Temporal trends in prevalence and outcomes of atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

Antithrombotic Strategies in Atrial Fibrillation After ACS and/or PCI: A 4-Way Comparison From AUGUSTUS

BACKGROUND

The optimal antithrombotic regimen for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who had an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is not known.

OBJECTIVES

The authors sought to determine which antithrombotic regimen best balances safety and efficacy.

METHODS

AUGUSTUS, a multicenter 2 × 2 factorial design randomized trial compared apixaban with vitamin K antagonist (VKA) and aspirin with placebo in patients with AF with recent ACS and/or PCI treated with a P2Y12 inhibitor. We conducted a 4-way analysis comparing safety and efficacy outcomes in the 4 randomized groups. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death, major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding, or hospitalization for cardiovascular causes over 6-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes included individual components of the primary endpoint.

RESULTS

A total of 4,614 patients were enrolled. All patients were treated with a P2Y12 inhibitor. The primary endpoint occurred in 21.9% of patients randomized to apixaban plus placebo, 27.3% randomized to apixaban plus aspirin, 28.0% randomized to VKA plus placebo, and 33.3% randomized to VKA plus aspirin. Rates of major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding and hospitalization for cardiovascular causes were lower with apixaban and placebo compared with the other 3 antithrombotic strategies. There was no difference between the 4 randomized groups with respect to all-cause death.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with AF and a recent ACS and/or PCI, an antithrombotic regimen that included a P2Y12 inhibitor and apixaban without aspirin resulted in a lower incidence of the composite of death, bleeding, or cardiovascular hospitalization than regimens including VKA, aspirin, or both. (An Open-label, 2 x 2 Factorial, Randomized Controlled, Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety of Apixaban vs. Vitamin K Antagonist and Aspirin vs. Aspirin Placebo in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Acute Coronary Syndrome or Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; NCT02415400).

Optimal Antithrombotic Therapy Beyond 1-Year After Coronary Revascularization in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Currently, non-vitamin K-antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) monotherapy has been suggested as the optimal antithrombotic therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF) beyond one year after coronary revascularization. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes between NOAC monotherapy and NOAC plus antiplatelet combination therapy using real-world data.

METHODS

Between 2015 and 2020, patients with AF who had received NOACs beyond one year after coronary revascularization were enrolled from Korean national insurance data. We emulated a pragmatic sequence of trials between the NOAC monotherapy and the antiplatelet combination therapy followed by propensity score matching. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and stroke.

RESULTS

Among 206,407 person-trials from 4,465 individuals, we compared 3,275 pairs of the monotherapy and the matched combination therapy. During a median follow-up of 1.24 years, the incidence rate of MACCE was 19.4% and 20.0% per patient-year in the monotherapy group and the antiplatelet combination group, respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88-1.05; P = 0.422). Compared with the antiplatelet combination group, the monotherapy group had a significantly lower incidence rate of major bleeding, defined as intracranial bleeding or gastrointestinal bleeding requiring hospitalization (2.8% vs. 3.6% per patient-year; HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.62-0.97; P = 0.024).

CONCLUSION

As an antithrombotic therapy for AF beyond one year after coronary revascularization, NOAC monotherapy was associated with a similar risk of MACCE and a lower risk of major bleeding compared to NOAC plus antiplatelet combination therapy.

Predictors of gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with acute coronary syndrome and the optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy

Background

This study aims to estimate the risk factors of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and to evaluate the optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT).

Materials and Methods

We enrolled 1266 patients with ACS in a telephone follow-up program to determine whether any of the patients were hospitalized for GI bleeding. We collected baseline data, laboratory tests, electrocardiograms, and echocardiography covering all ACS patients. Multivariable regression was performed to adjust for confounders and predictors of GI bleeding. At the same time, the optimal duration of DAPT for ACS patients was evaluated.

Results

A total of 1061 ACS patients were included in the study. After 13-68 months, 48 patients (4.5%) were hospitalized for GI bleeding. The risk of GI bleeding was significantly increased in patients treated with DAPT for more than 18 months (hazard ratio 12.792, 5.607-29.185, P < 0.01). Receiver Operating Characteristic curve showed that the duration of DAPT using a cutoff of 14.5 months resulted in a sensitivity of 66.7% and a specificity of 77%.

Conclusion

In patients with ACS, DAPT time are the main risk factors of GI bleeding. The optimal duration of DAPT is 14.5 months.

Clinical Significance of Atrial Fibrillation Status in Patients With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Background

Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) often develop atrial fibrillation (AF). We investigated the clinical effects of AF status on in-hospital mortality and complications in patients with PCI using a recent large-scale nationwide dataset.

