Chronic total occlusion in non-infarct-related artery is associated with increased short-and long-term mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (from the CREDO-Kyoto AMI registry)

Future Directions of Chronic Total Occlusion Management: Identifying the Right Patient for Intervention With a Focus on Biomarkers

The management of a chronic total occlusion (CTO) of a coronary artery has been a conundrum in interventional cardiology, as revascularization has not been proven to provide a mortality benefit. However, there are subgroups of patients with a CTO that have high levels of ischemia on myocardial perfusion imaging and high circulating levels of high sensitivity troponin-I (hsTn-I) and N terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT pro-BNP) that are at a particularly high-risk for adverse cardiovascular events. These high-risk subgroups of patients with a CTO may have not been well represented in prior clinical trials, and may gain a mortality benefit from revascularization of the CTO. Conversely, patients with low levels of ischemia and these biomarkers are at lower risk and may not gain a mortality benefit from revascularization of their CTO. It is important for future randomized controlled trials to investigate the efficacy of CTO PCI in patients with elevated biomarkers and high ischemic burden on myocardial perfusion imaging to determine if patients at high-risk gain a mortality benefit from revascularization.

Multiple Biomarkers to Predict Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Coronary Chronic Total Occlusions

There are limited tools available to predict the long-term prognosis of persons with coronary chronic total occlusions (CTO). A previously described blood biomarker panel to predict cardiovascular (CV) events was evaluated in patients with CTO. From 1,251 patients in the CASABLANCA study, 241 participants with a CTO were followed for an average of 4 years for occurrence of major adverse CV events (MACE, CV death, nonfatal myocardial infarction or stroke) and CV death/heart failure (HF) hospitalization. Results of a biomarker panel (kidney injury molecule-1, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, osteopontin, and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1) from baseline samples were expressed as low-, medium-, and high-risk. By 4 years, a total of 67 (27.8%) MACE and 56 (23.2%) CV death/HF hospitalization events occurred. The C-statistic of the panel for MACE through 4 years was 0.79 (p < 0.001). Considering the low-risk group as referent, the hazard ratio (HR) of MACE by 4 years was 6.65 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.98 to 14.8) and 12.4 (95% CI:5.17 to 29.6) for the medium and high-risk groups (both p < 0.001). The C-statistic for CVD/HF hospitalization by 4 years was 0.84 (p < 0.001). Compared to the low-risk score group, the medium and high-risk groups had HR of 5.61 (95% CI: 2.33 to 13.5) and 15.6 (95% CI: 6.18, 39.2; both p value <0.001). In conclusion, a multiple biomarker panel assisted in discriminating a broad range of risk for adverse outcomes in patients with coronary CTO. These results may have implications for risk stratification, patient care and could have a role for clinical trial enrichment.

Myocardial infarction in multivessel disease: Does presence of chronic total occlusion make a difference?

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Myocardial infarction (MI) in multivessel disease (MVD) and chronic total occlusion (CTO) is associated with high mortality. However, all-cause mortality of matched cohort without a CTO is unclear. Our aim was to analyse clinical characteristics, presenting symptoms, and survival of patients with MI in MVD and the possible impact of CTO on 1-year mortality.

METHODS

All MI patients with MVD (two or three vessel disease) hospitalized in our center from January 2020 to September 2022 (1309 patients) were selected. We conducted a propensity score matching (PSM) analysis based on age, gender, type of MI, and compared patients with CTO (CTO group, n = 90) and without CTO (Control group, n = 90).

RESULTS

We observed no difference in presenting clinical symptoms and initial heart rhythm between the groups. 1-year follow-up shows all-cause mortality rate of 23.3 % (n = 21) in the CTO group (Mean survival [MS] = 292.1 days, 95 % CI = 263.8 to 320.4) and 18.9 % (n = 17) in the Control group (MS = 310.2 days, 95 % CI = 285.3 to 335.2), p = 0.44. PCI alone was performed in 64.4 % (n = 58) in both groups, CABG in 18.8 % (n = 17) and 24.4 % (n = 22) (CTO vs. Control group respectively). Combination of PCI and CABG occurred in 8.8 % (n = 8) in both groups. Conservative treatment was chosen for 7 CTO and 2 Control group patients.

