Diabetes mellitus is independently associated with early stent thrombosis in patients undergoing drug eluting stent implantation: Analysis from the Victorian cardiac outcomes registry

Drug-Coated Balloon-Based Intervention for Coronary Artery Disease: The Second Report of Asia-Pacific Consensus Group

Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) provide a stent-free alternative, reducing risks like stent thrombosis and in-stent restenosis and the need for prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy. Recent studies show that DCBs can be effective and safe across various coronary artery diseases (CADs) when lesions are adequately prepared. Specifically, all coronary lesions are treated using the provisional approach, where active lesion preparation is followed by DCB or drug-eluting stent treatment, depending on the results. This approach means DCB is considered the default device before initiating intervention, with efforts focused on obtaining adequate lesion preparation. Depending on the result, DCB or drug-eluting stent is selected, which is termed DCB-based percutaneous coronary intervention. Therefore, this second report of the Asia-Pacific Consensus Group provides practical guidelines (DCB-based percutaneous coronary intervention) based on the latest evidence for DCB treatment in CAD and aims to expand its application across various CADs, facilitating its effective use in real-world clinical practice.

Association between quantitative flow ratio and clinical outcomes in multivessel disease STEMI patients with diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

Among patients with multivessel disease and ST-elevation myocardial infarction (MVD-STEMI), complete revascularization (CR) has been shown with improved outcomes. However, it is controversial whether diabetes mellitus (DM) status affects the outcomes. Quantitative flow ratio (QFR), as a newer non-invasive tool for identifying functional coronary stenosis and determining the presence of functional CR (FCR), may open up a new perspective for studying the above issues. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate an association between QFR-based FCR and clinical outcomes in MVD-STEMI patients under DM status.

METHODS

A total of 623 patients were included in the final analysis. The patients were divided into nonDM cohort and DM cohort. Within each cohort, patients were further stratified into functional CR (FCR) layer and functional incomplete revascularization (FIR) layer based on QFR assessment. The primary outcomes were 3-year major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), encompassing cardiac death, ischemia-driven revascularization (target vessel and non-target vessel), rehospitalization due to unstable angina pectoris, and non-fatal myocardial infarction.

RESULTS

The incidence of MACEs was significantly lower in the FCR layer than in the FIR layer (12.6% vs 24.0%, log-rank P<0.001). In the nonDM cohort, the incidence of MACEs was also lower in the FCR layer than in the FIR layer (9.8% vs 18.5%, log-rank P = 0.032). Similar situations occurred in the DM cohort (16.1% vs 27.9%, log-rank P = 0.017). In addition, the multivariate Cox analysis showed that rSSQFR (QFR-derived residual SYNTAX score) was significantly associated with the increased risk of MACEs in the nonDM cohort (HR (95% CI) = 1.18 (1.10-1.26), P<0.001) and DM cohort (HR (95% CI) = 1.13 (1.09-1.18), P<0.001). ROC analysis showed adding rSSQFR into the model of clinical risk factors yielded a significant improvement in prediction of MACEs, especially in the DM cohort (AUC (95% CI) = 0.747 (0.675-0.819), P = 0.001) than in the nonDM cohort (AUC (95% CI) = 0.697 (0.602-0.791), P = 0.033). Furthermore, additional multivariate Cox analysis showed that rSSQFR was associated with the increased risk of MACEs in patients with moderate lesions (DS of 50%-89%) after procedure (HR (95% CI) = 1.16 (0.11-1.22), P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with MVD-STEMI, the incidence of MACEs was lower in FCR than in FIR, and the decrease was particularly significant in the DM cohort. The association between QFR-derived rSSQFR and MACEs was independent of baseline characteristic differences, and rSSQFR provided higher prognostic predictive ability in DM cohort than in nonDM cohort. Additionally, QFR had the additional utility of identifying moderate residual lesions that require revascularization.

