Right ventricular function suffers from reperfusion delay: tissue Doppler study

Short- and Long-Term Outcomes in Patients With Right Ventricular Infarction According to Modalities of Reperfusion Strategies in China: Data From China Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry

Purpose

We sought to investigate the short- and long-term outcomes in patients with right ventricular infarction in China.

Methods

Data from China Acute Myocardial Infarction (CAMI) Registry for patients with right ventricular infarction between January 2013 and September 2014 were analyzed.

Results

Of the 1,988 patients with right ventricular infarction, 733 patients did not receive reperfusion therapy, 281 patients received thrombolysis therapy, and 974 patients underwent primary PCI. Primary PCI and thrombolysis were all associated with lower risks of in-hospital (3.1 vs. 12.6%; adjusted OR: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.27–0.87; P = 0.0151 and 5.7 vs. 12.6%; adjusted OR: 0.43; 95% CI: 0.22–0.85; P = 0.0155, respectively), and 2-year all-cause mortality (6.3 vs. 20.9%; adjusted HR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.34–0.73; P = 0.0003 and 11.0 vs. 20.9%; adjusted HR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.38–0.92; P = 0.0189, respectively), compared with no reperfusion therapy. Meanwhile, primary PCI was superior to thrombolysis in reducing the risks of in-hospital atrial-ventricular block (4.2 vs. 8.9%; adjusted OR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.23–0.91; P = 0.0257), cardiogenic shock (5.3 vs. 13.9%; adjusted OR: 0.43; 95% CI: 0.23–0.83; P = 0.0115), and heart failure (8.5 vs. 23.5%; adjusted OR: 0.35; 95% CI: 0.22–0.56; P < 0.0001). Primary PCI could reduce the risk of 2-year major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event (19.1 vs. 33.3%; adjusted HR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.56–0.92; P = 0.0092) relative to no reperfusion therapy, whereas thrombolysis may increase the risk of 2-year revascularization (15.5 vs. 8.7%; adjusted HR: 1.90; 95% CI: 1.15–3.16; P = 0.0124) compared with no reperfusion therapy.

Conclusions

Timely reperfusion therapy is essential for patients with right ventricular infarction. Primary PCI may be considered as the default treatment strategy for patients with right ventricular infarction in the contemporary primary PCI era.

Assessment of right ventricular function after successful revascularization for acute anterior myocardial infarction without right ventricular infarction by echocardiography

Background

Right ventricular (RV) involvement in acute left ventricular (LV) myocardial infarction (MI) is frequently underestimated in the clinical setting owing to the diagnostic limitations of the electrocardiogram and echocardiography.

Objective

To assess RV function in patients presented with first acute anterior ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who underwent successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and factors affecting it.

Methods

Forty consecutive patients with anterior STEMI who underwent successful primary PCI were enrolled in the study. Presence of a coexisting clinical condition that might affect RV function, patients with RV infarction or those having significant stenosis (>50%) affecting RV branch or right coronary artery proximal to RV branch were excluded. Echocardiography was performed during the hospital stay to assess the LV and RV systolic and diastolic function with special focus on tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, RV end-diastolic dimension, right atrial area, RV fractional area change, and tissue Doppler-derived myocardial performance index.

Results and Conclusion

RV dysfunction according to our definition in the first anterior MI occurred in (55%) of the study population. Independent predictors for abnormal RV function were left circumflex artery mid or proximal affection, eventful procedure, occurrence of no reflow, glucose level, LV end-systolic dimension, LV end-diastolic dimension, and LV ejection fraction.

Right ventricular function in patients presenting with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing an invasive approach

Background

Right ventricular involvement in ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) entails an increased morbidity and mortality. However, very scarce data is present on its affection in the setting of non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI).

Aim

To assess the affection of right ventricular function in patients presenting with NSTEMI undergoing an invasive procedure.

Subjects and methods

One hundred and fifty patients admitted with a first NSTEMI and eligible for reperfusion therapy via invasive percutaneous coronary intervention. These patients were divided in two groups; group A including patients with normal RV function, and group B including patients with impaired RV function as diagnosed by tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) cutoff value < 17 mm. All patients underwent angioplasty and were followed up in-hospital and for 3 months.

