = 0.02). This rate decreased as operators performed more ICE-guided procedures, although 82% of operators had performed <10 ICE-guided procedures overall.

CONCLUSIONS

In the largest comparison to date, ICE use was infrequent. ICE and TEE both achieved high rates of complete LAAO. ICE was associated with significantly higher rates of pericardial effusion requiring intervention.

Left atrial appendage occlusion guided by intracardiac echocardiography in a patient with a 34 mm atrial septal defect occluder: a case report

Background

Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE)-guided left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is increasingly common. Patients with previous atrial septal defect closure constitute a significant challenge for transseptal access.

Case summary

A 49-year-old man with persistent atrial fibrillation, hypertension, and reduced left ventricular function was considered for LAAO after a life-threatening intrathoracic bleeding while on oral anticoagulation. Percutaneous atrial septal defect closure was performed 15 years before with a 34 mm Amplatzer Septal Occluder. Preprocedural cardiac computed tomography demonstrated the atrial septal occluder device with a small native interatrial septum at the inferior margin. The left atrial appendage landing zone measured 17 × 22 mm. The LAAO was performed under local analgesia. A steerable sheath was used to guide the transseptal puncture, and the ICE probe was traced along a guidewire across the atrial septum. A 12-F Amulet delivery sheath was advanced through the same transseptal hole. Under ICE and fluoroscopy guidance, a 25 mm Amplatzer Amulet was deployed. Follow-up imaging showed a well-positioned device with a small peridevice leak at the disc.

Discussion

This case report illustrates the feasibility of LAAO performed with ICE guidance from the left atrium in a patient with a large Amplatzer Septal Occluder with a small native interatrial septum. It demonstrates that prior atrial septal defect closure should not be considered as a contraindication for LAAO but warrants careful preprocedural planning.

Intracardiac echocardiography is a promising strategy for guiding closure of the left atrial appendage

Background and Aims

Percutaneous transcatheter left atrial appendage (LAA) closure (LAAC) is an effective approach for preventing ischemic stroke in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients. Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE), a new imaging modality, is a promising strategy for guiding LAAC. This review highlights the various strategies for ICE-guided-LAAC as an option for clinical policy.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search was conducted of PubMed, ScienceDirect, Ovid Web of Science, SpringerLink, and other notable databases to identify recent peer-reviewed clinical trials, reviews, and research articles related to ICE and its application in the guidance of LAAC.

Results

Various methods are used to evaluate the spatial structure and dimensions of the LAA. The main techniques for guiding LAAC are transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), cardiac computed tomography (CTA), and ICE. Among these techniques, the advantages of ICE typically include (1) multiangle and real-time assessment of intracardiac structure, (2) a reduction in procedural fluoroscopy, (3) reduced operation time and improved workflow in the catheterization laboratory, and (4) the avoidance of general anesthesia and the early detection of complications.

Conclusion

ICE is a promising strategy for the guidance of LAAC. Among the most advanced and recent technological innovations in cardiovascular imaging in general and volume imaging in particular, ICE offers greater efficacy and safety.

Comparison of intracardiac vs. transesophageal echocardiography for "one-stop" procedures of combined radiofrequency catheter ablation and left atrial appendage closure with the Watchman device in the treatment of atrial fibrillation

Background and objective

This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of "one-stop" procedures that combined radiofrequency catheter ablation and left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) with the Watchman device under the guidance of intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) vs. transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Methods and results

In this study, we prospectively enrolled patients who underwent "one-stop" procedures under the guidance of ICE (n = 193, 109 men, 65.02 ± 8.47 years) or TEE (n = 109, 69 men, 64.23 ± 7.75 years) between January 2021 and October 2022. Intraprocedural thrombus formation in the left atrial appendage (LAA) was observed in 3 (1.46%) patients in the ICE group and 15 (11.63%) patients in the TEE group (P < 0.05) before LAAC. Total fluoroscopy time and dose in the ICE group were less than those in the TEE group. The total "one-stop" turnaround time and LAAC procedure time in the ICE group were significantly shorter than those in the TEE group (P < 0.05). Postoperative esophagus discomfort, nausea and vomiting, and hypotension were more often seen in the TEE group (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in matched cases between ICE and fluoroscopy measurements (P = 0.082). The TEE results related to LAAC and clinical events were similar between the two groups during the follow-up (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

The ICE-guided "one-stop" procedure was safe and feasible with less radiation exposure, shorter turnaround time, and fewer complications and intraoperative thrombus formations than the TEE group. ICE offered accurate measurements in the LAA dimension during LAAC. Echocardiography during the "one-stop" procedures was necessary to rule out the intraoperative thrombus.

The Emerging Role of Intracardiac Echocardiography (ICE) in Left Atrial Appendage Closure (LAAC)

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) has emerged as a powerful imaging tool to guide percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC). Herein, we review an imaging protocol for ICE-guided LAAC and discuss the evidence for its use.