Polymer-free stents for percutaneous coronary intervention in diabetic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Aim: To compare the efficacy of polymer-free drug-eluting stents (PF-DES) versus other stents in diabetic patients with coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions.Materials & methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to identify pertinent randomized controlled trials. The primary end point was the occurrence of target lesion failure.Results: Eight randomized controlled trials were included for a total of 4854 subjects. The PF-DES group experienced a trend in favor of a lower rate of target lesion failure (Incidence rate ratio = 0.91; p = 0.11) and a significantly lower rate of cardiac mortality, as compared with the control group (Incidence rate ratio = 0.82; p = 0.04). However, statistical significance was lost if bare-metal stent patients were excluded and a trend in favor of the PF-DES strategy was reported only for cardiac mortality.Conclusion: PF-DES could be a valuable strategy in diabetic patients with coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions.

Diabetic conditions promote drug coating degradation but prevent endothelial coverage after stenting

The endothelialization of drug-eluting stents is delayed after implantation in patients with diabetes. Although numerous factors were implicated in hyperglycemia-induced endothelial dysfunction, the effects of stent drug coating degradation on endothelial dysfunction remains unclear. We hypothesized that diabetic conditions promote drugcoating degradation and enhance antiproliferative agent release, but that the rapid release of these antiproliferative agents inhibits endothelial cell proliferation leading to poor reendothelialization post-stenting. To verify this hypothesis, a dynamic hyperglycemic circulation system was introduced to measure the profile of drugcoating degradation in vitro. Flow cytometry and RNA sequencing were performed to evaluate endothelial cell proliferation. Moreover, a Type 1 diabetic rabbit model was generated and a rescue experiment conducted to evaluate the effects of rapid drugcoating elution on endothelial coverage in vivo. The main findings were as follows: 1) diabetic conditions promoted drugcoating degradation and increased antiproliferative agent release; 2) this increase in antiproliferative agent release inhibited endothelial cell proliferation and delayed endothelial coverage; and 3) strict glycemic control attenuated drugcoating degradation and promoted endothelial coverage post-stenting. This is the first study to illustrate rapid drugcoating degradation and its potential effects on endothelial recovery under diabetic conditions, highlighting the importance of strict glycemic management in patients with diabetes after drug-eluting stent implantation. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Diabetic conditions promote drug coating degradation and increase the release of antiproliferative agents. Rapid drug coating degradation under diabetic conditions inhibits endothelial cell proliferation and delays endothelialization. Strict glycemic control attenuates drug coating degradation and promotes endothelialization.

Natural History and Clinical Outcomes After ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Without Stent Insertion

After restoration of coronary perfusion in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), discrete severe stenotic coronary lesions are not always apparent. There remains ambiguity whether drug-eluting stent (DES) insertion or initial medical management is best practice. We sought to assess short-term clinical outcomes in patients presenting with STEMI without initial stent insertion. Patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention for STEMI between 2014 and 2020 were prospectively enrolled and assessed for inclusion. Patients presenting with in-stent restenosis or stent thrombosis, or who did not survive to hospital discharge were excluded. Of 13,871 patients presenting, 456 (3.3%) were treated without initial stenting. These patients were older than those treated with DES (66.1 ± 13.6 vs 62.3 ± 12.4 years, p <0.001), had higher rates of diabetes (23.5% vs 16.0%, p <0.001) and previous revascularization with either percutaneous coronary intervention (14.0% vs 7.3%, p <0.001) or coronary artery bypass graft (3.5% vs 1.8%, p = 0.008). Thirty-day mortality was elevated in patients treated without stenting compared to those receiving DES (4.2% vs 0.9%, p <0.001), as were rates of myocardial infarction (1.3% vs 0.5%, p = 0.026) and major adverse cardiac events (10.5% vs 2.4%, p <0.001). After propensity matching, a trend toward increased mortality remained (4.2% vs 2.0%, p = 0.055). In conclusion, a no-stenting initial strategy, compared with DES insertion, is associated with increased 30-day mortality in those presenting with STEMI without severe stenosis. These data suggest when appropriate, current-generation DES insertion should be undertaken.

