1
|
Balci MM, Balci KG, Ocak K, Ekici E, Çetin EH, Selçuk H, Selçuk T, Maden O. Predictive Value of Resting Fractional Flow Reserve and Atherogenic Index of Plasma for Evaluation of Physiologically Significant Coronary Artery Lesions. Angiology 2023; 74:282-287. [PMID: 35500241 DOI: 10.1177/00033197221098280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
This study aimed to assess the relationship between the atherogenic index of plasma (AIP) and resting distal-to-aortic pressure ratio (Pd/Pa) in patients with intermediate coronary artery stenosis. This retrospective study included 802 chronic coronary syndrome patients with intermediate coronary artery stenosis who underwent fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement. The resting Pd/Pa showed a significant negative correlation with AIP (rho= -.205, p < .001). When final FFR was divided into three tertiles (≤80, 81-89, ≥90), resting Pd/Pa was significantly lower, and AIP was markedly higher in the lower final FFR tertiles (both AIP and resting Pd/Pa differed significantly across the all three tertiles, p < .001). Furthermore, functionally significant stenosis independent predictors in multivariate analyses were AIP and resting Pd/Pa (p = .010 and p < .001, respectively). We observed for the first time an increase in AIP levels in the presence of functionally significant stenoses that may help better planning and identification of those patients with the functionally substantial atherosclerotic burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Kadir Ocak
- 574949Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cerrato E, Mejía-Rentería H, Franzè A, Quadri G, Belliggiano D, Biscaglia S, Lo Savio L, Spataro F, Erriquez A, Giacobbe F, Vergara-Uzcategui C, di Girolamo D, Tebaldi M, Varbella F, Campo G, Escaned J. Quantitative flow ratio as a new tool for angiography-based physiological evaluation of coronary artery disease: a review. Future Cardiol 2021; 17:1435-1452. [PMID: 33739146 DOI: 10.2217/fca-2020-0199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
The functional evaluation of coronary stenoses has obtained important clinical results in recent years, resulting in strong guideline recommendations. Nonetheless, the use of coronary wire-based functional evaluation has not yet become part of the routine in catheterization laboratories for several reasons, including the need to advance a wire into the coronary vessel to interrogate the stenosis. Angiography-derived indexes have been introduced to expand the current use of physiology to estimate the functional meaning of a stenosis on the basis of angiographic data only. The most studied and validated angiography-derived index is certainly the quantitative flow ratio. This article will summarize the basics of the quantitative flow ratio, the related validation studies and its current and future applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrico Cerrato
- Interventional Cardiology Unit, San Luigi Gonzaga University Hospital, Orbassano & Rivoli Infermi Hospital, Rivoli, Turin, Italy
| | - Hernan Mejía-Rentería
- Department of Cardiology, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria San Carlos & Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Alfonso Franzè
- Interventional Cardiology Unit, San Luigi Gonzaga University Hospital, Orbassano & Rivoli Infermi Hospital, Rivoli, Turin, Italy
| | - Giorgio Quadri
- Interventional Cardiology Unit, San Luigi Gonzaga University Hospital, Orbassano & Rivoli Infermi Hospital, Rivoli, Turin, Italy
| | - Davide Belliggiano
- Interventional Cardiology Unit, San Luigi Gonzaga University Hospital, Orbassano & Rivoli Infermi Hospital, Rivoli, Turin, Italy
| | - Simone Biscaglia
- Cardiovascular Institute, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Ferrara, Cona, Italy.,Maria Cecilia Hospital, GVM Care & Research, Cotignola, RA, Italy
| | - Luca Lo Savio
- Interventional Cardiology Unit, Rivoli Infermi Hospital, Rivoli, Turin, Italy
| | - Fabio Spataro
- Interventional Cardiology Unit, Rivoli Infermi Hospital, Rivoli, Turin, Italy
| | - Andrea Erriquez
- Cardiovascular Institute, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Ferrara, Cona, Italy.,Maria Cecilia Hospital, GVM Care & Research, Cotignola, RA, Italy
| | - Federico Giacobbe
- Interventional Cardiology Unit, San Luigi Gonzaga University Hospital, Orbassano & Rivoli Infermi Hospital, Rivoli, Turin, Italy
| | - Carlos Vergara-Uzcategui
- Department of Cardiology, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria San Carlos & Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Matteo Tebaldi
- Cardiovascular Institute, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Ferrara, Cona, Italy.,Maria Cecilia Hospital, GVM Care & Research, Cotignola, RA, Italy
| | - Ferdinando Varbella
- Interventional Cardiology Unit, San Luigi Gonzaga University Hospital, Orbassano & Rivoli Infermi Hospital, Rivoli, Turin, Italy
| | - Gianluca Campo
- Cardiovascular Institute, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Ferrara, Cona, Italy.,Maria Cecilia Hospital, GVM Care & Research, Cotignola, RA, Italy
| | - Javier Escaned
