1
|
Lappegård KT, Moe F. Remote Monitoring of CIEDs-For Both Safety, Economy and Convenience? INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 19:ijerph19010312. [PMID: 35010572 PMCID: PMC8751026 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19010312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2021] [Revised: 12/17/2021] [Accepted: 12/25/2021] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
Cardiac implantable electronic devices such as pacemakers and defibrillators are increasingly monitored by systems transmitting information directly from the patient to the hospital. This may increase safety and patient satisfaction and also under certain circumstances represent an economic advantage. The review summarizes some of the recent research in the field of remote monitoring of cardiac devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Knut Tore Lappegård
- Department of Medicine, Nordland Hospital, N-8092 Bodo, Norway;
- Department of Clinical Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, N-9037 Tromso, Norway
- Correspondence:
| | - Frode Moe
- Department of Medicine, Nordland Hospital, N-8092 Bodo, Norway;
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lopez-Villegas A, Leal-Costa C, Perez-Heredia M, Villegas-Tripiana I, Catalán-Matamoros D. Knowledge Update on the Economic Evaluation of Pacemaker Telemonitoring Systems. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:ijerph182212120. [PMID: 34831876 PMCID: PMC8624333 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182212120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2021] [Revised: 11/15/2021] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
(1) Introduction: In the last two decades, telemedicine has been increasingly applied to telemonitoring (TM) of patients with pacemakers; however, presently, its growth has significantly accelerated because of the COVID-19 pandemic, which has pushed patients and healthcare workers alike to seek new ways to stay healthy with minimal physical contact. Therefore, the main objective of this study was to update the current knowledge on the differences in the medium-and long-term effectiveness of TM and conventional monitoring (CM) in relation to costs and health outcomes. (2) Methods: Three databases and one scientific registry were searched (PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Google Scholar), with no restrictions on language or year of publication. Studies published until July 2021 were included. The inclusion criteria were: (a) experimental or observational design, (b) complete economic evaluation, (c) patients with implanted pacemakers, and (d) comparison of TM with CM. Measurements of study characteristics (author, study duration, sample size, age, sex, major indication for implantation, and pacemaker used), analysis, significant results of the variables (analysis performed, primary endpoints, secondary endpoints, health outcomes, and cost outcomes), and further miscellaneous measurements (methodological quality, variables coded, instrument development, coder training, and intercoder reliability, etc.) were included. (3) Results: 11 studies met the inclusion criteria, consisting of 3372 enrolled patients; 1773 (52.58%) of them were part of randomized clinical trials. The mean age was 72 years, and the atrioventricular block was established as the main indication for device implantation. TM was significantly effective in detecting the presence or absence of pacemaker problems, leading to a reduction in the number of unscheduled hospital visits (8.34-55.55%). The cost of TM was up to 87% lower than that of CM. There were no significant differences in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and the number of cardiovascular events. (4) Conclusions: Most of the studies included in this systematic review confirm that in the TM group of patients with pacemakers, cardiovascular events are detected and treated earlier, and the number of unscheduled visits to the hospital is significantly reduced, without affecting the HRQoL of patients. In addition, with TM modality, both formal and informal costs are significantly reduced in the medium and long term.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Lopez-Villegas
- Social Involvement of Critical and Emergency Medicine, CTS-609 Research Group, Poniente Hospital, 04700 El Ejido-Almería, Spain;
| | - César Leal-Costa
- Nursing Department, University of Murcia, 30120 Murcia, Spain
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +34-868-889-771
| | - Mercedes Perez-Heredia
- Research Management Department, Primary Care District Poniente of Almería, 04700 El Ejido-Almería, Spain;
| | | | - Daniel Catalán-Matamoros
- UC3M MediaLab, Department of Communication and Media Studies, Madrid University Carlos III, 28903 Madrid, Spain;
- Health Sciences Research Institute, University of Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
Telemedicine is the use of information and communication technology to deliver healthcare at a distance. It has been resorted to during the COVID-19 pandemic to lessen the need for in-person patient care decreasing the risk of transmission, and it can be of benefit afterward in the management of cardiac disease. The elderly population has unique challenges concerning the use of telehealth technologies. We thus review the advances in telemedicine technologies in treating elderly cardiac patients including in our discussion only studies with a mean age of participants above 60. Remote monitoring of blood pressure, weight, and symptoms, along with home ECG recording has been found to be superior to usual in-clinic follow up. Combining remote monitoring with video conferencing with physicians, patient education websites, and applications is also of benefit. Remote monitoring of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators (ICD) and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Defibrillators (CRT-D) is also beneficial but can be at the cost of an increase in both appropriate and inappropriate interventions. Implantable sensing devices compatible with remote monitoring have been developed and have been shown to improve care and cost-effectiveness. New smartphone software can detect arrhythmias using home ECG recordings and can detect atrial fibrillation using smartphone cameras. Remote monitoring of implanted pacemakers has shown non-inferiority to in clinic follow up. On the other hand, small-scale questionnaire-based studies demonstrated the willingness of the elderly cardiac patients to use such technologies, and their satisfaction with their use and ease of use. Large-scale studies should further investigate useability in samples more representative of the general elderly population with more diverse socioeconomic and educational backgrounds. Accordingly, it seems that studying integrating multiple technologies into telehealth programs is of great value. Further efforts should also be put in validating the technologies for specific diseases along with the legal and reimbursement aspects of the use of telehealth.