RECENT FINDINGS

Standardized imaging protocols have been proposed but have not been fully validated. ICE imaging yields similar procedural and clinical outcomes when compared to transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) to guide LAAC. Despite benefits of avoiding general anesthesia, TEE, and multiple physicians for LAAC procedures, ICE imaging remains under-utilized. Novel ICE catheters with 3D imaging capabilities may improve accuracy and efficiency of LAAC device implantation. ICE guidance is feasible, safe, and effective for LAAC. As the field evolves, further studies will be necessary to assess this technological advancement in imaging guidance.

Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Under Miniaturized Transesophageal Echocardiographic Guidance and Conscious Sedation: Multicenter European Experience

BACKGROUND

Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) procedures are widely guided by standard transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) probes, requiring general anesthesia in most patients. The use of miniaturized TEE probes allows for LAAO guidance under local anesthesia and offers an attractive imaging alternative to standard TEE probes.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of miniaturized TEE probes for procedural guidance of LAAO.

METHODS

Multicenter retrospective observational study of LAAO procedures performed under miniaturized TEE guidance and conscious sedation. The primary efficacy endpoint was technical success. The secondary efficacy endpoint was procedural success (technical success without major periprocedural complications). The safety outcome was a composite of major periprocedural complications.

RESULTS

A total of 546 consecutive LAAO procedures were performed in 5 European centers. Technical success was achieved in 534 (98.0%) patients. Sixteen major periprocedural complications occurred in 15 (2.9%) patients, yielding a procedural success rate of 97.0%. Conversion to general anesthesia was required in 4 (0.7%) patients. Short-term imaging follow-up was available in 422 patients with an incidence of major (>5 mm) TEE-detected residual leaks of 0.7%, complete LAA occlusion of 82.2% on cardiac computed tomography, and device-related thrombus of 5%. As compared with procedural 2-dimensional imaging for device sizing, preprocedural assessment by 3-dimensional imaging resulted in improved technical success (100% vs 95.0%; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

LAAO under conscious sedation and miniaturized TEE guidance is safe and feasible with a high rate of technical success and a low rate of periprocedural complications.

Comparison of in-hospital outcomes and complications of left atrial appendage closure with the Watchman device between males and females

AIMS

Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) with WATCHMAN device is being used for patients with atrial fibrillation (AFB) and, as an off-label use, atrial flutter (AFL) who can't comply with long-term anticoagulation. We aim to study the differences in outcomes between sexes in patients undergoing Watchman device implantation.

METHODOLOGY

The National Inpatient Sample was queried between 2016 and 2019 using ICD-10 clinical modification codes I48x for AFB and AFL. Patients who underwent LAAO were identified using the procedural code 02L73DK. Comorbidities and complications were identified using ICD procedure and diagnosis codes. Differences in primary outcomes were analyzed using multivariable regression and propensity score matching.

RESULTS

38 105 admissions were identified, of which 16 795 (44%) were females (76 ± 7.6 years) and 21 310 (56%) were males (75 ± 8 years). Females were more likely to have cardiac (frequencies: 5.8% vs 3.75%, aOR: 1.5 [1.35-1.68], p1 day inpatient (1.79 [1.67-1.93], P < 0.01) and be discharged to a facility (1.54 [1.33-1.80], P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Females are more likely to develop cardiac, renal, bleeding, pulmonary and TEE-related complications following LAAO procedure, while concurrently showing higher mortality, length of stay and discharge to facilities.

The Case for Intracardiac Echo to Guide Left Atrial Appendage Closure

Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) has become a commonly used alternative to anticoagulation for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. There is a growing interest in adopting a minimally invasive procedural approach using intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) and moderate sedation. In this article, we review the rational for and the data supporting ICE-guided LAAC and discuss the pros and cons of this approach.

A comparable efficacy and safety between intracardiac echocardiography and transesophageal echocardiography for percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion

Background

Accumulated clinical studies utilized intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) to guide percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO). However, its procedural success and safety compared to traditional transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) remained elusive. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to compare efficacy and safety of ICE and TEE for LAAO.

Methods

We screened studies from four online databases (including the Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science) from their inception to 1 December 2022. We used a random or fixed-effect model to synthesize the clinical outcomes and conducted a subgroup analysis to identify the potential confounding factors.

Results

A total of twenty eligible studies with 3,610 atrial fibrillation (AF) patients (1,564 patients for ICE and 2,046 patients for TEE) were enrolled. Compared with TEE group, there was no significant difference in procedural success rate [risk ratio (RR) = 1.01; P = 0.171], total procedural time [weighted mean difference (WMD) = -5.58; P = 0.292], contrast volume (WMD = -2.61; P = 0.595), fluoroscopic time (WMD = -0.34; P = 0.705; I² = 82.80%), procedural complications (RR = 0.82; P = 0.261), and long-term adverse events (RR = 0.86; P = 0.329) in the ICE group. Subgroup analysis revealed that ICE group might be associated with the reduction of contrast use and fluoroscopic time in the hypertension proportion <90 subgroup, with lower total procedure time, contrast volume, and the fluoroscopic time in device type subgroup with multi-seal mechanism, and with the lower contrast use in paroxysmal AF (PAF) proportion ≤50 subgroup. Whereas, ICE group might increase the total procedure time in PAF proportion >50 subgroup and contrast use in multi-center subgroup, respectively.

