Clinical impact of increasing left ventricular pacing output in cardiac resynchronization therapy - the new optimization strategy

Retrograde penetration pacing into the conduction system as an alternative approach of his-bundle pacing: Retrograde penetration pacing into the conduction system

BACKGROUND

The optimal right ventricular (RV) pacing site during pacemaker implantation is still unclear due to left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony by traditional RV pacing. His-bundle (HIS) pacing has achieved narrow QRS and maintained LV synchrony but high failure rate. RV septal pacing occasionally has QRS waveform with wide and narrow component in the early and late phase, respectively, and maintains LV synchrony, reflecting the normal conduction system. We aimed to define this QRS waveform as retrograde penetration pacing into the conduction system (RPP-CS) and compared its effect on LV synchrony as an alternative approach of HIS pacing.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We enrolled 42 patients with atrio ventricular block (AVB) or bradycardia atrial fibrillation (AF) requiring pacemaker implantation (RPP-CS, n = 27; no RPP-CS, n = 15). Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. RPP-CS was observed in 96% and 26% of the RV septum and apex area, respectively. RPP-CS had a significantly shorter QRS width (p < 0.001). The frequency of maintaining LV synchrony was significantly higher in RPP-CS (67% vs. 20%, p = 0.003). The QRS interval's optimal cut-off value during RPP-CS was 132 ms for prediction of LV synchrony (sensitivity 83%, specificity 89%, positive predictive value 94%, and negative predictive value 73%). During RPP-CS, shorter QRS intervals (QRS ≤ 132 ms) had better postoperative LV ejection fraction than longer intervals (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

RPP-CS, especially with short QRS intervals (≤132 ms), had a high frequency of LV synchrony, maintained postoperative cardiac function, and may be an adequate first-line RV pacing site strategy for AVB or bradycardia AF as an alternative approach of HIS pacing.

Myocardial viability as shown by left ventricular lead pacing threshold and improved dyssynchrony by QRS narrowing predicts the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy

INTRODUCTION

Patients with advanced heart failure and dyssynchrony can benefit from cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). To predict the response to CRT, myocardial viability and improved dyssynchrony are suggested to be important.

METHODS

We retrospectively investigated 93 patients who underwent CRT implantation in Nagoya University Hospital. We assessed QRS narrowing the day after implantation to measure the improvement in dyssynchrony and measured the left ventricular pacing threshold (LVPT) to determine the local myocardial viability in all patients. Responders to CRT were defined as those having a greater than or equal to 15% decrease in left ventricular end-systolic volume by echocardiography at their 6-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Sixty-two patients (67%) were classified as responders. The QRS width before CRT implantation, QRS narrowing after implantation, left atrial diameter, septal-to-posterior wall motion delay, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, radial strain, and LVPT were significantly different between the responder and nonresponder groups. On multivariate analysis, QRS narrowing (odds ratio [OR], 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.05; P = 0.005) and LVPT (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.22-0.82; P = 0.011) were independent predictors of a response to CRT. We calculated the cutoff values from the receiver operating characteristic curves as 22.5 milliseconds of QRS narrowing and 1.55 V of LVPT. The response rates in patients with both predictive factors (QRS narrowing ≥ 22.5 milliseconds and LVPT ≤ 1.55 V), one factor, and no factors were 91%, 61%, and 25%, respectively (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Both myocardial viability and improved electrical dyssynchrony may be essential to predict a good response to CRT.

Clinical impact of increasing left ventricular pacing output in cardiac resynchronization therapy - the new optimization strategy

We report a patient who did not improve after standard optimization of atrioventricular and intraventricular pacing timing, but showed response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) after increasing left ventricular (LV) pacing output. Increasing LV pacing output is one of the useful optimization methods for CRT nonresponder.