CONCLUSION

We observed no 1-year mortality difference in patients with MI, MVD and a CTO compared to a matched cohort of patients with MI, MVD without CTO. Excellent 1-year survival was observed in patients treated by CABG, irrespective of CTO presence.

Infarct-related artery only revascularization versus multi-vessel revascularization for patients with Killip I-IV acute myocardial infarction and multivessel disease

BACKGROUND

The optimal revascularization strategy for non-culprit vessels is still up for debate nowadays, particularly when it comes to individuals with different Killip classes. Therefore, the aim of our study was to investigate whether multivessel revascularization, as compared with infarct-related artery (IRA) alone revascularization, improves long-term prognosis in patients who have experienced an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and have multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data from 646 patients who presented with AMI and multivessel CAD at Beijing Chaoyang hospital between November 2014 and November 2020. Based on various revascularization strategies, patients were categorised into two groups: IRA-only revascularization (n = 416) and multivessel revascularization (n = 230). The primary endpoint was cardiovascular death.

RESULTS

In the following 60.6 months (60.6 ± 23.9), the primary endpoint occurred in 3% of the multivessel revascularization group versus 9.6% in the IRA-only revascularization group (HR 0.284, CI 0.120-0.669, p = 0.002). For the Killip I-II patients (n = 533), the primary endpoint occurred in 2.6% of the multivessel revascularization group versus 9.5% in the IRA-only revascularization group (HR 0.236, CI 0.083-0.667, p = 0.003). For Killip III-IV patients (n = 113), there was no significance differences in the primary endpoint. After using the inverse probability weighted method, the benefit of complete revascularization was consistently observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Multivessel revascularization significantly reduced the incidence of cardiovascular death for patients presenting with AMI and multivessel CAD, particularly for Killip I-II patients. There were no significant differences in the primary outcome across the groups of patients with Killip III-IV.

Chronic Total Occlusions: A State-of-the-Art Review

The percutaneous management of chronic total occlusions (CTO) is a well-established sub-specialty of Interventional Cardiology, requiring specialist equipment, training, and techniques. The heterogeneity of approaches in CTO has led to the generation of multiple algorithms to guide operators in their management. The evidence base for management of CTOs has suffered from inconsistent descriptive and quantitative terminology in defining the nature of lesions and techniques utilised, as well as seemingly contradictory data about improvement in ventricular function, symptoms of angina, and mortality from large-scale registries and randomised controlled trials. Through this review, we explore the history of CTO management and its supporting evidence in detail, with an outline of limitations of CTO-percutaneous coronary intervention and a look at the future of this growing field within cardiology.

The Presence of Chronic Total Occlusion in Noninfarct-Related Arteries Is Associated With Higher Mortality and Worse Patient Outcomes Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for STEMI: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression

Reperfusion therapy with percutaneous coronary intervention improves outcomes in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. We conducted a meta-analysis to assess the impact of chronic total occlusion (CTO) in noninfarct-related artery on the outcomes of these patients. Comprehensive searches were performed using PubMed, Google Scholar, and EMBASE. The primary endpoint was the 30-day mortality rate, with secondary endpoints including all-cause mortality, repeat myocardial infarction, and stroke. Forest plots were created for the pooled analysis of the results, with statistical significance set at P < 0.05. A total of 19 studies were included in this meta-analysis, with 23,989 patients (3589 in CTO group and 20,400 in no-CTO group). The presence of CTO was associated with significantly higher odds of 30-day mortality [18.38% vs 5.74%; relative risk (RR), 3.69; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 2.68-5.07; P < 0.00001], all-cause mortality (31.00% vs 13.40%; RR, 2.79; 95% CI, 2.31-3.37; P < 0.00001), cardiovascular-related deaths (12.61% vs 4.1%; RR, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.99-3.44; P < 0.00001), and major adverse cardiovascular events (13.64% vs 9.88%; RR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.52-2.86; P < 0.00001) than the non-CTO group. No significant differences in repeated myocardial infarction or stroke were observed between the CTO and non-CTO groups. Our findings underscore the need for further research on the benefits and risks of performing staged or simultaneous percutaneous coronary intervention for CTO in the noninfarct-related artery in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Long-Term Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Total Occlusion

