Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing complex percutaneous coronary intervention

Trends in dual antiplatelet therapy regimens and clinical outcomes among patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents: A multicenter real-world study

Background

The patterns of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) use and the associated clinical outcomes in current practice remain limited. This study evaluates DAPT regimen patterns and clinical outcomes among acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Methods

This multicenter retrospective cohort study included ACS patients treated with PCI from January 2017 to February 2022 at five tertiary hospitals in Thailand. DAPT was categorized as nonpotent (NP-DAPT) or potent (P-DAPT). We described DAPT trends, with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and major bleeding, as primary efficacy and safety outcomes. Outcomes were assessed using inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) with Cox's proportional hazards model.

Results

The study included 1877 patients with ACS undergoing PCI. The mean age was 64.51 years (standard deviation 11.34), with 639 (34.04%) female patients and 1159 (61.75%) presenting ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Of these, 924 (49.23%) received NP-DAPT, and 953 (50.77%) were prescribed P-DAPT. Crude MACE incidence was lower in the P-DAPT compared to the NP-DAPT group (6.82% vs. 10.28%). After applying IPTW and conducting Cox's proportional hazard analysis, no significant differences in MACE were observed between groups (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.58-1.25, p = 0.408), nor in major bleeding (HR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.37-1.70, p = 0.555). P-DAPT was associated with any higher bleeding risk (HR: 1.52, 95% CI: 1.13-2.03, p = 0.005).

Conclusion

Standard DAPT remains predominant among Thai ACS patients, with NP-DAPT prescriptions approaching those of P-DAPT. Despite similar rates of MACE and major bleeding between the groups, P-DAPT was associated with a higher risk of any bleeding.

Ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel in Patients with left main Coronary Artery Stenting

PURPOSE

The left main (LM) coronary artery disease poses high risks for its special anatomical characteristics. Optimal antiplatelet therapy is still controversial in this disease. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor and clopidogrel in patients with stent implantation in the LM coronary artery.

METHODS

We analyzed 3221 patients with stent implantation in the LM coronary artery from January 2011 to June 2022. Patients were separated into two groups: the ticagrelor group (n = 1550) and the clopidogrel group (n = 1671). Baseline data were balanced by propensity score matching. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality, and secondary endpoints included cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, stent thrombosis, or target vessel revascularization. The primary safety endpoint was major bleeding, defined as BARC 3, 5 bleeding.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching (n = 1228 in each group), ticagrelor was linked to a lower incidence of all-cause mortality compared with clopidogrel after a three-year follow-up (5.7% vs. 8.5%; HR:0.728; 95%CI:0.537-0.985, P = 0.040). Ticagrelor treatment reduced target lesion revascularization (3.3% vs. 6.4%; HR: 0.542; 95%CI: 0.371-0.791, P = 0.001) and stent thrombosis (1.6% vs. 3.7%; HR: 0.459; 95%CI: 0.271-0.776, P = 0.004). There was no significant difference in major bleeding between the two groups. Multivariate COX analysis suggested that age, heart rate, diabetes, prior myocardial infarction, hemoglobin, serum creatinine, ticagrelor, DAPT duration, LM true-bifurcation, LM stent diameters, and IVUS were independent predictive parameters of all-cause death.

CONCLUSIONS

Ticagrelor was associated with lower all-cause mortality and no increased risk of major bleeding compared to clopidogrel in LM stenting patients. Thus, ticagrelor can be considered a viable substitute for clopidogrel in LM disease.

Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients with Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Cardiogenic Shock

Managing antithrombotic therapy in patients undergoing complex and high-risk in indicated patients, including those treated with complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or presenting with cardiogenic shock (CS), is challenging. This review highlights the critical role of antithrombotic therapy, during and after PCI, to optimize the efficacy while minimizing risks. Unfractionated heparin remains the mainstay anticoagulant for complex PCI and CS, with bivalirudin as a potential safer alternative. Cangrelor offers consistent antiplatelet effects, especially when timely absorption of oral agents is uncertain.

The residual risk of inflammation and remnant cholesterol in acute coronary syndrome patients on statin treatment undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND

Residual risk assessment for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients after sufficient medical management remains challenging. The usefulness of measuring high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and remnant cholesterol (RC) in assessing the level of residual inflammation risk (RIR) and residual cholesterol risk (RCR) for risk stratification in these patients needs to be evaluated.

METHODS

Patients admitted for ACS on statin treatment who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between March 2016 and March 2019 were enrolled in the analysis. The included patients were stratified based on the levels of hsCRP and RC during hospitalization. The primary outcome was ischemic events at 12 months, defined as a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. The secondary outcomes included 12-month all-cause death and cardiac death.

RESULTS

Among the 5778 patients, the median hsCRP concentration was 2.60 mg/L and the median RC concentration was 24.98 mg/dL. The RIR was significantly associated with ischemic events (highest hsCRP tertile vs. lowest hsCRP tertile, adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 1.52, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-2.30, P = 0.046), cardiac death (aHR: 1.77, 95% CI:1.02-3.07, P = 0.0418) and all-cause death (aHR: 2.00, 95% CI: 1.24-3.24, P = 0.0048). The RCR was also significantly associated with these outcomes, with corresponding values for the highest tertile of RC were 1.81 (1.21-2.73, P = 0.0043), 2.76 (1.57-4.86, P = 0.0004), and 1.72 (1.09-2.73, P = 0.0208), respectively. The risks of ischemic events (aHR: 2.80, 95% CI: 1.75-4.49, P < 0.0001), cardiac death (aHR: 4.10, 95% CI: 2.18-7.70, P < 0.0001), and all-cause death (aHR: 3.00, 95% CI, 1.73-5.19, P < 0.0001) were significantly greater in patients with both RIR and RCR (highest hsCRP and RC tertile) than in patients with neither RIR nor RCR (lowest hsCRP and RC tertile). Notably, the RIR and RCR was associated with an increased risk of ischemic events especially in patients with adequate low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) control (LDL-C < 70 mg/dl) (Pinteraction=0.04). Furthermore, the RIR and RCR provide more accurate evaluations of risk in addition to the GRACE score in these patients [areas under the curve (AUC) for ischemic events: 0.64 vs. 0.66, P = 0.003].

CONCLUSION

Among ACS patients receiving contemporary statin treatment who underwent PCI, high risks of both residual inflammation and cholesterol, as assessed by hsCRP and RC, were strongly associated with increased risks of ischemic events, cardiac death, and all-cause death.

Recanalisation of coronary chronic total occlusions

Percutaneous treatment of coronary chronic total occlusions (CTO) has advanced greatly since its advent in the late 1970s through the development of dedicated wires and microcatheters, the improved skills of highly experienced operators and the adoption of new sophisticated strategies to guide procedural planning. The contemporary procedural success rate is 80-90% with a reduction in complications. Although there has been no improvement in prognosis in randomised trials to date, they, and other controlled registries of thousands of patients, confirm the pivotal role of CTO recanalisation in the treatment of angina and dyspnoea and an improvement in quality of life. Despite this evidence, CTO recanalisation is grossly underutilised. This review reports a detailed overview of the history, indications and treatment strategies for CTO recanalisation and hopes to increase interest among new, and especially young, operators in this demanding, rapidly evolving field of interventional cardiology.