Conclusion

Our study suggests that ICE may have comparable efficacy and safety compared to TEE for LAAO.

Intracardiac Echocardiography to Guide Watchman FLX Implantation: The ICE LAA Study

BACKGROUND

Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) is increasingly used to guide left atrial appendage closure (LAAC).

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of ICE-guided LAAC with the Watchman FLX device.

METHODS

The ICE LAA (I Can See Left Atrial Appendage) study was a prospective, multicenter study with independent adjudication of echocardiographic data by a core laboratory and clinical events by a clinical events committee. Patients with atrial fibrillation with CHA₂DS₂-VASc scores ≥2 and clinical indications for LAAC were eligible. Preplanning with either cardiac computed tomography or transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) within 7 days prior to LAAC was mandatory. Intraprocedural ICE was carried out from the left atrium. The primary outcome was the rate of significant peri-device leaks (>5 mm) at 45-day TEE.

RESULTS

A total of 100 patients were enrolled. The mean age was 76 ± 8 years, the mean CHA₂DS₂-VASc score was 4.0 ± 1.5, and the mean HAS-BLED score was 2.5 ± 0.9. The incidence of the primary outcome of significant peridevice leak (>5 mm) was 0%; all patients evaluated by TEE at 45 days had effective LAAC. All patients received Watchman FLX devices, and technical success was 100%. The number of devices per case was 1.0 ± 0.1. ICE successfully guided the assessment of device release criteria, including device compression (19.2% ± 7.1%; recommended range: 10%-30%). No subject required conversion to TEE. Procedural complications were 4 access-site bleeds. There was no stroke, transient ischemic attack, systemic embolization, pericardial effusion, device embolization, or device-related thrombus during the procedure or 45-day follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

ICE can be used to successfully guide LAAC with the Watchman FLX, with excellent procedural success, a high rate of effective LAAC, and minimal periprocedural complications. (I Can See Left Atrial Appendage [ICELAA] Clinical Study; NCT04196335).

Can intracardiac echocardiography completely replace transesophageal echocardiography to guide left atrial appendage closure?-The comparisons of intracardiac echocardiography with transesophageal echocardiography

Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is an effective means of preventing ischemic stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is the primary imaging technique to guide LAAC. Its shortcomings, namely the use of general anesthesia and tracheal intubation, inevitably increase procedural risks. Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE), a novel imaging modality for guiding LAAC, has proven more advantageous over TEE due to use of local anesthesia, shortened procedural time, and reduced radiation exposure. This review highlights the differences between ICE and TEE guided LAAC, aiming to provide a reference for clinical decision-making.

Rehearsal simulation to determine the size of device for left atrial appendage occlusion using patient-specific 3D-printed phantoms

Left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion (LAAO) is used to close the finger-like extension from the left atrium with occlusion devices to block the source of thrombosis. However, selection of the devices size is not easy due to various anatomical changes. The purpose of this study is patient-specific, computed tomography angiography (CTA)-based, three-dimensionally (3D) printed LAAO phantoms were applied pre-procedure to determine the size. Ten patients were enrolled prospectively in March 2019 and December 2020. The cardiac structure appearing in CTA was first segmented, and the left atrium and related structures in the LAAO procedure were modeled. The phantoms were fabricated using two methods of fused deposition modeling (FDM) and stereolithography (SLA) 3D printers with thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) and flexible resin materials and evaluated by comparing their physical and material properties. The 3D-printed phantoms were directly used to confirm the shape of LAA, and to predict the device size for LAAO. In summary, the shore A hardness of TPU of FDM was about 80–85 shore A, and that of flexible resin of SLA was about 50–70 shore A. The measurement error between the STL model and 3D printing phantoms were 0.45 ± 0.37 mm (Bland–Altman, limits of agreement from − 1.8 to 1.6 mm). At the rehearsal, the estimations of device sizes were the exact same with those in the actual procedures of all 10 patients. In conclusion, simulation with a 3D-printed left atrium phantom could be used to predict the LAAO insertion device size accurately before the procedure.

The Case for Intracardiac Echo to Guide Left Atrial Appendage Closure

Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) has become a commonly used alternative to anticoagulation for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. There is a growing interest in adopting a minimally invasive procedural approach using intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) and moderate sedation. In this article, we review the rational for and the data supporting ICE-guided LAAC and discuss the pros and cons of this approach.

Intracardiac Echocardiography-Guided Left Atrial Appendage Closure With a Novel Foam-Based Conformable Device: Safety and 1-Year Outcomes

OBJECTIVES

This is a first report of the safety and 1-year outcomes of left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) using a novel foam-based conformable device, guided by intracardiac echocardiography (ICE).

