Initial report of safety and procedure duration of robotic-assisted chronic total occlusion coronary intervention

Robotic Assisted Versus Manual Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Robotics in percutaneous coronary intervention (R-PCI) has been one such area of advancement where potential benefits may include reduced operator radiation exposure, improved outcomes, and reduced rate of adverse events. Limited data exist about the benefits of R-PCI versus conventional manual PCI (M-PCI). We appraised the latest evidence in the form of a meta-analysis of observational and retrospective studies.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane to identify relevant clinical studies. Summary effects were calculated using a DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model as the pooled odds ratio or mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). All studies adhering to the inclusion criteria of direct comparisons between R-PCI and M-PCI were evaluated.

RESULTS

Seven studies with a total of 2230 patients were identified. There was significant decrease in the chest-level operator radiation exposure (MD = -442.32; 95% CI = -675.88 to -208.76), fluoroscopy time (MD = -1.46; 95% CI = -2.92 to 0.00), and amount of contrast used (MD = -18.28; 95% CI = -24.16 to -12.41) in the robotic group compared to the manual group. PCI time and the procedural success rate was not statistically different between the 2 groups. Clinical outcomes of major adverse cardiac events, all-cause mortality, and myocardial infarction were not different between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic PCI is associated with reduced operator radiation exposure, fluoroscopy time, and amount of contrast used. While there is a significant reduction in the procedural characteristics with robotic PCI, the clinical outcomes are not different compared to M-PCI. R-PCI is safe and effective with potential benefits to both the operator and the patient simultaneously.

Latest Developments in Robotic Percutaneous Coronary Interventions

Since the first robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention procedure (R-PCI) was performed in 2004, there has been a steady evolution in robotic technology, combined with a growth in the number of robotic installations worldwide and operator experience. This review summarises the latest developments in R-PCI with a focus on developments in robotic technology, procedural complexity, tele-stenting and training methods, which have all contributed to the global expansion in R-PCI.

Safety and feasibility of intravascular ultrasound-guided robotic percutaneous coronary intervention

OBJECTIVE

Previous studies have demonstrated the benefit of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for preventing longitudinal geographic miss (LGM). However, it is yet unclear whether IVUS guidance is useful for robotic-PCI (robotic-assisted perctaneous coronary intervention [R-PCI]).

METHODS

A total of 58 consecutive patients with stable angina who underwent IVUS-guided R-PCI were enrolled. The stent landing position was angiographically marked using a balloon marker before stenting, followed by measurements of the expected stent length using balloon pullback. Subsequently, prestenting IVUS was performed to determine stent landing. All pre-PCI IVUS images were assessed for lesion length and percent plaque volume (%PV) using both IVUS and angiographic marking. LGM was defined as a residual %PV >50% at either the distal or proximal stent edge, any stent edge dissection, or additional stent deployment immediately after stenting.

RESULTS

The included patients had an average age of 67.1 ± 10.1 years. IVUS guidance had significantly longer lesion lengths compared with angiographic marking. Based on IVUS-guided stent deployment, nine cases exhibited LGM immediately after stenting. IVUS-marked landing points had a significantly smaller %PV and significantly larger lumen area compared with those for angiography.

CONCLUSION

IVUS-guided R-PCI was well-tolerated and may be better at preventing LGM compared with angiography-guided R-PCI.

Robotic-Assisted Solutions for Invasive Cardiology, Cardiac Surgery and Routine On-Ward Tasks: A Narrative Review