Methods

Using a claims-based dataset from 1022 hospitals in Japan for the time period between 2012 and 2016, patients with PCI were identified and classified into 3 groups according to AF status: no AF, prevalent AF before admission, and incident AF after admission. In-hospital mortality, complications, and medical costs were compared in crude and propensity-matched cohorts.

Results

In 659,525 hospitalized patients undergoing PCI, prevalent AF and incident AF were observed in 6.0% and 1.3% patients, respectively; the AF rates increased over 5 years. A greater proportion of older patients and patients with comorbidities had both of these categories of AF; undergoing PCI for acute coronary syndrome was common in incident AF. Both prevalent AF and incident AF were associated with worse crude outcomes and complications during hospitalization. In propensity-matched cohorts, incident AF was associated with a higher in-hospital mortality rate, longer length of stay, higher direct costs, and higher rate of complications, including stroke and acute kidney injury, compared with prevalent AF. These outcomes, except length of in-hospital stay, did not change for either AF status over 5 years.

Conclusions

Prevalent AF and incident AF in patients undergoing PCI were both associated with deteriorating crude outcomes and complications; in particular, incident AF was associated with worse adjusted outcomes and complications. Further efforts are needed to improve patient outcomes in an aging society in which the incidence of AF is increasing.

The role of triple antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin plus clopidogrel forms the backbone of secondary prevention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) or who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), but in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), oral anticoagulation (OAC) is superior to antiplatelet therapy for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism. Patients with AF who undergo PCI or have an ACS event therefore have an indication for both OAC and DAPT, so-called triple antithrombotic therapy. However, observational analyses have shown that the annual rate of major bleeding on triple therapy exceeds 10%. For this reason, five major randomized clinical trials have compared double antithrombotic therapy with OAC and a P2Y₁₂ inhibitor versus triple therapy in patients with AF who underwent PCI or had an ACS event. Each of the trials showed that double antithrombotic therapy reduced the rate of major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding compared with triple therapy and was non-inferior for prevention of ischemic events, including cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. In the one trial that directly compared warfarin with a non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC), apixaban reduced the rate of major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding compared with warfarin and was non-inferior with respect to prevention of ischemic events. As a result of these trials, consensus guidelines recommend that patients with AF who undergo PCI or have an ACS event should be treated with triple antithrombotic therapy (OAC + P2Y₁₂ inhibitor + aspirin) for 7 days or less, followed by double antithrombotic therapy (OAC + P2Y₁₂ inhibitor) for 6 to 12 months.

Clopidogrel or ticagrelor alongside dabigatran in acute coronary syndrome and indication for NOAC: a study rationale

The combination of oral anticoagulants with platelet inhibitors has been widely investigated in patients with coronary stenting and concomitant atrial fibrillation. In these patients, default therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndrome is clopidogrel plus non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant, omitting aspirin. However, in view of the high thromboembolic risk associated with acute coronary syndrome and the number of poor metabolizers for clopidogrel, investigation of alternative P2Y12-inhibitors is mandatory. This prospective, multicenter, open-label, registry-based, randomized, controlled trial aims to show the non-inferiority of dabigatran plus ticagrelor versus dabigatran plus clopidogrel in patients on chronic anticoagulants who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndrome. The primary end point is major bleeding as defined by the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium bleeding definition. Trial registration number: NL75644.096.21.

Impact of the Malnutrition on Mortality in Elderly Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Purpose

Malnutrition has been shown to be related to adverse clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure, hypertension, atrial fibrillation and other cardiovascular diseases. However, in the patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), especially in the elderly, the association of nutritional state and all-cause mortality remains unknown. We aimed to investigate the association of malnutrition with all-cause mortality in the elder patients undergoing PCI.

Patients and Methods

Based on the largest retrospective and observational cohort study from January 2007 to December 2017, the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score was applied to 21,479 consecutive patients with age ≥60 who undergoing PCI for nutritional assessment. Participants were classified as absent, mild, moderate and severe malnutrition by CONUT score. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare all-cause mortality among the above four groups. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were performed to examine the association of malnutrition with all-cause mortality.

Results

According to the CONUT score, 48.19%, 15.08% and 0.94% patients were mildly, moderately and severely malnourished, respectively. During a median follow-up of 5.16 years (interquartile range: 3.02 to 7.89 years), 3173 (14.77%) patients died. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the risk of all-cause mortality was significantly higher in patients with a worse nutritional status. Compared with normal nutritional state, malnutrition was associated with significantly increased risk for all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio for mild, moderate and severe degrees of malnutrition, respectively: 1.20 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.09 to 1.33], 1.32 [95% CI: 1.17 to 1.49] and 1.76 [95% CI: 1.33 to 2.33]).