BACKGROUND

Limitations of current transcatheter LAAC devices include the need for precise coaxial delivery into the left atrial appendage (LAA), potential for traumatic implantation, incomplete LAA seal, and device-related thrombus.

METHODS

The device (Conformal Left Atrial Appendage Seal, Conformal Medical Inc) is a self-expanding occluder consisting of a cylindrical nitinol endoskeleton with low-profile anchor barbs around the midpoint, covered with a porous foam cup. In a prospective single-center series, under conscious sedation, the device was delivered under fluoroscopic and ICE guidance. After positioning, a transesophageal echocardiography probe was placed to confirm ICE findings before device release. After closure, dual antiplatelet therapy was administered for 6 months. Follow-up imaging was planned for 45 days and 6 and 12 months.

RESULTS

A total of 15 patients (age 71.3 ± 10.8 years, 33% men, CHA₂DS₂-VASc 4.1 ± 1.7, HAS-BLED 3.4 ± 1.4) underwent LAAC, 100% successfully. There were no procedure/device-related complications requiring intervention. Asymptomatic pericardial effusion occurred in 2 patients. The 45-day, 6-month, and 12-month follow-up imaging in 11, 9, and 13 patients, respectively, revealed adequate LAA seal (leak ≤5 mm) in all patients; device-related thrombus was detected in 1 patient at 6 months. Over 1-year follow-up, there were no ischemic strokes and 1 minor bleed. Nonprocedure-/device-related death occurred in 2 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This first report indicates that LAAC with the conformable implant guided by ICE imaging is feasible with encouraging 1-year clinical outcomes. (The Conformal Prague Study; NCT04193826).

2019 Chinese expert consensus statement on left atrial appendage closure in patients with atrial fibrillation

The left atrial appendage closure (LAAC), the efficacy and safety of which has been proved by a number of randomized controlled trials and registries, is recommended by several guidelines to prevent stroke in high‐risk patients with non‐valvular atrial fibrillation. However, current guidelines only discuss the indications and contraindications of LAAC, as an emerging technology, there still lacks comprehensive recommendations involved with LAAC, including devices, image assessment modality, identification and treatment of complications, perioperative medication, and postoperative management. Therefore, the Chinese Society of Cardiology (CSC) of Chinese Medical Association (CMA) and the Editorial Board of Chinese Journal of Cardiology jointly issued the expert consensus statement on LAAC in the prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation after comprehensive discussion by experts with different backgrounds. This consensus provided three levels of recommendations to guide and standardize the clinical application of LAAC based on existing evidence and clinical practice experience, including appropriate (more potential benefits or fewer harms), uncertain (somehow reasonable but need more evidence), and inappropriate (unlikely to benefit, or have more complications).

Safety and efficacy of left atrial appendage occlusion with the ACP or Watchman device guided by intracardiac echocardiography from the left atrium

Background

There is a paucity of randomized data regarding the safety and efficacy of the use of intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) from the left atrium (LA) to guide left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) procedures under local anesthesia using either of the available devices.

Hypothesis

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of ICE from the LA with transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) for guidance during transcatheter LAAO procedures.

Methods

Single‐center, cohort study of patients undergoing LAAO with the Amplatzer Cardiac Plug or Watchman device. Procedures were guided by ICE from the LA with local anesthesia (n = 175) or TEE under general anesthesia (n = 49). Efficacy outcomes were procedural success and peri‐device leaks 6 weeks after LAAO. The safety outcome was a composite of procedure‐related complications.

Results

Procedural success was similar between groups: 100% in the TEE‐guided group, and 98% in the ICE‐guided group. Procedure‐related complications such as death, embolism, migration, or major vascular complications occurred similarly between groups (p = 0.590). The rate and degree of peri‐device leaks or presence of a thrombus on the device did not differ between groups on follow‐up CT. Turnover time in the catheter laboratory and use of contrast agent were reduced with ICE.

Conclusions

ICE in the left atrium to guide LAAO procedures appears to be as effective and safe as TEE. There was no increase in procedure‐related complications, whatever the device used. ICE resulted in similar procedural success while decreasing procedure time and requiring only local anesthesia.

Length of stay following percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion: Data from the prospective, multicenter Amplatzer Amulet Occluder Observational Study

Aims

To evaluate factors influencing the length of stay in patients undergoing percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO).

Methods and results

Patient characteristics, procedural data and the occurrence of serious adverse events were analyzed from the Amplatzer^TM Amulet^TM Occluder Observational Study. Patients were divided into three groups: same day (S, 0day, n = 60, 5.6%) early (E, 1day, n = 526, 48.9%), regular (R, 2-3days, n = 338, 31.4%) and late (L, ≥4days, n = 152, 14.1%) discharge and followed up for 60 days. Procedure and device related SAE during the in-hospital stay (S: 0.0% vs. E: 1.0% vs. R: 2.1% vs. L: 23%, p<0.0001) were a major trigger for a prolonged in-hospital stay. Of the 37 subjects in the late discharge group with an SAE prior to discharge, cardiac or bleeding complications were the most common underlying conditions, occurring in 26 subjects. Multinomial logistic analysis only identified HAS-BLED score as an independent influencing factor (p = 0.04) for a late discharge. After 60 days, mortality tended to be greatest in the late discharge group (S: 0.0% vs. E: 1.0% vs. R: 1.2% vs. L: 3.3%, p = 0.1066).