Although a chronic total occlusion (CTO) in the setting of an acute coronary syndrome is associated with greater risk, the prognosis of patients with a CTO and stable coronary artery disease (CAD) remains unknown. This study aimed to investigate adverse event rates in patients with stable CAD with and without a CTO. In 3,597 patients with stable CAD (>50% coronary luminal stenosis) who underwent cardiac catheterization, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and the composite major adverse cardiac event (MACE) rates for cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and heart failure hospitalization were evaluated. Cox proportional hazards and Fine and Gray subdistribution hazard models were used to compare event-free survival in patient subsets after adjustment for covariates. Event rates were higher in patients with CTOs than in those without CTOs after adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics (cardiovascular death hazard ratio [HR] 1.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05 to 1.57, p = 0.012). Patients with CTO revascularization had lower event rates than those of patients without CTO revascularization (cardiovascular death HR 0.43, CI 0.26 to 0.70, p = 0.001). Those with nonrevascularized CTOs were at particularly great risk when compared with those without CTO (cardiovascular death HR 1.52, CI 1.25 to 1.84, p <0.001). Moreover, those with revascularized CTOs had similar event rates to those of patients with CAD without CTOs. Patients with CTO have higher rates of adverse cardiovascular events than those of patients with significant CAD without CTO. This risk is greatest in patients with nonrevascularized CTO.

A non-interventional cardiologist's guide to coronary chronic total occlusions

Coronary chronic total occlusions (CTO) are present in up to one-third of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). It is thus essential for all clinical cardiologists to possess a basic awareness and understanding of CTOs, including optimal evaluation and management. While percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for CTO lesions has many similarities to non-CTO PCI, there are important considerations pertaining to pre-procedural evaluation, interventional techniques, procedural complications, and post-procedure management and follow-up unique to patients undergoing this highly specialized intervention. Distinct from other existing topical reviews, the current manuscript focuses on key knowledge relevant to non-interventional cardiologists.

The impact of chronic total occlusion in non-infarct related arteries on patient outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention for STEMI superimposed with cardiogenic shock: A pilot systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Chronic total occlusion (CTO) is defined as a near-total blockage of a coronary artery and often occurs in arteries that are not directly responsible for the event, known as non-infarct-related arteries (NIRA). Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a complication of ST-elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI) that carries significant mortality. We performed a meta-analysis to find an association between mortality in patients undergoing PCI for STEMI that have superimposed CS, with the presence of CTO in the NIRA.

MATERIALS AND METHODOLOGY

A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar and clinicaltrials.gov from inception till October 2023 to retrieve studies that compare the presence of CTO with the absence of CTO in NIRA in STEMI with CS patients undergoing PCI. The primary endpoint was 30-day mortality and the secondary endpoints were risk of all-cause mortality (ACM) and repeat myocardial infarction (MI). Forest plots were generated using the random effects model by pooling odds ratios (ORs) with a 95 % confidence interval. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

5 observational studies with a total of 5186 patients (1031 with CTO in NIRA and 4155 with no CTO in NIRA) were included. The presence of CTO in NIRA was associated with higher odds of 30-day mortality [OR: 3.10; 95 % CI: 1.52, 6.32; p < 0.002], and ACM [OR: 2.37; 95 % CI: 1.83, 3.08; p < 0.00001]. The odds of repeat MI were comparable between the two groups [OR: 1.61, 95 % CI: 0.03, 74.36, p = 0.81].