- Department of Cardiology, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria San Carlos & Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gutiérrez-Barrios A, Noval-Morillas I, Camacho-Freire S, Puche JE, Gheorghe L, Silva E, Alarcon-Lastra I, Cañadas-Pruaño D, Gómez-Menchero A, Calle-Pérez G, Diaz-Fernandez JF, Vázquez-García R. Contrast FFR plus intracoronary injection of nitro-glycerine accurately predicts FFR for coronary stenosis functional assessment. Minerva Cardiol Angiol 2020; 69:449-457. [PMID: 33258564 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-5683.20.05354-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is the "gold standard" for assessing the physiological significance of coronary disease. In the last decade, several alternative adenosine-free indexes have been proposed in order to facilitate the dissemination of the functional evaluation of coronary stenosis. Our aim was to investigate whether radiographic contrast plus intracoronary nitroglycerin (cFFR-NTG) can predict functional assessment of coronary stenosis offering superior diagnostic agreement with FFR compared to non-hyperemic indexes and contrast mediated FFR (cFFR). METHODS Three hundred twenty-nine lesions evaluated with pressure wire in 266 patients were prospectively included in this multicenter study. RESULTS The ROC curves for cFFR-NTG using an FFR≤0.80 showed a higher accuracy in predicting FFR (AUC=0.97) than resting Pd/Pa (AUC=0.90, P<0.01) and cFFR (AUC=0.93.5, P<0.01). A significant (P<0.01) strong correlation was found between FFR and the four analyzed indexes: Pd/Pa (r=0.78); iFR/RFR (r=0.73); cFFR(r=0.89) and cFFR-NTG (r=0.93). cFFR-NTG showed the closest agreement at Bland-Altman analysis. The cFFR-NTG cut off value >0.84 showed the highest negative predictive value (88%), specificity (91%), sensitivity (94%) and accuracy (92%) of the studied indexes. CONCLUSIONS Submaximal hyperemic adenosine-free indexes are an efficient alternative to adenosine for the physiological assessment of epicardial coronary disease. The most accurate index in predicting the functional significance of coronary stenosis using FFR as reference was cFFR-NTG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alejandro Gutiérrez-Barrios
- Department of Cardiology, Puerta del Mar University Hospital, Cádiz, Spain - .,Instituto de Investigación e Innovación en Ciencias Biomédicas de Cádiz (INiBICA), Cádiz, Spain -
| | - Inmaculada Noval-Morillas
- Department of Cardiology, Puerta del Mar University Hospital, Cádiz, Spain.,Instituto de Investigación e Innovación en Ciencias Biomédicas de Cádiz (INiBICA), Cádiz, Spain
| | | | - Juan E Puche
- Department of Cardiology, Puerta del Mar University Hospital, Cádiz, Spain
| | - Livia Gheorghe
- Department of Cardiology, Puerta del Mar University Hospital, Cádiz, Spain.,Instituto de Investigación e Innovación en Ciencias Biomédicas de Cádiz (INiBICA), Cádiz, Spain
| | - Etelvino Silva
- Department of Cardiology, Juan Ramón Jiménez Hospital, Huelva, Spain
| | | | - Dolores Cañadas-Pruaño
- Department of Cardiology, Puerta del Mar University Hospital, Cádiz, Spain.,Instituto de Investigación e Innovación en Ciencias Biomédicas de Cádiz (INiBICA), Cádiz, Spain
| | | | - Germán Calle-Pérez
- Department of Cardiology, Puerta del Mar University Hospital, Cádiz, Spain.,Instituto de Investigación e Innovación en Ciencias Biomédicas de Cádiz (INiBICA), Cádiz, Spain
| | | | - Rafael Vázquez-García
- Department of Cardiology, Puerta del Mar University Hospital, Cádiz, Spain.,Instituto de Investigación e Innovación en Ciencias Biomédicas de Cádiz (INiBICA), Cádiz, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Performance of Contrast-Fractional Flow Reserve versus Quantitative Flow Ratio for Functional Assessment of Coronary Stenoses. J Interv Cardiol 2020. [DOI: 10.1155/2020/7352150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background. Use of the fractional flow reserve (FFR) technique is recommended to evaluate coronary stenosis severity and guide revascularization. However, its high cost, time to administer, and the side effects of adenosine reduce its clinical utility. Two novel adenosine-free indices, contrast-FFR (cFFR) and quantitative flow ratio (QFR), can simplify the functional evaluation of coronary stenosis. This study aimed to analyze the diagnostic performance of cFFR and QFR using FFR as a reference index. Methods. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies in which cFFR or QFR was compared to FFR. A bivariate model was applied to pool diagnostic parameters. Cochran’s Q test and the I2 index were used to assess heterogeneity and identify the potential source of heterogeneity by metaregression and sensitivity analysis. Results. Overall, 2220 and 3000 coronary lesions from 20 studies were evaluated by cFFR and QFR, respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.87 (95% CI: 0.81, 0.91) and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.88, 0.94) for cFFR and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.82, 0.91) and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.87, 0.93) for QFR, respectively. No statistical significance of sensitivity and specificity for cFFR and QFR were observed in the bivariate analysis (P=0.8406 and 0.4397, resp.). The area under summary receiver-operating curve of cFFR and QFR was 0.95 (95% CI: 0.93, 0.97) for cFFR and 0.95 (95% CI: 0.93, 0.97). Conclusion. Both cFFR and QFR have good diagnostic performance in detecting functional severity of coronary arteries and showed similar diagnostic parameters.
Collapse
|