Conclusion

Over half of the subjects receiving an Amplatzer Amulet occluder were discharged within 1 day of the implant procedure. Serious adverse events were a major trigger for a late discharge after LAAO. Increased HAS-BLED score was associated with a prolonged in-hospital stay.

Feasibility and safety of left atrial appendage occlusion guided by procedural fluoroscopy only: A pilot study

BACKGROUND

Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is usually performed via the guidance of procedural transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) companied by general anesthesia (GA).

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the feasibility and safety of LAAO guided by procedural fluoroscopy only.

METHODS

The patients eligible for LAAO were enrolled into the current study and received implantation of either Watchman device or LAmbre device. The procedure was carried out with procedural fluoroscopy only and no companied GA; the position, shape, and leakage of the device were assessed by contrast angiography. TEE was performed after 3-month follow-up to evaluate the thrombosis, and leakage of device.

RESULTS

Ninety-seven patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) with either Watchman device (n = 49) or LAmbre device (n = 48) were consecutively enrolled. Watchman device group was of lower CHA₂ DS₂ -VASc and HAS-BLED scores compared with LAmbre device groups (p < .05); the two groups had similar distributions of other baseline characteristics (p > .05), including procedural success rate (98.0% vs. 97.9%), mean procedure time, mean fluoroscopy time, total radiation dose, contrast medium dose, percentage of peri-device leakage. Pericardial effusions requiring intervention occurred in two of the Watchman group. TEE follow-up found no patient with residual leakage ≥5 mm at 3 months and no device related thrombosis (DRT). During the 22.0 ± 11.1 months follow-up, two patients experienced ischemic stroke.

CONCLUSIONS

LAAO with the procedural imaging of fluoroscopy only exhibited the promising results of efficacy and safety. A prospective randomized multicenter study would be required to verify the observations in this study.

Role of Intracardiac Echography for Transcatheter Occlusion of Left Atrial Appendage

Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is an increasingly common procedure for patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and contraindications to long-term anticoagulation. Traditionally, LAAC has been performed under transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) guidance. Although most operators have become experienced and comfortable with TEE-guided appendage closure, there has been a growing interest in the use of intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) for LAAC. This article describes the rationale and technique for ICE-guided LAAC.

Intracardiac Echocardiography During Transvenous Lead Extraction

Transvenous lead extraction is an invaluable procedure within the contemporary management of cardiac implantable electronic devices. Transvenous lead extraction has traditionally been guided by fluoroscopy. Complementary imaging with intracardiac echocardiography can provide valuable additional information, such as identification of complications, lead-adherent echodensities, and sites of lead-tissue adherence. As such, it can be used to aid in risk stratification before lead removal, help to choose tools or techniques, and provide visual monitoring throughout the procedure. Intracardiac echocardiography can be incorporated into the lead extraction workflow of the contemporary electrophysiologist and provide valuable information supporting safety and efficacy.

Intracardiac echocardiography-guided implantation of the Watchman FLX left atrial appendage closure device

BACKGROUND

The next-generation Watchman FLX left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) device has: (1) an atraumatic closed distal end, (2) reduced height, (3) a recessed screw hub to decrease device-related thrombus (DRT), (4) two rows of J-shape anchors so redeployment is possible after full recapture, and (5) ability to treat a greater size range of LAA ostia.

OBJECTIVE

To report, for the first time, the feasibility and safety of intracardiac echocardiography (ICE)-guided Watchman FLX implantation.

METHODS

A single-center prospective registry of atrial fibrillation patients planned for LAAC with the FLX device underwent ICE-guided implantation with conscious sedation. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) imaging was done preprocedure (to assess LAA size and exclude thrombus) and at clinical follow-up at 6-12 weeks. Clinical outcomes were LAA closure success, complications, leak, or DRT on follow-up TEE and major safety events.

RESULTS

The study included 30 patients: age 75 ± 8 years, 53% men, CHA₂ DS₂ -VASc 4.6 ± 1.6, and HAS-BLED 3.4 ± 1.1. The primary indication was prior bleeding in 60% (72% GI bleeding). The LAA orifice width and length were 22.7 ± 3.1 and 25.7 ± 5.7 mm, respectively. Technical success was 100% (the first-choice device was used in 28 of 30). Procedure time was less than 30 min in 27 of 30 cases, with 36 ± 15 ml contrast used. The final device size was 29.2 ± 4.7 mm with 21.6 ± 4.5% compression. There were no procedure-related complications. Follow-up TEE at a median 47 days follow-up showed 100% device success with no DRT or peridevice leak ≥5 mm. Major safety events occurred in 6.6% (2/30).