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of CTO in the NIRA serves as an independent indicator of unfavorable clinical outcomes including increased risk of 30-day mortality and all-cause mortality. The risk of repeat MI was comparable between the two groups. Large-scale, multicenter trials are warranted to identify the most effective management approach for these patients.

Multiple Biomarkers to Predict Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Coronary Chronic Total Occlusions

Background

There are limited tools available to predict the long-term prognosis of persons with coronary chronic total occlusions (CTO).

Objectives

We evaluated performance of a blood biomarker panel to predict cardiovascular (CV) events in patients with CTO.

Methods

From 1251 patients in the CASABLANCA study, 241 participants with a CTO were followed for an average of 4 years for occurrence of major adverse CV events (MACE, CV death, non-fatal myocardial infarction or stroke) and CV death/heart failure (HF) hospitalization. Results of a biomarker panel (kidney injury molecule-1, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, osteopontin, and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1) from baseline samples were expressed as low-, moderate-, and high-risk.

Results

By 4 years, a total of 67 (27.8%) MACE events and 56 (23.2%) CV death/HF hospitalization events occurred. The C-statistic of the panel for MACE through 4 years was 0.79. Considering patients in the low-risk group as a reference, the hazard ratio of MACE by 4 years was 6.65 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.98-14.8) and 12.4 (95% CI:5.17-29.6) for the moderate and high-risk groups (both P <0.001). The C-statistic for CVD/HF hospitalization by 4 years was 0.84. Compared to the low-risk score group, the moderate and high-risk groups had hazard ratios of 5.61 (95% CI: 2.33-13.5) and 15.6 (95% CI: 6.18, 39.2; both P value <0.001).

Conclusion

A multiple biomarker panel assists in evaluating the risk of adverse outcomes in patients with coronary CTO. These results may have implications for patient care and could have a role for clinical trial enrichment.

Clinical Trial

CASABLANCA, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00842868.

Impact of chronic total occlusions on outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A propensity-score matched analysis using the National Inpatient Sample database

BACKGROUND

There is limited data on the impact of chronic total occlusions (CTOs) on the outcomes of patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the contemporary era.

METHODS

We queried the National Inpatient Sample between October 2015 and December 2017 using the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth revision codes to identify hospitalized AMI patients undergoing PCI. A 1:1 propensity-score matched analysis was performed to compare in-hospital outcomes of patients with and without CTOs.

RESULTS

Among 576,760 admissions identified during the study period, 51,225(8.8 %) had CTO and 525,535 (91.1 %) did not. After 1:1 propensity-score matching, each matched group contained 51,210 admissions. In-hospital mortality was significantly higher in the CTO group compared with the non-CTO group (4.7 % vs 3 %, p < 0.0001). In the CTO group, hospital length of stay was longer (median 3 vs 2 days, p = 0.001) and lower percentage of patients were discharged to home (78.8 % vs 81.1 %, p < 0.0001), compared with the non-CTO group. Median cost of hospital stay was also higher in the CTO group compared with the non-CTO group ($20,921 vs $19,856, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this propensity-score matched analysis of a large US inpatient database, the presence of CTOs in AMI patients undergoing PCI identified a higher risk cohort with in higher in-hospital mortality, longer hospital length of stay and higher hospitalization cost.