Results

RV dysfunction occurred in ninety-five (61.3%) patients of the study population. Significant improvement occurred to TAPSE after 3 months in comparison to TAPSE at baseline (15.45 ± 3.21 versus 17.09 ± 4.17 mm). Those with impaired RV function showed improvement of TAPSE after three months as compared to baseline (13.62 ± 2.58 vs 17.16 ± 3.64 p = 0.008). Multivariate analysis determined the independent predictors of RV dysfunction as RVEDD > 26 mm, RVFAC < 35%, RAA > 20 cm², and TAPSE < 17 mm.

Conclusion

RV dysfunction is not uncommon in NSTEMI when using the definition of TAPSE < 17 mm. Following up RV function by TAPSE, showed significant improvement after 3 months with successful PCI as compared to baseline. We recommend assessing and following up RV function in all patients admitted with a NSTEMI.

Acute Complications of Myocardial Infarction in the Current Era: Diagnosis and Management

Coronary heart disease is a major cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide. The incidence of mechanical complications of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has gone down to less than 1% since the advent of percutaneous coronary intervention, but although mortality resulting from AMI has gone down in recent years, the burden remains high. Mechanical complications of AMI include cardiogenic shock, free wall rupture, ventricular septal rupture, acute mitral regurgitation, and right ventricular infarction. Detailed knowledge of the complications and their risk factors can help clinicians in making an early diagnosis. Prompt diagnosis with appropriate medical therapy and timely surgical intervention are necessary for favorable outcomes.

The challenges in the management of right ventricular infarction

In recent years, right ventricular (RV) infarction seems to be underdiagnosed in most cases of acute myocardial ischaemia despite its frequent association with inferior-wall and, occasionally, anterior-wall myocardial infarction (MI). However, its initial management is drastically different from that of left ventricular MI, and studies have indicated that RV infarction remains associated with significant morbidity and mortality, even in the mechanical reperfusion era. The pathophysiology of RV infarction involves the interaction between the right and left ventricle (LV), and the mechanism has been clarified with the advent of diagnostic non-invasive modalities, such as echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance. In recent years, considerable progress has been made in the treatment of RV infarction; early revascularization remains the cornerstone of the management, and fluid resuscitation, with appropriate target selection, is necessary to maintain appropriate preload. Early recognition in intensive care with clear understanding of the pathophysiology is essential to improve its prognosis. In terms of management, the support strategy for RV dysfunction is different from that for LV dysfunction since the former may often be temporary. Along with early reperfusion, maintenance of an adequate heart rate and atrioventricular synchrony are essential to sustain a sufficient cardiac output in patients with RV infarction. In refractory cases, more intensive mechanical support is required, and new therapeutic options, such as Tandem-Heart or percutaneous cardiopulmonary support systems, are being developed.

Right ventricular involvement in patients with coronary artery disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

RV involvement in coronary artery disease (CAD) includes isolated infarction and involvement in left ventricular infarction. Right ventricular involvement with left ventricular infarction has unique clinical signs and symptoms, requires different management, and has worse prognosis than left ventricular infarcts without right ventricular involvement. Although the right ventricle (RV) is geometrically complex, advances in echocardiography, nuclear imaging, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging technologies have helped to optimally visualize its structure and function and to better elucidate its role in CAD.

RECENT FINDINGS

Newer noninvasive imaging modalities to visualize the RV are highlighted and their emerging clinical utilities are emphasized, including three-dimensional echocardiography, tissue Doppler velocity and strain imaging, computed tomography, and MRI.

SUMMARY

The RV is often involved in CAD. Available imaging modalities demonstrate different aspects of right ventricular involvement, yielding new insights into pathophysiology, clinical care, and management. As imaging technologies widen in their scope, cardiologists will increasingly have the imaging tools to integrate information on right ventricular morphology, hemodynamics, and function, enabling appropriate care for patients with right ventricular involvement in CAD.