Collapse
|
4
|
Sülz S, van Elten HJ, Askari M, Weggelaar-Jansen AM, Huijsman R. eHealth Applications to Support Independent Living of Older Persons: Scoping Review of Costs and Benefits Identified in Economic Evaluations. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23:e24363. [PMID: 33687335 PMCID: PMC7988395 DOI: 10.2196/24363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2020] [Revised: 12/04/2020] [Accepted: 01/13/2021] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND eHealth applications are constantly increasing and are frequently considered to constitute a promising strategy for cost containment in health care, particularly if the applications aim to support older persons. Older persons are, however, not the only major eHealth stakeholder. eHealth suppliers, caregivers, funding bodies, and health authorities are also likely to attribute value to eHealth applications, but they can differ in their value attribution because they are affected differently by eHealth costs and benefits. Therefore, any assessment of the value of eHealth applications requires the consideration of multiple stakeholders in a holistic and integrated manner. Such a holistic and reliable value assessment requires a profound understanding of the application's costs and benefits. The first step in measuring costs and benefits is identifying the relevant costs and benefit categories that the eHealth application affects. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to support the conceptual phase of an economic evaluation by providing an overview of the relevant direct and indirect costs and benefits incorporated in economic evaluations so far. METHODS We conducted a systematic literature search covering papers published until December 2019 by using the Embase, Medline Ovid, Web of Science, and CINAHL EBSCOhost databases. We included papers on eHealth applications with web-based contact possibilities between clients and health care providers (mobile health apps) and applications for self-management, telehomecare, telemedicine, telemonitoring, telerehabilitation, and active healthy aging technologies for older persons. We included studies that focused on any type of economic evaluation, including costs and benefit measures. RESULTS We identified 55 papers with economic evaluations. These studies considered a range of different types of costs and benefits. Costs pertained to implementation activities and operational activities related to eHealth applications. Benefits (or consequences) could be categorized according to stakeholder groups, that is, older persons, caregivers, and health care providers. These benefits can further be divided into stakeholder-specific outcomes and resource usage. Some cost and benefit types have received more attention than others. For instance, patient outcomes have been predominantly captured via quality-of-life considerations and various types of physical health status indicators. From the perspective of resource usage, a strong emphasis has been placed on home care visits and hospital usage. CONCLUSIONS Economic evaluations of eHealth applications are gaining momentum, and studies have shown considerable variation regarding the costs and benefits that they include. We contribute to the body of literature by providing a detailed and up-to-date framework of cost and benefit categories that any interested stakeholder can use as a starting point to conduct an economic evaluation in the context of independent living of older persons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra Sülz
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Hilco J van Elten
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marjan Askari
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Anne Marie Weggelaar-Jansen
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Clinical Informatics, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands
| | - Robbert Huijsman
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Geriant, Heerhugowaard, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) telehealth management may improve initial and chronic care access, time to diagnosis and treatment, between-visit care, e-communications and e-education, workflows, costs, and therapy outcomes. OSA telehealth options may be used to replace or supplement none, some, or all steps in the evaluation, testing, treatments, and management of OSA. All telehealth steps must adhere to OSA guidelines. OSA telehealth may be adapted for continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and non-CPAP treatments. E-data collection enhances uses for individual and group analytics, phenotyping, testing and treatment selections, high-risk identification and targeted support, and comparative and multispecialty therapy studies.
