1
|
Sedhom R, Cortese B, Khedr M, Bharadwaj A, Brilakis ES, Pershad A, Basir MB, Alaswad K, Yeh RW, Megaly M. Utilization of Non-Drug-Eluting Devices for Inpatient Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the United States. Am J Cardiol 2023; 186:209-215. [PMID: 36328830 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.09.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2022] [Revised: 09/11/2022] [Accepted: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
There is a paucity of data on the contemporary use of non-drug-eluting devices (balloon angioplasty or bare-metal stents) in contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the United States. We utilized the Nationwide Readmissions Database to identify patients hospitalized to undergo PCI with non-drug-eluting devices from 2016 to 2019. The main outcome of interest was the trends in utilization over the study years. Among 1,870,262 PCI procedures, 127,810 (6.8%) were performed with non-drug-eluting devices; 72% of these were in the setting of acute myocardial infarction (MI). The use of non-drug-eluting devices decreased throughout the study period from 12.9% of all PCI in the first quarter of 2016 to 3.4% in the last quarter of 2019 (p <0.001). Factors associated with their use included advanced age and high bleeding risk. Only a small percentage were used as a bridge to coronary artery bypass graft surgery (2%) and for treatment of in-stent restenosis (3%). The in-hospital mortality was 5.8% for the entire cohort and 6.6% when the indication for use was an acute MI. In patients presenting with an acute MI, reinfarction within 30 days was common and occurred in 18% of the patients. In conclusion, the use of non-drug-eluting devices in PCI in the United States decreased from 2016 to 2019. Factors associated with their use included old age and high bleeding risk. Due to suboptimal outcomes in patients currently being treated with non-drug-eluting devices, there remains an unmet clinical need for alternative treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramy Sedhom
- Division of Cardiology, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, California
| | - Bernardo Cortese
- Foundation for Cardiovascular Research and Innovation, Milan, Italy
| | - Mohamed Khedr
- Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Menoufia, Egypt
| | - Aditya Bharadwaj
- Division of Cardiology, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, California
| | | | - Ashish Pershad
- Division of Cardiology, Chandler Regional Medical Center, Chandler, Arizona
| | - Mir B Basir
- Department of Cardiology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Khaldoon Alaswad
- Department of Cardiology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Robert W Yeh
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Michael Megaly
- Department of Cardiology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ahmed T, Pacha HM, Addoumieh A, Koutroumpakis E, Song J, Charitakis K, Boudoulas KD, Cilingiroglu M, Marmagkiolis K, Grines C, Iliescu CA. Percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with cancer using bare metal stents compared to drug-eluting stents. Front Cardiovasc Med 2022; 9:901431. [DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.901431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2022] [Accepted: 09/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundManagement of coronary artery disease (CAD) is unique and challenging in cancer patients. However, little is known about the outcomes of using BMS or DES in these patients. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in cancer patients who were treated with bare metal stents (BMS) vs. drug-eluting stents (DES).MethodsWe identified cancer patients who underwent PCI using BMS or DES between 2013 and 2020. Outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS) and the number of revascularizations. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate the survival probability. Multivariate Cox regression models were utilized to compare OS between BMS and DES.ResultsWe included 346 cancer patients who underwent PCI with a median follow-up of 34.1 months (95% CI, 28.4–38.7). Among these, 42 patients were treated with BMS (12.1%) and 304 with DES (87.9%). Age and gender were similar between the BMS and DES groups (p = 0.09 and 0.93, respectively). DES use was more frequent in the white race, while black patients had more BMS (p = 0.03). The use of DES was more common in patients with NSTEMI (p = 0.03). The median survival was 46 months (95% CI, 34–66). There was no significant difference in the number of revascularizations between the BMS and DES groups (p = 0.43). There was no significant difference in OS between the BMS and DES groups in multivariate analysis (p = 0.26). In addition, independent predictors for worse survival included age > 65 years, BMI ≤ 25 g/m2, hemoglobin level ≤ 12 g/dL, and initial presentation with NSTEMI.ConclusionsIn our study, several revascularizations and survival were similar between cancer patients with CAD treated with BMS and DES. This finding suggests that DES use is not associated with an increased risk for stent thrombosis, and as cancer survival improves, there may be a more significant role for DES.