Robots are defined as programmable machines that can perform specified tasks. Medical robots are emerging solutions in the field of cardiology leveraging recent technological innovations of control systems, sensors, actuators, and imaging modalities. Robotic platforms are successfully applied for percutaneous coronary intervention, invasive cardiac electrophysiology procedures as well as surgical operations including minimally invasive aortic and mitral valve repair, coronary artery bypass procedures, and structural heart diseases. Furthermore, machines are used as staff-assisting tools to support nurses with repetitive clinical duties i.e., food delivery. High precision and resolution allow for excellent maneuverability, enabling the performance of medical procedures in challenging anatomies that are difficult or impossible using conventional approaches. Moreover, robot-assisted techniques protect operators from occupational hazards, reducing exposure to ionizing radiation, and limiting risk of orthopedic injuries. Novel automatic systems provide advantages for patients, ensuring device stability with optimized utilization of fluoroscopy. The acceptance of robotic technology among healthcare providers as well as patients paves the way for widespread clinical application in the field of cardiovascular medicine. However, incorporation of robotic systems is associated with some disadvantages including high costs of installation and expensive disposable instrumentations, the need for large operating room space, and the necessity of dedicated training for operators due to the challenging learning curve of robotic-assisted interventional systems.

Feasibility of robotic neuroendovascular surgery

BACKGROUND

Several recent reports of CorPath GRX vascular robot (Cordinus Vascular Robotics, Natick, MA) use intracranially suggest feasibility of neuroendovascular application. Further use and development is likely. During this progression it is important to understand endovascular robot feasibility principles established in cardiac and peripheral vascular literature which enabled extension intracranially. Identification and discussion of robotic proof of concept principals from sister disciplines may help guide safe and accountable neuroendovascular application.

OBJECTIVE

Summarize endovascular robotic feasibility principals established in cardiac and peripheral vascular literature relevant to neuroendovascular application.

METHODS

Searches of PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar were conducted under PRISMA guidelines1 using MeSH search terms. Abstracts were uploaded to Covidence citation review (Covidence, Melbourne, AUS) using RIS format. Pertinent articles underwent full text review and findings are presented in narrative and tabular format.

RESULTS

Search terms generated 1642 articles; 177, 265 and 1200 results for PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar respectively. With duplicates removed, title review identified 176 abstracts. 55 articles were included, 45 from primary review and 10 identified during literature review. As it pertained to endovascular robotic feasibility proof of concept 12 cardiac, 3 peripheral vascular and 5 neuroendovascular studies were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Cardiac and peripheral vascular literature established endovascular robot feasibility and efficacy with equivalent to superior outcomes after short learning curves while reducing radiation exposure >95% for the primary operator. Limitations of cost, lack of haptic integration and coaxial system control continue, but as it stands neuroendovascular robotic implementation is worth continued investigation.

Techniques to Overcome the Pushability of Robotic-Assisted PCI

Robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was developed with a safety system that limits pushability as compared to manual PCI, thus preventing inadvertent deep delivery of the device and avoiding complications. This safety feature may limit robotic completion when performing intervention to more complex lesions that may require device delivery through calcified or previously stented lesions. In this article, we report three cases that highlight techniques to overcome this limited pushability, resulting in successful robotic completion of the procedures.

Robotic Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (R-PCI): Time to Focus on the Pros and Cons

AIM

To assess the safety, efficiency, and device compatibility of the Second Generation Robotic System.

METHODS

Data on Robot-Assisted PCI (R-PCI) is frequently insufficient in India. Many articles were published in national, non-indexed journals that are not available online and are difficult to obtain. Recognizing these constraints, the current review is intended to compile the available data on this important new innovation technique. This review could encourage future research and serve as a valuable source of information.

RESULTS

/Conclusion: In terms of procedure efficiency, operator radiation reduction, and safety, the recent implementation and development of second-generation robotic systems have had a significant impact on interventional cardiology. This technology will play a significant role in the future of interventional cardiology as advancements eliminate the need for manual assistance, improve devices compatibility, and expand the use of robotics for telestenting procedures. A larger study demonstrating the safety and feasibility of tele-stenting over greater geographic distances, as well as addressing fundamental technical difficulties, would be required before attempting R-PCI.

