Obesity and vascular complication in percutaneous transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve insertion

Complex Transfemoral Access During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Narrative Review of Management, Complexity Scores, and Alternative Access

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become a well-established treatment for severe aortic stenosis across all levels of surgical risk. While transfemoral access remains the default approach, complications arising from vascular access-especially in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD)-pose significant challenges. Hostile vascular access, characterized by narrow vessel diameters, severe calcification, and tortuosity, complicates the procedure and necessitates alternative strategies. Recent advancements, such as intravascular lithotripsy (IVL), have shown promise in managing severely calcified arteries, improving the feasibility of transfemoral TAVR in patients previously considered ineligible. IVL uses pulsatile sonic waves to fragment arterial calcifications, enhancing vessel compliance and facilitating safe device delivery. Studies have demonstrated that IVL-assisted TAVR improves procedural success and reduces complications in patients with PAD. Additionally, orbital atherectomy, an adjunctive therapy targeting both concentric and eccentric calcifications, may complement the management of complex arterial calcification. The Hostile and passage-puncture scores offer valuable risk stratification tools for predicting vascular complications, aiding in better access site selection. Post-procedural echocardiography, particularly femoral artery sonography, may also play a role in detecting vascular complications early, enabling timely intervention. Finally, alternative access sites are increasingly being explored, with emerging data helping to guide the final access site decision. As TAVR continues to expand into lower risk populations, optimizing vascular access strategies remains essential to improving procedural outcomes. This review highlights the importance of preoperative imaging, endovascular techniques, and post-procedural monitoring in overcoming vascular challenges and ensuring successful TAVR outcomes.

Obesity and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Amidst an aging population and escalating obesity prevalence, elucidating the impact of obesity on transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) outcomes becomes paramount. The so-called "obesity paradox"-a term denoting the counterintuitive association of obesity, typically a risk factor for cardiovascular diseases, with improved survival outcomes in TAVR patients relative to their leaner or normal-weight counterparts-merits rigorous examination. This review comprehensively investigates the complex relationship between obesity and the clinical outcomes associated with TAVR, with a specific focus on mortality and periprocedural complications. This study aims to deepen our understanding of obesity's role in TAVR and the underlying mechanisms of the obesity paradox, thereby optimizing management strategies for this patient demographic, tailored to their unique physiological and metabolic profiles.

Inpatient outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement based on class of obesity

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a transformative option for severe aortic stenosis, especially in elderly patients. obesity's impact on TAVR outcomes is limited. Using the National Inpatient Sample from 2016 to 2020, We analyzed 217,300 TAVR hospitalizations across BMI groups. No difference in in-hospital mortality was observed, class III obesity experienced longer hospital stays (adjusted β: 0.43 days, P < 0.05), higher costs (adjusted β: $3,126, P < 0.05), increased heart failure exacerbation (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 2.68, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [1.03-7.01], p < 0.05), vascular access complications (aOR: 1.29, 95% CI: [1.07-1.52], P < 0.05), and post-operative pulmonary complications (Pneumonia (aOR: 1.42, 95% CI: [1.16-1.74], p < 0.05), acute hypoxic respiratory failure (aOR: 1.99, 95% CI: [1.67-2.36], p < 0.05), and non-invasive ventilation (aOR: 1.62, 95% CI: [1.07-2.44], p < 0.05). Complete heart block and permanent pacemaker requirement were higher in both class II and class III ((aOR: 1.30, 95% CI: [1.11-1.51], P < 0.05), (aOR:1.25, 95% CI: [1.06-1.46], P < 0.05) and ((aOR: 1.18, 95% CI: [1.00-1.40], P < 0.05), (aOR:1.22, 95% CI: [1.02-1.45], P < 0.05)) respectively. Understanding these links is crucial for optimizing TAVR care in obesity, ensuring enhanced outcomes, and procedural safety.