Conclusion

Malnutrition is prevalent among elderly patients with CAD undergoing PCI, and is strongly related to the all-cause mortality increasing. For elderly patients with CAD undergoing PCI, it is necessary to assess the status of nutrition, and evaluate the efficacy of nutritional interventions.

Impact of Platelet Reactivity in ACS Patients on Clinical Outcomes with Triple Antithrombotic Therapy

Optimal antithrombotic therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients on oral anticoagulants (OAC) remains a clinical conundrum. In fact, combining an OAC with dual antiplatelet therapy (triple antithrombotic therapy, TAT) increases the risk of bleeding. Clopidogrel is the only thienopyridine recommended in TAT patients. Whether its response plays a relevant role in this setting remains uncertain. We aimed to evaluate the level of platelet reactivity inhibition (PRI) achieved by oral TAT in Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing PCI and its relationship with outcomes. We performed a multicenter prospective observational study and assessed PRI by vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) index following a loading dose of clopidogrel. The primary endpoint was the incidence of major adverse cerebral or cardiovascular events (MACCE) at six months based on High on Treatment Platelet Reactivity (HTPR, VASP > 50%). The secondary endpoint was the incidence of bleeding at six months based on Low on Treatment Platelet Reactivity (LTPR, VASP < 16%). 491 patients were followed up for six months: 7.7% experienced MACCE and 17.3% experienced bleeding. There was no significant relationship between HTPR and MACCE, neither between LTPR and bleeding. Vitamin-K antagonist (VKA) treatment was associated with more MACCE and bleeding events, and the majority of events occurred within the first months. VASP index failed to predict outcomes in post-ACS patients with TAT. We confirm that direct acting OAC should be prioritized over VKA in TAT regimen.

Necessity of Antiaggregation and Anticoagulation and Its Prognostic Impact: A Cardiologist's View

BACKGROUND

In modern cardiology, anticoagulation and antiaggregation are key components of current treatment strategies. However, in patients treated with anticoagulation and antiplatelet substances, bleeding is a major risk.

FINDINGS

In all major cardiovascular diseases, a multitude of studies have shown a positive impact of antithrombotic treatment on cardiovascular death. In patients with higher bleeding risks, recent studies showed the safety of reducing the period of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), i.e., after percutaneous coronary intervention. In patients with coronary artery disease and atrial fibrillation (AF), triple therapy including DAPT and anticoagulation is associated with very high bleeding risks. However, recently published data showed the safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and P2Y12 inhibitors only compared to vitamin K antagonist (VKA) and DAPT. Anticoagulation in nonvalvular AF reduces major cerebrovascular ischemic events. However, the inherent cerebrovascular bleeding risk is an important concern of this treatment. With the advent of DOACs, this risk could be reduced compared to VKA. Furthermore, anticoagulation and antiaggregation are crucial after treatment of valve disease, both after surgical and interventional procedures. Even in heart failure, new data show benefits using antithrombotic substances.

CONCLUSIONS

Anticoagulation and antiaggregation are of major prognostic relevance in cardiovascular diseases. However, the inherent bleeding risk has to be considered.

Temporal trends in prevalence and outcomes of atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

HYPOTHESIS

Large administrative data may provide further insight into temporal trends in the prevalence and burden of AF in patients who underwent PCI.

METHODS

Using the National Inpatient Sample database in the U.S., AF patients ≥18 years who underwent PCI between 2005 and 2014 and were identified by the International Classification of Diseases, ninth revision, Clinical Modification, were examined. In-hospital mortality, morbidity, resource use, and medical costs were evaluated in crude and propensity-matched analyses.

RESULTS

Among an estimated 6 272 232 hospitalizations, of patients undergoing PCI, AF prevalence was 9.9% and steadily increased from 8.6% to 12.0% between 2005 and 2014 (P < .001); there was also a greater proportion of comorbidities. There was a marked increase in AF prevalence among those aged ≥65 years and those undergoing elective PCIs. AF was independently associated with higher in-hospital mortality and higher rates of transient ischaemic attack/stroke, bleeding complications, and non-home discharge. Excessive in-hospital mortality, stroke rate, gastrointestinal bleeding, blood transfusion, length of stay, and costs among AF hospitalizations were consistently observed throughout the study period.

CONCLUSION

AF becomes more prevalent in patients undergoing PCI, possibly due to a higher comorbidity, particularly in elderly patients with non-acute indications. Less favorable trends in mortality, bleeding, and stroke among AF patients who underwent PCI were consistent over time. Continuous efforts are needed to improve outcomes and manage strategies for AF patients undergoing PCI.