Collapse
|
3
|
Biscaglia S, Erriquez A, Serenelli M, D'Ascenzo F, De Ferrari G, Ariza Sole A, Sanchis J, Giannini F, Gallo F, Scala A, Menozzi A, Pighi M, Moreno R, Iannopollo G, Menozzi M, Guiducci V, Tebaldi M, Campo G. Complete versus culprit-only strategy in older MI patients with multivessel disease. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2022; 99:970-978. [PMID: 35170844 DOI: 10.1002/ccd.30075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2021] [Accepted: 12/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
AIMS The revascularization strategy to pursue in older myocardial infarction (MI) patients with multivessel disease (MVD) is currently unknown. For this reason, while waiting for the results of dedicated trials, we sought to compare a complete versus a culprit-only strategy in older MI patients by merging data from four registries. METHODS AND RESULTS The inclusion criteria for the target population of the present study were (i) age ≥ 75 years; (ii) MI (STE or NSTE); (iii) MVD; (iv) successful treatment of culprit lesion. Propensity scores (PS) were derived using logistic regression (backward stepwise selection, p < 0.2). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were cardiovascular (CV) death, MI, and major bleeding. Multivariable adjustment included the PS and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). The Kaplan-Meier plots were weighted for IPT. Among 2087 patients included, 1362 (65%) received culprit-only treatment whereas 725 (35%) complete revascularization. The mean age was 81.5 years, while the mean follow-up was 419 ± 284 days. Seventy-four patients (10%) died in the complete group and 223 in the culprit-only one (16%). The adjusted cumulative 1-year mortality was 9.7% in the complete and 12.9% in the culprit-only group (adjusted HR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.50-0.89). Complete revascularization was associated with lower incidence of CV death (adjusted HR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.48-0.95) and MI (adjusted HR 0.67, 95% CI: 0.48-0.95). CONCLUSIONS Culprit-only is the default strategy in older MI patients with MVD. In our analysis, complete revascularization was associated with lower all-cause and CV mortality and with a lower MI rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Biscaglia
- Cardiovascular Institute, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Ferrara, Cona (FE), Ferrara, Italy
| | - Andrea Erriquez
- Cardiovascular Institute, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Ferrara, Cona (FE), Ferrara, Italy
| | - Matteo Serenelli
- Cardiovascular Institute, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Ferrara, Cona (FE), Ferrara, Italy
| | - Fabrizio D'Ascenzo
- Cardiology Department, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Gaetano De Ferrari
- Cardiology Department, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Albert Ariza Sole
- Cardiology Department, Bellvitge University Hospital. L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Juan Sanchis
- Cardiology Department, University Clinic Hospital of Valencia, INCLIVA, University of Valencia, CIBERCV, Valencia, Spain
| | - Francesco Giannini
- Interventional Cardiology Unit, GVM Care & Research, Maria Cecilia Hospital, Cotignola, Ravenna, Italy
| | - Francesco Gallo
- Interventional Cardiology, Ospedale dell'Angelo, Venezia, Venice, Italy
| | - Antonella Scala
- Cardiovascular Institute, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Ferrara, Cona (FE), Ferrara, Italy
| | - Alberto Menozzi
- S.C. Cardiologia, Ospedale Sant'Andrea, ASL5 Liguria, La Spezia, Liguria, Italy
| | - Michele Pighi
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Raul Moreno
- Interventional Cardiology, University Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Mila Menozzi
- Cardiovascular Department, Infermi Hospital, Rimini, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Guiducci
- Cardiology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Matteo Tebaldi
- Cardiovascular Institute, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Ferrara, Cona (FE), Ferrara, Italy
| | - Gianluca Campo
- Cardiovascular Institute, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Ferrara, Cona (FE), Ferrara, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Incidence and risk factors for major bleeding among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: Findings from the Norwegian Coronary Stent Trial (NORSTENT). PLoS One 2021; 16:e0247358. [PMID: 33661918 PMCID: PMC7932162 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2020] [Accepted: 02/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Bleeding is a concern after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and subsequent dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). We herein report the incidence and risk factors for major bleeding in the Norwegian Coronary Stent Trial (NORSTENT). MATERIALS AND METHODS NORSTENT was a