Three-year survival of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in dialysis

A risk model of mortality rate in dialysis patients following transcatheter aortic valve replacement

BACKGROUND

Dialysis patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) generally have poor prognosis compared with non-dialysis patients. Furthermore, there are few reliable risk models in this clinical setting. Therefore, we aimed to establish a risk model in dialysis patients undergoing TAVR that would be informative for their prognosis and the decision-making process of TAVR.

METHODS

A total 118 dialysis patients (full cohort) with severe aortic stenosis underwent TAVR in our institute between 2012 and 2022. The patients of the full cohort were randomly assigned to two groups in a 2:1 ratio to form derivation and validation cohorts. Risk factors contributing to deaths were analyzed from the preoperative variables and a risk model was established from Cox proportional hazard model.

RESULTS

There were 69 deaths following TAVR derived from infectious disease (43.5 %), cardiovascular-related disease (11.6 %), cerebral stroke or hemorrhage (2.9 %), cancer (1.4 %), unknown origin (18.8 %), and others (21.7 %) during the observational period (811 ± 719 days). The cumulative overall survival rates using the Kaplan-Meier method at 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years in the full cohort were 82.8 %, 41.9 %, and 24.2 %, respectively. An optimal risk model composed of five contributors: peripheral vascular disease, serum albumin, left ventricular ejection fraction < 40 %, operative age, and hemoglobin level, was established. The estimated C index for the developed models were 0.748 (95 % CI: 0.672-0.824) in derivation cohort and 0.705 (95 % CI: 0.578-0.832) in validation cohort. The prediction model showed good calibration [intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.937 (95%CI: 0.806-0.981)] between actual and predicted survival.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk model was a good indicator to estimate the prognosis in dialysis patients undergoing TAVR.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement in dialysis-dependent patients: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

This meta-analysis aims to compare the clinical outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) versus aortic valve replacement (AVR) for aortic stenosis in dialysis-dependent patients.

METHODS

Literature searches employed PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar and Embase to identify relevant studies. Bias-treated data were prioritized, isolated and pooled for analysis; raw data were utilized where bias-treated data were unavailable. Outcomes were analysed to assess for study data crossover.

RESULTS

Literature search identified 10 retrospective studies; following data source analysis, five studies were included. Upon pooling of bias-treated data, TAVI was significantly favoured in early mortality [odds ratio (OR), 0.42; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.19-0.92; I2  = 92%; P  = 0.03], 1-year mortality (OR, 0.88; 95% CI 0.80-0.97; I2  = 0%; P  = 0.01), rates of stroke/cerebrovascular events (OR, 0.71; 95% CI 0.55-0.93; I2  = 0%; P  = 0.01) and blood transfusions (OR, 0.36; 95% CI 0.21-0.62; I2  = 86%; P  = 0.0002). Pooling demonstrated fewer new pacemaker implantations in the AVR group (OR, 3.33; 95% CI 1.94-5.73; I2  = 74%; P  ≤ 0.0001) and no difference in the rate of vascular complications (OR, 2.27; 95% CI 0.60-8.59; I2  = 83%; P  = 0.23). Analysis including raw data revealed the length of hospital stay to favour TAVI with a mean difference of -9.20 days (95% CI -15.58 to -2.82; I2  = 97%; P  = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

Bias-treated meta-analysis comparing surgical AVR and TAVI favoured TAVI in early mortality, 1-year mortality, rates of stroke/cerebrovascular events and blood transfusions. There was no difference in the rates of vascular complications; however, TAVI required more pacemaker implantations. Data pooling including raw data revealed that the length of hospital admission favours TAVI.

Acute Coronary Syndrome After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (Results from Over 40,000 Patients)

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) encompasses a broad category of presentations from unstable angina to ST-elevation myocardial infarctions. Most patients undergo coronary angiography upon presentation for diagnosis and treatment. However, the ACS management strategy after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) may be complicated because of challenging coronary access. The National Readmission Database was reviewed to identify all patients who were readmitted with ACS within 90 days after TAVI between 2012 and 2018. Their outcomes were described between patients who were readmitted with ACS (ACS group) and without (non-ACS group). A total of 44,653 patients were readmitted within 90 days after TAVI. Among them, 1,416 patients (3.2%) were readmitted with ACS. The ACS group had a higher prevalence of men, diabetes, hypertension, congestive heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, and a history of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In the ACS group, 101 patients (7.1%) developed cardiogenic shock, whereas 120 patients (8.5%) developed ventricular arrhythmias. Overall, 141 patients (9.9%) in the ACS group died during readmissions (vs 3.0% in the non-ACS group, p <0.001). Among the ACS group, PCI was performed in 33 (5.9%), whereas coronary bypass grafting was performed in 12 (0.82%). The factors associated with ACS readmission included a history of diabetes, congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease, and PCI, and nonelective TAVI. Coronary artery bypass grafting was an independent factor related to in-hospital mortality during ACS readmission (odds ratio 11.9, 95% confidence interval 2.18 to 65.4, p = 0.004), whereas PCI was not (odds ratio 0.19, 95% confidence interval 0.03 to 1.44, p = 0.11). In conclusion, patients readmitted with ACS have significantly higher mortality compared with those readmitted without ACS. History of PCI is an independent factor associated with ACS after TAVI.

Chronic kidney disease and transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an established treatment option for patients with severe aortic stenosis. Patients with aortic stenosis have a higher prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD). CKD is generally associated with an increased risk of mortality, cardiovascular events, and readmission for heart failure; this supports the concept of a cardio-renal syndrome (CRS). CRS encompasses a spectrum of disorders of the heart and kidneys, wherein dysfunction in one organ may cause dysfunction in the other. TAVI treatment is expected to break this malignant cycle of CRS and improve cardio-renal function after the procedure. However, several reports demonstrate that patients with CKD have been associated with poor outcomes after the procedure. In addition, TAVI treatments for patients with advanced CKD and those with end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis are considered more challenging. Adequate management to preserve cardio-renal function in patients undergoing TAVI may reduce the risk of cardio-renal adverse events and improve the long-term prognosis. The current comprehensive review article aims to assess the prognostic impact of CKD after TAVI and seek optimal care in patients with CKD even after successful TAVI.

Trans-Apical Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in a Dialysis Patient with Systolic Heart Failure

Mortality and morbidity remain high following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in dialysis patients or those with low left ventricular ejection fraction. Therapeutic strategy for those with these comorbidities remains unestablished. We had a dialysis patient with peripheral artery disease and low left ventricular ejection fraction, who received successfully scheduled trans-apical TAVR following sufficient reverse remodeling by 3-month optimal medical therapy. Our strategy should be validated in a larger robust cohort.