Periprocedural and 30-day outcomes of robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention used in the intravascular imaging guidance

In recent years, there have been several reports on robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention (R-PCI), but few studies have been conducted on R-PCI performed under intravascular imaging guidance. To elucidate the periprocedural and postoperative 30-day outcomes of intravascular imaging-guided R-PCI, we performed a retrospective observational study on all patients in 102 consecutive cases who underwent R-PCI under intravascular imaging guidance at a single center in Japan from June 12, 2019 to February 18, 2021. The primary end point was 30-day survival, and the secondary end point was the incidence of complications. Intravascular imaging-guided R-PCI was performed 110 times in total on 125 lesions. The medians of procedural time, fluoroscopy time, contrast volume, patient entrance skin dose, and radiation exposure to the main operator were 49 min, 16 min, 67 mL, 0.62 Gy, and 0 μSv, respectively. Furthermore, 60.0% of target lesion branches were American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association classification type B2 or type C. However, in all cases, lesion dilatation was successful, and the final Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction flow grade was 3. The combination of manual operation was required in 12.7% of all cases, but 30-day survival was confirmed in all cases. There were two problems at the puncture site. One small distal branch artery dissection occurred due to manual operation, but no cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction, stroke) occurred and no target lesion restenosis was observed within 30 days of R-PCI. Hence, R-PCI using intravascular imaging demonstrated highly satisfactory treatment outcomes, and no complication caused by robotic operation was observed.

Safety and Efficacy of Robotic-Assisted PCI

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Robotics has been used in multiple areas of procedural medical intervention. Robotic percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been available since 2004. Its adoption has been slow with initial application in simple cases.

RECENT FINDINGS

With increasing adoption, robotic PCI has been applied to a broader variety of coronary substrates with demonstration of safety and efficacy. Improvements in the robotic console with future generation devices should add to the utility of this platform. Robotic PCI advances the innovations in endovascular space into a different dimension, removing the dependence of the procedure on patient-operator ergonomics and likely operator skill.

Totally robotic three-vessel percutaneous coronary intervention with total occlusion using robotic automation

Robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has emerged as an alternative to manual PCI to mitigate the risk of occupational hazards for operators, and to increase precision of device placement. Previous studies have reported the safety and efficacy of robotic-assisted PCI in simpler lesions, and recently the safety and efficacy of robotic-assisted chronic total occlusion PCI have been reported. Herein, we report two cases with three-vessel disease, including total occlusions, successfully treated robotically utilizing newer guidewire and device automation.

Robotic Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The Good, the Bad, and What is to Come

The introduction of robots into healthcare has brought a wealth of opportunity for technical advancements, ranging from cleaning robots to disinfect hospital rooms to the high-tech surgical robots used in the operating room. Robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention (R-PCI) has been a more recent development in the field, and is particularly revolutionary in that it serves to benefit the interventional cardiologist as well as the patient. Published data on R-PCI have shown its feasibility, safety, and more recently, its potential benefits. This review examines the current role of the robot in the catheterization laboratory, the authors’ experience with the most current generation of the robot, and what is yet to come.

Safety and feasibility of robotic assisted percutaneous coronary intervention compared to standard percutaneous coronary intervention- a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

Robotically assisted PCI offers a great alternative to S–PCI. This has gained even more relevance during the COVID-19 pandemic era however safety of R–PCI compared to S–PCI has not been studied well. This study explores the safety and efficacy of robotically assisted PCI (R–PCI) compared to standard PCI (S–PCI) for the treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD).

Methods

PubMed, Scopus, Ovid, and Google scholar databases were searched for studies comparing R–PCI to S–PCI. Outcomes included clinical success, procedure time, fluoroscopy time, contrast use and radiation exposure.