CONCLUSION

The Watchman FLX device can be safely implanted with intraprocedural ICE imaging instead of TEE.

Left atrial appendage closure with the Watchman device using intracardiac vs transesophageal echocardiography: Procedural and cost considerations

BACKGROUND

Imaging guidance for left atrial appendage (LAA) closure (LAAC) conventionally consists of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and fluoroscopy under general anesthesia (GA). Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) can eliminate the need for GA, expedite procedural logistics, and reduce the patient experience to a simple venous puncture.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to define optimal ICE views and compare procedural parameters and cost of ICE vs TEE during LAAC with the Watchman device.

METHODS

Optimal ICE views of the LAA for Watchman implant were delineated using Carto-Sound and 3-dimensional rendition of the LAA in 6 patients. Procedural and financial parameters of 104 consecutive patients with standard indications for LAAC undergoing Watchman implant using ICE guidance through a single transseptal puncture (n = 53 [51%]) were compared with those of TEE-guided implants (n = 51 [49%]) in 3 centers.

RESULTS

Clinical characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. Total in-room, turnaround, and fluoroscopy times all were shorter using ICE (P <.05) under local anesthesia compared to the TEE group. Implant success was 100% in both groups without peri-device leaks or procedural complications. Follow-up TEE showed no significant peri-device leak in both groups. Total hospital charges for ICE with local anesthesia vs TEE were similar, as were total hospital direct and indirect costs. Professional fees were significantly lower with ICE and local anesthesia than with TEE because the charge of anesthesia staff was avoided.

CONCLUSION

ICE-guided Watchman implant is safe, feasible, and comparable in cost to TEE during LAAC with a Watchman device but avoids GA and expedites procedure turnaround.

Fusion Imaging of X-ray and Transesophageal Echocardiography Improves the Procedure of Left Atrial Appendage Closure

Background

Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is an alternative treatment strategy for patients with atrial fibrillation who are at risk for thromboembolic events and considered not suitable for oral anticoagulation (OAC). LAAC is mainly performed under the guidance of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and fluoroscopy. The study presented here should analyze whether fusion imaging (FI) of transesophageal echocardiography and X-ray performed during LAAC is feasible and can improve the results of the procedure.

Methods

The data presented here are from a retrospective single center study. Sample size was defined as 50 patients in which LAAC was performed without fusion imaging (control group) and 25 patients were the LAAC procedure was guided by fusion imaging (treatment group). Inclusion criteria were defined as age > 18 years and completion of an LAAC procedure defined as deployment of a WATCHMAN 2.5 LAA occluder. Study endpoints were procedure time, amount of used contrast medium, radiation dose, final position of the WATCHMAN in TEE (deviation from ideal positioning), and clinical endpoints, respectively.

Results

LAA closure was successfully performed in all patients. No case of device embolism was occurring, and none of the patients experienced a periprocedural stroke/TIA nor a systemic embolism, respectively. Mean procedure time was 15 min shorter in the group of patients where fusion imaging was applied (p < 0.001). Additionally, the use of fusion imaging was associated with a significant reduction of contrast medium (20.6 ml less than in control; p < 0.045). Regarding the final position of the WATCHMAN, no relevant differences were found between the groups.

Summary

The use of fusion imaging significantly reduced procedure time and the amount of contrast medium in patients undergoing LAAC.

Left atrial appendage closure with zero fluoroscopic exposure via intracardiac echocardiographic guidance

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is conventionally guided by fluoroscopy and transesophageal echocardiography. We introduce an LAAC technique without fluoroscopy exposure using intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) and electroanatomic mapping system (EAMS) under local anesthesia.

METHODS

Seven non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients who underwent LAAC with the LAmbre devices under the ICE and EAMS guidance were compared to 7 patients following the conventional approach by propensity score matching. ICE probe was advanced into the left atrium (LA) to guide sizing and device implantation following the orthogonal tri-axial technique (Axis-X: from left pulmonary veins [PVs] to LAA; Axis-Y: from right PV ostium to LAA; Axis-Z: from lower LA to LAA).

RESULTS

The mean diameters of ostia and landing zone were 21.4 ± 3.9 mm and 20.4 ± 4.2 mm, respectively. LAmbre devices with a mean umbrella diameter of 23.7 ± 4.2 mm and cover disc diameter of 29.4 ± 3.6 mm were successfully implanted and acute complete LAA sealing without peri-device leak (PDL) were achieved in all cases. Neither fluoroscopy exposure nor contrast consumption was recorded. No procedure related complications were documented. The mean procedural time and PDLs at follow-ups were comparable to those in the conventional group. No stroke or thromboembolic events were documented.

CONCLUSION

The fluoroscopy exposure could be minimized, even to zero, in the ICEguided LAAC procedures feasibly and safely using LAmbre devices. The orthogonal triaxial technique is considered efficacious and safe for the procedures.