Optimal medical therapy improves outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus and acute myocardial infarction

AIMS

We aimed to explored the association between the use of optimal medical therapy (OMT) in patients with myocardial infarction (AMI) and diabetes mellitus (DM) and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Bleeding complications in a Multicenter registry of patients discharged with diagnosis of Acute Coronary Syndrome (BleeMACS) is an international registry that enrolled participants with acute coronary syndrome followed up for at least 1 year across 15 centers from 2003 to 2014. Baseline characteristics and endpoints were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among 3095 (23.2%) patients with AMI and DM, 1898 (61.3%) received OMT at hospital discharge. OMT was associated with significantly reduced mortality (4.3% vs. 10.8%, p < 0.001), re-AMI (4.4% vs. 8.1%, p < 0.001), and composite endpoint of death/re-AMI (8.0% vs. 17.6%, p < 0.001). No difference was observed among regions. Propensity score matching confirmed that OMT significantly associated with lower mortality. After adjusting for confounding variables, OMT, drug-eluting stents, and complete revascularization were independent protective factors of 1-year mortality, whereas left ventricular ejection fraction and age were risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Guideline-recommended OMT was prescribed at suboptimal frequencies with geographic variations in this worldwide cohort. OMT can improve long-term clinical outcomes in patients with DM and AMI.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02466854 June 9, 2015.

Peri-Coronary Adipose Tissue Is a Predictor of Stent Failure in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

PURPOSE

Coronary inflammation is postulated as a driver of atherosclerosis and dysfunctional arterial healing which may trigger stent failure. Pericoronary adipose tissue (PCAT) attenuation, detected on computer tomography coronary angiography (CTCA), is an emerging non-invasive marker of coronary inflammation. This propensity matched study assessed the utility of both lesion specific (PCATLesion) and standardized PCAT attenuation as assessed in the proximal RCA (PCATRCA) as a predictor of stent failure in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention. This is the first study to our knowledge that assesses the association of PCAT with stent failure.

METHODS

Patients undergoing CTCA assessment for coronary artery disease with subsequent stent insertion within 60 days and repeat coronary angiography for any clinical reason within 5 years were included in the study. Stent failure was defined as binary restenosis of >50 % on quantitative coronary angiography analysis or stent thrombosis. Both PCATLesion and PCATRCA was assessed utilizing semi-automated proprietary software on baseline CTCA. Patients with stent failure were propensity matched utilizing age, sex, cardiovascular risk factors and procedural characteristics.

RESULTS

One hundred and fifty-one patients met inclusion criteria. Of these, 26 (17.2 %) had study-defined failure. A significant difference in PCATLesion attenuation between patients with and without failure was observed (-79.0 ± 12.6 vs. -85.9 ± 10.3HU, p = 0.035). There was no significant difference in PCATRCA attenuation between the two groups (-79.5 ± 10.1 vs -81.0 ± 12.3HU, p = 0.50). Univariate regression analysis showed PCATLesion attenuation was independently associated with stent failure (OR 1.06, 95 % CI 1.01-1.12, P = 0.035).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with stent failure exhibit significantly increased PCATLesion attenuation at baseline. These data suggest that baseline plaque inflammation may be an important driver for coronary stent failure.