Prognostic impact of non-culprit chronic total occlusion over time in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention

AIMS

Previous studies indicated that a chronic total occlusion (CTO) in a non-infarct-related artery is linked to higher mortality mainly in the acute setting in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Our aim was to assess the temporal distribution of mortality risk associated with non-culprit CTO over years after STEMI.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The study included 8679 STEMI patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Kaplan-Meier cumulative mortality curves for non-culprit CTO vs. no CTO were compared with log-rank test, with landmarks set at 30 days and 1 year. Adjusted Cox regression models were constructed to assess the impact of non-culprit CTO on mortality over different time intervals. Tests for interaction were pre-specified between non-culprit CTO and acute heart failure and left ventricular ejection fraction. The primary outcome variable was all-cause mortality, and the median follow-up was 5 years. Non-culprit CTO was present in 11.6% of patients (n = 1010). Presence of a CTO was associated with increased early [30-day adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.54-2.36; P < 0.001] and late mortality (5-year adjusted HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.42-1.95; P < 0.001). Landmark analyses revealed an annual two-fold increase in mortality in patients with vs. without a CTO after the first year of follow-up. The observed pattern of mortality increase over time was independent of acute or chronic LV impairment.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-culprit CTO is independently associated with mortality over 5 years after primary PCI for STEMI, with a constant annual two-fold increase in the risk of death beyond the first year of follow-up.

Management of refractory angina: an update

Despite the use of anti-anginal drugs and/or percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting, the proportion of patients with coronary artery disease who have daily or weekly angina ranges from 2% to 24%. Refractory angina refers to long-lasting symptoms (for >3 months) due to established reversible ischaemia, which cannot be controlled by escalating medical therapy with the use of 2nd- and 3rd-line pharmacological agents, bypass grafting, or stenting. While there is uncertain prognostic benefit, the treatment of refractory angina is important to improve the quality of life of the patients affected. This review focuses on conventional pharmacological approaches to treating refractory angina, including guideline directed drug combination and dosages. The symptomatic and prognostic impact of advanced and novel revascularization strategies such as chronic total occlusion PCI, transmyocardial laser revascularization, coronary sinus occlusion, radiation therapy for recurrent restenosis, and spinal cord stimulation are also covered and recommendations of the 2019 ESC Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Management of Chronic Coronary Syndromes discussed. Finally, the potential clinical use of current angiogenetic and stem cell therapies in reducing ischaemia and/or pain is evaluated.

Prognostic Impact of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Chronic Total Occlusion in Acute and Periprocedural Myocardial Infarction

Coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO) has gained increasing clinical attention as the most advanced form of coronary artery disease. Prior studies already indicated a clear association of CTO with adverse clinical outcomes, especially in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and concomitant CTO of the non-infarct-related coronary artery (non-IRA). Nevertheless, the prognostic impact of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of CTO in the acute setting during AMI is still controversial. Due to the complexity of the CTO lesion, CTO-PCI leads to an increased risk of complications compared to non-occlusive coronary lesions. Therefore, this review outlines the prognostic impact of CTO-PCI in patients with AMI. In addition, the prognostic impact of periprocedural myocardial infarction caused by CTO-PCI will be discussed.

Latest developments in chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention

INTRODUCTION

Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (CTO PCI) is now performed with high success rates and acceptable complication rates.

AREAS COVERED

We describe recent clinical and technological developments in CTO PCI from 2018 to 2020.

EXPERT OPINION

After publication of six randomized controlled trials, improving patient symptoms remains the principal indication for CTO PCI. Although good outcomes can be achieved with CTO PCI at experienced centers, success rates are significantly lower at less experienced centers, despite increased use in CTO crossing algorithms and development of novel and improved equipment and techniques.

Five-Year Follow-up After Percutaneous Management of a 40-Year-Old Man in Shock Treated by Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and MitraClip

Acute coronary syndromes complicated by cardiogenic shock are associated with high mortality, and patients are definitely considered at high procedural risk. We present here the 5-year success of full percutaneous management of a young patient in cardiogenic shock with acute and chronic coronary artery disease as well as significant mitral regurgitation. Whereas the benefit of culprit lesion coronary revascularization is well established, evidence supporting chronic total occlusion revascularization in the acute setting remains poor. Percutaneous management of acute mitral regurgitation with cardiogenic shock is a viable option in patients with recurrent pulmonary edema.