'Minimalist approach' for transcatheter mitral valve replacement using intracardiac echocardiography and conscious sedation: a case series

Background

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation operators have adapted to a less invasive technique by foregoing the use of general anaesthesia and transoesophageal echocardiography. This is known as a ‘minimalist approach’. This approach has yet to be explored in transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR). Two patients with high perioperative risk underwent TMVR using only monitored conscious sedation (CS) and intracardiac echocardiography (ICE).

Case summary

The patients were symptomatic and required treatment of severe mitral regurgitation and severe mitral stenosis in a mitral valve ring and prosthetic mitral valve, respectively. With the use of an antegrade transseptal approach, the procedure was conducted under CS using ICE only. After placement of the prosthetic mitral valve, the valve was assessed by advancing the ICE catheter through the interatrial septal defect and no significant paravalvular leak occurred. In one case, ad hoc treatment of right to left shunting was successfully pursued. Valve function was excellent immediately and at 24 h after implantation and resulted in significant haemodynamic improvement.

Conclusion

With more TMVR cases being conducted, the ‘minimalist approach’ with CS and ICE may be considered in selected cases.

Left atrial appendage occlusion with the Amplatzer Amulet: update on device sizing

PURPOSE

The present paper analyzes the role of different imaging modalities for left atrial appendage (LAA) assessment and the recommended specific measurements to improve device selection with regard to the Amulet device.

BACKGROUND

Morphological LAA assessment is one of the pivotal factors to achieve proper LAA sealing and potentially reduce the risk of complications by minimizing manipulation inside the appendage.

METHODS

Eight experienced physicians in LAAO were asked to contribute in the preparation of a device sizing consensus manuscript after comprehensive assessment of previous published data on LAA imaging/measurement.

RESULTS

LAA morphology is often complex and requires more detailed spatial resolution and 3-dimensional assessments to reduce the risk of mis-sizing. Traditionally, upsizing of devices based upon the largest measured LAA diameters have been used. However, this may lead to oversizing in markedly elliptical appendages. Thus, when 3D imaging modalities are available, utilizing the LAA mean diameters might be a better alternative. Operators should also note the systematic biases in differences in measurements obtained with different imaging modalities, with CT giving the largest measurements, followed by 3D-TEE, and then 2D-TEE and angiography. In fact, for 2D imaging techniques (2D-TEE and angiography), LAA diameters tend to be underestimated, and therefore, LAA largest diameters seem to be still the best option for device sizing. Some specific anatomies such as proximal chicken-wing or conic LAAs may require different measurements and implantations to achieve implant success.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, LAA mean diameters might be a better alternative to largest diameters when 3D imaging modalities are available.

4D Volume Intracardiac Echocardiography for Intraprocedural Guidance of Transcatheter Left Atrial Appendage Closure

Background

Fluoroscopy and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) are used to guide transcatheter left atrial appendage (LAA) closure in patients with atrial fibrillation to prevent thromboembolic events. This study examines whether real-time three-dimensional volume ICE guidance (4D volume ICE) can be used as an alternative to TEE during LAA closure (LAAC).

Methods and Results

Fifteen patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), who had high risk for stroke and contraindication for long-term warfarin therapy, were enrolled in the study. The WATCHMAN device was used for transcatheter LAAC under fluoroscopy. LAA and device sizing was performed using TEE and volume ICE guidance from the right heart. Intraprocedural ICE measurements were consistent with TEE; LAA maximal width and depth, and maximal diameter of the implanted device were moderately correlated (Pearson's coefficient: 0.63, 0.65, and 0.71 respectively; p<0.05) with good agreement (bias: -0.03 cm, -0.07 cm, and 0.003 cm respectively). The average imaging success rate, defined by the number of patients with all the required intraprocedural measurements, was 67% for ICE and 100% for TEE. The WATCHMAN device was successfully implanted in all patients with a device to patient ratio of 1.33.

Conclusions

4D volume ICE can be used as an intraprocedural sizing and guidance tool for transcatheter LAAC with measurements comparable to TEE. Challenging patient characteristics significantly degrade the diagnostic image quality when imaging from the right heart. Standardized workflow with proper patient selection and optimal preprocedural planning may improve the diagnostic quality of volume ICE guidance for transcatheter LAAC procedure.

