Rationale and design of a global registry to evaluate real-world clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation and high risk of stroke treated with left atrial appendage occlusion using the AMPLATZER amulet device-Perspective of available/ongoing

Left atrial appendage occlusion in atrial fibrillation: shaping the future of stroke prevention

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia, significantly increasing the risk of thromboembolic events, particularly ischemic stroke. The left atrial appendage (LAA) is the predominant site of thrombus formation in patients with AF, making it a crucial target for stroke prevention strategies. Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) has emerged as an important therapeutic alternative to oral anticoagulation, particularly in patients with contraindications to long-term anticoagulant therapy. This review examines the role of LAAO in AF management, discussing current indications, patient selection, procedural techniques, and clinical outcomes. We also explore the latest evidence from major clinical trials and real-world studies, highlighting the efficacy and safety of LAAO compared to standard anticoagulation. Additionally, we consider the unresolved questions and the potential future directions for this intervention, including emerging technologies and the integration of LAAO into broader AF management protocols. Our review underscores the growing importance of LAAO in reducing thromboembolic risk in AF patients, particularly those unable to tolerate traditional anticoagulation, and offers insights into the ongoing evolution of this treatment modality in clinical practice.

Clinical outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion in general anaesthesia or conscious sedation: data from the prospective global Amplatzer Amulet Occluder Observational Study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) using conscious sedation (CS).

BACKGROUND

Several percutaneous structural heart disease interventions are safely and efficiently performed using CS instead of general anaesthesia (GA). This concept has not been evaluated in a large multicenter cohort of patients undergoing LAAO.

METHODS

Patients from the prospective, global Amplatzer Amulet Occluder Observational Study were divided into two groups (GA vs CS). Baseline information, periprocedural and postprocedural efficacy and complications, as well as outcomes through 7 days post implant were compared.

RESULTS

Patients undergoing transesophageal-guided implants were categorised by GA (n=607, 64%) or CS (n=342, 36%) usage. Mean age was 75 years in both groups. LAAO technical success was achieved in 99% of both groups. The procedure duration (GA: 35±22 min vs CS: 27±19 min, p<0.001), total amount of contrast medium (GA: 105±81 mL vs CS: 86±66 mL, p<0.001) and fluoroscopic time (GA: 13±9 min vs CS: 12±13 min, p<0.001) were less in CS cases. Procedure-related or device-related serious adverse events during the first 7 days were numerically higher in the CS group (GA: 4.9% vs CS: 7.6%, p=0.114). Peridevice residual flow was absent or ≤5 mm 1-3 months after the procedure in 99.7% of the GA and in 100% of the CS group (p=1.000).

CONCLUSIONS

In a large global study, LAAO with the Amplatzer Amulet occluder is safe and feasible using CS. Procedure duration and total amount of contrast were less with CS than GA cases.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02447081; Results.

[Left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation : Present evidence, ongoing studies, open questions]

About every fifth ischemic stroke is caused by atrial fibrillation. Oral anticoagulation is highly effective in secondary stroke prevention, but a relevant portion of patients with atrial fibrillation is not (permanently) anticoagulated for a variety of reasons. Based on present evidence, no general recommendation can be given for left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. However, left atrial appendage occlusion is a treatment option after severe anticoagulation-related bleeding, if the cause of bleeding is not treatable. Left atrial appendage occlusion is critical in patients with a relative contraindication for oral anticoagulation or lack of adherence to given medication. It seems to be important that further randomized studies confirm a benefit of left atrial appendage occlusion in selected patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. In addition, it is vital to clarify whether discontinuation of antiplatelets is feasible after catheter-based left atrial appendage occlusion, as antiplatelets are associated with a risk of bleeding. Within this review article, we discuss present evidence, gaps of knowledge and provide an overview on ongoing clinical studies. In addition, we summarize the design of the CLOSURE-AF study. This randomized multicenter study will start recruitment soon and is funded by the German Center for Cardiovascular Research e. V.

Day-case percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion-Safety and efficacy

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the safety and efficacy of percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion performed as a day case procedure.

BACKGROUND

LAA occlusion has been shown to be safe and effective for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. It has not been shown if the procedure can safely be performed on a day-case basis.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis was made of 117 LAA occlusion procedures in a single large teaching hospital in the UK. Procedural success, procedural complications, length of stay, and readmission data were examined.

RESULTS

Successful deployment of a device was possible in all but one patient (whose appendage was too large). Major in-hospital complications occurred in 1.7% of patients (both femoral vascular). Same-day discharge was made in 66% of patients overall. Since January 2016, only 3 of 59 patients (5%) have remained in hospital overnight following LAAO. Echocardiography 2-4 hr postprocedure was undertaken prior to discharge. One patient was readmitted within 7 days but this readmission would not have been prevented by overnight stay.

CONCLUSIONS

LAA occlusion can be safely performed as a day case procedure with acceptable complication rates and no increment of complications related to the lack of routine overnight stay.