randomized, double blind, pragmatic trial among patients with acute coronary syndrome or stable coronary disease undergoing PCI during 2008-11. The patients (N = 9,013) were randomized to receive either a drug-eluting stent or a bare-metal stent, and were treated with at least nine months of DAPT. The patients were followed for a median of five years, with Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) 3-5 major bleeding as one of the safety endpoints. We estimated cumulative incidence of major bleeding by a competing risks model and risk factors through cause-specific Cox models. RESULTS The 12-month cumulative incidence of major bleeding was 2.3%. Independent risk factors for major bleeding were chronic kidney disease, low bodyweight (< 60 kilograms), diabetes mellitus, and advanced age (> 80 years). A myocardial infarction (MI) or PCI during follow-up increased the risk of major bleeding (HR = 1.67, 95% CI 1-29-2.15). CONCLUSIONS The 12-month cumulative incidence of major bleeding in NORSTENT was higher than reported in previous, explanatory trials. This analysis strengthens the role of chronic kidney disease, advanced age, and low bodyweight as risk factors for major bleeding among patients receiving DAPT after PCI. The presence of diabetes mellitus or recurrent MI among patients is furthermore a signal of increased bleeding risk. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION Unique identifier NCT00811772; http://www.clinicaltrial.gov.
Collapse
|
5
|
Gilchrist IC. Epitaph for bare‐metal stents: Unlearning is hard to do. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2021. [DOI: 10.1002/ccd.29528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ian C. Gilchrist
- Department of Medicine Penn State University, College of Medicine Hershey Pennsylvania USA
- Penn State Heart and Vascular Institute MS Hershey Medical Center Hershey Pennsylvania USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Polimeni A, Sorrentino S, Spaccarotella C, Mongiardo A, Sabatino J, De Rosa S, Gori T, Indolfi C. Stent Thrombosis After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: From Bare-Metal to the Last Generation of Drug-Eluting Stents. Cardiol Clin 2020; 38:639-647. [PMID: 33036724 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccl.2020.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
Since their introduction in clinical practice in 1986, different types of coronary stents have been developed and become available for the treatment of coronary artery disease. Stent thrombosis (ST) is an uncommon but harmful complication after percutaneous coronary implantation, with a high occurrence of acute myocardial infarction and risk of mortality. Among several procedural and clinical predictors, the type of coronary stent is a strong determinant of ST. This article reviews the available evidence on the most used coronary stent types in the modern era and the related risk of ST.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Polimeni
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, "Magna Graecia" University, Viale Europa, Catanzaro 88100, Italy; Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, "Magna Graecia" University, Viale Europa, Catanzaro 88100, Italy
| | - Sabato Sorrentino
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, "Magna Graecia" University, Viale Europa, Catanzaro 88100, Italy; Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, "Magna Graecia" University, Viale Europa, Catanzaro 88100, Italy
| | - Carmen Spaccarotella
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, "Magna Graecia" University, Viale Europa, Catanzaro 88100, Italy; Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, "Magna Graecia" University, Viale Europa, Catanzaro 88100, Italy
| | - Annalisa Mongiardo
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, "Magna Graecia" University, Viale Europa, Catanzaro 88100, Italy
| | - Jolanda Sabatino
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, "Magna Graecia" University, Viale Europa, Catanzaro 88100, Italy; Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, "Magna Graecia" University, Viale Europa, Catanzaro 88100, Italy
| | - Salvatore De Rosa
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, "Magna Graecia" University, Viale Europa, Catanzaro 88100, Italy; Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, "Magna Graecia" University, Viale Europa, Catanzaro 88100, Italy
| | - Tommaso Gori
- Kardiologie I, Zentrum für Kardiologie, University Medical Center Mainz, Deutsches Zentrum für Herz und Kreislauf Forschung, Langenbeckstraße 1, Standort Rhein-Main 55131, Germany
| | - Ciro Indolfi
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, "Magna Graecia" University, Viale Europa, Catanzaro 88100, Italy; Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, "Magna Graecia" University, Viale Europa, Catanzaro 88100, Italy; Mediterranea Cardiocentro, Via Orazio, 2, Naples 80122, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|