Use of Intracardiac Echocardiography in Interventional Cardiology: Working With the Anatomy Rather Than Fighting It

The indications for catheter-based structural and electrophysiological procedures have recently expanded to more complex scenarios, in which an accurate definition of the variable individual cardiac anatomy is key to obtain optimal results. Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) is a unique imaging modality able to provide high-resolution real-time visualization of cardiac structures, continuous monitoring of catheter location within the heart, and early recognition of procedural complications, such as pericardial effusion or thrombus formation. Additional benefits are excellent patient tolerance, reduction of fluoroscopy time, and lack of need for general anesthesia or a second operator. For these reasons, ICE has largely replaced transesophageal echocardiography as ideal imaging modality for guiding certain procedures, such as atrial septal defect closure and catheter ablation of cardiac arrhythmias, and has an emerging role in others, including mitral valvuloplasty, transcatheter aortic valve replacement, and left atrial appendage closure. In electrophysiology procedures, ICE allows integration of real-time images with electroanatomic maps; it has a role in assessment of arrhythmogenic substrate, and it is particularly useful for mapping structures that are not visualized by fluoroscopy, such as the interatrial or interventricular septum, papillary muscles, and intracavitary muscular ridges. Most recently, a three-dimensional (3D) volumetric ICE system has also been developed, with potential for greater anatomic information and a promising role in structural interventions. In this state-of-the-art review, we provide guidance on how to conduct a comprehensive ICE survey and summarize the main applications of ICE in a variety of structural and electrophysiology procedures.

Intracardiac vs transesophageal echocardiography for percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion: A meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is typically performed utilizing transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and fluoroscopy. Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) can be a suitable alternative to guide implantation. Given the limited data, we performed a meta-analysis of all studies that compared ICE vs TEE for percutaneous LAAC.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Google Scholar, and major scientific conference sessions for published abstracts and manuscripts until 1 August 2018. Studies reporting clinical outcomes comparing TEE vs ICE for endocardial LAAC in human subjects aged greater than or equal to 18 years were included. Two investigators independently extracted the data and individual quality assessment was performed. The analysis was performed using Cochrane Collaboration software, RevMan 5.3.

RESULTS

Five eligible studies consisting of 1157 patients (ICE-391 patients and TEE-766 patients) were included. Four studies were retrospective and one was prospective, nonrandomized. Two studies included Watchman, two included the Amplatzer Cardiac Plug/Amulet device, and one included both devices. There was no significant difference in CHA2DS2VASC or HAS-BLED scores between both groups. There was no significant difference in acute procedural success between ICE vs TEE (risk ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.99-1.04; P = 0.24). There was no significant difference in fluoroscopy time (mean difference [MD], 1.84 minutes; 95% CI, 0.59-4.27; P = 0.14) and total procedure time (MD, -5.06 minutes; 95% CI, -24.6-14.4; P = 0.61) between both groups. There was also no significant difference in complications including pericardial tamponade, device embolization, and stroke between both groups.

CONCLUSION

In our meta-analysis, ICE was as effective as TEE during percutaneous LAAC.

Anesthetic Management of Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Endocardial and Epicardial Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion

Atrial fibrillation is the most common cardiac arrhythmia in adults affecting almost 6 million adults in the United States. The 2 most common comorbidities associated with atrial fibrillation are heart failure and thromboembolic events. Heart failure symptoms may be treated with rate control, antiarrhythmic medications or by catheter ablation. Unfortunately, despite optimal medical management, thromboembolic events still occur. Recently, there has been a great deal of interest and innovation in finding an alternative to chronic anticoagulation. Several percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion devices have been developed over recent years, some of which have proven to be noninferior to anticoagulation in preventing strokes in atrial fibrillation patients. The 2 most widely used left atrial appendage occlusion devices are the WATCHMAN (Atritech Inc, Plymouth, MN, USA) and the LARIAT (SentreHEART, Palo Alto, CA, USA) devices. After a detailed description of the procedures, the anesthetic considerations of each procedure and management of specific adverse events are discussed within this review.

Intracardiac versus transesophageal echocardiography to guide transcatheter closure of interatrial communications: Nationwide trend and comparative analysis

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to assess current temporal trends in utilization of ICE versus TEE guided closure of interatrial communications, and to compare periprocedural complications and resource utilization between the two imaging modalities.

BACKGROUND

While transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has historically been used to guide percutaneous structural heart interventions, intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) is being increasingly utilized to guide many of these procedures such as closure of interatrial communications.

METHODS

Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, all patients aged >18 years, who underwent ASD or PFO closure with either ICE or TEE guidance between 2003 and 2014 were included. Comparative analysis of outcomes and resource utilization was performed using a propensity score-matching model.

RESULTS

ICE guidance for interatrial communication closure increased from 9.7% in 2003 to 50.6% in 2014. In the matched model, the primary endpoint of major adverse cardiovascular events occurred less frequently in the ICE group versus the TEE group (11.1% vs 14.3%, respectively, P = 0.008), mainly driven by less vascular complications in the ICE group (0.5% vs 1.3%, P = 0.045). Length of stay was shorter in the ICE group (3 ± 4 vs 4 ± 4 days, P < 0.0001). Cost was similar in the two groups 18 454 ± 17 035$ in the TEE group vs 18 278 ± 15 780$ in the ICE group (P = 0.75).

CONCLUSIONS

Intracardiac echocardiogram utilization to guide closure of interatrial communications has plateaued after a rapid rise throughout the 2000s. When utilized to guide interatrial communication closure procedure, ICE is as safe as TEE and does not increase cost or prolonged hospitalizations.