Impact of baseline thrombocytopenia on the long-term outcome of patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention: An analysis of 9,897 consecutive patients

Baseline platelet count in percutaneous coronary intervention: a dose-response meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

The nature of the relationship between baseline platelet count and clinical outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is unclear. We undertook dose-response and pairwise meta-analyses to better describe the prognostic value of the initial platelet count and clinical endpoints in patients after PCI.

METHODS

A search of PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science (up to 9 October 2021) was performed to identify studies that evaluated the association between platelet count and clinical outcomes following PCI. The primary outcomes of interest were all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and major bleeding. We performed random-effects pairwise and one-stage dose-response meta-analyses by calculating HRs and 95% CIs.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis included 19 studies with 217 459 patients. We report a J-shaped relationship between baseline thrombocyte counts and all-cause death, MACE and major bleeding at follow-up. The risk of haemorrhagic events exceeded the risk of thrombotic events at low platelet counts (<175×109/L), while a predominant ischaemic risk was observed at high platelet counts (>250×109/L). Pairwise meta-analyses revealed a robust link between initial platelet counts and the risk of postdischarge all-cause mortality, major bleeding (for thrombocytopenia: HR 1.39, 95% CI 1.30 to 1.49; HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.15 to 2.00, respectively) and future death from any cause and MACE (thrombocytosis: HR 1.60, 95% CI 1.29 to 1.98; HR 1.47, 95% CI 1.22 to 1.78, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Low platelet counts were associated with the predominant bleeding risk, while high platelet counts were only associated with the ischaemic events.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42021283270.

Long-term effects of baseline on-treatment platelet reactivity in patients with acute coronary syndrome and thrombocytopenia undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the association between on-treatment platelet reactivity (TPR) and long-term outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and thrombocytopenia (TP) in the real world.

METHODS

This prospective observational study enrolled patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) that underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Patients with ACS and TP under dual antiplatelet therapy were selected for analysis. The 2- and 5-year clinical outcomes were evaluated among patients with high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR), low on-treatment platelet reactivity (LTPR) and normal on-treatment platelet reactivity (NTPR), as tested by thromboelastogram at baseline.

RESULTS

A total of 10 724 patients with CAD that underwent PCI were identified. Of these, 474 patients with ACS and TP met the inclusion criteria: 124 (26.2%) with HTPR, 163 (34.4%) with LTPR and 187 (39.5%) with NTPR. The 5-year rates of all-cause death, major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, cardiac death, myocardial infarction, revascularization, stroke and bleeding were not significantly different among the three groups. Multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that patients with HTPR were not independently associated with any of the 5-year endpoints compared with patients with NTPR.

CONCLUSIONS

TPR at baseline was not independently associated with long-term outcomes in patients with ACS and TP that underwent PCI.

Impact of severity of baseline thrombocytopenia on outcomes after percutaneous coronary interventions: Analysis from the Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking (VA CART) Program

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the degree of severity of baseline thrombocytopenia (TCP) on outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) BACKGROUND: The association of TCP with clinical outcomes among patients undergoing coronary intervention has not been previously evaluated.

METHODS

Using data from the US Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking (CART) Program, we identified patients undergoing PCI between October 1, 2007, to September 30, 2017. The cohort was then stratified by platelet count, as no TCP (platelet count >150,000/mcl), mild TCP (100-150,000/mcl), or moderate-severe TCP (<100,000/mcl) and this was associated with clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

The cohort included 80,427 patients (98% male), of which 14.9% (13.2% mild, 1.7% moderate-severe) suffered from TCP at the time of PCI. Compared with mild or no TCP, moderate-severe TCP was associated with increased risk of post-PCI pericardiocentesis (0.6% vs. 0.2% vs. 0.2%, p = 0.018) and in-hospital mortality (1.5% vs. 0.7% vs. 0.7%) without a difference in postprocedure stroke (0.5% vs. 0.3% vs. 0.3%, p = 0.6). Over a median follow-up of 1729 days, time-to-repeat revascularization was significantly shorter in moderate-severe TCP (1080 vs. 1347 vs. 1467 days, p < 0.001) despite lower risk of revascularization. Both mild (adjusted HR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.07-1.15, p < 0.001) and moderate-severe TCP (HR: 1.55, 95% CI: 1.43-1.69, p < 0.001) were associated with increased all-cause mortality compared with those without TCP.

CONCLUSIONS

Thrombocytopenia was associated with increased short- and long-term adverse events among patients undergoing PCI. Any degree of TCP was associated with increased long-term all-cause mortality while moderate-severe TCP was also associated with increased risk of periprocedural adverse events.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of impact of baseline thrombocytopenia on cardiovascular outcomes and mortality in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND

Thrombocytopenia (TP) is associated with higher incidence of bleeding in the setting of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) leading to increased morbidity and mortality. Herein, we report a meta-analysis evaluating the effects of baseline thrombocytopenia (bTP) on cardiovascular outcomes in patients undergoing PCI.

