Static versus dynamic exercise: effects on Doppler echocardiographic indices of left ventricular performance

Hemodynamic Changes During Physiological and Pharmacological Stress Testing in Healthy Subjects, Aortic Stenosis and Aortic Coarctation Patients-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction: Exercise testing has become a diagnostic standard in the evaluation and management of heart disease. While different methods of exercise and pharmacological stress testing exist, only little is known about their comparability. We aimed to assess hemodynamic changes during dynamic exercise, isometric exercise, and dobutamine stress testing at different stress intensities in healthy subjects and patients with aortic stenosis (AS) and aortic coarctation (CoA).

Methods: A systematic literature search (PROSPERO 2017:CRD42017078608) in MEDLINE of interventional trials was conducted to identify eligible studies providing evidence of changes in hemodynamic parameters under different stress conditions acquired by MRI or echocardiography. A random effects model was used to estimate pooled mean changes in hemodynamics.

Results: One hundred and twenty-eight study arms with a total of 3,139 stress-examinations were included. In healthy subjects/(where available) in AS, pooled mean changes (95% CIs) during light dynamic stress were 31.78 (27.82–35.74) bpm in heart rate (HR) and 6.59 (2.58–10.61) ml in stroke volume (SV). Changes during light pharmacological stress were 13.71 (7.87–19.56)/14.0 (9.82–18.18) bpm in HR, and 5.47 (0.3–10.63)/8.0 (3.82–12.18) ml in SV. Changes during light isometric stress were 18.44 (10.74–26.14)/5.0 (−1.17–11.17) bpm in HR and −4.17 (−14.37–6.03)/−4.0 (−16.43–8.43) ml in SV. Changes during moderate dynamic stress were 49.57 (40.03–59.1)/46.45 (42.63–50.27) bpm in HR and 11.64 (5.87–17.42) ml in SV. During moderate pharmacological stress, changes in HR were 42.83 (36.94–48.72)/18.66 (2.38–34.93) bpm and in SV 6.29 (−2.0–14.58)/13.11 (7.99–18.23) ml. During high intensity dynamic stress changes in HR were 89.31 (81.46–97.17)/55.32 (47.31–63.33) bpm and in SV 21.31 (13.42–29.21)/−0.96 (−5.27–3.35) ml. During high pharmacological stress, changes in HR were 53.58 (36.53–70.64)/42.52 (32.77–52.28) bpm, and in SV 0.98 (−9.32–11.27)/14.06 (−1.62–29.74) ml. HR increase and age were inversely correlated at high stress intensities. In CoA, evidence was limited to single studies.

Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis presents pooled hemodynamic changes under light, moderate and high intensity exercise and pharmacological stress, while considering the potential influence of age. Despite limited availability of comparative studies, the reference values presented in this review allow estimation of the expected individual range of a circulatory response in healthy individuals and patients with AS and may contribute to future study planning and patient-specific models even when stress testing is contraindicated.

The relationships between plasma adrenomedullin and endothelin-1 concentrations and Doppler echocardiographic indices of left ventricular function during static exercise in healthy men

Our previous study showed a significant relationships between static exercise-induced changes in plasma adrenomedullin (ADM) and those in endothelin-1 (ET-1), noradrenaline (NA) and pre-ejection period/left ventricular ejection time ratio (PEP/LVET) in older healthy men. It is hypothesized that ADM, ET-1, NA and adrenaline (A) may function as endogenous regulators of cardiac function by modulating myocardial contractility during static exercise. The present study was undertaken to assess the relationships between exercise-induced changes in plasma ADM, ET-1, NA, A concentrations and those in ascending aortic blood flow peak velocity (PV) and mean acceleration (MA) measured by Doppler echocardiography in 24 healthy older men during two 3-min bouts of handgrip at 30% of maximal voluntary contraction, performed alternately with each hand without any break between the bouts. Plasma ADM, ET-1, NA and A as well as heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP), PV and MA were determined. During handgrip, plasma ADM, ET-1, NA and A as well as HR, BP increased, whereas PV and MA decreased. The increases in plasma ADM correlated positively with those in ET-1, NA and diastolic BP, and correlated negatively with changes in PV (r= −0.68) and MA (r= −0.62). The increases in plasma ET-1 correlated positively with those in NA and BPs and correlated negatively with changes in PV (r= −0.67) and MA (r= −0.60). The results of this study suggest that in healthy older men the exercise-induced changes in plasma ADM, ET 1 and catecholamines are related to alterations in left ventricular contractile state and may co-operatively counteract age-related deterioration of cardiac performance in men.

Relationships between plasma adrenomedullin concentration and systolic time intervals during static handgrip in patients with heart failure

Our previous study showed elevation of plasma adrenomedullin (ADM) during static handgrip in patients with heart failure (HF). It is hypothesized that ADM increases with left ventricle dysfunction during handgrip and thus plays a compensatory role. In the present study pre-ejection period (PEP) and left ventricular ejection time (LVET) were used to assess cardiac performance in 24 male HF patients (II/III class NYHA) during two 3-min bouts of handgrip at 30% of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) performed alternately with each hand without any break between the bouts. Plasma ADM, noradrenaline (NA), adrenaline (A), heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP) and stroke volume (SV) were determined. During handgrip plasma ADM, NA, A, HR, BP, PEP/LVET increased, PEP was prolonged and LVET shortened. The increases in plasma ADM correlated with changes in: PEP (r = -0.881), LVET (r = 0.713), PEP/LVET (r = -0.769), SV (r = 0.836), diastolic BP (r = 0.700), total peripheral resistance (TPR) (r = 0.718) and noradrenaline (r = 0.756). The study demonstrated that in HF patients changes in plasma ADM during handgrip are related to cardiac performance.

Doppler echocardiographic assessment of an impedance-based dual-chamber rate-responsive pacemaker

Rate-responsive pacing allows patients with chronotropic incompetence to achieve more physiologic heart rate responses to exercise. One sensor currently being investigated uses impedance-derived measurements of changes in right ventricular stroke volume to alter the pacing rate. Correlation of pacemaker-derived measurements of stroke volume with an accepted method of stroke volume measurement has not been performed. The relative changes in impedance-derived stroke volume were compared in 10 patients with an impedance-based dual-chamber rate-responsive pacemaker (Precept DR, Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc.) with simultaneous Doppler echocardiographic measurements of right and left ventricular stroke volume. These comparisons were made during pacing at 2 heart rates (70 and 100 beats/min) and 3 AV intervals (150, 200 and 250 ms) while in a supine resting state, during lower body negative pressure to -30 mm Hg, and while performing 25% maximal handgrip. Pacemaker-derived stroke volume decreased by 7 to 11% and Doppler time-velocity integral measurements decreased by 14 to 19% in response to an increase in pacing rate (p = NS). There was also no significant difference by either technique in the mean stroke volume change when the atrioventricular interval was varied. Both techniques detected a decrease in stroke volume during lower body negative pressure, ranging from -7 to -20% by pacemaker, and -17 to -38% by Doppler. Overall, the pacemaker stroke volume measurements responded in an appropriate direction to each intervention, signaling the pacemaker's ability to detect directional change in stroke volume. The Precept DR may aid in the programming of parameters such as atrioventricular interval and heart rate by allowing for optimization of stroke volume in individual patients.