Outcomes of Prediabetes Compared with Normoglycaemia and Diabetes Mellitus in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background: Patients with prediabetes are at increased risk of coronary artery disease (CAD). However, the association between prediabetes and adverse clinical outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is inconsistent, in contrast to outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). Thus, this meta-analysis evaluated the impact of dysglycaemia on PCI outcomes. Methods: The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were systematically reviewed from inception of databases until June 2022. In 17 studies, outcomes of PCI in patients with prediabetes were compared with patients who were normoglycaemic, and patients with DM. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at the longest follow-up. Results: Included were 12 prospective and five retrospective studies, with 11,868, 14,894 and 13,536 patients undergoing PCI in the prediabetes, normoglycaemic and DM groups, respectively. Normoglycaemic patients had a statistically lower risk of all-cause mortality, (risk ratio [RR] 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52-0.84), myocardial infarction (MI; RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.61-0.95) and cardiac mortality (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.39-0.87) compared with prediabetic patients undergoing PCI at the longest follow-up. Patients with prediabetes had a lower risk of all-cause mortality (RR=0.72 [95% CI 0.53-0.97]) and cardiac mortality (RR =0.47 [95% CI 0.23-0.93]) compared with patients with DM who underwent PCI. Conclusion: Among patients who underwent PCI for CAD, the risk of all-cause and cardiac mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events and MI in prediabetic patients was higher compared with normoglycaemic patients but lower compared with patients with DM.

Drug-coated balloon-based versus drug-eluting stent-only revascularization in patients with diabetes and multivessel coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

Data on drug-coated balloon (DCB) treatment in the context of diabetes mellitus (DM) and multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) are limited. We aimed to investigate the clinical impact of DCB-based revascularization on percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with DM and multivessel CAD.

METHODS

A total of 254 patients with multivessel disease (104 patients with DM) successfully treated with DCB alone or combined with drug-eluting stent (DES) were retrospectively enrolled (DCB-based group) and compared with 254 propensity-matched patients treated with second-generation DES from the PTRG-DES registry (n = 13,160 patients) (DES-only group). Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) comprised cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stroke, stent or target lesion thrombosis, target vessel revascularization, and major bleeding at 2 years.

RESULTS

The DCB-based group was associated with a reduced risk of MACE in patients with DM (hazard ratio [HR] 0.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.05-0.68, p = 0.003], but not in those without DM (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.20-1.38, p = 0.167) at the 2-year follow-up. In patients with DM, the risk of cardiac death was lower in the DCB-based group than the DES-only group, but not in those without DM. In both patients with or without DM, the burdens of DES and small DES (less than 2.5 mm) used were lower in the DCB-based group than in the DES-only group.

CONCLUSIONS

In multivessel CAD, the clinical benefit of a DCB-based revascularization strategy appears to be more evident in patients with DM than in those without DM after 2 years of follow-up. (Impact of Drug-Coated Balloon Treatment in De Novo Coronary Lesion; NCT04619277).

Impact of diabetes on clinical outcomes after revascularization with the dual therapy CD34 antibody-covered sirolimus-eluting Combo stent and the sirolimus-eluting Orsiro stent

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety of the dual therapy CD34 antibody-covered sirolimus-eluting Combo stent (DTS) and the sirolimus-eluting Orsiro stent (SES) in patients with and without diabetes mellitus (DM) included in the Scandinavian Organization for Randomized Trials with Clinical Outcome (SORT OUT) X study.

BACKGROUND

The incidence of target lesion failure (TLF) after treatment with modern drug-eluting stents has been reported to be significantly higher in patients with DM when compared to patients without DM. Thus, whether the results from the SORT OUT X study apply to patients with and without DM remains unknown.

METHODS

In total 3146 patients were randomized to stent implantation with DTS (n = 1578; DM: n = 279) or SES (n = 1568; DM: n = 271). The primary end point, TLF, was a composite of cardiac death, target-lesion myocardial infarction (MI), or target lesion revascularization (TLR) within 1 year.

RESULTS

At 1 year, the rate of TLF was increased in the DTS group compared to the SES group, both among patients with DM (9.3% vs. 4.8%; risk difference: 4.5%; incidence rate ratio: 1.99, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-3.90) and without DM (5.7% vs. 3.5%; incidence rate ratio: 1.67, 95% CI: 1.15-2.42). The differences were mainly explained by higher rates of TLR.

CONCLUSION

Compared to the SES, the DTS was associated with an increased risk of TLF at 12 months in patients with and without DM. The differences were mainly explained by higher rates of TLR, whereas rates of cardiac death and target lesion MI did not differ significantly between the two stent groups in patients with or without DM.