METHODS

Literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library and clinicaltrials.gov from inception till October 2019. Patients were divided into two groups: Patients with (a) no Thrombocytopenia (nTP) (b) bTP before PCI. Primary endpoints were in-hospital, and all-cause mortality rates at the longest follow-up. The main summary estimate was random effects risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

A total of 6,51,543 patients from 10 retrospective studies were included. There was increased in-hospital all-cause mortality (RR 2.58 [1.7-3.8], p < .001) and bleeding (RR 2.37 [1.41-3.98], p < .005), in the bTP group compared to the nTP group. There was no difference for in-hopsital major adverse cardiovascular outcomes (MACE) (RR 1.38 [0.94-2.0], p < .10), post-PCI MI (RR 1.17 [0.9-1.5], p = .19) and TVR (RR 1.65 [0.8-3.6], p = .21), respectively. Outcomes at longest follow-up showed increased incidence of all-cause mortality (RR 1.86 [1.2-2.9], p < .006) and bleeding (RR 1.72 [1.1-2.9], p = .04) in bTP group, while there was no significant difference for post-PCI MI (RR 1.07 [0.91-1.3], p = .42), MACE (RR 1.86 [0.69-1.8], p = .68) and TVR (RR 1.1 [0.9-1.2], p = .93) between both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

bTP in patients undergoing PCI is associated with increased mortality and predicts risk of bleeding.

Impact of Thrombocytopenia on In-Hospital Outcome in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Background

Thrombocytopenia was intuitively considered to be associated with higher risk of bleeding and multiple comorbidities after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, controversial results exist, and the real-world clinical impact of thrombocytopenia in patients undergoing PCI is largely unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of baseline thrombocytopenia on the prognosis of patients undergoing PCI.

Methods

Using the West China Hospital Inpatient Sample database, patients who underwent PCI were identified from August 2012 to January 2019. Baseline thrombocytopenia was defined as a preprocedural platelet count of 100 × 10⁹/L or less obtained from a routine blood sample taken within 48 hours before coronary PCI. The clinical effect of the advanced thrombocytopenia group (≤85 × 10⁹/L), according to the median value of platelet count in the thrombocytopenia cohort, was further assessed. The primary outcome was a composite of in-hospital death, bleeding events, and post-PCI transfusion.

Results

Of 9531 patients enrolled in our study, 936 had baseline thrombocytopenia and 8595 patients did not have. There were no significant differences in the primary outcome between the two groups. However, advanced thrombocytopenia was independently associated with higher risk of primary outcome (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.06 to 2.65, p = 0.029). Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients with thrombocytopenia were associated with higher odds of major bleeding (BARC ≥ 2) (OR 2.56, 95% CI 1.24 to 5.44, p = 0.011). Compared with the nonthrombocytopenia group, the thrombocytopenia group with ticagrelor use had higher odds of major bleeding (OR 9.7, 95% CI 1.57 to 60.4 versus OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.03 to 1.69, interaction p = 0.025).

Conclusions

It seems feasible for patients with thrombocytopenia to receive PCI, but close attention should be paid to advanced thrombocytopenia, the risk of postprocedure bleeding in ACS patients, and the use of more potent P2Y₁₂ inhibitor.

Dual anti-platelet therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention in a population of patients with thrombocytopenia at baseline: a meta-analysis

Background

In this meta-analysis, we aimed to systematically compare the post percutaneous coronary interventional (PCI) adverse bleeding events, stent thrombosis, stroke and other cardiovascular outcomes in a population of patients with and without thrombocytopenia at baseline who were followed up on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT).

Methods

Relevant English language articles which were published before June 2019 were retrieved from MEDLINE, http://www.ClinicalTrials.com, EMBASE, Cochrane central, and Google scholar briefly using specific terms such as percutaneous coronary intervention or dual antiplatelet therapy, and thrombocytopenia. All the participants were followed up on DAPT following discharge. Specific endpoints including bleeding events, stent thrombosis, stroke and other adverse cardiovascular events were assessed. The latest version of the RevMan software was used for the statistical assessment. Odd ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) based on a fixed or a random statistical model were used to represent the data graphically.

Results

A total number of 118,945 participants (from 8 studies) were included with 37,753 suffering from thrombocytopenia at baseline. Our results showed post procedural bleeding (OR: 1.89, 95% CI: 1.16–3.07; P = 0.01), access site bleeding (OR: 1.66, 95% CI: 1.15–2.39; P = 0.006), intra-cranial bleeding (OR: 1.78, 95% CI: 1.30–2.43; P = 0.0003), gastro-intestinal bleeding (OR: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.14–1.82; P = 0.002) and any major bleeding (OR: 1.67, 95% CI: 1.42–1.97; P = 0.00001) to be significantly higher in thrombocytopenic patients treated with DAPT after PCI. Total stroke (OR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.18–1.78; P = 0.0004) specifically hemorrhagic stroke (OR: 1.67, 95% CI: 1.30–2.14; P = 0.0001) was also significantly higher in these patients with thrombocytopenia at baseline. All-cause mortality and major adverse cardiac events were also significantly higher. However, overall total stent thrombosis (OR: 1.18, 95% CI: 0.90–1.55; P = 0.24) including definite and probable stent thrombosis were not significantly different compared to the control group.

Conclusions

According to the results of this analysis, DAPT might have to be cautiously be used following PCI in a population of patients with thrombocytopenia at baseline due to the significantly higher bleeding rate including gastro-intestinal, intra-cranial bleeding and hemorrhagic stroke. Hence, special care might have to be taken when considering anti-platelet agents following PCI in these high risk patients. However, considering the present limitations of this analysis, this hypothesis will have to be confirmed in future trials.