Collapse
|
6
|
Ohlow MA, Awada H, Laubscher M, Geller JC, Brunelli M. Very early discharge after cardiac implantable electronic device implantations: is this the future? J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2020; 60:231-237. [PMID: 32239387 DOI: 10.1007/s10840-020-00730-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2020] [Accepted: 03/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To limit the ever-increasing healthcare costs, strategies to minimize hospitalization length are warranted. In this perspective, early discharge (the same day or after < 24 h) post-cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation might represent a useful strategy; nevertheless, it is imperative first to understand the timing of (potentially lethal) complications and evaluate whether this is not only an effective but also a safe clinical decision. METHODS A retrospective cohort analysis of all patients undergoing new CIED implantation from Jan 2008 to Dec 2014 was conducted. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and timing of complications post CIED implantation were evaluated, and the timing of complications was divided into intra-operative, 0-6 h (h), 6 to 24 h, and > 24 h post-implant. One-year post-implant follow-up (FU) was performed in our CIED clinic. RESULTS A total of 1868 patients (68% men, average age 70 years, 85% hypertension, 39% diabetes, 57% coronary artery disease, and average left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 41%) received 703 (38%) pacemaker, 448 (24%) implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), 639 (34%) cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices, and 78 (4.2%) cardiac contractility modulation. A total of 199 (11%) patients experienced 214 complications. Most (75%) occurred > 24 h post-implantation (with a median of 7 days). At univariate analysis, complications occurred more often in patients with a lower LVEF, on anticoagulation/antiplatelet therapy, and undergoing ICD/CRT-D implantation (p < 0.05 for all). CONCLUSION Most complications occur > 24 h after first time CIED implantation. Therefore, it might not be optimal to discharge patients in ≤ 24 h, unless extensive ambulatory monitoring for complications is available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc-Alexander Ohlow
- Department of Cardiology, SRH Wald-Klinikum, Straße des Friedens 122, 07548, Gera, Germany.
| | - Hassan Awada
- Department of Cardiology, Zentralklinik, Robert-Koch-Allee 9, 99437, Bad Berka, Germany
| | - Moritz Laubscher
- Department of Cardiology, Zentralklinik, Robert-Koch-Allee 9, 99437, Bad Berka, Germany
| | - J Christoph Geller
- Department of invasive and interventional Electrophysiology, Zentralklinik, Robert-Koch-Allee 9, 99437, Bad Berka, Germany
| | - Michele Brunelli
- Department of Cardiology and Endocrinology, Staedtisches Klinikum, 39130, Magdeburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Parahuleva MS, Soydan N, Divchev D, Lüsebrink U, Schieffer B, Erdogan A. Home monitoring after ambulatory implanted primary cardiac implantable electronic devices: The home ambulance pilot study. Clin Cardiol 2017; 40:1068-1075. [PMID: 28833266 DOI: 10.1002/clc.22772] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2017] [Revised: 07/05/2017] [Accepted: 07/11/2017] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Home Monitoring (HM) system of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) permits early detection of arrhythmias or device system failures. The aim of this pilot study was to examine how the safety and efficacy of the HM system in patients after ambulatory implanted primary CIEDs compare to patients with a standard procedure and hospitalization. HYPOTHESIS We hypothesized that HM and their modifications would be a useful extension of the present concepts for ambulatory implanted CIEDs. METHODS This retrospective analysis evaluates telemetric data obtained from 364 patients in an ambulatory single center over 6 years. Patients were assigned to an active group (n = 217), consisting of those who were discharged early on the day of implantation of the primary CIED, or to a control group (n = 147), consisting of those discharged and followed up with the HM system according to usual medical practices. RESULTS The mean duration of hospitalization was 73.2% shorter in the active group than in the control group, corresponding to 20.5 ± 13 fewer hours (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.3-29.5; P < 0.01) spent in the hospital (7.5 ± 1.5 vs 28 ± 4.5 h). This shorter mean hospital stay was attributable to a 78.8% shorter postoperative period in the active group. The proportion of patients with treatment-related adverse events was 11% (n = 23) in the active group and 17% (n = 25) in the control group (95% CI: 5.5-8.3; P = 0.061). This 6% absolute risk reduction (95% CI: 3.3-9.1; P = 0.789) confirmed the noninferiority of the ambulatory implanted CIED when compared with standard management of these patients. CONCLUSIONS Early discharge with the HM system after ambulatory CIED implantation was safe and not inferior to the classic medical procedure. Thus, together with lower costs, HM and its modifications would be a useful extension of the present concepts for ambulatory implanted CIEDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariana S Parahuleva
- Internal Medicine/Cardiology and Angiology Department, University Hospital of Giessen and Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Nedim Soydan
- Internist Practice Center, Balserische Stiftung Hospital, Giessen, Germany
| | - Dimitar Divchev
- Internal Medicine/Cardiology and Angiology Department, University Hospital of Giessen and Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Ulrich Lüsebrink
- Internal Medicine/Cardiology and Angiology Department, University Hospital of Giessen and Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Bernhard Schieffer
- Internal Medicine/Cardiology and Angiology Department, University Hospital of Giessen and Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Ali Erdogan
- Internist Practice Center, Balserische Stiftung Hospital, Giessen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|