Results

Theauthors included 5 studies comprising 1555 patients in this meta-analysis. Clinical success was comparable in both arms (p = 0.91). Procedure time was significantly longer in R–PCI group (risk ratio: 5.52, 95% confidence interval: 1.85 to 9.91, p = 0.003). Compared to S–PCI, patients in R–PCI group had lower contrast use (meandifference: −19.88, 95% confidence interval: −21.43 to −18.33, p < 0.001), fluoroscopy time (mean difference:-1.82, 95% confidence interval: −3.64 to −0.00, p = 0.05) and radiation exposure (mean difference:-457.8, 95% confidence interval: −707.14 to −208.14, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

R–PCI can achieve similar success as S–PCI at the expense of longer procedural times. However, radiation exposure and contrast exposure were lower in the R–PCI arm.

Robotics, imaging, and artificial intelligence in the catheterisation laboratory

The catheterisation laboratory today combines diagnosis and therapeutics, through various imaging modalities and a prolific list of interventional tools, led by balloons and stents. In this review, we focus primarily on advances in image-based coronary interventions. The X-ray images that are the primary modality for diagnosis and interventions are combined with novel tools for visualisation and display, including multi-imaging co-registration modalities with three- and four-dimensional presentations. Interpretation of the physiologic significance of coronary stenosis based on prior angiographic images is being explored and implemented. Major efforts to reduce X-ray exposure to the staff and the patients, using computer-based algorithms for image processing, and novel methods to limit the radiation spread are being explored. The use of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning for better patient care requires attention to universal methods for sharing and combining large data sets and for allowing interpretation and analysis of large cohorts of patients. Barriers to data sharing using integrated and universal protocols should be overcome to allow these methods to become widely applicable. Robotic catheterisation takes the physician away from the ionising radiation spot, enables coronary angioplasty and stenting without compromising safety, and may allow increased precision. Remote coronary procedures over the internet, that have been explored in virtual and animal studies and already applied to patients in a small pilot study, open possibilities for sharing experience across the world without travelling. Application of those technologies to neurovascular, and particularly stroke interventions, may be very timely in view of the need for expert neuro-interventionalists located mostly in central areas.

Impact of body mass index on outcome and health status after chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights from the OPEN-CTO study

BACKGROUND

The effect of body mass index (BMI) on the procedural outcomes and health status (HS) change after chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is largely unknown.

METHODS

Thousand consecutive patients enrolled in a 12-center prospective CTO PCI study (Outcomes, Patient Health Status, and Efficiency in Chronic Total Occlusion Hybrid Procedures [OPEN-CTO]) were categorized into three groups by baseline BMI (obese ≥30, overweight 25-30, and normal 18.5-25), after excluding seven patients with BMI <18.5. Baseline and follow-up HS at 1 year were quantified using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire, Rose Dyspnea Score, and Personal Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8). Hierarchical, multivariable logistic, and repeated measures linear regression models were used to assess procedural success, major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), and HS outcomes, as appropriate.

RESULTS

The obese and overweight were 47.6% and 37.4%, respectively. While procedure time and contrast dose were similar among the groups, total radiation dose (mGy) was higher with increased BMI (3,019 ± 2,027, 2,267 ± 1,714, 1,642 ± 1,223, p < .01). Procedural success rates, as well as MACCE rates, were similar among the three groups (obese 83.1%, overweight 79.8%, normal 81.9%, p = .47 and 5.1, 8.4, and 8.7%, p = .11). These rates remained similar after adjustment for baseline characteristics. The HS improvement from baseline to 12 months after adjustment was similar in obese and overweight patients compared to normal weight patients.

CONCLUSIONS

CTO PCI in obese and overweight patients can be performed with similar success and complication rates. Obese and overweight patients derive similar HS benefit from CTO PCI compared to normal weight patients.

Preprocedure Planning for Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The Separation Is in the Preparation

To perform chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention safely, efficiently, and successfully, adequate time must be dedicated to thorough preprocedural planning. This process should encompass a patient encounter, becoming fully familiarized with the patient's clinical traits, a detailed review of coronary anatomy, laying out an algorithmic procedural approach and making any relevant plans for actions that will enhance intraprocedural safety.