Antiarrhythmic drug classifications and the clinician: a gambit in the land of chaos

Antiarrhythmic drugs for atrial fibrillation: lessons from the past and opportunities for the future

Atrial fibrillation (AF) remains a highly prevalent and troublesome cardiac arrhythmia, associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm (rhythm-control therapy) is an important element of AF management in symptomatic patients. Despite significant advances and increasing importance of catheter ablation, antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) remain a cornerstone of rhythm-control therapy. During the past 50 years, experimental and clinical research has greatly increased our understanding of AADs. As part of the special issue on paradigm shifts in AF, this review summarizes important milestones in AAD research that have shaped their current role in AF management, including (i) awareness of the proarrhythmic potential of AADs; (ii) increasing understanding of the pleiotropic effects of AADs; (iii) the development of dronedarone; and (iv) the search for AF-specific AADs. Finally, we discuss short- and long-term opportunities for better AF management through advances in AAD therapy, including personalization of AAD therapy based on individual AF mechanisms.

Ionic mechanisms of ischemia-related ventricular arrhythmias

The aim of this review is the utmost simplification of the cellular electrophysiologic background of ischemia-related arrhythmias. In the acute and subacute phase of myocardial infarction, arrhythmias can be caused by an abnormal impulse generation, abnormal automaticity or triggered activity caused by early or delayed afterdepolarizations (EAD and DAD), or by abnormalities of impulse conduction (i.e., reentry). This paper addresses therapeutic intervention aimed at preventing the depolarization of "pathologic" slow fibers, counteracting the inward calcium (Ca) influx that takes place through the L-type channels (Ca antagonists), or hyperpolarizing the diastolic membrane action potential, increasing potassium (K) efflux (K-channel openers) in arrhythmias generated by an abnormal automaticity (ectopic tachycardias or accelerated idioventricular rhythms). If the cause enhanced impulse generation is related to triggered activity, and since both EAD and DAD are dependent on calcium currents that can appear during a delayed repolarization, the therapeutic options are to shorten the repolarization phase through K-channel openers or Ca antagonists, or to suppress the inward currents directly responsible for the afterdepolarization with Ca blockers. Magnesium seems to represent a reasonable choice, as it is able to shorten the action potential duration and to function as a Ca antagonist. Abnormalities of impulse conduction (re-entry) account for the remainder of arrhythmias that occur in the acute and subacute phase of ischemia and for most dysrhythmias that develop during the chronic phase. Reentrant circuits due to ischemia are usually Na channel-dependent. Drug choice will depend on the length of the excitable gap: in case of a short gap (ventricular fibrillation, polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, etc.), the refractory period has been identified as the most vulnerable parameter, and therefore a correct therapeutic approach will be based on drugs able to prolong the effective refractory period (K-channel blockers, such as class III antiarrhythmic drugs); on the other hand, for those arrhythmias characterized by a long excitable gap (most of the monomorphic ventricular tachycardias), the most appropriate therapeutic intervention consists of depressing ventricular excit-ability and conduction by use of sodium-channel blockers such as mexiletine and lidocaine. Compared with other class I antiarrhythmic agents, these drugs minimally affect refractoriness and exhibit a use-dependent effect and a voltage dependent action (i.e., more pronounced on the ischemic tissue because of its partial depolarization).